Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bull Cancer ; 89(4): 381-98, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12016039

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French cancer centers and specialists from French public university and general hospitals and private clinics. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations, clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline , web sites and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups, then submitted for review to 75 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients are: 1) Nutritional evaluation and monitoring may be proposed to bone-marrow transplant recipients (options). 2) Nutritional evaluation consists of body weight assessment and percent weight loss evaluation (standard, expert agreement). 3) Nutritional monitoring should include daily weight monitoring, clinical monitoring of hydration and assessment of daily dietary intake (standard, expert agreement). 4) Artificial nutrition is recommended in immuno-suppressed bone marrow transplant patients. This is not systematically indicated in other situation (standard). 5) Artificial nutrition, intravenous hydration and oral nutrition can be proposed to bone-marrow transplant recipients (option). 6) There is no standard modality for artificial nutrition (level of evidence B 1). Exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition and enteral plus parenteral nutrition may be proposed to bone-marrow transplant patients (options). 7) Lipid intake representing up to 30% of the non-protein caloric intake should be supplied to patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (standard, level of evidence B1). 8) Oral supplementation with nitrogen substrates or glutamine is not recommended. Parenteral glutamine supplementation may be proposed (option).


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Evaluación Nutricional , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Algoritmos , Aminoácidos de Cadena Ramificada/administración & dosificación , Peso Corporal , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Ingestión de Alimentos , Ingestión de Energía , Nutrición Enteral , Glutamina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Nutrición Parenteral , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Bull Cancer ; 90(7): 629-42, 2003 Jul.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12957805

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To update clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with salivary gland malignant tumors previously validated in 1997. These recommendations cover diagnosis, classification, treatment and follow-up of patients with these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPG s according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article is a summary version of the full document presenting the updated clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. The main questions addressed by the expert group in this update concern the place of fine needle aspiration biopsy in preoperative diagnosis, the place of cervical lymph node area surgical treatment, the place of postoperative irradiation and neutron therapy in the treatment of unresectable tumors and also the place of medical imaging, especially RMI, for the diagnosis of these tumors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales , Pronóstico , Radioterapia , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales/patología
3.
Bull Cancer ; 92(4): 381-409, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15888395

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French regional cancer centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate clinical practice guidelines for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. These recommendations cover the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. The Standards, Options and Recommendations are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. RESULTS: This guidelines presents the synthesis of the data concerning the evaluation of the therapeutic ones. The main questions concern the type of gastrectomy to realize (Total Gastrectomy or gastrectomy subtotal), the extent of the lymphadenectomy (D2, D3 versus D1, D3, D2 versus D4) and the role of postoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/normas , Gastroplastia/métodos , Gastroplastia/normas , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esplenectomía/métodos , Esplenectomía/normas , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia
4.
Bull Cancer ; 91(10): 759-68, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15556876

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To update clinical practice guidelines for first line palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously validated in 1995, then updated in 1997 and published again in 1998. These recommendations do not cover second line treatment. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines have been developed, they are reviewed by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article is a summary version of the updated clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. The main questions addressed by the expert group in this update concerned (1) Which patients should be treated? (2) What is the best treatment duration? (3) Which treatment should be administered? The new data identified concerning which patients to treat and the duration of treatment were consistent with the data presented in the initial report and did not modify the original recommendations from 1997. The new data available represent stronger evidence than those in the original report (Two good-quality meta-analyses published since 1997). A new guideline concerning patients who are 75 years old or more has been added. Concerning, the new evidence identified has modified the guidelines for the therapeutic schema to adopt from 1997. These modifications concern irinotecan, oxaliplatin, oral fluoropyrimidines and methotrexate. Treatment with irinotecan or oxaliplatin associated with continuous 5FU infusion, modulated with folinic acid (LV5FU2-like) has become a standard. The use of oral fluoropyrimidines has become an option for patients who refuse hospitalisation or treatment by infusion. The use of methotrexate combined with 5FU is no longer recommended.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Estadificación de Neoplasias/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA