From the genesis to the present: The evolution of sublingual immunotherapy for cedar pollinosis.

In 2004, we started the initial attempt to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) using Japanese cedar (JC) pollen extract solution through a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative study. Based on its success in demonstrating the substantial efficacy of SLIT, we next conducted a larger-scale study by administering JC pollen to all JCP patients recruited. It was because of aiming to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of SLIT and its underlying mechanisms by comparing high- and non-responder patients. Despite limitations posed by liquid medication, significant effectiveness and safety demonstrated by the 2-year treatment served as the foundation for launching the first SLIT medicine for JCP, in 2014. Furthermore, in addition to the clearer Th1/Th2-imbalanced property in the high-responders, the possible involvement of bitter taste receptors in CD4+ T cells, apoptosis pathways in CD4+ T cells and basophils, and inducing a mast cell degranulation inhibitory molecule in the effect of SLIT was demonstrated. To solve the limitations posed by liquid medication, clinical trials evaluating JC pollen sublingual tablets started in 2014. Due to the minimal side effects, ease of administration, and convenient storage, the sublingual tablet medicine was launched in 2018. Giving the ongoing rise in demand for SLIT and considering that more than 1% of JCP patients are currently undergoing SLIT, the practical use of this treatment for multiple allergens is becoming increasingly important.

Executive summary: Japanese guidelines for allergic rhinitis 2020.

The Practical Guideline for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis, the fist guideline for allergic rhinitis in Japan, was prepared after a symposium held by the Japanese Society of Allergology in 1993. The current 9th edition was published in 2020 and is widely used today. The most recent collection of evidence from the literature was supplemented to the revised guideline to incorporate evidence-based medicine. The revised guideline includes updated epidemiology of allergic rhinitis in Japan, a figure representing the mechanisms of allergic rhinitis in both the onset and sensitization phases with the introduction of regulatory T cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells, practical assessment for diagnosis, new pharmacotherapy agents such as anti-IgE mAb and a new drug delivery system for antihistamines, sublingual immunotherapy for children, dual sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mites and Japanese cedar pollen extract, new classification for surgery for allergic rhinitis, and treatment and prescriptions for older adults. An evidence-based step-by-step strategy for treatment is also described.

Re-evaluation of over-the-counter histamine H1-receptor antagonists based on their effects on murine models of allergen-induced nasal hyperresponsiveness.

T cells play an essential role in the development of allergen-induced nasal hyperresponsiveness (NHR), a pathophysiological response in allergic rhinitis. The effects of histamine H1-receptor antagonists (antihistamines) on murine NHR models were investigated. Intragastric epinastine, fexofenadine, and loratadine administration suppressed allergen-induced immediate nasal response but not NHR in immunized mice. Regardless of the alleviation of stimulation-induced Th2 cytokine expression by loratadine and desloratadine in vitro, allergen-induced NHR and nasal eosinophil infiltration in Th2 cell-transferred mice were unaffected by loratadine in vivo. This influence on T cell-mediated NHR was excluded from the pharmacological effects of antihistamines.

Safety profile and immunological response of dual sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite tablet and Japanese cedar pollen tablet.

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies of dual administration of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets for perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis. This trial (JapicCTI-184014) was conducted to investigate the safety profile and immunological response during dual therapy with SQ house dust mite (HDM) and Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) SLIT tablets. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of 109 Japanese patients with coexisting HDM and JCP allergic rhinitis who had positive tests for HDM- and JCP specific IgE (≥0.7 kU/L). Patients were allocated to receive HDM (N = 54) or JCP (N = 55) SLIT tablets alone for 4 weeks followed by 8 weeks of dual therapy with both SLIT tablets administered within 5 min of each other. Adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and serum IgE and IgG4 specific for HDM (Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) and JCP were recorded. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects with AEs and ADRs was similar between the two groups and between the two periods of monotherapy and dual therapy. Most AEs and ADRs were mild in severity, and no serious events were observed. The most common ADRs were local events in the oral cavity. Levels of IgE and IgG4 specific for HDM (D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus) and JCP were increased after treatment with HDM and JCP SLIT tablets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dual therapy with both SLIT tablets administered within 5 min after 4 weeks of monotherapy with HDM or JCP tablet was well tolerated and induced the expected immunological responses.

Treatment duration-dependent efficacy of Japanese cedar pollen sublingual immunotherapy: Evaluation of a phase II/III trial over three pollen dispersal seasons.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to investigate the optimal dose and long-term efficacy and safety of Japanese cedar (JC) pollen tablets for SLIT (JapicCTI-142579). Here, we report details of the effects of the JC pollen SLIT tablet on rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptoms over three pollen dispersal seasons. METHODS: A total of 1042 JC pollinosis patients (aged 5-64 years) were randomized to receive tablets containing placebo (P), 2000, 5000, or 10,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) of JC pollen for 15 months to identify an optimal dose. Patients receiving P (n = 240) and the optimal dose (5000 JAU; A, n = 236) were then randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (AA, AP, PA, and PP groups, allocation ratio 2:1:1:2). Nasal and ocular symptoms, rescue medication use, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed on quantitative scales. RESULTS: In the second and third seasons, the AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly better improvements in nasal, ocular, and medication scores compared with the PP group in the order AA > AP > PA > PP during the second season and AA > PA > AP > PP during the third season. Rescue medication use and QOL scores were also significantly better in the AA, AP, and PA groups compared with the PP group. CONCLUSIONS: The JC pollen SLIT tablet relieved nasal and ocular symptoms and medication use and improved QOL in a treatment duration-dependent manner. Continuous dosing regimens appear to enhance the efficacy of the drug.

Identification of biomarker sets for predicting the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy against pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is effective against allergic rhinitis, although a substantial proportion of individuals is refractory. Herein, we describe a predictive modality to reliably identify SLIT non-responders (NRs). We conducted a 2-year clinical study in 193 adult patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis, with biweekly administration of 2000 Japanese allergy units of cedar pollen extract as the maintenance dose. After identifying high-responder (HR) patients with improved severity scores and NR patients with unchanged or exacerbated symptoms, differences in 33 HR and 34 NR patients were evaluated in terms of peripheral blood cellular profiles by flow cytometry and serum factors by ELISA and cytokine bead array, both pre- and post-SLIT. Improved clinical responses were seen in 72% of the treated patients. Pre-therapy IL-12p70 and post-therapy IgG1 serum levels were significantly different between HR and NR patients, although these parameters alone failed to distinguish NR from HR patients. However, the analysis of serum parameters in the pre-therapy samples with the Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm distinguished NR patients with high probability within the training data set. Cluster analysis revealed a positive correlation between serum Th1/Th2 cytokines and other cytokines/chemokines in HR patients after SLIT. Thus, processing of pre-therapy serum parameters with AdaBoost and cluster analysis can be reliably used to develop a prediction method for HR/NR patients.

An analysis of factors related to the effect of sublingual immunotherapy on Japanese cedar pollen induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) can improve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and modify its natural history; however, its efficacy varies among patients. This study aimed to determine which factors modify the effect of SLIT through post hoc analysis of a previous phase 3 trial of standardized Japanese cedar (JC) pollen extract (CEDARTOLEN®). METHODS: The study included 482 patients who had previously completed a phase 3 trial during two seasons. The SLIT and placebo groups each contained 241 subjects. Because pollen dispersal differed in the two seasons, we identified good and poor responders from the SLIT group in the 2nd season. We compared patient baseline characteristics, changes in serum immunoglobulin, and severity of symptoms in the 1st season between good and poor responders, as well as between SLIT and placebo groups. RESULTS: When we compared the baseline characteristics of good and poor responders, a significant difference was observed in body mass index (BMI) such that the patients with BMI ≥25 presented with lower treatment efficacy. No significant difference was observed in correlation with any other factors or treatment-induced alterations of serum immunoglobulin levels. We found that 75.3% of the patients with moderate symptoms and 50.9% of the patients with severe or very severe symptoms in the 1st season met our criteria for good responders in the 2nd season. CONCLUSIONS: BMI might modify the effect of SLIT; however, other factors were not related clearly. The severity of symptoms in the 1st season of treatment does not predict that in the 2nd season.

Effects of anti-allergic drugs on T cell-mediated nasal hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: We have recently demonstrated that T cell-mediated nasal hyperresponsiveness (NHR) is a representative pathophysiological feature of allergic rhinitis (AR). Although several anti-allergic drugs are used for the treatment of AR, the efficacy of these drugs on T cell-mediated NHR have not been elucidated. In these studies we investigated the effects of dexamethasone (Dex), montelukast (Mk), and chlorpheniramine (Chl) on NHR in antigen-immunized and antigen-specific Th2 cell-transferred mice. METHODS: OVA-immunized BALB/c mice were treated with Dex, Mk, or Chl and challenged intranasally with OVA. We then assessed NHR, the number of inflammatory cells in the nasal lavage fluid (NALF), mRNA expression of Th2 cytokines in the nasal tissue, the population of CD3+CD4+ cells in the nasal lymphoid tissue (NALT), and antigen-specific serum IgE and IgG levels. Antigen-induced NHR and changes in antigen-specific T cells in the NALT were investigated in OVA-specific Th2 cell-transferred mice. RESULTS: Dex significantly suppressed antigen-induced NHR, inflammatory cell infiltration, and IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-13 expression in immunized mice. Chl was completely ineffective, and only IL-13 expression was suppressed by Mk. None of these drugs affected IgE and IgG production. Antigen-induced NHR and the increase in antigen-specific T cells in the NALT of Th2 cell-transferred mice were inhibited by Dex, but not by Mk or Chl. CONCLUSIONS: Steroids are effective for the reduction of NHR in AR by suppressing the accumulation of inflammatory cells, especially antigen-specific T cells.

[INVESTIGATION OF TREATMENT GOAL IN ALLERGEN IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR JAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSIS].

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: As few reports are available on treatment goal for Japanese cedar pollinosis treated with allergen immunotherapy, therapeutic effect has to be assessed based on subjective symptoms in clinical practice. This research was conducted to investigate the informative treatment goal in clinical practice by using the results of TO-194SL phase III clinical trial. METHODS: In this investigation, correlation between total nasal symptom medication score (TNSMS), which was predefined as the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints evaluated by severe symptom day, quality of life (QOL) score, and overall evaluation by subject, was firstly investigated. Based on the results, stratified analyses of the secondary endpoints to confirm relationships on the stratified results, TNSMS, and cedar season were performed. RESULTS: Correlation between TNSMS and evaluations which were severe symptom day, QOL score, and overall evaluation by subject was reasonably observed. TNSMS generally showed 3 or below (classified as mild) throughout the entire pollen season when these evaluations reached each threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation suggest that a few evaluation items would help patients to realize the therapeutic effects of allergen immunotherapy if they could be the treatment goal in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of bilastine in Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Bilastine, a novel non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamine, has been approved in most European countries since 2010. This study aimed to evaluate the superiority of bilastine over placebo in Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study (trial registration number JapicCTI-142600) evaluated the effect of a 2-week treatment period with bilastine (20 mg once daily), fexofenadine (60 mg twice daily), or a matched placebo (double dummy) in patients with PAR. All patients were instructed to record individual nasal and ocular symptoms in diaries daily. The primary endpoint was the mean change in total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) from baseline to Week 2 (Days 10-13). RESULTS: A total of 765 patients were randomly allocated to receive bilastine, fexofenadine, or placebo (256, 254, and 255 patients, respectively). The mean change in TNSS from baseline at Week 2 was significantly decreased by bilastine (-0.98) compared to placebo (-0.63, P = 0.023). Bilastine and fexofenadine showed no significant difference in the primary endpoint. However, the mean change in TNSS from baseline on Day 1 was more significantly decreased by bilastine (-0.99) than by placebo (-0.28, P < 0.001) or fexofenadine (-0.62, P = 0.032). The active drugs also improved instantaneous TNSS 1 h after the first and before the second drug administration on Day 1 (P < 0.05). The study drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: After 2-week treatment period, bilastine 20 mg once daily was effective and tolerable in Japanese patients with PAR, and exhibited a rapid onset of action.

α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist attenuates allergen-induced immediate nasal response in murine model of allergic rhinitis.

The expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits on various immune cells suggests their involvement in allergic rhinitis. However, how exactly they contribute to this pathogenesis is not yet confirmed. Our present study examined the therapeutic potential of GTS-21, an α7 nAChR agonist, for treating allergic rhinitis by employing its mouse models. GTS-21 treatment reduced allergen-induced immediate nasal response in ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized model. However, nasal hyperresponsiveness or eosinophil infiltration elicited in either the OVA-sensitized or T helper 2 cell-transplanted model was not affected by GTS-21. GTS-21 did not alter allergen-induced passive cutaneous anaphylaxis response in anti-dinitrophenyl IgE-sensitized mice. This evidence implies GTS-21's potential to alleviate allergic rhinitis without perturbing T cells or mast cells.

Severity assessment of Japanese cedar pollinosis using the practical guideline for the management of allergic rhinitis in Japan and the allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma guideline.

BACKGROUND: This study intended to assess the severity of Japanese cedar pollinosis using the Practical Guideline for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Japan (PG-MARJ) and the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Guideline. METHODS: An Internet questionnaire survey of patients with pollinosis was conducted in mid-May 2011 and responses were obtained from 3382 individuals who had potential symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis from February to early May 2011 and who had experienced such symptoms for at least two pollen seasons. RESULTS: According to PG-MARJ, 23.5% of the respondents had severest rhinitis, 29.4% severe rhinitis, 31.3% moderate rhinitis, 13.8% mild rhinitis and 2.0% asymptomatic rhinitis. According to ARIA, 67.2% of them had moderate/severe persistent rhinitis, 23.8% moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis, 4.4% mild persistent rhinitis and 4.6% mild intermittent rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe rhinitis was diagnosed in more than 80% of the respondents according to PG-MARJ, while moderate/severe rhinitis was diagnosed in more than 90% of the respondents according to ARIA. Most of the respondents suffered relatively severe pollinosis. More than 80% of the respondents had all the three major symptoms (i.e., sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal blockage). Disagreement in the severity assessment between the two guidelines was noted in approximately 20% of the respondents.