Does Anxiety Affect Survival in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease?

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral and physiological risk factors worsen the prognosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Anxiety is known to be a psychological predictor of CHD. In this study, we investigated whether this factor is associated with all-cause mortality in CHD patients in the long term. METHODS: We studied 180 patients (mean age 60.6 SD 9.2 years, 26% women) with CHD from the Berlin Anxiety Trial (BAT) and the Stepwise Psychotherapy Intervention for Reducing Risk in Coronary Artery Disease (SPIRR-CAD) study. Their cardiac and psychological risk profile was represented by standardized procedures, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. Mortality outcomes were assessed using a community-based registry. RESULTS: Of 180 patients, we obtained information on all-cause mortality in 175 (96.7%) after a mean follow-up of 12.2 years (range 10.4-16.6 years). Of all participants, 54.4% had prior myocardial infarction, 95.3% had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 22.2% had prior coronary artery bypass graft. Most of the patients (98.4%) had New York Heart Association class I and II, 25.6% had diabetes and 38.2% were smokers. Patients had a mean HADS anxiety score of 9.7 SD 4.1 at study entrance. We found the highest HADS anxiety quartile all-cause mortality in 14%, 30.2% in the middle quartiles and 58.7% in the lowest quartile (chi2 20.8, p = 0.001). Related to psychological mechanisms, a low level of anxiety, seemed to be a significant predictor of all-cause mortality. We found no advantage for patients who had received psychosocial therapy in terms of survival. CONCLUSION: These first data confirmed our hypothesis about the association of psychological risk factors with the long-term outcome of CAD patients. Future studies will clarify whether the severity of disease, age or a particular type of coping or denial mechanism are associated with the presented outcome in low-anxious patients.

Depression, anxiety, and vital exhaustion are associated with pro-coagulant markers in depressed patients with coronary artery disease - A cross sectional and prospective secondary analysis of the SPIRR-CAD trial.

INTRODUCTION: A hyper-coagulant state is a biological mechanism that triggers cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Depressive symptoms and anxiety predict an unfavourable course of CAD. The SPIRR-CAD-RCT examined the effects of a psychological intervention and provided the opportunity to explore cross-sectional associations between indices of psychological strain and coagulation parameters, as well as prospective changes in depression scores and coagulation parameters. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we investigated 253 CAD patients (194 male; age m 58.9, SD 8.3 yrs.) with mild to moderate depression (≥8 on the HADS-D) at baseline and at follow-up 18 months later: TF, fibrinogen, D-dimer, VWF, FVII and PAI-1 and the course of depression (HAM-D), vital exhaustion (VE) and anxiety scores (HADS-A) were examined by ANOVA in the total and younger age groups (≤ 60). RESULTS: HAM-D at baseline was correlated with TF (corr. R2 = 0.27; F = 9.31, p = 0.001). HADS anxiety was associated with fibrinogen (corr. R2.20; F = 7.27, p = 0.001). There was no detectable therapeutic effect on coagulation. Fibrinogen and VWF decreased within 18 months (time effect; p = 0.02; p = 0.04), as did HADS-D in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). Fibrinogen decreased more in patients ≤60 years with high VE compared to low VE (interaction time x group, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show an association between TF and depression. Coagulation parameters as potential mediators of CAD progression correlated cross-sectionally with depression and anxiety and prospectively with VE. Further studies should replicate these correlations in depressed and non-depressed CAD patients. ISRCTN: 76240576; clinicaltrials.gov.

Socioeconomic factors in coronary artery disease - Results from the SPIRR-CAD study.

Low socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with an increased coronary risk in Western countries. All stress experiences are more pronounced in low SES patients with stress emanating from problems with family, job, or money. The SPIRR-CAD study offered an excellent opportunity to examine these risk factors in German speaking mildly and medium depressed patients. In the SPIRR CAD study, a German multi centre randomized clinical trial of 450 male and 120 female coronary patients, we examined the standard and psychosocial risk factor profiles in relation to SES, as assessed by educational level. All differences in risk factors between low and high SES were in the inverse direction. Of standard risk factors, only smoking was socially graded and more common in low SES. Of psychosocial factors and emotions, exhaustion showed the strongest and most consistent inverse social gradient, but also anger, anxiety and depression were socially graded. The findings suggest that in German patients, as in other national groups, social gradients in CHD risk are considerable. They can be ascribed to both psychosocial and to standard risk factors. In the present two years follow-up, the prospective significance of psychological and social risk factors was analyzed showing that emotional factors played an important role, in that low and high SES patients differed in the expected direction. However, the differences were not statistically significant and therefore firm conclusions from follow up were not possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 76240576; NCT00705965.

Gender differences in psychosocial outcomes of psychotherapy trial in patients with depression and coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: The biological and psychosocial risk profile differs between women and men with coronary artery disease (CAD). Depressive symptoms and Vital Exhaustion (VE) predict an unfavourable course of CAD. The secondary analysis of the SPIRR-CAD trial offered the possibility to examine gender as exposure variable of the clinical and psychological situation at baseline and in a variety of psychosocial measures as outcomes. METHODS: In this trial, 450 men (78.9%) and 120 women (21.1%) with CAD (age ≤ 75 y), with mild to moderate depression (scoring ≥8 on the HADS), were randomized to usual care with or without a stepwise psychotherapy intervention. Beside clinical measures exhaustion and other indicators of depressive symptoms were collected at baseline and 18-month follow up. RESULTS: Men had more signs and symptoms of heart disease at baseline, whereas women had higher psychosocial burden (e.g. negative affect). Women were more likely to live alone, had lower educational levels and employment rates and higher levels of depression and exhaustion. The psychotherapy intervention differed as a function of gender: In women, VE decreased from 29.4 ±â€¯8.1 to 22.1 ±â€¯11.7 in the intervention group (IG) and from 29.2 ±â€¯8.2 to 25.1 ±â€¯11.3 in the control group (CG). In men VE decreased from 23.3 + -10.8 to 21.2 ±â€¯9.7 in the IG and from 23.6 ±â€¯10.7 to 19.3 ±â€¯11.3 in the CG (time x intervention x gender; F = 4.97; p = .026). DISCUSSION: Women had a higher psychosocial burden than men. VE compared to other rating instruments of depressive symptoms suggested a stronger response to the intervention in women. VE may help to understand gender differences in psychotherapeutic treatment studies of CAD. ISRCTN: 76240576; clinicaltrials.gov.