Stinging insect hypersensitivity: a practice parameter update 2011.

These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Stinging insect hypersensitivity: a practice parameter update II." Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or the ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. The Joint Task Force understands that the cost of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents is an important concern that may appropriately influence the work-up and treatment chosen for a given patient. The Joint Task Force recognizes that the emphasis of our primary recommendations regarding a medication may vary, for example, depending on third party payer issues and product patent expiration dates. However, since a given test or agent's cost is so widely variable, and there is a paucity of pharmacoeconomic data, the Joint Task Force generally does not consider cost when formulating Practice Parameter recommendations. In extraordinary circumstances, when the cost benefit of an intervention is prohibitive as supported by pharmacoeconomic data, commentary may be provided.

Insect sting allergy.

Insect sting allergy has served as an excellent model for the allergic process over the past century. In particular, during the last 30 years, a new form of diagnostic testing and treatment with vo m has been one of the great suc-cess stories in the entire field of allergy. VIT reduces the risk of recurrent life-threatening reactions from about 60% to less than 2%. Progress and further questions continue with a search for a definitive diagnostic test that more accurately predicts which patients are at risk for future reactions, and defines which patients can stop VIT and which ones need to continue treatment.

Managing insect sting allergy. The ins and outs of venom immunotherapy.

Insect sting allergy can lead to severe, even fatal, reactions in susceptible persons. Although self-injection epinephrine often terminates the reaction, it is not always effective. In this article, Dr Graft explores the use of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in selected patients in whom successful treatment can produce psychosocial as well as physiologic benefits.

Maintenance venom immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Venom immunotherapy has proven to be a very effective method for the prevention of future re-sting reactions. However, initiation of the venom injection program is just the beginning. This review looks at recent papers which shed light on other issues that arise during maintenance venom immunotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Prophylactic antihistamines taken before venom injections reduce the frequency of reactions and one report suggests that they may improve efficacy. The schedule of venom injections usually does not have to be adjusted for patients who develop local reactions; a very large reaction may be the exception. Patients who react to stings should have their maintenance doses increased. Most patients are able to extend the interval between injections to 8 weeks in the third year of treatment. Two groups have proposed a maintenance interval of 12 weeks for routine use. SUMMARY: Our understanding of insect sting sensitivity continues to improve, leading to better outcomes for allergic patients.