Building Healthy Babies: A Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment for a Pre-Conception Program in Ontario.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to gather Ontario clinicians' and public members' views on the design of a pre-conception patient education program. METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, online surveys comprised of rank order, multiple choice, and short answer questions were completed by clinicians and public members. Semi-structured focus groups consisting of 2-6 participants each were then held via videoconference. Demographic variables and survey responses were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive and summary statistics. Descriptive thematic qualitative analysis using the constant comparative method of grounded theory was completed on each transcript to generate themes. RESULTS: A total of 168 public members and 43 clinicians in Ontario completed surveys, while 11 clinicians and 11 public members participated in the focus groups. A pre-conception program in Ontario was felt to be important. An individual appointment with a primary care provider was the favoured program format per survey responses, whereas a virtual format with an interactive component was preferred among focus group participants. Important topics to include were pre-conception health (infertility, genetic screening, folic acid), prenatal and postpartum counselling (diet, activity, substance use, prenatal care, postpartum course), and medical optimization in pregnancy (high-risk medical conditions, medications, mental health). Both groups emphasized the need to consider accommodations for marginalized populations and various cultures and languages. CONCLUSION: A standardized pre-conception patient education program is felt to be of high value by Ontario clinicians and public members. A pre-conception program may help improve obstetrical outcomes and decrease rates of major congenital anomalies in Ontario.

Is a day 7 blastocyst predictive of the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 and day 6 blastocysts?

PURPOSE: To explore if a day 7 blastocyst is predictive of the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 or day 6 blastocysts? METHODS: Retrospective cohort of autologous frozen embryo transfers (FET), February 2019 to April 2022. Cycles divided into groups 1 to 5, according to the day of embryo cryopreservation and the presence of a day 7 blastocyst sibling within the cohort: group 1/group 2-day 5 blastocyst without/with a day 7 sibling, group 3/group 4-day 6 blastocyst without/with a day 7 sibling, group 5-day 7 blastocyst. Clinical, ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage rates, cycle, and patient characteristics are reported. Multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis accounts for confounders and assesses the effect of a sibling day 7 blastocyst on ongoing pregnancy rates of day 5 or day 6 blastocyst FETs. RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rates are 38.4%, 59.5%, 30.8%, 32.7%, and 4.4% in groups 1-5, respectively. When correcting for maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and discarded per cohort, and ploidy, embryos cryopreserved on either day 6 or day 7 have reduced odds of ongoing pregnancy after FET compared to day 5 blastocysts (OR = 0.76, IQR [0.61-0.95], p-value = 0.01). However, the presence of a day 7 sibling does not significantly affect odds of ongoing pregnancy of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts compared to the same-day blastocyst without a day 7 sibling (p-value = 0.20 and 0.46, respectively). This finding is consistent within both the Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) unscreened and screened (euploid) embryo subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Day of embryo cryopreservation significantly affects ongoing pregnancy rates. However, day 7 embryos within a cohort do not affect the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, suggesting that slow embryo development is an embryo-specific trait.

The effect of the Ontario Fertility Program on IVF utilization and outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the demographics and clinical outcomes similar for patients aged ≥40 but <43 years seeking IVF in Ontario, Canada, before and after implementation of the Ontario Fertility Program (OFP), which supports public funding of IVF up to age 43? DESIGN: Retrospective database review using the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry Plus (CARTR Plus) and Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario databases. Cycles from women who underwent autologous IVF and who were aged ≥40 and <43 years were analysed during a 2-year period prior to (2014-2015) and after (2016-2017) introduction of publicly funded IVF through the OFP. RESULTS: There was an almost doubling of treatment cycles in women aged 40-42 in Ontario after the OFP launch. Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle start (17.0% versus 13.3%, P < 0.001) and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per stimulation cycle (20.5% versus 16.8%, P < 0.001) were statistically higher in women before OFP implementation. While cumulative live birth rate per cycle start was statistically lower after funding was introduced (12.5% versus 10.5%, P = 0.027), the clinical importance of this difference appears small. Outcomes were above the 10% live birth per cycle threshold recommended by the Advisory Process for Infertility Services panel, commissioned by the Ministry of Health, to determine access to publicly funded IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IVF in women over age 40 doubled with access to OFP funding; however, eligibility criteria based on age still meet the target of achieving a cumulative live birth rate of at least 10%.

Patients' and providers' perspectives on non-urgent egg freezing decision-making: a thematic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF) is complex for patients and providers supporting them. Though prior studies have explored patient perspectives, no study has also included the separate perspectives of providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured individual interviews exploring the decision to undergo EF. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers who counsel patients about EF from across Canada. Data analysis was accomplished using thematic analysis. Data saturation was met after interviewing 13 providers and 12 patients. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified and explored, illuminating ways in which patients and providers navigate decision-making around EF: (1) patients viewed EF as a 'back-up plan' for delaying the decision about whether to have children, while providers were hesitant to present EF in this way given the uncertainty of success; (2) providers viewed ovarian reserve testing as essential while patients believed it unnecessarily complicated the decision; (3) patients and providers cited a need for change in broader societal attitudes regarding EF since social stigma was a significant barrier to decision-making; and (4) commonality and peer support were desired by patients to assist in their decision, although some providers were hesitant to recommend this to patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the decision to undergo EF is complex and individual patient values play a significant role. In some areas, there is disconnect between providers and patients in their views on how to navigate EF decision-making, and these should be addressed in discussions between providers and patients to improve shared decision-making.

Patients' and providers' perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up.

Deep learning analysis of endometrial histology as a promising tool to predict the chance of pregnancy after frozen embryo transfers.

PURPOSE: Endometrial histology on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained preparations provides information associated with receptivity. However, traditional histological examination by Noyes' dating method is of limited value as it is prone to subjectivity and is not well correlated with fertility status or pregnancy outcome. This study aims to mitigate the weaknesses of Noyes' dating by analyzing endometrial histology through deep learning (DL) algorithm to predict the chance of pregnancy. METHODS: Endometrial biopsies were taken during the window of receptivity from healthy volunteers in natural menstrual cycles (group A) and infertile patients undergoing mock artificial cycles (group B). H&E staining was performed followed by whole slide image scanning for DL analysis. RESULTS: In a proof-of-concept trial to differentiate group A (n=24) vs. B (n=37), a DL-based binary classifier was trained, cross-validated, and achieved 100% for accuracy. Patients in group B underwent subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) and were further categorized into "pregnant (n=15)" or "non-pregnant (n=18)" sub-groups based on the outcomes. In the following trial to predict pregnancy outcome in group B, the DL-based binary classifier yielded 77.8% for accuracy. Its performance was further validated by an accuracy of 75% in a "held-out" test set where patients had euploid embryo transfers. Furthermore, the DL model identified histo-characteristics including stromal edema, glandular secretion, and endometrial vascularity as important features related to pregnancy prediction. CONCLUSIONS: DL-based endometrial histology analysis demonstrated its feasibility and robustness in pregnancy prediction for patients undergoing FETs, indicating its value as a prognostic tool in fertility treatment.

Impact of assisted reproduction, infertility, sex and paternal factors on the placental DNA methylome.

Children conceived using Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) have a higher incidence of growth and birth defects, attributable in part to epigenetic perturbations. Both ART and germline defects associated with parental infertility could interfere with epigenetic reprogramming events in germ cells or early embryos. Mouse models indicate that the placenta is more susceptible to the induction of epigenetic abnormalities than the embryo, and thus the placental methylome may provide a sensitive indicator of 'at risk' conceptuses. Our goal was to use genome-wide profiling to examine the extent of epigenetic abnormalities in matched placentas from an ART/infertility group and control singleton pregnancies (n = 44/group) from a human prospective longitudinal birth cohort, the Design, Develop, Discover (3D) Study. Principal component analysis revealed a group of ART outliers. The ART outlier group was enriched for females and a subset of placentas showing loss of methylation of several imprinted genes including GNAS, SGCE, KCNQT1OT1 and BLCAP/NNAT. Within the ART group, placentas from pregnancies conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) showed distinct epigenetic profiles as compared to those conceived with less invasive procedures (ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination). Male factor infertility and paternal age further differentiated the IVF/ICSI group, suggesting an interaction of infertility and techniques in perturbing the placental epigenome. Together, the results suggest that the human placenta is sensitive to the induction of epigenetic defects by ART and/or infertility, and we stress the importance of considering both sex and paternal factors and that some but not all ART conceptuses will be susceptible.

Endometrial laminin subunit beta-3 expression associates with reproductive outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure.

PURPOSE: Endometrial laminin subunit beta-3 (LAMB3) is a candidate gene whose expression distinguishes the endometrial window of receptivity (WOR) in human. This study aims to examine endometrial LAMB3 levels in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF), in order to assess the ability of LAMB3 to predict pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Endometrial biopsies were taken during the WOR from 21 healthy volunteers in natural menstrual cycles and from 50 RIF patients in mock cycles prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of LAMB3 was performed, and the H-score was correlated with the pregnancy outcome in subsequent FETs. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, endometrial LAMB3 was demonstrated to be highly expressed during the WOR with the staining exclusively in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells. In a discovery set of RIF patients, the LAMB3 expression level was found to be significantly higher in those who conceived compared to those who did not in subsequent FETs. A receiving operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7818 (95% confidence interval 59.92-96.44%) with an H-score cutoff of 4.129 to differentiate cases with positive or negative pregnancy outcomes. This cutoff achieved an accuracy of 75% in pregnancy prediction in a following validation set of RIF patients, in which the pregnancy rate in subsequent FETs was three-fold higher when the mock cycle LAMB3 H-score was ≥ 4.129 compared to < 4.129. CONCLUSIONS: IHC measurement of endometrial LAMB3 expression could be a promising prognostic method to predict pregnancy outcome for RIF patients undergoing FETs.

Cost effectiveness of in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation genetic testing to prevent transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations.

STUDY QUESTION: Is it cost-effective to use in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation genetic testing of monogenic defects (IVT/PGT-M) to prevent transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations to second-generation new births in comparison with naturally conceived births? SUMMARY ANSWER: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we found that IVF/PGT-M is cost-effective for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers if using a willingness to pay of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have a significantly increased risk of several types of cancer throughout their lifetime. The cost of risk reduction, screening and treatment of cancer in this population is high. In addition, there is a 50% chance of passing on this genetic mutation to each child. One option to avoid transmission of an inherited deleterious gene to one's offspring involves in vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We implemented a state transition model comparing the healthcare impact of a cohort of healthy children born after IVF/PGT-M, who have a population risk of developing cancer, to a cohort of naturally conceived live-births, half of whom are carriers of the BRCA mutation. Transition probabilities are based on published sources, a lifetime horizon and a perspective of a provincial Ministry of Health in Canada. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The target population is the second-generation new births who have at least one parent with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, IVF/PGT-M is a cost-effective intervention for carriers of either BRCA mutation. For BRCA1, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for IVF/PGT-M is $14 242/QALY. For BRCA2, the ICER of intervention is $12 893/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results show that IVF/PGT-M has a 98.4 and 97.3% chance of being cost-effective for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, at the $50 000/QALY threshold. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our model did not include the short-term negative effect of IVF/PGT-M on the woman's quality of life; in addition, our model did not consider any ethical issues related to post-implantation genetic testing. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In countries in which the healthcare of a large segment of the population is covered by a single payer system such as the government, it would be cost-effective for that payer to cover the cost of IVF/PGT-M for couples in which one member has a BRCA mutation, in order to avoid the future costs and disutility of managing offspring with an inherited BRCA mutation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Dr Wong's research program was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canadian Liver Foundation and an Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science Early Researcher Award. All authors declared no conflict of interests.

Safety and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Tubal Microinserts Versus Laparoscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion or Salpingectomy for Hydrosalpinges Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to answer the following question: What are the complications and assisted reproductive technology outcomes among women with hydrosalpinges managed by hysteroscopic microinsert tubal occlusion compared with women with hydrosalpinges managed by laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy? METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2009 to December 2014 at two academic, tertiary care, in vitro fertilization centres in Toronto, Ontario. All patients (n = 52) who underwent hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinges were identified. Patients who proceeded with embryo transfer cycles after hysteroscopic microinsert (n = 33) were further age matched to a cohort of patients who underwent embryo transfer after laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy (n = 33). Main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate per patient and per embryo transfer cycle. RESULTS: Among 33 patients, there were 39 fresh and 37 frozen embryo transfer cycles in the hysteroscopic group (group A); among 33 patients in the laparoscopic group (group B), there were 42 fresh and 29 frozen embryo transfer cycles. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate in group A and group B was similar (66.7% vs. 69.7%, respectively; P = 0.8). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer cycle was also similar in both groups (28.9% in group A vs. 32.4% in group B; P = 0.6). There were two incidents of ectopic pregnancy in the laparoscopic group and no ectopic pregnancy in the hysteroscopic group. There were three major complications: tubo-ovarian abscess, distal migration of the coil after microinsert placement, and an acute abdomen following the hysteroscopic procedure. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic placement of a microinsert for hydrosalpinx management before embryo transfer were comparable to those following laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy. However, caution is advised regarding microinsert placement for hydrosalpinges before proceeding with assisted reproductive technology.

Expanding Urgent Oncofertility Services for Reproductive Age Women Remote from a Tertiary Level Fertility Centre by Use of Telemedicine and an On-site Nurse Navigator.

The objective of this study was to examine a 1-year pilot program aimed at increasing access to fertility preservation (FP) information and services for reproductive-age women newly diagnosed with cancer at a centre geographically remote from a tertiary fertility clinic. An oncofertility nurse navigator (ONN) position was created within the regional cancer centre with the goals of (1) improving local physician knowledge of FP and FP services and (2) improving patient access to FP counselling and services. The ONN identified all women diagnosed with cancer requiring treatment that could impact their fertility and discussed FP options with them and their physicians. As part of a comprehensive program aimed at facilitating access to FP services, the ONN arranged consultations with fertility specialists via telemedicine and coordinated satellite cycle monitoring with a local gynaecologist in order to minimize travel. Patients were surveyed about their reproductive plans, decision-making around FP and experiences with the program. Physicians were surveyed about their engagement with FP services, barriers to FP access and satisfaction with the program. Twenty-two women were eligible for FP during the year-long pilot program. All participated in the study. The most common diagnoses were breast and cervical cancer. At the time of diagnosis, 36.4% of women had no biological children and 68.2% did not desire (more) children. Four women had an FP consultation, and two proceeded with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. At the end of the pilot program, more physician respondents often or always discussed FP with their patients, stated they frequently refer for FP consultations and stated their patients could obtain FP services in a timely fashion. An ONN within a cancer centre remote from tertiary fertility care can enable access to FP services with minimal need for travel by using local gynaecologic expertise and telemedicine.

The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Premenopausal breast cancer patients are at risk of treatment-related infertility. Many patients do not receive sufficient fertility information before treatment. As such, our team developed and alpha tested the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks, and Expectations decision aid (BEFORE DA). METHODS: The BEFORE DA development process was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Our team used integrated knowledge translation by collaborating with multiple stakeholders throughout the development process including breast cancer survivors, multi-disciplinary health care providers (HCPs), advocates, and cancer organization representatives. Based on previously conducted literature reviews and a needs assessment by our team - we developed a paper prototype. The paper prototype was finalized at an engagement meeting with stakeholders and created into a graphically designed paper and mirrored online decision aid. Alpha testing was conducted with new and previously engaged stakeholders through a questionnaire, telephone interviews, or focus group. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input. RESULTS: Our team developed an 18-page paper prototype containing information deemed valuable by stakeholders for fertility decision-making. The engagement meeting brought together 28 stakeholders to finalize the prototype. Alpha testing of the paper and online BEFORE DA occurred with 17 participants. Participants found the BEFORE DA usable, acceptable, and most provided enthusiastic support for its use with premenopausal breast cancer patients facing a fertility decision. Participants also identified areas for improvement including clarifying content/messages and modifying the design/photos. The final BEFORE DA is a 32-page paper and mirrored online decision aid ( https://fertilityaid.rethinkbreastcancer.com ). The BEFORE DA includes information on fertility, fertility options before/after treatment, values clarification, question list, next steps, glossary and reference list, and tailored information on the cost of fertility preservation and additional resources by geographic location. CONCLUSION: The BEFORE DA, designed in collaboration with stakeholders, is a new tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients and HCPs to assist with fertility discussions and decision-making. The BEFORE DA helps to fill the information gap as it is a tool that HCPs can refer patients to for supplementary information surrounding fertility.

Progesterone, progesterone/estradiol and ART outcomes in day-5 transfer cycles.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of elevated luteal-phase progesterone levels (PE) and high progesterone/estradiol ratio ('P/E2' ratio) on IVF outcomes, exclusively in GnRH-antagonist cycles with day-5 embryo transfer. PE was not found to have a significant effect on implantation or clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25-1.25, p = .16). Elevated 'P/E2' ratio (≥0.55) on trigger day was associated with a poorer response to stimulation and lower clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-1.00, p = .05). Patients with PE and low 'P/E2' ratio yielded significantly more oocytes than patients with PE and high 'P/E2' ratio. The mean implantation rate per patient decreased by 60% in the group with PE and high 'P/E2' ratio in comparison to the group with PE and low 'P/E2' ratio (17.9%±36.6 vs. 45.5%±47.2, p = .06), although no statistical significance was observed. The detrimental effect of PE may be mitigated by culturing embryos to day-5 before embryo transfer. Combined assessment of serum progesterone and 'P/E2' ratio may predict pregnancy outcome better than progesterone levels alone.

Unexplained Infertility and Undiagnosed Celiac Disease: Study of a Multiethnic Canadian Population.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence of Celiac disease (CD) in Canadian women with unexplained infertility versus women with an identifiable cause of infertility and to assess the sensitivity of the point-of-care Biocard Celiac Test Kit versus standard serum serologic testing. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, women aged 18 to 44 who were evaluated for infertility between February 2010 and May 2012 at a tertiary academic care fertility clinic in Toronto, ON, were invited to participate. They were categorized as having unexplained infertility (Cases) or infertility secondary to a known cause (Controls). Women on a gluten-free diet or previously diagnosed with CD were excluded. Outcome measures were the Celiac Questionnaire, serum testing for tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody (anti-tTG IgA), serum IgA levels, and Biocard Celiac Test Kit. RESULTS: Of 685 women approached, 1.2% (4/326) with unexplained infertility and 1.1% (4/359) with an identifiable infertility cause were newly found to have CD. Biocard testing revealed the same results as standard serologic IgA and anti-tTG IgA testing. CONCLUSION: CD was not more common in women with unexplained infertility than those with an identifiable cause of infertility. These results do not support the routine screening of Canadian women with infertility for CD.

Delaying Thyroxine Until Positive Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin is Safe for Patients Receiving Fertility Therapy: Applying New ATA Guidelines to Subclinical Hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the effect of changing TSH threshold recommendations from 2.5 to 4 mIU/L before fertility therapy on the prevalence of early gestational subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) (TSH2 >2.5 mIU/L) and to evaluate implications on progression to clinical pregnancy (defined as detection of cardiac activity on ultrasound). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in an academic fertility clinic on all patients with a measured pre-treatment TSH (TSH1) and positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin following fertility treatment. The study assessed the effect of TSH2 on ongoing pregnancy, both in patients newly diagnosed with SCH and in patients previously receiving LT4, stratified by initial TSH. RESULTS: Of 482 women included in the study, baseline TSH (TSH1) was <2.5 mIU/L in 333 women (69%) and 2.5-4 mIU/L in 64 women (13.2%). Eighty-five women were taking LT4 at baseline (17.6%). Among women with a TSH1 between 2.5 and 4 mIU/L, the corresponding TSH in early pregnancy (TSH2) was <2.5 mIU/L in 35 women (55%). Overall, there was no difference in progression to clinical pregnancy between women with a TSH2 of 2.5-4 mIU/L compared with women with a TSH2 <2.5 mIU/L (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.44-1.09). Similarly, when excluding women taking LT4 at baseline, there was no difference in progression to clinical pregnancy (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.28-2.86). CONCLUSION: Rate of progression to clinical pregnancy was equivalent between women with an early pregnancy TSH (TSH2) <2.5 and women with a TSH2 of 2.5-4.0 mIU/L. Our findings support initiating LT4 in early pregnancy, as opposed to pre-pregnancy if the TSH remains above cut-off because there does not appear to be a difference in in early pregnancy outcomes if treatment is delayed.

An approach to fertility preservation in prepubertal and postpubertal females: a critical review of current literature.

Advancements in childhood cancer treatment have led to increasing survivorship, creating a greater emphasis on long-term management of patients, including quality of life and side effects from therapy; foremost of which is preserving fertility. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recently revised their guidelines and recommend fertility preservation options be discussed at the earliest possible opportunity for newly diagnosed patients, including methods available for children that remain investigational. Herein, we discuss the current barriers to and the impact of these guidelines for pediatric oncologists caring for young female patients, and provide some suggestions on how to approach this complicated topic.

Oocyte cryopreservation in Canada: a survey of Canadian ART clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the status of oocyte cryopreservation in Canadian assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics. METHODS: An online survey was sent to the medical directors of all Canadian ART clinics between December 2010 and February 2011. The survey included questions about the availability of, the indications for, and the elements of consent for oocyte cryopreservation. Clinics were also asked whether they offered social egg freezing. RESULTS: Twenty of the 28 Canadian ART clinics (71.4%) participated in this survey, and 16 (80%) of those clinics offered oocyte cryopreservation. Forty-five percent of the clinics offered elective oocyte cryopreservation (social egg freezing) for healthy women seeking to prolong fertility. Although most clinics counselled patients that oocyte cryopreservation is experimental, most clinics (87.5%) did not perform the procedure under a protocol approved by a research ethics board. The majority of clinics included most of the essential elements of informed consent during their counselling process. Most clinics that offered social egg freezing performed the procedure for women up to the age of 42, although some clinics did not offer the procedure for women under the age of 35 (28.6%) or over the age of 38 (42.9%). CONCLUSION: More than one half of Canadian ART clinics are offering oocyte cryopreservation, although not all clinics offer social egg freezing for healthy women to prolong fertility. Most clinics described the technique as experimental, and the majority included most of the elements of informed consent in their counselling process.

Fertility preservation practices among Ontario oncologists.

This study explores the attitudes, knowledge, and referring behaviors in fertility preservation among Ontario physicians providing adult cancer care. Ontario physicians with specialties in medical oncology, radiation oncology, gynaecologic oncology, and urology were invited to complete a 48-item questionnaire. A total of 152 questionnaires were available for analysis with a response rate of 23.7%. Seventy-four percent of the physicians indicated that they rarely or never modified cancer treatment due to concern about future fertility. Differences were found in fertility preservation knowledge among respondents in different medical specialties (p < 0.01) and clinical settings (p < 0.05). The frequency of initiating a referral was strongly associated with knowing where to refer patients (p < 0.001). The odds of knowing where to refer cancer patients was higher for physicians who work in a teaching hospital (p < 0.01) and a cancer centre (p < 0.01) compared with those who primarily work in a community setting. About 45% did not know where to refer female patients, and 69.7% rarely ever made a fertility preservation consultation referral for their female patients. The majority of respondents had positive attitudes despite their lack of current knowledge in cryopreservation services and fertility preservation options through assisted reproductive technologies. Our findings provide further insights of the relevance of considering physicians' medical backgrounds and practice settings when designing training modules to raise their awareness in fertility preservation issues.