Single-Cell Analysis of Crohn's Disease Lesions Identifies a Pathogenic Cellular Module Associated with Resistance to Anti-TNF Therapy.

Clinical benefits of cytokine blockade in ileal Crohn's disease (iCD) are limited to a subset of patients. Here, we applied single-cell technologies to iCD lesions to address whether cellular heterogeneity contributes to treatment resistance. We found that a subset of patients expressed a unique cellular module in inflamed tissues that consisted of IgG plasma cells, inflammatory mononuclear phagocytes, activated T cells, and stromal cells, which we named the GIMATS module. Analysis of ligand-receptor interaction pairs identified a distinct network connectivity that likely drives the GIMATS module. Strikingly, the GIMATS module was also present in a subset of patients in four independent iCD cohorts (n = 441), and its presence at diagnosis correlated with failure to achieve durable corticosteroid-free remission upon anti-TNF therapy. These results emphasize the limitations of current diagnostic assays and the potential for single-cell mapping tools to identify novel biomarkers of treatment response and tailored therapeutic opportunities.

The association between pre-colectomy thiopurine use and risk of neoplasia after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The risk of neoplasia of the pouch or residual rectum in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is incompletely investigated. Thiopurine use is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with UC. We tested the hypothesis that thiopurine use prior to TPC may be associated with a reduced risk of primary neoplasia after IPAA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients from a tertiary referral center from January 2008 to December 2017. Eligible patients with UC or IC underwent TPC with IPAA and had at least two pouchoscopies with biopsies ≥ 6 months after surgery. Propensity score analysis was conducted to match thiopurine exposed vs unexposed groups based on clinical covariates. Multivariable Cox regression analysis estimated the risk of neoplasia. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients with UC or IC (57.4% male, median age 35.6 years) were analyzed. Ninety-seven patients (34.2%) were confirmed to have thiopurine exposure ≥ 12 weeks immediately prior to TPC ("exposed") and 187 (65.8%) were confirmed to have no thiopurine exposure for at least 365 days prior to TPC ("non-exposed"). Compared to non-exposed patients, patients with thiopurine exposure less often had dysplasia (7.2% vs 23.0%, p = 0.001) and had lower grades of dysplasia before colectomy. After IPAA, patients with neoplasia were older (44.0 vs 34.8 years, p = 0.03), more likely to have had dysplasia as colectomy indication (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.007), and more likely to require pouch excision (55.6% vs 10.2%, p < 0.0001), compared to patients without neoplasia. On propensity-matched cohort analysis, no factors were significantly associated with risk of primary neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Thiopurine exposure for at least the 12 weeks prior to TPC in patients with UC or IC does not appear to be independently associated with risk of primary neoplasia following IPAA.

Early versus delayed ileocolic resection for complicated Crohn's disease: is "cooling off" necessary?

BACKGROUND: Ileal Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by intraabdominal abscess, phlegmon, fistula, and/or microperforation is commonly treated with antibiotics, bowel rest, and percutaneous drainage followed by interval ileocolic resection (ICR). This "cool off" strategy is intended to facilitate the safe completion of a one-stage resection using a minimally invasive approach and minimize perioperative complications. There is limited data evaluating the benefits of delayed versus early resection. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) database at a tertiary center was queried from 2013-2020 to identify patients who underwent ICR for complicated ileal CD confirmed on preoperative imaging. ICR cohorts were classified as early (≤ 7 days) vs delayed (> 7 days) based on the interval from diagnostic imaging to surgery. Operative approach and 30-day postoperative morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 474 patients who underwent ICR over the 7-year period, 112 patients had complicated ileal CD including 99 patients (88%) with intraabdominal abscess. Early ICR was performed in 52 patients (46%) at a median of 3 days (IQR 2, 5) from diagnostic imaging. Delayed ICR was performed in 60 patients (54%) following a median "cool off" period of 23 days of non-operative treatment (IQR 14, 44), including preoperative percutaneous abscess drainage in 17 patients (28%). A higher proportion of patients with intraabdominal abscess underwent delayed vs early ICR (57% vs 43%, p = 0.19). Overall, there were no significant differences in the rate of laparoscopy (96% vs 90%), conversion to open surgery (12% vs 17%), rates of extended bowel resection (8% vs 13%), additional concurrent procedures (44% vs 52%), or fecal diversion (10% vs 2%) in the early vs delayed ICR groups. The median postoperative length of stay was 5 days in both groups with an overall 25% vs 17% (p = 0.39) 30-day postoperative complication rate and a 6% vs 5% 30-day readmission rate in early vs delayed ICR groups, respectively. Overall median follow-up time was 14.3 months (IQR 1.2, 24.1) with no difference in the rate of subsequent CD-related intestinal resection (4% vs 5%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary series, at a high-volume tertiary referral center, a "cool off" delayed resectional approach was not found to reduce perioperative complications in patients undergoing ICR for complicated ileal Crohn's disease. Laparoscopic ICR can be performed within one week of diagnosis with low rates of conversion and postoperative complications.

Management of Anastomotic Leaks in Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis.

Anastomotic leaks remain a dreaded complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Their impacts can be devastating, ranging from an acute leak leading to postoperative sepsis to chronic leaks and sinus tracts resulting in long-term pouch dysfunction and subsequent pouch failure. The management of acute leaks is intricate. Initial management is important to resolve acute sepsis, but the type of acute intervention impacts long-term pouch function. Aggressive management in the postoperative period, including the use of IV fluids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and operative interventions may be necessary to preserve pouch structure and function. Early identification and knowledge of the most common areas of leak, such as at the IPAA anastomosis, are important for guiding management. Long-term complications, such as pouch sinuses, pouch-vaginal fistulas, and diminished IPAA function complicate the overall survival and functionality of the pouch. Knowledge and awareness of the identification and management of leaks is crucial for optimizing IPAA success.

Recycling of Precolectomy Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Chronic Pouch Inflammation Is Associated With Treatment Failure.

Despite improvements in medical management, 10%-15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) require total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for refractory disease.1 Acute pouchitis is the most common post-IPAA inflammatory condition, with cumulative incidence of 45% at 5 years.2 Up to 20%-30% of patients develop chronic pouch inflammation (CPI), categorized as antibiotic responsive, antibiotic refractory, or Crohn's disease-like (CDL).3.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race: A Solid Case for a 3-Stage Approach in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis require surgery during their disease course, of which the most common is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the rates of anastomotic leaks among all staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA procedures. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care IBD center. PATIENTS: All patients with ulcerative colitis or IBD-unspecified who underwent a primary total proctocolectomy with IPAA for medically refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anastomotic leak within a 6-month postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare patients with and without anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 584 nonemergent patients, of whom 50 (8.6%) underwent 1-stage, 162 (27.7%) underwent 2-stage, 58 (9.9%) underwent modified 2-stage, and 314 (53.7%) underwent a 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA. The primary indication was medically refractory disease in 488 patients and dysplasia/cancer in 101 patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in 10 patients (3.2%) after 3-stage, 14 patients (8.6%) after 2-stage, 6 patients (10.3%) after modified 2-stage, and 10 patients (20.0%) after a 1-stage procedure. A 3-stage procedure had fewer leaks and additional procedures for leaks compared with 1- and modified 2-stage procedures (p < 0.03). The 3-stage procedure had fewer combined anastomotic leaks and pelvic abscesses than all of the other staged procedures (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design and evolving electronic medical charts system. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA is the optimal staged method in ulcerative colitis to reduce leaks and related complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693. LENTO Y CONSTANTE GANA LA CARRERA UN CASO SLIDO PARA UN ENFOQUE DE TRES ETAPAS EN LA COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:Aproximadamente el 10-20% de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa requieren cirugía durante el curso de su enfermedad, de los cuales la más común es la proctocolectomía restauradora escalonada con anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar las tasas de fugas anastomóticas entre todos los procedimientos de proctocolectomía restauradora por etapas con procedimiento de anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un único centro de atención terciaria de tercer nivel para enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.PACIENTES:Se identificaron todos los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa o enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal inespecífica que se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total primaria mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal por enfermedad médicamente refractaria o displasia entre 2008 y 2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la fuga anastomótica dentro de un período posoperatorio de seis meses. Se utilizó regresión logística univariante y multivariante para comparar pacientes con y sin fugas anastomóticas.RESULTADOS:La muestra estuvo compuesta por 584 pacientes no emergentes, de los cuales 50 (8,6%) se sometieron a una etapa, 162 (27,7%) se sometieron a dos etapas, 58 (9,9%) se sometieron a modificación en dos etapas y 314 (53,7%) se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total en tres tiempos mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal. La indicación principal fue enfermedad médicamente refractaria en 488 pacientes y displasia / cáncer en 101 pacientes. Se produjo una fuga anastomótica en 10 (3,2%) pacientes después de tres etapas, 14 (8,6%) pacientes después de dos etapas, 6 (10,3%) pacientes después de dos etapas modificadas y 10 (20,0%) pacientes después de una etapa procedimiento. Un procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas y procedimientos adicionales para las fugas en comparación con los procedimientos de una y dos etapas modificadas (p <0.03). El procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas anastomóticas y abscesos pélvicos combinados que todos los demás procedimientos por etapas (p <0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y su sistema de registros médicos electrónicos en evolución.CONCLUSIONES:La proctocolectomía total en tres etapas mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal es el método óptimo por etapas en la colitis ulcerosa para reducir las fugas y las complicaciones relacionadas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693.

The role of laparoscopic surgery in repeat ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

AIM: Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for primary uncomplicated ileocolic resection (ICR); however, its role for repeat resections is unclear. This study assessed the outcomes of primary and repeated ICRs for Crohn's disease to examine rates of laparoscopy and patient morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted at a tertiary centre between 2013 and 2019. All patients undergoing ICRs for Crohn's disease were included. The cohort was divided into three groups based on number of resections-primary (1R), secondary (2R) and tertiary or more (>2R) groups. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Over a 6-year period, 474 patients underwent ICR for Crohn's disease, including 369 primary (1R, 77.8%) and 105 repeat (≥2R, 22.2%) resections. A laparoscopic approach was less common in the ≥2R versus 1R groups (79.0% vs. 93.8%, P < 0.001), but rates of conversion to an open procedure were comparable. Morbidity was higher amongst repeat resections although this was not significant (20.0% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.18). Amongst cases approached laparoscopically (n = 429), rates of conversion and postoperative morbidity did not differ by stage of resection, although operative time was longer for repeat operations. Even in the group undergoing laparoscopy for tertiary or greater resections (>2R, n = 29), the rates of conversion (10%) and morbidity (14%) were relatively low. CONCLUSION: In this contemporary series of primary and reoperative ICR for ileal CD, a laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe for the majority of repeat ICRs when performed at a high volume centre.

Ileostomy reversal after subtotal colectomy in Crohn's disease: a single institutional experience at a high-volume center.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate factors leading to ostomy reversal among a group of 44 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who underwent subtotal colectomy (STC) between June 2011 and September 2018. METHODS: Our study design was a retrospective chart review. Patients with CD who underwent STC were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate several risk factors for non-reversal including medications received prior to surgery and indication for STC. RESULTS: Of 44 STCs performed, 31 (70.5%) were completed laparoscopically and 13 required an open approach (29.5%). Nine patients (20.4%) underwent ostomy reversal, and the mean time to reversal was 8.4 months. Preoperative therapy with an immunomodulator or biologic was associated with ostomy reversal (OR and CI: 0.43, 0.09-0.93; 0.47, 0.10-0.96), as was a diagnosis of intraabdominal abscess (0.43, 0.09-0.93). CONCLUSION: Ileostomy reversal after STC in Crohn's disease is uncommon. Certain treatment regimens and diagnostic factors may impact the likelihood of ostomy reversal. Based on the available data, patients with CD whose disease is severe enough to require STC should be counseled that their ostomy will most likely be permanent. However, due to the low incidence of this procedure for CD, more data is needed.

Surgical Techniques and Differences in Postoperative Outcomes for Patients With Crohn's Disease With Ileosigmoid Fistulas: A Single-Institution Experience, 2010-2016.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of ileosigmoid fistulas in Crohn's disease is poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in patient postoperative outcomes for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) and sigmoid colon repair type (sigmoid resection versus primary repair). DESIGN: Using a prospectively collected database, we gathered perioperative data from chart reviews to calculate differences and associations between treatment groups. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients with Crohn's disease who underwent surgery for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016 were included. RESULTS: We identified 84 patients, with an average age of 37 years. A total of 51 were men and 33 were women; 34 underwent a sigmoid resection, whereas 50 had a primary repair of the sigmoid. All of the patients underwent an ileocolic resection. A total of 67 surgeries were initially attempted laparoscopically, of which 17 (25.4%) were converted to open, with 50 (59.5%) completed laparoscopically. There were no significant differences in length of stay or incidence of postoperative complications by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open). For patients who underwent a primary sigmoid repair versus a sigmoid resection, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, but there was a significant difference in the length of stay (6.36 vs 9.56 d for primary repair versus resection; multivariate p value of 0.022). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complications and length of stay were measured. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its small sample size, cross-sectional nature of the data, and limited information about preoperative outpatient medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas in Crohn's disease is safe and does not result in a different length of stay or incidence of postoperative complications. Primary repair (rather than resection) of the sigmoid colon in these cases, when feasible, appears to be safe and is likely to be cost-effective given the reduced length of stay. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A993. TÉCNICAS QUIRÚRGICAS Y DIFERENCIAS EN LOS RESULTADOS POSTOPERATORIOS PARA LOS PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN CON FÍSTULAS ILEO-SIGMOIDEAS: UNA EXPERIENCIA EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIÓN, 2010-2016: El tratamiento quirúrgico de las fístulas ileo-sigmoideas en la enfermedad de Crohn está mal caracterizado. OBJETIVO: Identificar las diferencias en los resultados postoperatorios de los pacientes para las fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas por abordaje quirúrgico (laparoscópica versus abierta) y tipo de reparación de colon sigmoide (resección sigmoidea versus reparación primaria). DISEÑO:: Utilizando una base de datos recopilada de forma prospectiva, se recopilaron datos perioperatorios de las revisiones de los gráficos para calcular las diferencias y las asociaciones entre los grupos de tratamiento. AJUSTE: Un solo centro de atención terciaria. PACIENTES: Pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn que se sometieron a una cirugía para fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas entre el 1 de julio de 2010 y el 30 de junio de 2016. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 84 pacientes, con una edad promedio de 37 años. Un total de 51 eran hombres y 33 mujeres; 34 se sometieron a una resección sigmoidea, mientras que 50 tuvieron una reparación primaria del sigmoide. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a resección ileocólica. Inicialmente, un total de 67 círugias se intentaron por vía laparoscópica, de las cuales 17 (25,4%) se convirtieron en cirugías abiertas, y 50 (59,5%) se completaron por vía laparoscópica. No hubo diferencias significativas en la duración de la estancia o la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias por abordaje quirúrgico (laparoscópica versus abierta). Para los pacientes que se sometieron a una reparación sigmoidea primaria versus una resección sigmoidea, no hubo diferencias significativas en las complicaciones postoperatorias, pero sí hubo una diferencia significativa en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (6,36 versus a 9,56 días para la reparación primaria frente a la resección; p multivariable -valor de 0.022). PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Complicaciones postoperatorias y duración de la estancia. LIMITACIONES: Tamaño de muestra pequeño, naturaleza transversal de los datos e información limitada sobre el tratamiento médico ambulatorio preoperatorio del paciente. CONCLUSIONES: La cirugía laparoscópica para fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas en la enfermedad de Crohn es segura y no ocasiona una duración diferente de la estancia hospitalaria ni una incidencia diferente de complicaciones postoperatorias. La reparación primaria (en lugar de la resección) del colon sigmoide en estos casos, cuando es posible, parece ser segura y es probable que sea rentable, dada la duración reducida de la estancia. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A993.

Impact of Intravenous Acetaminophen on Perioperative Opioid Utilization and Outcomes in Open Colectomies: A Claims Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The value of intravenous acetaminophen in postoperative pain management remains debated. The authors tested the hypothesis that intravenous acetaminophen use, in isolation and in comparison to oral, would be associated with decreased opioid utilization (clinically significant reduction defined as 25%) and opioid-related adverse effects in open colectomy patients. METHODS: Using national claims data from open colectomy patients (Premier Healthcare Database, Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., USA; 2011 to 2016; n = 181,640; 602 hospitals), we separately categorized oral and intravenous acetaminophen use: 1 (1,000 mg) or more than 1 dose on the day of surgery, postoperative day 1, or later. Multilevel models measured associations between intravenous or oral acetaminophen and (1) opioid utilization and (2) opioid-related adverse effects. Percent change and multiplicity-adjusted 99.5% CI are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 25.1% of patients received intravenous acetaminophen, of whom 48.0% (n = 21,878) received 1 dose on the day of surgery. In adjusted analyses, particularly more than 1 dose of intravenous acetaminophen (versus nonuse) on postoperative day 1 was associated with a -12.4% (99.5% CI, -15.2 to -9.4%) change in opioid utilization. In comparison, a stronger reduction was seen in those receiving more than 1 oral acetaminophen dose: -22.6% (99.5% CI, -26.2 to -18.9%). Unadjusted group medians were 550 and 490 oral morphine equivalents, respectively. Intravenous versus oral differences were less pronounced among those receiving more than 1 acetaminophen dose on the day of surgery: -8.0% (99.5% CI, -11.0 to -4.9%) median 499 oral morphine equivalents versus -8.7% (99.5% CI, -14.4 to -2.7%) median 445 oral morphine equivalents, respectively; all statistically significant, but none clinically significant. Comparable outcome patterns existed for opioid-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstrated marginal effects do not support routine use of intravenous acetaminophen given alternative nonopioid analgesic options.

Managing acute cholecystitis among Medicaid insured in New York State: opportunities to optimize care.

BACKGROUND: Identifying sources of unnecessary cost within Medicaid will help focus cost containment efforts. This study sought to identify differences in surgical management and associated costs of cholecystitis between Medicaid and privately insured in New York State. METHODS: The New York State all-payer mandatory discharge database from 2003 to 2013, had 297,635 patients with Medicaid (75,512) and privately (222,123) insurance who underwent cholecystectomy for cholecystitis. Patients were stratified by insurance. Four surgical management approaches were delineated based on cholecystectomy timing: primary, interval, emergency, and delayed cholecystectomy. Delayed cholecystectomy was defined as more than one hospital visit from diagnosis to definitive cholecystectomy. Medicaid and privately insured patients were propensity score matched. Surgical management approach and associated costs were compared between matched cohorts. RESULTS: A greater proportion of Medicaid patients underwent delayed cholecystectomy compared to matched privately insured patients, 8.5 versus 4.8%; P < 0.001. Primary initial cholecystectomy was performed in fewer Medicaid compared to privately insured patients, 55.4 versus 66.0%, P < 0.001. Primary initial cholecystectomy was the cheapest surgical management approach, with the median cost of $3707, and delayed cholecystectomy was the most expensive, $12,212, P < 0.001. The median cost per Medicaid patient was $6170 versus $4804 per matched privately insured patient, P < 0.001. The annual predicted cost savings for New York State Medicaid would be $13,097,371, if the distribution of surgical management approaches were proportionally similar to private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients with cholecystitis were more frequently managed with delayed cholecystectomy than privately insured patients, which had substantial cost implications for the New York Medicaid Program.

Can laparoscopic surgery prevent incisional hernia in patients with Crohn's disease: a comparison study of 750 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic bowel resection.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is a frequent occurrence following open surgery for Crohn's disease (CD). This study compares the IH rates of patients with CD undergoing open versus laparoscopic bowel resection. METHODS: Seven hundred and fifty patients with CD operated by the authors at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA, were reviewed from a prospectively maintained surgical database. Five hundred patients with Crohn's disease undergoing open surgery were compared to 250 patients undergoing laparoscopic bowel resection. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up in the study population was 6.8 years. Patients undergoing open surgery had a significantly higher age at onset of disease, age at surgery, longer duration of disease, lower serum albumin, history of multiple previous resections, were more likely to be on steroids, needed more blood transfusions, and had an increased necessity for an ileostomy during resection. Nevertheless, the incidence of IH at 36 months was nearly identical in both groups (10.8 vs. 8.4% for open vs laparoscopic). 16% of the patients in the laparoscopic group (range: 7-20%) required conversion to open surgery. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection that required conversion to open surgery had the highest IH rate at 18%. There was a significant correlation between IH and the length of the midline vertical extraction incision. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis and small transverse or trocar site extraction incisions had no IH. CONCLUSIONS: A marked decrease or complete elimination of IH in patients with CD undergoing bowel resection may be possible using advanced laparoscopic techniques that require intra-abdominal anastomosis and use of the smallest transverse extraction incisions.

Payer status and access to laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid populations have been shown to have inferior surgical outcomes, but less is known about their access to advanced surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients with Medicaid and ulcerative colitis who presented for subtotal colectomy would have reduced access to the laparoscopic approach in comparison with a similar population with private insurance. DESIGN/SETTINGS/PATIENTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2008 to 2010, we identified all patients who underwent subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. The χ test and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors for laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the use of open or laparoscopic subtotal colectomy. Secondary end points included hospital length of stay and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2589 subtotal colectomy hospitalizations for ulcerative colitis (435 with Medicaid and 2154 with private insurance). The private insurance and Medicaid groups did not have significantly different mean age, sex, or Charlson scores (p > 0.05). Although 43% of the private insurance cohort received laparoscopic subtotal colectomy during their hospitalization, only 23% of the Medicaid population received equivalent care (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis that included age, sex, emergency status, hospital location, hospital size, teaching status, income, and Charlson score, urban teaching hospital status (p < 0.01), emergency status (p = 0.045), age <40 (p < 0.01), northeast location (p = 0.01), and private insurance status (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of the laparoscopic approach. LIMITATIONS: Administrative data have the potential for unrecognized miscoding or incomplete risk adjustment. Disease severity is not accounted for in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. CONCLUSION: Medicaid payer status was associated with reduced use of laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Although this finding may be due in part to physician preference or patient characteristics, health system factors appear to contribute to selection of the surgical approach.

Emergent Subtotal Colectomies Have Higher Leak Rates in Subsequent J-Pouch Stages.

PURPOSE: The most common surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). On occasion, an emergent first-stage subtotal colectomy must be performed. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of postoperative complications in three-stage IPAA patients who underwent emergent vs non-emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies in the subsequent staged procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review conducted at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. All UC or IBD-Unspecified patients who underwent a three-stage IPAA between 2008 and 2017 were identified. Emergent surgery was defined as that performed on an inpatient who had perforation, toxic megacolon, uncontrolled hemorrhage, or septic shock. The primary outcomes were the presence of anastomotic leak, obstruction, bleeding, and the need for reoperation for each within a 6-month postoperative period of the second (RPC with IPAA and DLI) and third surgical stages (ileostomy reversal). RESULTS: A total of 342 patients underwent a three-stage IPAA, of which 30 (9.4%) had emergent first-stage operations. Patients who underwent an emergent STC were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure following the subsequent second and third-staged operations on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). No difference was found for obstruction, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, or bleeding (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Three-stage IPAA patients with emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure for a leak following the subsequent second- and third-stage operations.

Ulcerative colitis is characterized by a plasmablast-skewed humoral response associated with disease activity.

B cells, which are critical for intestinal homeostasis, remain understudied in ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we recruited three cohorts of patients with UC (primary cohort, n = 145; validation cohort 1, n = 664; and validation cohort 2, n = 143) to comprehensively define the landscape of B cells during UC-associated intestinal inflammation. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell IgH gene sequencing and protein-level validation, we mapped the compositional, transcriptional and clonotypic landscape of mucosal and circulating B cells. We found major perturbations within the mucosal B cell compartment, including an expansion of naive B cells and IgG+ plasma cells with curtailed diversity and maturation. Furthermore, we isolated an auto-reactive plasma cell clone targeting integrin αvß6 from inflamed UC intestines. We also identified a subset of intestinal CXCL13-expressing TFH-like T peripheral helper cells that were associated with the pathogenic B cell response. Finally, across all three cohorts, we confirmed that changes in intestinal humoral immunity are reflected in circulation by the expansion of gut-homing plasmablasts that correlates with disease activity and predicts disease complications. Our data demonstrate a highly dysregulated B cell response in UC and highlight a potential role of B cells in disease pathogenesis.

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure performed by surgical residents under the supervision of attending surgeons. There is a perception that performance of LC in a facility with a surgical training program provides a safer environment due to the presence of an assistant surgeon. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bile duct injury, conversion, and mortality between hospitals with surgical residency programs (Group I) and hospitals without surgical training programs (Group II). METHODS: ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to extract and analyze LC procedures from the Florida State Inpatient Database from 1997 through 2006. Bile duct injury was indicated by the code for a biliary reconstruction procedure performed during the same admission. Hospitals with surgical training programs were identified by participation in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and verified by contact with each hospital. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2006 there were 234,220 LCs identified, with 17,596 performed by Group I and 213,906 performed by Group II. Rate of BDI for Group I and Group II was 0.24 and 0.26%, respectively (p=0.71). There was a significant difference noted in emergency and urgent admission rates (65.6% for Group I vs. 77.2% for Group II; p<0.001) and conversion (9.1% for Group I vs. 7.5% for Group II; p<0.001). Mortality was 0.44% for Group I and 0.55% for Group II (p=0.060). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that bile duct injury rates are not influenced by the presence of a surgical residency program. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality for LC at hospitals with surgical residencies when compared to hospitals without surgical residencies. A significant difference was noted in admission type and conversion rate but this did not appear to affect the rate of bile duct injury.

A case report of foreign body appendicitis caused by tongue piercing ingestion.

INTRODUCTION: Foreign body ingestion is an uncommon clinical problem in healthy adults. Furthermore, it is even less common for an ingested foreign body to cause any obstructive symptoms within the gastrointestinal tract. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here, we describe an unusual case of acute appendicitis induced by a tongue piercing that was ingested by a 32-year-old woman with a recent history of endotracheal intubation. Abdominal X-ray revealed metallic foreign bodies in the right lower quadrant. The foreign bodies remained in place on serial X-rays despite bowel preparation and they were not visualized on colonoscopy. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis confirms the location of the foreign body within the appendix. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed without complications and the tongue piercing was recovered within the lumen of the resected appendix. DISCUSSION: Foreign body ingestion is a rare cause of appendicitis. Most ingested foreign bodies spontaneously pass through the gastrointestinal tract within a week. However, in rare instances, the foreign body becomes lodged in the appendix, often resulting in appendicitis. CONCLUSION: In patients with appendicitis secondary to foreign body ingestion, we suggest surgical management to reduce the risk of peritonitis, perforation, and abscess formation.

Luminal Narrowing Alone Allows an Accurate Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease Small Bowel Strictures at Cross-Sectional Imaging.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current consensus recommendations define small bowel strictures [SBS] in Crohn's disease [CD] on imaging as luminal narrowing with unequivocal upstream bowel dilation. The aim of this study was to [1] evaluate the performance of cross-sectional imaging for SBS diagnosis in CD using luminal narrowing with upstream SB dilation and luminal narrowing with or without upstream dilation, and [2] compare the diagnostic performance of computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance enterography [MRE] for SBS diagnosis. METHODS: In total, 111 CD patients [81 with pathologically confirmed SBS, 30 controls] who underwent CT and/or MRE were assessed. Two radiologists [R1, R2] blinded to pathology findings independently assessed the presence of luminal narrowing and upstream SB dilation. Statistical analysis was performed for [1] luminal narrowing with or without SB upstream dilation ['possible SBS'], and [2] luminal narrowing with upstream SB dilation ≥3 cm ['definite SBS']. RESULTS: Sensitivity for detecting SBS was significantly higher using 'possible SBS' [R1, 82.1%; R2, 77.9%] compared to 'definite SBS' [R1, 62.1%; R2, 65.3%; p < 0.0001] with equivalent specificity [R1, 96.7%; R2, 93.3%; p > 0.9]. Using the criterion 'possible SBS', sensitivity/specificity were equivalent between CT [R1, 87.3%/93.3%; R2, 83.6%/86.7%] and MRE [R1, 75.0%/100%; R2: 70.0%/100%]. Using the criterion 'definite SBS', CT showed significantly higher sensitivity [78.2%] compared to MRE [40.0%] for R1 but not R2 with similar specificities [CT, 86.7-93.3%; MRE, 100%]. CONCLUSION: SBS can be diagnosed using luminal narrowing alone without the need for upstream dilation. CT and MRE show similar diagnostic performance for SBS diagnosis using luminal narrowing with or without upstream dilation.

Laparoscopic approach for metachronous cecal and sigmoid volvulus.

BACKGROUND: Metachronous colonic volvulus is a rare event that has never been approached laparoscopically. METHODS: Here we discuss the case of a 63-year-old female with a metachronous sigmoid and cecal volvulus. RESULTS: The patient underwent 2 separate successful laparoscopic resections. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The following is a discussion of the case and the laparoscopic technique, accompanied by a brief review of colonic volvulus. In experienced hands, laparoscopy is a safe approach for acute colonic volvulus.

Analysis of Outcomes by Extraction Site following Subtotal Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis frequently requires surgery as a definitive management strategy. The colonic specimen can be extracted from various sites including a midline incision, the stoma site, or a Pfannenstiel incision. It is unclear if one extraction site offers improved outcomes and fewer complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of charts obtained of colorectal surgery patients was conducted for all patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent a subtotal colectomy between 2008 and 2016 at a single tertiary care institution. Demographic data and outcomes data including parastomal and incisional hernias, advanced wound/ostomy certified nurse referrals, surgical site infections, reoperations, and readmissions were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed to detect any significant differences in outcomes between groups based on extraction site (midline incision, stoma site, or Pfannenstiel incision). RESULTS: Univariate analysis did not show any statistical differences between groups in regard to outcomes. Stoma site extraction did not statistically differ from midline extraction in regard to hernias, advanced ostomy referrals, infections, or reoperations, but midline incision extraction did have a lower risk of readmission (OR = 0.56, p = 0.0066). Pfannenstiel extraction had lower risk of incisional hernias (OR = 0.25, p = 0.0002), advanced ostomy referrals (OR = 0.45, p = 0.0164) and readmission (OR = 0.26, p < 0.0001) as compared to stoma site extraction. CONCLUSIONS: While stoma site extraction can be successfully performed for most patients requiring subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis, Pfannenstiel extraction leads to the fewest number of complications and provides the most consistent results.