Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Birth ; 51(1): 13-27, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37789580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current pandemic and future public health emergencies highlight the importance of evaluating a telehealth care model. Previous studies have reached mixed conclusions about the effectiveness of remote monitoring on glycemic control and maternal and infant outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of remote blood glucose monitoring for women with gestational diabetes mellitus and to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of women with gestational diabetes mellitus for policymakers and healthcare providers during situations such as pandemics or natural disasters. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from their inception to July 10, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English with respect to remote blood glucose monitoring in women with GDM were included in the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the quality of the studies. Risk ratios, mean differences, 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1265 participants were included in the 11 RCTs. There were no significant differences in glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes between the remote monitoring group and a standard care group, which included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, mean 2-h postprandial blood glucose, caesarean birth, gestational weight gain, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and other outcomes. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals that it is unclear if remote glucose monitoring is preferable to standard of care glucose monitoring. To improve glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes during the current epidemic or other natural disasters, the implementation of double-blind RCTs in the context of simulating similar disasters remains to be studied in the future.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Telemedicina , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Glucemia/análisis , Control Glucémico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Reprod Health ; 20(1): 182, 2023 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062456

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is recognized internationally as the most scientific and effective way to feed infants and young children. According to the World Health Organization in 2022, the exclusive breastfeeding rate within 6 months is 34.1% in China, which is still far from the goal of "more than 60% exclusive breastfeeding rate of infants within 6 months" by 2030 required by China's State Council. It is necessary to promote breastfeeding and provide maternal breastfeeding guidance to increase exclusive breastfeeding. Factors influencing breastfeeding can be explained by the society ecosystems theory, distributed in macro, mezzo and micro systems. The interventions focused on breastfeeding promotion are mainly carried out in the health systems and services, home and family environment, community environment, work environment, policy environment or a combination of these facilities. But there is sparse research on integrating resources in the macro, mezzo and micro systems of maternal breastfeeding processes to promote breastfeeding behavior. A randomized controlled trial will test the effect of a breastfeeding promotion intervention model based on the society ecosystems theory versus usual prenatal and postnatal care on maternal and infant health and the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 6 months. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a single-blind, parallel design, randomized controlled trial with an intervention group (n = 109) and a control group (n = 109) that compares the effect of a breastfeeding promotion intervention model based on the society ecosystems theory with usual prenatal and postnatal care. The intervention covers macro- (policy, culture), mezzo- (family-hospital-community) and micro- (biological, psychological and social) systems of the maternal breastfeeding process. Infant feeding patterns, neonatal morbidity and physical and mental health of antenatal and postpartum women will be collected at baseline (28 to 35 weeks of gestation), 1-, 4-, and 6-month postpartum. DISCUSSION: This is a multifaceted, multifactorial, and multi-environmental breastfeeding promotion strategy to help mothers and their families learn breastfeeding knowledge and skills. The study provides a new modality for adding breastfeeding interventions to prenatal and postnatal care for healthcare providers in the hospital and the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2300075795.


Maternal education and support during breastfeeding can increase maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, promote breastfeeding behaviors, and improve maternal and infant health outcomes. The interventions focused on breastfeeding promotion are mainly carried out in the health systems and services, home and family environment, community environment, work environment, policy environment or a combination of any of these facilities. But there is sparse research on integrating in multifaceted, multifactorial, and multi-environmental resources of maternal breastfeeding processes to help pregnant women and their families learn breastfeeding knowledge and skills. The current study optimizes the existing breastfeeding promotion intervention program and construct a breastfeeding promotion intervention program to correct the public's perception of breastfeeding, increase breastfeeding self-efficacy and improve breastfeeding behavior, thus increasing the breastfeeding duration and improving maternal and infant outcomes. The program includes presenting breastfeeding-related policies and support facilities; prenatal educational sessions combined with theories and skills on breastfeeding, development of lactation, infants feeding and cares for maternal families; postnatal hands-on instruction and WeChat group peer support from hospital; home visits, group counseling and experience sharing from community and one-on-one personalized counseling throughout the intervention. The present study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of breastfeeding promotion intervention including prenatal and postnatal care on the breastfeeding duration, breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy, maternal and infant health.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Promoción de la Salud , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Preescolar , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Ecosistema , Método Simple Ciego , Madres/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 117, 2023 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health professionals, including nurses, experienced heavy workloads and significant physical and mental health challenges during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 19 pandemic, which may affect career choices for those considering nursing and for nursing students. The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a period of risk, but also an occasion to redeploy the professional identity (PI) of nursing students. However, the relationship between perceived social support (PSS), self-efficacy (SE), PI and anxiety remains unclear under the background of COVID-19. This study aims to explore whether PSS has an indirect effect on PI through mediation of SE and whether the anxiety can moderate the relationship between PSS and SE in nursing students during their internship period. METHODS: An observational, national cross-sectional study was conducted following the STROBE guidelines. An online questionnaire was completed by 2,457 nursing students from 24 provinces in China during their internship during September to October 2021. Measures included Chinese translations of the Professional Identity Questionnaire for Nursing Students, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the 7-item Generalized Anxiety disorder scale. RESULTS: Both PSS (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and SE (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with PI. The indirect effect of PSS on PI through SE was positive (ß = 0.348, p < 0.001), with an effect of 72.7%. The results of the moderating effect analysis showed that anxiety attenuated the effect of PSS on SE. Moderation models indicated that anxiety has a weak negative moderating effect on the effect of PSS on SE (ß =-0.0308, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A better PSS and higher scores in SE were associated with PI in nursing students, and a better PSS had an indirect effect on the PI of nursing students through SE. Anxiety played a negative moderating role in the relationship between PSS and SE.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Autoeficacia , Estudios Transversales , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Apoyo Social
4.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao ; 23(7): 1861-8, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23173460

RESUMEN

A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of foliar spraying three compound agents [plant polysaccharides (P1), plant polysaccharides and 5-aminolevulinic acid (P2), and plant polysaccharides and 5-aminolevulinic acid and dimethylpiperidinium chloride (P3)] at the initial flowering stage of soybean on its leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthesis and transpiration, dry matter accumulation and allocation, and grain yield. Within 35 days after spraying the three compound agents, the leaf chlorophyll content had obvious increase, and its decreasing trend with plant growth had somewhat delay. Compared with the control, spraying P1 and P3 increased the leaf photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency by more than 13.2% and 10.3%, respectively. With the spraying of the three compound agents, the dry matter accumulation in aerial part increased, and the allocation of dry matter from leaf to pod was also enhanced, with the contribution of post-anthesis assimilates to grain yield increased by more than 17.1%. The 100-grain mass and the pods and seeds per plant increased significantly after spraying P1 and P3, but had no significant increase after spraying P2. The grain yield of soybean treated with the three compound agents increased by more than 5.9%, compared with the control. This study showed that the three plant polysaccharide compound agents could increase the leaf chlorophyll content, delay the leaf-senescence, improve the leaf photosynthetic capacity and water status, effectively control the dry matter accumulation and post-anthesis assimilates allocation, and increase the grain yield of soybean.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Aminolevulínico/farmacología , Fertilizantes , Glycine max/crecimiento & desarrollo , Fotosíntesis/efectos de los fármacos , Polisacáridos/farmacología , Biomasa , Piperidonas/farmacología , Glycine max/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA