First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to test transcutaneous focused ultrasound in the form of ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy to reposition ureteral stones and facilitate passage in awake subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult subjects with a diagnosed proximal or distal ureteral stone were prospectively recruited. Ultrasonic propulsion alone or with burst wave lithotripsy was administered by a handheld transducer to awake, unanesthetized subjects. Efficacy outcomes included stone motion, stone passage, and pain relief. Safety outcome was the reporting of associated anticipated or adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received either ultrasonic propulsion alone (n = 16) or with burst wave lithotripsy bursts (n = 13), and stone motion was observed in 19 (66%). The stone passed in 18 (86%) of the 21 distal ureteral stone cases with at least 2 weeks follow-up in an average of 3.9±4.9 days post-procedure. Fragmentation was observed in 7 of the burst wave lithotripsy cases. All subjects tolerated the procedure with average pain scores (0-10) dropping from 2.1±2.3 to 1.6±2.0 (P = .03). Anticipated events were limited to hematuria on initial urination post-procedure and mild pain. In total, 7 subjects had associated discomfort with only 2.2% (18 of 820) propulsion bursts. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy and safety of using ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy in awake subjects to reposition and break ureteral stones to relieve pain and facilitate passage.

In-Office Ultrasound Facilitates Timely Clinical Care at a Multidisciplinary Kidney Stone Center.

INTRODUCTION: A considerable publication record exists comparing sensitivity and specificity of radiological ultrasound (including point of care ultrasound) to computerized tomography for stone disease. However, the practical application of in-office ultrasound to support the growing number of kidney stone centers around the world represents a nuanced topic that is ripe for study and discussion. METHODS: We provide a descriptive analysis of how in-office ultrasound is being used as an adjunct to clinical care based on our experience during 50 days in clinic at an institutionally affiliated, multidisciplinary kidney stone center. Clinic subjects gave consent and underwent ultrasound as part of research studies. Ultrasonograms were shared with and verified by the treating physician before the patient was discharged from care. We counted the number of times research imaging altered the care plan. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients enrolled the clinician used the information obtained from the studies in 20 (33%) to determine the course of clinical care that resulted in a change in treatment or process. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound has the potential to be a cost-effective and valuable tool that can provide more efficient workflow within a kidney stone center or urology clinic.