Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(3)2021 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33806811

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: The incidence of diverticulitis is increasing in western countries. Complicated diverticulitis is defined as diverticulitis associated with localized or generalized perforation, localized or distant abscess, fistula, stricture or obstruction. Colonic symptomatic strictures are often treated with segmental colectomy. The aim of our study is to report our experience with Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) placement to relieve sigmoid obstruction secondary to diverticulitis, either as a permanent solution or as a bridge to elective colectomy. Material and Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 21 patients underwent SEMS placement for sigmoid obstruction secondary to diverticulitis at our institution. In four patients with poor general conditions, SEMS was considered the definitive form of treatment. In 17 patients, the stent was placed as bridge to elective colectomy. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were postoperative mortality and morbidity after SEMS and subsequent elective colectomy. Results: There was no mortality or major morbidity after SEMS placement or subsequent elective colectomy. No stoma was performed. Conclusions: Placement of Colorectal Self Expandable Stent represents a useful tool to relieve obstruction in patients with left-sided colonic diverticulitis. SEMS placement makes it possible to transform an emergency clinical condition into an elective condition, giving time to resolve the inflammation and the infection inevitably associated with complicated diverticulitis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Diverticulitis , Obstrucción Intestinal , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Colon , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Prof Inferm ; 70(4): 206-213, 2017.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460557

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The error in medicine has long been discussed in scientific debates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the degree knowledge, attitude and behavior of students in Nursing for the failure in the health sector. METHODS: It was administered to 231 students of Nursing of the Sapienza University of Rome (171 females and 60 males), aged between 21 and 45 years, a structured questionnaire in three questions that explore the experiences and opinions about the errors found in medical practice, the causes underlying them and the mistakes that should never be committed. Data were collected, stratified by sex, age, marital status, and analyzed using the χ2 test. Significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The 5 errors found more frequently in clinical practice by the students were the following: Errors that favors the onset of hospital infections (58.9%); Non adherence to protocols (50.2%); Patient care (45.9%); Errors due to the administration of therapies and drugs (45.9%); Errors relating to the execution of withdrawals (35.9%). The five cases considered most frequently responsible for such errors were: the rush (70.1%), followed by neglect / superficial (55%); disorganization (51.5%); not hygienically / infertility (50.6%) and inattention (42.9%). With regard to the errors that you should never commit, students have shown more frequently: the errors of administration of therapies / medications (69.3%); errors of prescription therapies / medications (58.9%); errors related to surgery (52.8%); the exchange of patient or misidentification of the patient (50.6%); errors that favor the occurrence of hospital infections (48.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study shows the importance of a culture of error in medicine, also as part of undergraduate education, in order to train and educate future health professionals to this issue in order to promoting patient safety and quality of health.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Errores Médicos , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Roma , Adulto Joven
3.
Intern Emerg Med ; 7(3): 275-80, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22161317

RESUMEN

"Triage" is a useful tool used in emergency departments (EDs) to prioritize the care of patients. Through a methodical process of different sequential steps, the triage nurse assigns a color code which goes from red-critical patient with immediate access to medical examination-to a white code that represents no urgency. Clinical studies have shown that patients can be victims of errors during the process of care, especially in complex systems such as EDs. To reduce errors it is essential to map the risks in order to identify the causes (both individual and organizational); the introduction of corrective changes cannot be postponed. The incorrect assessment at triage represents one of the major errors in EDs. By monitoring this activity, through the analysis of sentinel events we can reduce adverse consequences. Missed recognition of a red code indicates a sentinel event. We used a "root cause analysis" to explain an episode of missed recognition of red code at triage. A nurse without specific training in triage and inexperienced in critical care was identified as the "root cause" of the sentinel event. To make improvements we planned a triage training course (for newly employed nurses and a refresher course for existing staff) and created a team of dedicated triage nurses.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Urgencia/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Triaje/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Enfermería de Urgencia/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA