Recombinant allergens for specific immunotherapy.

Recombinant DNA technology provides the means for producing allergens that are equivalent to their natural counterparts and also genetically engineered variants with reduced IgE-binding activity. The proteins are produced as chemically defined molecules with consistent structural and immunologic properties. Several hundred allergens have been cloned and expressed as recombinant proteins, and these provide the means for making a very detailed diagnosis of a patient's sensitization profile. Clinical development programs are now in progress to assess the suitability of recombinant allergens for both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. Recombinant hypoallergenic variants, which are developed with the aim of increasing the doses that can be administered while at the same time reducing the risks for therapy-associated side effects, are also in clinical trials for subcutaneous immunotherapy. Grass and birch pollen preparations have been shown to be clinically effective, and studies with various other allergens are in progress. Personalized or patient-tailored immunotherapy is still a very distant prospect, but the first recombinant products based on single allergens or defined mixtures could reach the market within the next 5 years.

A Search for subgroups of patients with ARDS who may benefit from surfactant replacement therapy: a pooled analysis of five studies with recombinant surfactant protein-C surfactant (Venticute).

BACKGROUND: Studies to date have shown no survival benefit for the use of exogenous surfactant to treat patients with the ARDS. To identify specific patient subgroups for future study, we performed an exploratory post hoc analysis of clinical trials of recombinant surfactant protein-C (rSP-C) surfactant (Venticute; Nycomed GmbH; Konstanz, Germany). METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of all five multicenter studies in which patients with ARDS due to various predisposing events were treated with rSP-C surfactant. Patients received either usual care (n = 266) or usual care plus up to four intratracheal doses (50 mg/kg) of rSP-C surfactant (n = 266). Factors influencing the study end points were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: ARDS was most often associated with pneumonia or aspiration, sepsis, and trauma or surgery. For the overall patient population, treatment with rSP-C surfactant significantly improved oxygenation (p = 0.002) but had no effect on mortality (32.6%). Multivariate analysis showed age and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score to be the strongest predictors of mortality. In the subgroup of patients with severe ARDS due to pneumonia or aspiration, surfactant treatment was associated with markedly improved oxygenation (p = 0.0008) and improved survival (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: rSP-C surfactant improved oxygenation in patients with ARDS irrespective of the predisposition. Post hoc evidence of reduced mortality associated with surfactant treatment was obtained in patients with severe respiratory insufficiency due to pneumonia or aspiration. Those patients are the focus of a current randomized, blinded, clinical trial with rSP-C surfactant.

Effect of recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant on the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that exogenous surfactant may be of value in the treatment of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and two phase 2 clinical trials have shown a trend toward benefit. We conducted two phase 3 studies of a protein-containing surfactant in adults with ARDS. METHODS: In two multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials involving 448 patients with ARDS from various causes, we compared standard therapy alone with standard therapy plus up to four intratracheal doses of a recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant given within a period of 24 hours. RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 66 percent 28 days after treatment, and the median number of ventilator-free days was 0 (68 percent range, 0 to 26); there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality or the need for mechanical ventilation. Patients receiving surfactant had a significantly greater improvement in blood oxygenation during the initial 24 hours of treatment than patients receiving standard therapy, according to both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The use of exogenous surfactant in a heterogeneous population of patients with ARDS did not improve survival. Patients who received surfactant had a greater improvement in gas exchange during the 24-hour treatment period than patients who received standard therapy alone, suggesting the potential benefit of a longer treatment course.

Cyclooxygenase-inhibition enhances the effects of rSP-C surfactant therapy in a rat lavage model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

UNLABELLED: The effects of additional i.v. therapy with a cyclooxygenase-inhibitor Eltenac to a recombinant surfactant protein C (rSP-C) based surfactant were investigated in a rat lung lavage model of acute lung injury. Treatment was done at 60 min after the induction of acute lung injury by lavage. The influence of the different treatments were tested with regard to improving oxygenation, histopathological changes (hyaline membrane formation and alveolar influx of neutrophil leukocytes). These effects were further compared to a fixed combination of Eltenac with rSP-C surfactant which was administered intratracheally (i.tr.), 60 min after lavage. To prove that fibrinogen is involved in the formation of hyaline membranes in this animal model confocal microscopy was applied. Furthermore, for selected cases the influence of Eltenac or rSP-C surfactant on fibrinogen leakage was investigated by using confocal microscopy. Results of additional i.v. therapy exhibited an improved oxygenation with rSP-C surfactant, while a high dose of Eltenacalone did not influence oxygenation as compared to untreated controls. Addition of Eltenac lead to improved oxygenation using the low dose of rSP-C surfactant. The rSP-C surfactant prevented further hyaline membrane formation. Furthemore, addition of Eltenac to the low dose of rSP-C surfactant lead to improved hyaline membrane formation at a dose of 100 micromol/kg b.w. Results of combined i.tr. therapy confirmed the results of the additional therapy. Again, rSP-C surfactant improved oxygenation and further hyaline membrane formation, while even the high dose of i.tr. administered Eltenacalone only prevented further hyaline membrane formation. Using the low dose of rSP-C surfactant, combined treatment with Eltenac showed additional effects on oxygenation and inhibition of hyaline membrane formation. The maximum therapeutic effect of combined treatment was achieved at 0.3 mg Eltenac per kg b.w. which is equivalent to approximately 1 micromol. The inflammatory cell infiltration into the lung was not influenced by any of the therapeutic approaches. Confocal microscopy gave evidence that fibrinogen is involved in hyaline membrane formation in this animal model. Furthermore, as was shown by the explorative investigations with confocal microscopy, addition of the cyclooxygenase-inhibitor decreases the diffuse interstitial leakage of fibrinogen into the lung while surfactant monotherapy did not exhibit any influence on the fibrinogen influx into the alveoli. CONCLUSIONS: Confocal microscopy may be an effective method to investigate the connection between fibrinogen leakage and hyaline membrane formation. Effects of additional or combined treatment were superior when compared to each treatment alone leading to the conclusion that a rSP-C surfactant containing a cyclooxygenase-inhibitor, acts synergistically in this animal model of acute lung injury. Lower doses of Eltenac could be used to reach similar effects on oxygenation and prevention of hyaline membrane after combined i.tr. treatment than after additional i.v. treatment together with surfactant. This leads to the conclusion that a fixed combination of rSP-C surfactant and a cyclooxygenase-inhibitor may be an effective treatment. Further testing may be warranted to prove whether this is a promising treatment for patients with acute lung injury.

Allergen specific immunotherapy has no influence on standard chemistry and hematology laboratory parameters in clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: A set of standard clinical chemistry and hematology parameters are usually measured during clinical studies. The major outcome of these standard tests is to control that the drug investigated does not lead to pathophysiological changes in respective organs or blood. In some cases based on scientific rationale such tests may not be needed. In this paper we report on a standard set of clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory parameters measured before and after treatment in three different immunotherapy studies, representing different routes of administration and different formulations. METHODS: Thirteen hematological laboratory parameters and eight clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-centre, phase III studies. The three studies include one with sublingual immunotherapy (n = 185), one subcutaneous immunotherapy trial with an aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed recombinant hypoallergenic Bet v1-FV (n = 211) and one with pre-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy with a 6-grass pollen allergoid (n = 154). RESULTS: Allergen specific immunotherapy with both administration forms and formulations respectively did not show any influence on any of the 21 laboratory parameters analyzed. Few patients had a change in laboratory parameters from within normal range at baseline to either below or above at end-of-treatment. No differences between active and placebo were seen with respect to number of patients with such a change. CONCLUSIONS: This study with different preparations and routes of application indicates that the value of repeated measurements of standard clinical chemistry and hematology parameters during allergen immunotherapy should be discussed further.

Prospective validation of the "rhino conjunctivitis allergy-control-SCORE©" (RC-ACS©).

BACKGROUND: Recently we reported the validation of the "Allergy-Control-SCORE© (ACS)" which assesses symptom severity as well as medication use on three dimensions lung, nose and eyes. The aim of this study was to test the validity of the score for eyes and nose. METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-one consenting subjects (age 19-65y), including 81 patients with allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (RC) and 40 healthy controls, participated in the study. Patients rated daily nasal and eye symptoms using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, and severe) and their use of anti-symptomatic medication. Validation criteria were pollen counts in the course of the study period. Discrimination capacity was analyzed by comparing the rhino-conjunctivitis Allergy-Control-SCORE© (RC-ACS©) values of allergic patients and healthy controls. Convergent reliability was assessed by correlating RC-ACS© values with the global severity of allergy, the quality of life, and the allergy-related medical consultations. Retest reliability was assessed by the correlation of the repeated measured RC-ACS© scores during each of two consecutive weeks. RESULTS: Convergent reliability analysis indicated a significant correlation between RC-Allergy-Control-SCORE© and global severity of allergy (r = 0.691; p < 0.0001), quality of life (r = 0.757; p < 0.0001) and allergy-related medical consultations (r = 0.329; p = 0.0019). RC-Allergy-Control-SCORE© showed a good retest reliability (r = 0.813; p < 0.001) and discriminated extremely well between allergic patients and healthy controls (Median: 3.7 range: 0; 14.1 vs. Median: 0 range: 0; 2.9; p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 92.5% at a score value of 0.786. CONCLUSIONS: The RC-ACS© can be considered as valid and reliable to assess the severity of rhino-conjunctivitis severity in clinical trials and observational studies.

In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of the new glucocorticoid ciclesonide.

The glucocorticoid ciclesonide is the 2'R-epimer of 2'-cyclohexyl-11beta-hydroxy-21-isobutyryloxy-16bH-dioxolo[5',4':16,17]pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione. The active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC) is derived from ciclesonide by esterase cleavage of isobutyrate at the C21 position. The relative binding affinities at the rat glucocorticoid receptor were dexamethasone, 100; ciclesonide, 12; des-CIC, 1212; and budesonide, 905. Des-CIC potently inhibited the activation of murine and human lymphocytes in a series of different in vitro systems. With the exception of concanavalin A-stimulated rat spleen cells, des-CIC was more potent than the parent compound. Des-CIC compared well with budesonide in all in vitro systems. Furthermore, the respective 2'S-epimers were always significantly less potent than the 2'R-epimers. In vivo, ciclesonide (intratracheal administration), des-CIC, and budesonide inhibited antigen-induced accumulation of eosinophils, protein, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha into the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of ovalbumin-sensitized and -challenged Brown Norway rats with an ED(50) value ranging from 0.4 to 1.3 mg/kg, indicating similar potency, which suggests in vivo activation of the parent compound. Ciclesonide and budesonide inhibited the bradykinin-induced protein leakage into the rat trachea. In the rat cotton pellet model, ciclesonide inhibited granuloma formation (ED(50):= of 2 microg/pellet), whereas budesonide and des-CIC were 15- and 20-fold less active; thymus involution was induced with an ED(50) of 303, 279, and 154 microg/pellet, respectively. When applied orally to rats for 28 days, ciclesonide showed low potency in reducing weight of thymus and adrenals, suggesting low oral bioavailability. The in vivo data on ciclesonide highlight its effective local action and a reduced potential for side effects.

Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome with recombinant surfactant protein C surfactant.

We performed a phase I/II trial in North America of a recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant (Venticute) as treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either standard therapy or standard therapy plus one of two doses of exogenous surfactant given four times over 24 hours. Surfactant administration was well tolerated. No significant treatment benefit was associated with surfactant treatment. Bronchoalveolar lavage of treated patients at 48 hours reflected the presence of exogenous surfactant components, did not show evidence of improved surface tension lowering function, and had interleukin-6 concentrations that were significantly lower than control group values, consistent with an antiinflammatory treatment effect. The presence of exogenous surfactant was not detected in lavage fluid obtained at 120 hours. Future studies might rationally employ larger surfactant doses and a more prolonged dosing schedule.