RESUMEN
Importance: Intraoperative handovers of anesthesia care are common. Handovers might improve care by reducing physician fatigue, but there is also an inherent risk of losing critical information. Large observational analyses report associations between handover of anesthesia care and adverse events, including higher mortality. Objective: To determine the effect of handovers of anesthesia care on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a parallel-group, randomized clinical trial conducted in 12 German centers with patients enrolled between June 2019 and June 2021 (final follow-up, July 31, 2021). Eligible participants had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4 and were scheduled for major inpatient surgery expected to last at least 2 hours. Interventions: A total of 1817 participants were randomized to receive either a complete handover to receive anesthesia care by another clinician (n = 908) or no handover of anesthesia care (n = 909). None of the participating institutions used a standardized handover protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a 30-day composite of all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, or serious postoperative complications. There were 19 secondary outcomes, including the components of the primary composite, along with intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Results: Among 1817 randomized patients, 1772 (98%; mean age, 66 [SD, 12] years; 997 men [56%]; and 1717 [97%] with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3) completed the trial. The median total duration of anesthesia was 267 minutes (IQR, 206-351 minutes), and the median time from start of anesthesia to first handover was 144 minutes in the handover group (IQR, 105-213 minutes). The composite primary outcome occurred in 268 of 891 patients (30%) in the handover group and in 284 of 881 (33%) in the no handover group (absolute risk difference [RD], -2.5%; 95% CI, -6.8% to 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.10; P = .27). Nineteen of 889 patients (2.1%) in the handover group and 30 of 873 (3.4%) in the no handover group experienced all-cause 30-day mortality (absolute RD, -1.3%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 0.2%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.10; P = .11); 115 of 888 (13%) vs 136 of 872 (16%) were readmitted to the hospital (absolute RD, -2.7%; 95% CI, -5.9% to 0.6%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05; P = .12); and 195 of 890 (22%) vs 189 of 874 (22%) experienced serious postoperative complications (absolute RD, 0.3%; 95% CI, -3.6% to 4.1%; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.28; P = .91). None of the 19 prespecified secondary end points differed significantly. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults undergoing extended surgical procedures, there was no significant difference between the patients randomized to receive handover of anesthesia care from one clinician to another, compared with the no handover group, in the composite primary outcome of mortality, readmission, or serious postoperative complications within 30 days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04016454.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Pase de Guardia , Anciano , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pase de Guardia/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidadRESUMEN
Although atypical meningioma recurs frequently in spite of total resection and/or radiotherapy, no consensus on optimal adjuvant management was found. However, several retrospective studies analysed the additional effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in atypical meningioma with inconsistent results. Therefrom, the purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the recurrence/progression and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of atypical meningioma, particularly focused on the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Between February 2001 and March 2015, 161 atypical meningioma resections were performed in our Department of Neurosurgery, of which, 128 cases underwent surgical treatment alone and 33 cases underwent surgery and radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to provide median point estimates and PFS rates. The Cox-regression model was used in the univariate and multivariate analysis to identify significant factors associated with treatment. The extent of resection (Simpson grade I and II) significantly influenced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.8, CI (95%) 1.3-2.6, p-value = 0.0004). There was no significant benefit for progression-free survival after adjuvant radiotherapy (hazard ratio = 1.48, CI (95%) 0.76-2.86, p-value = 0.22). Additionally, meningioma located at the anterior and posterior fossa showed a significantly longer PFS compared to other locations (p-value = 0.03). Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy had no significant impact on recurrence/progression rate or PFS. The extent of resection according to Simpson grade remains the most important prognostic factor associated with lower recurrence/progression rates and longer PFS in patients with atypical meningioma. The location of the tumours at the anterior or posterior fossa was an independent factor associated with improved PFS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/diagnóstico , Meningioma/radioterapia , Meningioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies demonstrated that the implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline-based bundle, consisting of different supportive measures in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), might reduce rate and severity of AKI after surgery. However, the effects of the care bundle in broader population of patients undergoing surgery require confirmation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BigpAK-2 trial is an international, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. The trial aims to enrol 1302 patients undergoing major surgery who are subsequently admitted to the intensive care or high dependency unit and are at high-risk for postoperative AKI as identified by urinary biomarkers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2*insulin like growth factor binding protein 7 (TIMP-2)*IGFBP7)). Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care (control) or a KDIGO-based AKI care bundle (intervention). The primary endpoint is the incidence of moderate or severe AKI (stage 2 or 3) within 72 hours after surgery, according to the KDIGO 2012 criteria. Secondary endpoints include adherence to the KDIGO care bundle, occurrence and severity of any stage of AKI, change in biomarker values during 12 hours after initial measurement of (TIMP-2)*(IGFBP7), number of free days of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), duration of RRT, renal recovery, 30-day and 60-day mortality, intensive care unit length-of-stay and hospital length-of-stay and major adverse kidney events. An add-on study will investigate blood and urine samples from recruited patients for immunological functions and kidney damage. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The BigpAK-2 trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Münster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. A study amendment was approved subsequently. In the UK, the trial was adopted as an NIHR portfolio study. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04647396.