A multicentre study of the precision and accuracy of the TruSlice and TruSlice Digital histological dissection devices.

BACKGROUND: Five key factors enabling a good surgical grossing technique include a flat uniformly perpendicular specimen cutting face, appropriate immobilisation of the tissue specimen during grossing, good visualisation of the cutting tissue face, sharp cutting knives and the grossing knife action. TruSlice and TruSlice Digital are new innovative tools based on a guillotine configuration. The TruSlice has plastic inserts whilst the TruSlice Digital has an electronic micrometre attached: both features enable these dissection factors to be controlled. The devices were assessed in five hospitals in the UK. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 267 fixed tissue samples from 23 tissue types were analysed, principally the breast (n = 32) skin (30), rectum (28), colon (27) and cervix (17). Precision and accuracy were evaluated by measuring the defined thickness, and the consistency of achieving the defined thickness of tissue samples taken respectively. Both parameters were expressed as a total percentage of compliance for the cohort of samples accessed. RESULTS: Overall, the mean (standard deviation) score for precision was 81 (11) % whilst the accuracy score was 82 (11) % (both p < 0.05, chi-squared test), although this varied with type of tissue. Accuracy and precision were strongly correlated (rp = 0.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TruSlice Digital devices offer an assured precision and accuracy performance which is reproducible across an assortment of tissue types. The use of a micrometre to set tissue slice thickness is innovative and should comply with laboratory accreditation requirements, alleviating concerns of how to tackle issues such as the 'measurement of uncertainty' at the grossing bench.

Development of new and accurate measurement devices (TruSlice and TruSlice Digital) for use in histological dissection: an attempt to improve specimen dissection precision.

Histological dissection of human tissue has relied on conventional procedures, which have largely remained unchanged for decades. Practices to determine measurement parameters employed in these procedures have largely relied on the use of rulers and weighing scales. It is well documented in the scientific literature that both fixation and processing of tissue can significantly affect the viability of the of tissue sections both for tinctorial and immunocytochemical investigations. Both of these factors can be compounded in their negative effects by inappropriate sampling of tissue at histological cut up. There are five key factors to ensure good surgical grossing technique, flat uniformly perpendicular specimen cutting face, appropriate immobilisation of the tissue specimen during grossing, good visualisation of the cutting tissue face, sharp cutting knives and the grossing knife action. Meeting these factors implies the devices are fit for purpose. Here we describe an innovative approach to designing cut up devices to improve accuracy and precision, which take these five key requirements into consideration. The devices showed accuracy and precision, enabling tissue slices to be produced in a uniformly perpendicular fashion to within 2 mm in thickness and to enable consistency and reproducibility of performance across a series of tissue types. The application of a digital rule on one of these devices ensures accuracy and also enables quality control issues to be clearly assessed. As cellular pathology laboratories conform to ever increasing standards of compliance and performance in practice, the advent of assured precision and accuracy at cut up is awaited. Recommendations from accreditation bodies such as the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) continue to push for improvements in this area of histological investigation. These newly designed devices may give the answers to these requirements and provide the impetus for a new generation of innovative equipment for histological dissection.

Evaluation of a New Mordant Based Haematoxylin Dye (Haematoxylin X) for Use in Clinical Pathology.

Recently, St John's Dermatopathology Laboratory and CellPath Ltd have developed a new patented haematoxylin dye (Haematoxylin X) that utilises a chromium-based mordant (Chromium Sulphate). In this study, the performance of this new haematoxylin (Haematoxylin X) was compared against some commonly utilised alum-based haematoxylins (Carazzi's, Harris' and Mayer's) when used as a part of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue, special stains, immunohistochemical counterstaining and frozen section (Mohs procedure) staining procedures. FFPE sections of different tissue types and frozen skin tissues were sectioned and stained with each haematoxylin subtype to allow for a direct comparison of staining quality. The slides were independently evaluated microscopically by two assessors. A combined score was generated to determine the sensitivity (defined as the intensity of haematoxylin staining being too weak or too strong and the colour of the haematoxylin staining not being blue/black) and specificity (defined as the presence of haematoxylin background staining, uneven staining, and staining deposits) for each of the four haematoxylin subtypes. The scoring criteria were based on the UKNEQAS Cellular pathology techniques assessment criteria. In FFPE tissue, the results for specificity identified Harris haematoxylin scoring the highest (91.2%) followed by Haematoxylin X (88.0%) and Mayer's (87.0%). The sensitivity scores again identified Harris haematoxylin as scoring the highest (95.1%) followed by Haematoxylin X (90.0%) and Mayer's (88.0%). In frozen tissue, the results for specificity identified Haematoxylin X as scoring the highest (85.5%) followed by Carazzi's (80.7%) and Harris' (77.4%). The sensitivity scores again identified Haematoxylin X as scoring the highest (86.8%) followed by Carazzi's (82.0%) and Harris' (81.0%). The results achieved with all four haematoxylins showed a high degree of comparability, with Harris' haematoxylin scoring high scores overall compared to the other four when assessing FFPE sections. This may have been due to familiarity with the use of Harris' haematoxylin in-house. There was also evidence of more pronounced staining of extracellular mucin proteins with Haematoxylin X compared to the other alum haematoxylins that were assessed. Haematoxylin X scored highest when used in frozen section staining. In addition, Haematoxylin X has a potential applications for use in IHC and special stains procedures as a counterstain.