Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment.

The risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is four to seven times higher in patients with cancer than in those without. At JADPRO Live 2022, presenters discussed risk factors and assessing patients for VTE, as well as how to protect patients against VTE in both the inpatient and outpatient clinic settings. They reviewed selecting an appropriate anticoagulation treatment, including the choice of agent and duration of treatment for the patient with cancer, and finally the steps needed to assess and treat patients experiencing therapeutic anticoagulation failure.

Evaluation and associated risk factors for neutropenia with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The time-limited combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab (VenG) was established by the German CLL Study Group in the CLL14 trial for the upfront management of newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), showing a superior progression free survival benefit. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in the range of 52.8%-57.7%. However, patients who develop neutropenia with this combination have yet to be formally characterized in the literature as it has impact on the clinical practice setting. AIM: To determine the incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and identify risk factors for neutropenia among CLL patients treated with the VenG regimen. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of all adult patients with a diagnosis of CLL treated with VenG at the University of Colorado Hospital. Demographic information, laboratory data, clinical data, and medication prescriptions were collected from the patients' electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (73%) developed neutropenia during the course of therapy. The mean time to neutropenia from the start of treatment was 42 days (range 1-131). Our cohort harbored more high risk disease features and more comorbidities (CIRS score of 12). Four patients (28.6%) in the neutropenic group developed infectious complications during therapy and 6 (31%) patients were unable to be dose escalated to the final FDA approved dose of 400 mg. CONCLUSION: Our study cohort had higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in 73% of patients. This could be attributed to a higher rate of comorbidities, high risk features, concomitant interacting medications, and prior chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to determine if growth factor support is efficacious to achieve dose escalation with this therapy.

Real-world experience of venetoclax with azacitidine for untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Venetoclax is approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Venetoclax was available prior to approval off-label. We assessed our single-institution off-label experience with venetoclax/azacitidine, comparing outcomes with a clinical trial cohort that administered this regimen at the same institution. Thirty-three untreated AML patients unfit or unwilling to receive induction chemotherapy and prescribed venetoclax/azacitidine off-trial were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 33 patients who received the same therapy on trial. Outcomes were compared, and comparisons were made to a theoretical scenario in which off-trial patients received induction. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction evaluated measurable residual disease (MRD). Off-trial venetoclax was attainable in nearly all patients for whom this was desired. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery rate was 63.3% for off-trial patients who received treatment and 84.9% for trial patients (P = .081). The median overall survival for off-trial patients who received treatment was 381 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 174, not reached) vs 880 days (95% CI, 384, not reached) for trial patients (P = .041). Prior exposure to hypomethylating agents was associated with worse outcomes. Response rates with venetoclax/azacitidine were not inferior to a theoretical scenario in which patients received induction, and early death rates were less than expected with induction. MRD negativity was achievable. Newly diagnosed AML patients treated in a "real-world" scenario with off-trial venetoclax/azacitidine had inferior outcomes compared with patients treated in the setting of a clinical trial. Additionally, this therapy may be as effective, and less toxic, when compared with induction chemotherapy.