RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Significant efforts have been made in building large-scale kinetic models of cellular metabolism in the past two decades. However, most kinetic models published to date, remain focused around central carbon pathways or are built around ad hoc reduced models without clear justification on their derivation and usage. Systematic algorithms exist for reducing genome-scale metabolic reconstructions to build thermodynamically feasible and consistently reduced stoichiometric models. However, it is important to study how network complexity affects conclusions derived from large-scale kinetic models built around consistently reduced models before we can apply them to study biological systems. RESULTS: We reduced the iJO1366 Escherichia Coli genome-scale metabolic reconstruction systematically to build three stoichiometric models of different size. Since the reduced models are expansions around the core subsystems for which the reduction was performed, the models are nested. We present a method for scaling up the flux profile and the concentration vector reference steady-states from the smallest model to the larger ones, whilst preserving maximum equivalency. Populations of kinetic models, preserving similarity in kinetic parameters, were built around the reference steady-states and their metabolic sensitivity coefficients (MSCs) were computed. The MSCs were sensitive to the model complexity. We proposed a metric for measuring the sensitivity of MSCs to these structural changes. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed for the first time a workflow for scaling up the size of kinetic models while preserving equivalency between the kinetic models. Using this workflow, we demonstrate that model complexity in terms of networks size has significant impact on sensitivity characteristics of kinetic models. Therefore, it is essential to account for the effects of network complexity when constructing kinetic models. The presented metric for measuring MSC sensitivity to structural changes can guide modelers and experimentalists in improving model quality and guide synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Our proposed workflow enables the testing of the suitability of a kinetic model for answering certain study-specific questions. We argue that the model-based metabolic design targets that are common across models of different size are of higher confidence, while those that are different could be the objective of investigations for model improvement.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli , Ingeniería Metabólica , Modelos Biológicos , Algoritmos , Escherichia coli/genética , Cinética , Redes y Vías MetabólicasRESUMEN
The advancements in genome editing techniques over the past years have rekindled interest in rational metabolic engineering strategies. While Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA) is a well-established method for quantifying the effects of metabolic engineering interventions on flows in metabolic networks and metabolite concentrations, it does not consider the physiological limitations of the cellular environment and metabolic engineering design constraints. We report here a constraint-based framework, Network Response Analysis (NRA), for rational genetic strain design. NRA is cast as a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming problem that integrates MCA, Thermodynamically-based Flux Analysis (TFA), biologically relevant constraints, as well as genome editing restrictions into a comprehensive platform for identifying metabolic engineering targets. We show that the NRA formulation and its core constraints are equivalent to the ones of Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and TFA, which allows it to be used for a wide range of optimization criteria and with various physiological constraints. We also show how the parametrization and introduction of biological constraints enhance the NRA formulation compared to the classical MCA approach, and we demonstrate its features and its ability to generate multiple alternative optimal strategies given several user-defined boundaries and objectives. In summary, NRA is a sophisticated alternative to classical MCA for rational metabolic engineering that accommodates the incorporation of physiological data at metabolic flux, metabolite concentration, and enzyme expression levels.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli , Modelos Biológicos , Escherichia coli/genética , Ingeniería Metabólica , Análisis de Flujos Metabólicos , Redes y Vías Metabólicas/genéticaRESUMEN
Kinetic models of metabolism can be constructed to predict cellular regulation and devise metabolic engineering strategies, and various promising computational workflows have been developed in recent years for this. Due to the uncertainty in the kinetic parameter values required to build kinetic models, these workflows rely on ensemble modeling (EM) principles for sampling and building populations of models describing observed physiologies. Sensitivity coefficients from metabolic control analysis (MCA) of kinetic models can provide important insight about cellular control around a given physiological steady state. However, despite considering populations of kinetic models and their model outputs, current approaches do not provide adequate tools for statistical inference. To derive conclusions from model outputs, such as MCA sensitivity coefficients, it is necessary to rank/compare populations of variables with each other. Currently existing workflows consider confidence intervals (CIs) that are derived independently for each comparable variable. Hence, it is important to derive simultaneous CIs for the variables that we wish to rank/compare. Herein, we used an existing large-scale kinetic model of Escherichia Coli metabolism to present how univariate CIs can lead to incorrect conclusions, and we present a new workflow that applies three different multivariate statistical approaches. We use the Bonferroni and the exact normal methods to build symmetric CIs using the normality assumptions. We then suggest how bootstrapping can compute asymmetric CIs whilst relaxing this normality assumption. We conclude that the Bonferroni and the exact normal methods can provide simple and efficient ways for constructing reliable CIs, with the exact normal method favored over the Bonferroni when the compared variables present dependencies. Bootstrapping, despite its significantly higher computational cost, is recommended when comparing non-normal distributions of variables. Additionally, we show how the Bonferroni method can readily be used to estimate required sample numbers to attain a certain CI size.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Algoritmos , Células/metabolismo , Biología Computacional , Simulación por Computador , Intervalos de Confianza , Cinética , Metabolismo , Biología de Sistemas , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
Large-scale kinetic models are used for designing, predicting, and understanding the metabolic responses of living cells. Kinetic models are particularly attractive for the biosynthesis of target molecules in cells as they are typically better than other types of models at capturing the complex cellular biochemistry. Using simpler stoichiometric models as scaffolds, kinetic models are built around a steady-state flux profile and a metabolite concentration vector that are typically determined via optimization. However, as the underlying optimization problem is underdetermined, even after incorporating available experimental omics data, one cannot uniquely determine the operational configuration in terms of metabolic fluxes and metabolite concentrations. As a result, some reactions can operate in either the forward or reverse direction while still agreeing with the observed physiology. Here, we analyze how the underlying uncertainty in intracellular fluxes and concentrations affects predictions of constructed kinetic models and their design in metabolic engineering and systems biology studies. To this end, we integrated the omics data of optimally grown Escherichia coli into a stoichiometric model and constructed populations of non-linear large-scale kinetic models of alternative steady-state solutions consistent with the physiology of the E. coli aerobic metabolism. We performed metabolic control analysis (MCA) on these models, highlighting that MCA-based metabolic engineering decisions are strongly affected by the selected steady state and appear to be more sensitive to concentration values rather than flux values. To incorporate this into future studies, we propose a workflow for moving towards more reliable and robust predictions that are consistent with all alternative steady-state solutions. This workflow can be applied to all kinetic models to improve the consistency and accuracy of their predictions. Additionally, we show that, irrespective of the alternative steady-state solution, increased activity of phosphofructokinase and decreased ATP maintenance requirements would improve cellular growth of optimally grown E. coli.
Asunto(s)
Cinética , Ingeniería Metabólica/métodos , Metabolismo/fisiología , Modelos Teóricos , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Análisis de Flujos Metabólicos , Metabolismo/genética , Modelos Biológicos , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Whole-cell (WC) modeling is a promising tool for biological research, bioengineering, and medicine. However, substantial work remains to create accurate comprehensive models of complex cells. METHODS: We organized the 2015 Whole-Cell Modeling Summer School to teach WC modeling and evaluate the need for new WC modeling standards and software by recoding a recently published WC model in the Systems Biology Markup Language. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed several challenges to representing WC models using the current standards. CONCLUSION: We, therefore, propose several new WC modeling standards, software, and databases. SIGNIFICANCE: We anticipate that these new standards and software will enable more comprehensive models.