Development of a Dyad-Focused Intervention for Stroke Survivors and Their Family Caregivers: A Feasibility Study.

IMPORTANCE: Transitioning from the hospital to the community poses significant challenges for stroke survivors and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of a dyad-focused strategy training intervention. DESIGN: Single-arm trial with data collection at baseline, postintervention, and 3-mo follow-up. SETTING: Rehabilitation settings in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen stroke survivor-caregiver dyads. INTERVENTIONS: Dyad-focused strategy training was provided to stroke survivor-caregiver dyads twice a week over 6 wk. The training included shared decision-making, goal setting, performance evaluation, strategy development and implementation, and therapeutic guided discovery. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Feasibility indicators were Goal Attainment Scaling, Dyadic Relationship Scale, Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions, Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making Test, Stroop Color and Word Test, Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, and Zarit Burden Interview. RESULTS: In total, 15 dyads completed all intervention sessions with full attendance. Both stroke survivors and their caregivers demonstrated high engagement and comprehension and reported moderate to high satisfaction with the intervention. From baseline to postintervention, the effects on goal attainment, frequency and perceived difficulty of community participation, executive function, mobility function, and caregiver preparedness were significant and positive. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study supports the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of dyad-focused strategy training for stroke survivor-caregiver dyads transitioning from the hospital to the community in Taiwan. Our preliminary evidence indicates that dyads who receive strategy training exhibit advancement toward their goals and experience considerable enhancements in their individual outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: This study addresses the scarcity of interventions catering to both stroke survivors and their caregivers. By demonstrating the feasibility of our dyad-focused intervention, the research offers preliminary evidence that supports the potential advantages of involving both stroke survivors and their caregivers in the intervention process.

A combined circulating microRNA panel predicts the risk of vascular calcification in community-dwelling older adults with age strata differences.

BACKGROUND: Older adults have a higher risk of developing vascular calcification (VC). Circulating miRNAs can be potential risk indicators. However, prior studies used single miRNA mostly, whereas miRNA panels were rarely evaluated. We aimed to examine whether a miRNA panel outperformed each miRNA alone, and analyzed whether advanced age affected VC risk predictive performance offered by the miRNA panel. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled older adults (age ≥65 years) during their annual health checkup in 2017, and examined their VC severity followed by analyzing sera for VC regulatory miRNAs (miR-125b-5p, miR-125b-3p, and miR-378a-3p). We used multiple regression analyses to determine associations between each miRNA or a 3-combind panel and VC risk, followed by area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUROC) analysis. Participants were further divided to those of 65-75 and ≥75 years for comparison. RESULTS: From 199 older adults screened, 169 (median age, 73.3 years) with available calcification assessment were analyzed, among whom 74.6 % having VC. Those with VC had significantly lower circulating miR-125b-5p, miR-125b-3p, and miR-378a-3p levels than those without. Regression analyses showed that the 3-combined miRNA panel exhibited significant associations with VC risk, with significantly higher AUROC than those of models based on individual miRNA. Importantly, in those ≥75 years, the miRNA-predicted risk of VC was more prominent than that in the 65-75 years group. CONCLUSION: A miRNA panel for VC risk prediction might outperform individual miRNA alone in older adults, and advanced age modified the association between circulating miRNAs and the risk of VC.

Frailty recommendations and guidelines: an evaluation of the implementability and a critical appraisal of clinical applicability by the ISPRM Frailty Focus Group.

INTRODUCTION: Aging is associated with an increased burden of multi-morbidity and disease related functional loss and disability, widely impacting patients and health care systems. Frailty is a major actor in age-related disability and is an important target for rehabilitation interventions, considering that is a reversible condition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A working group of members of the ISPRM, responding to WHO 2030 call for action to strengthen rehabilitation, was established to assess the quality and implementability of the existing guidelines for the rehabilitation of frailty. Guidelines were retrieved using a systematic search on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science and from the reference lists of screened articles. The included guidelines were evaluated using the AGREE II to assess their quality and using the AGREE-REX to assess their clinical credibility and implementability. Guidelines with a score >4 in the AGREE II item evaluating the overall quality of the guideline were considered for endorsement. Finally, nine external reviewers evaluated the applicability of each recommendation from the endorsed guidelines, providing comments about the barriers and facilitators for their implementation in their country. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten guidelines were retrieved and evaluated by the working group, of which four guidelines, i.e. the WHO Guidelines on Integrated Care for Older People, the FOCUS guidelines, the Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty and the ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management of Frailty, were considered for endorsement. All these guidelines were rated as of adequate quality and implementability. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO Guidelines on Integrated Care for Older people (24) the ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and management of Frailty (15), the FOCUS guidelines (25) and the Asia Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines (14) for the Management of Frailty have the best quality and applicability of the existing guidelines on the management of frailty, we suggest that should be employed to define the standards of care for patients with frailty. There are barriers for their implementation, as stated by our experts, to take into account, and some of them are country- or region-specific. Screening for frailty, exercise, nutrition, pharmacological management, social and psychological support, management of incontinence, and an overall comprehensive clinical management are the best tools to face upon frailty.