Clinical and Prognostic Significance of CD117 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systemic Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of cluster of differentiation 117 (CD117) expression with the clinicopathological characteristics and the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No meta-analysis concerning the correlation of CD117 expression with clinical and prognostic values of the patients with NSCLC is reported. A systematic literature search was conducted to achieve eligible studies. The combined odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs: multivariate Cox analysis) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in this analysis. Final 17 eligible studies with 4,893 NSCLC patients using immunohistochemical detection were included in this meta-analysis. CD117 expression was not correlated with gender (male vs. female), clinical stage (stages 3-4 vs. stages 1-2), tumor grade (grade 3 vs. grades 1-2), T-stage (T-stages 3-4 vs. T-stages 0-2), distal metastasis, and disease-free survival (DFS) of NSCLC (all p values >0.05). CD117 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56-0.97, p = 0.03), histological type (adenocarcinoma (AC) versus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.26-2.39, p = 0.001), and a worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.22-2.92, p = 0.004). The expression of CD117 was significantly higher in AC than in SCC. CD117 may be an independent prognostic indicator for worse OS in NSCLC.

The association between human papillomavirus and lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the causal relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) and lung cancer, we conducted a study using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR). METHOD: Data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were analyzed with HPV E7 Type 16 and HPV E7 Type 18 as exposure factors. The outcome variables included lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer. Causality was estimated using inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and multiple validity analysis were also performed.. RESULTS: The results showed that HPV E7 Type 16 infection was associated with a higher risk of squamous cell lung cancer (OR = 7.69; 95% CI:1.98-29.85; p = 0.0149). HPV E7 Type 18 infection significantly increased the risk of lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.38-1.31; p = 0.0079) and lung cancer (OR = 7.69; 95% CI:1.98-29.85; p = 0.0292). No significant causal relationship was found between HPV E7 Type 16 and lung adenocarcinoma, lung cancer, or small cell lung carcinoma, and between HPV E7 Type 18 and squamous cell lung cancer or small cell lung carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed a causal relationship between HPV and lung cancers. Our findings provide valuable insights for further mechanistic and clinical studies on HPV-mediated cancer.

Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of capecitabine or S-1 plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX or SOX) for treating thymidine phosphorylase (TP)- or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-positive advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with stage IIIC to IV gastric cancer were assessed for TP and DPD expression by immunohistochemistry. The association between CAPOX or SOX efficacy and TP/DPD expression was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the objective remission rate (ORR, 52.27% vs. 47.62%; P>0.05), disease control rate (72.73% vs. 73.81%, P>0.05), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.739-1.741; P=0.586), and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.481-1.511; P=0.588) between CAPOX and SOX. A higher number of stage IV patients showed TP positivity, while DPD-positive patients predominantly showed intestinal type of gastric cancer. In TP-positive patients, the ORRs associated with CAPOX and SOX treatments were 57.14% and 38.10%, respectively; OS was better with CAPOX than with SOX (HR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.179-0.978; P=0.046). Among DPD-positive patients, the SOX treatment-associated ORR (60.87%) was significantly higher than the CAPOX treatment-associated ORR (43.48%). Furthermore, SOX treatment resulted in better OS than did CAPOX treatment (HR, 2.020; 95% CI, 1.019-4.837; P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in clinical efficacy was found between CAPOX and SOX. TP-positive patients might respond better to CAPOX while DPD-positive patients may respond better to SOX. Our findings might serve as a guide for personalized chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Claudin1 promotes the proliferation, invasion and migration of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by upregulating the expression and nuclear entry of ß-catenin.

The aim of the present study was to measure the expression of Claudin (CLDN) 1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to determine its biological function and mechanism of action. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were performed to measure the expression of CLDN1 mRNA and protein, respectively, in the immortalized human nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line NP69 and NPC-TW01 cells. Subsequently, small interfering RNA against CLDN1 and the LV-GFP-PURO-CLDN1 lentivirus were transfected into NPC-TW01 cells. Western blotting was used to determine the effects of CLDN1 down- and upregulation on the expression of the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers E-cadherin and vimentin. In addition, the effect of CLDN1 on the expression of ß-Catenin was determined. The results demonstrated that levels of CLDN1 mRNA and protein in NPC cells were significantly higher than in NP69 cells. Furthermore, the downregulation of CLDN1 inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of NPC-TW01 cells. The results of western blotting demonstrated that the downregulation of CLDN1 resulted in the upregulation of E-cadherin and inhibition of vimentin in NPC-TW01 cells. By contrast, the overexpression of CLDN1 resulted in the downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin in NPC-TW01 cells. The downregulation of ß-catenin attenuated the cancer-promoting effect of CLDN1 on NPC-TW01 cells, whereas the upregulation of ß-catenin reversed the tumor-suppressing effect of CLDN1 downregulation on NPC-TW01 cells. The results of the present study therefore demonstrate that CLDN1 expression is elevated in NPC cells. As an oncogene, CLDN1 promotes the proliferation, invasion and migration of NPC cells by upregulating the expression and nuclear entry of ß-catenin.

Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with Endostar and S-1 combined with oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of Endostar (recombinant human endostatin) and S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled trial, 165 late-stage gastric cancer patients were assigned to the experimental arm with Endostar in combination with SOX (80 patients) and the control arm with SOX alone (85 patients). The end points of this study included progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-control rate. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between the experimental arm and the control arm (53.8% vs 42.4%, P=0.188). The difference in disease-control rate was also statistically insignificant between the two arms (85.0% vs 72.9%, P=0.188). Progression-free survival in the experimental arm was significantly higher than that in the control arm (15.0 months vs 12.0 months, P=0.0001). Common adverse events included immunosuppression, gastrointestinal distress, and neuropathy. There was no statistical difference in the incidences of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of Endostar and SOX provides therapeutic benefits to advanced gastric cancer patients, with tolerable adverse effects.