Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion was Associated With Reductions in the Proportion of Hospitalizations That are Potentially Preventable Among Hispanic and White Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Using data on 5 years of postexpansion experience, we examined whether the coverage gains from Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion among Black, Hispanic, and White individuals led to improvements in objective indicators of outpatient care adequacy and quality. RESEARCH DESIGN: For the population of adults aged 45-64 with no insurance or Medicaid coverage, we obtained data on census population and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) during 2010-2018 in 14 expansion and 7 nonexpansion states. Our primary outcome was the percentage share of hospitalizations due to ACSC out of all hospitalizations ("ACSC share") among uninsured and Medicaid-covered patients. Secondary outcomes were the population rate of ACSC and all hospitalizations. We used multivariate regression models with an event-study difference-in-differences specification to estimate the change in the outcome measures associated with expansion in each of the 5 postexpansion years among Hispanic, Black, and White adults. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: At baseline, ACSC share in the expansion states was 19.0%, 14.5%, and 14.3% among Black, Hispanic, and White adults. Over the 5 years after expansion, Medicaid expansion was associated with an annual reduction in ACSC share of 5.3% (95% CI, -7.4% to -3.1%) among Hispanic and 8.0% (95% CI, -11.3% to -4.5%) among White adults. Among Black adults, estimates were mixed and indicated either no change or a reduction in ACSC share. CONCLUSIONS: After Medicaid expansion, low-income Hispanic and White adults experienced a decrease in the proportion of potentially preventable hospitalizations out of all hospitalizations.

North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation: the Early Enrollee Experience.

INTRODUCTION: On July 1, 2021, North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation mandatorily switched 1.6 million Medicaid beneficiaries from fee-for-service to managed care plans. We examined the early enrollee experience in terms of engagement in plan selection, provider continuity, use of primary care visits, and assistance with social needs. METHODS: Using electronic health records (EHR) covering pre- and post-transition periods (1/1/2019-5/31/2022) from the largest provider network in western North Carolina, we identified all children and adults under age 65 with continuous Medicaid or private coverage. We conducted primary surveys of a random sample of Medicaid-covered enrollees and obtained self-reported rates of engagement in plan selection, continuity of provider access, and receipt of social need assistance. We used comparative interrupted time series models to estimate the relative change in primary care visits associated with the transition. RESULTS: Our EHR-based study cohorts included 4859 Medicaid and 5137 privately insured enrollees, with 398 Medicaid enrollees in the primary surveys. We found that 77.3% of survey participants reported that the managed care plan they were on was not chosen but automatically assigned to them, 13.1% reported insufficient information about the transition, and 19.2% reported lacking assistance with plan choice. We found that 5.9% were assigned to a different primary care provider. Over 29% reported not receiving any additional social need assistance. The transition was associated with a 7.1% reduction (95% CI, -11.5 to -2.7%) in the volume of primary care visits among Medicaid enrollees relative to privately insured enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid enrollees in North Carolina may have had limited awareness and engagement in the transition process and experienced a reduction in primary care visits. As the state's transition process gains a foothold, future policy needs to improve enrollee engagement and develop evidence on healthcare utilization and patient outcomes.

Geographic Variation in Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Variation in surgical management exists nationally. We hypothesize that geographic variation exists in adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a national commercial insurance claims database (MarketScan) sample (2017-2019) was performed in adults with hospital admission due to aSBO. Geographic variation in rates of surgical intervention for aSBO was evaluated by state and compared to a risk-adjusted national baseline using a Bayesian spatial rates Poisson regression model. For individual-level analysis, patients were identified in 2018, with 365-d look back and follow-up periods. Logistic regression was performed for individual-level predictors of operative intervention for aSBO. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were included. State-level analysis revealed rates of operative intervention for aSBO were significantly higher in Missouri and lower in Florida. On individual-level analysis, age (P < 0.01) and male sex (P < 0.03) but not comorbidity profile or prior aSBO, were negatively associated with undergoing operative management for aSBO. Patients presenting in 2018 with a history of admission for aSBO the year prior experienced a five-fold increase in odds of representation (odds ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 3.1-9.6) in 2019. Patients who received an operation for aSBO in 2018 reduced the odds of readmission in the next year by 77% (odds ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.5). The volume of operations performed within a state did not influence readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of aSBO varies across the continental USA. Operative intervention is associated with decreased rates of representation in the following year. These data highlight a critical need for standardized guidelines for emergency general surgery patients.

Perceptions of North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, North Carolina switched 1.6 million beneficiaries from a fee-for-service Medicaid model to a managed care system. The state prepared beneficiaries with logistical planning and a communications plan. However, the rollout occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating significant challenges. Little is known about how Medicaid Transformation impacted the experience of Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups (N = 22) with Medicaid beneficiaries from January to March 2022 to gain insight into their experience with Medicaid Transformation. A convenience sample was recruited. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and verified. A codebook was developed using inductive and deductive codes. Two study team members independently coded the transcripts; discrepancies were resolved among the research team. Themes were derived by their prevalence and salience within the data. RESULTS: We identified four major themes: 1) Participants expressed confusion about the signup process; 2) Participants had a limited understanding of their new plans; 3) Participants expressed difficulty accessing services through their plans; and 4) Participants primarily noted negative changes to their care. These findings suggest that Medicaid enrollees felt unsupported during the enrollment process and had difficulty accessing assistance to gain a better understanding of their plans and new services. LIMITATIONS: Participants were recruited from a single institution in the Southeastern United States; results may not be transferable to other institutions. Participants were likely not representative of all Medicaid Transformation beneficiaries; only English-speaking participants were included. CONCLUSION: As the transition process continues, the North Carolina Medicaid program can benefit from integrating recommendations identified by member input to guide strategies for addressing whole-person care.

Ambulance diversion and ED destination by race/ethnicity: evaluation of Massachusetts' ambulance diversion ban.

BACKGROUND: The impact of ambulance diversion on potentially diverted patients, particularly racial/ethnic minority patients, is largely unknown. Treating Massachusetts' 2009 ambulance diversion ban as a natural experiment, we examined if the ban was associated with increased concordance in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) patients of different race/ethnicity being transported to the same emergency department (ED). METHODS: We obtained Medicare Fee for Service claims records (2007-2012) for enrollees aged 66 and older. We stratified the country into patient zip codes and identified zip codes with sizable (non-Hispanic) White, (non-Hispanic) Black and Hispanic enrollees. For a stratified random sample of enrollees from all diverse zip codes in Massachusetts and 18 selected comparison states, we identified EMS transports to an ED. In each zip code, we identified the most frequent ED destination of White EMS-transported patients ("reference ED"). Our main outcome was a dichotomous indicator of patient EMS transport to the reference ED, and secondary outcome was transport to an ED serving lower-income patients ("safety-net ED"). Using a difference-in-differences regression specification, we contrasted the pre- to post-ban changes in each outcome in Massachusetts with the corresponding change in the comparison states. RESULTS: Our study cohort of 744,791 enrollees from 3331 zip codes experienced 361,006 EMS transports. At baseline, the proportion transported to the reference ED was higher among White patients in Massachusetts and comparison states (67.2 and 60.9%) than among Black (43.6 and 46.2%) and Hispanic (62.5 and 52.7%) patients. Massachusetts ambulance diversion ban was associated with a decreased proportion transported to the reference ED among White (- 2.7 percentage point; 95% CI, - 4.5 to - 1.0) and Black (- 4.1 percentage point; 95% CI, - 6.2 to - 1.9) patients and no change among Hispanic patients. The ban was associated with an increase in likelihood of transport to a safety-net ED among Hispanic patients (3.0 percentage points, 95% CI, 0.3 to 5.7) and a decreased likelihood among White patients (1.2 percentage points, 95% CI, - 2.3 to - 0.2). CONCLUSION: Massachusetts ambulance diversion ban was associated with a reduction in the proportion of White and Black EMS patients being transported to the most frequent ED destination for White patients, highlighting the role of non-proximity factors in EMS transport destination.

Readmissions performance and penalty experience of safety-net hospitals under Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in March 2010, introduced payment-reduction penalties on acute care hospitals with higher-than-expected readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia. There is concern that hospitals serving large numbers of low-income and uninsured patients (safety-net hospitals) are at greater risk of higher readmissions and penalties, often due to factors that are likely outside the hospital's control. Using publicly reported data, we compared the readmissions performance and penalty experience among safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. METHODS: We used nationwide hospital level data for 2009-2016 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program, CMS Final Impact Rule, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. We identified as safety-net hospitals the top quartile of hospitals in terms of the proportion of patients receiving income-based public benefits. Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach based on the comparison of pre- vs. post-HRRP changes in (risk-adjusted) 30-day readmission rate in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals, we estimated the change in readmissions rate associated with HRRP. We also compared the penalty frequency among safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. RESULTS: Our study cohort included 1915 hospitals, of which 479 were safety-net hospitals. At baseline (2009), safety-net hospitals had a slightly higher readmission rate compared to non-safety net hospitals for all three conditions: AMI, 20.3% vs. 19.8% (p value< 0.001); heart failure, 25.2% vs. 24.2% (p-value< 0.001); pneumonia, 18.7% vs. 18.1% (p-value< 0.001). Beginning in 2012, readmission rates declined similarly in both hospital groups for all three cohorts. Based on difference-in-differences analysis, HRRP was associated with similar change in the readmissions rate in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals for AMI and heart failure. For the pneumonia cohort, we found a larger reduction (0.23%; p < 0.001) in safety-net hospitals. The frequency of readmissions penalty was higher among safety-net hospitals. The proportion of hospitals penalized during all four post-HRRP years was 72% among safety-net and 59% among non-safety-net hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results lend support to the concerns of disproportionately higher risk of performance-based penalty on safety-net hospitals.

Limited English Proficient Patient Visits and Emergency Department Admission Rates for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in California: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the risk of admission for emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) by limited English proficient (LEP) patients. OBJECTIVE: Estimate admission rates from ED for ACSCs comparing LEP and English proficient (EP) patients and examine how these rates vary at hospitals with a high versus low proportion of LEP patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of California's 2017 inpatient and ED administrative data PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling individuals ≥ 18 years without a primary diagnosis of pregnancy or childbirth. LEP patients had a principal language other than English. MAIN MEASURES: We used a series of linear probability models with incremental sets of covariates, including patient demographics, primary diagnosis, and Elixhauser comorbidities, to examine admission rate for visits of LEP versus EP patients. We then added an interaction covariate for high versus low LEP-serving hospital. We estimated models with and without hospital-level random effects. KEY RESULTS: These analyses included 9,641,689 ED visits; 14.7% were for LEP patients. . Observed rate of admission for all ACSC ED visits was higher for LEP than for EP patients (26.2% vs. 25.2; p value < .001). Adjusted rate of admission was not statistically significant (27.3% [95% CI 25.4-29.3%] vs. 26.2% [95% CI 24.3-28.1%]). For COPD, the difference was significant (36.8% [95% CI 35.0-38.6%] vs. 33.3% [95% CI 31.7-34.9%]). Difference in adjusted admission rate for LEP versus EP visits did not differ in high versus low LEP-serving hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In adjusted analyses, LEP was not a risk factor for admission for most ACSCs. This finding was observed in both high and low LEP-serving hospitals.

Racial/ethnic disparities in emergency department wait times in the United States, 2013-2017.

BACKGROUND: Previous research shows that Black and Hispanic patients have longer ED wait times than White patients, but these data do not reflect recent changes such as the Affordable Care Act. In addition, previous research does not account for the non-normal distribution of wait times, wherein a sizable subgroup of patients seen promptly and those not seen promptly experience long wait times. METHODS: We utilized National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) datasets (2013-2017) to examine mean ED wait time comparing visits by Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients to White patients. Using a two-part regression model, we adjusted for patient, hospital, and health system factors, and estimated differences, for each of five triage levels, in (a) likelihood of waiting at least 5 min and (b) difference in wait time among those not seen promptly. RESULTS: Our cohort included 38,800 White, 14,838 Black, 10,619 Hispanic, and 1257 Asian patient visits. Black (triage level 3) and Hispanic (triage levels 3 and 4) patients had longer mean wait times than White patients. Adjusted likelihood of not being seen promptly was lower among Blacks (triage levels 3, 4 and 5), Hispanics (triage level 5) and Asians (triage level 5) compared to Whites. Among those waiting at least 5 min, adjusted wait time was longer among Blacks in triage level 3 (5.2 min, 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.0) and level 4 (2.5 min, 95% CI, 0.2 to 4.9), Hispanics in triage level 4 (4.7 min, 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.7) and Asians in triage level 5 (16.3 min, 95% CI, 0.6 to 31.9) compared to Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Minority patients were less likely to wait to be seen, but waited longer if not seen promptly. These data exhibit that ED wait time disparities persist for African American and Hispanic patients and extend this observation to Asian patients.

Association between Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and readmission rates across hospitals by medicare bed share.

BACKGROUND: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), implemented beginning in 2013, seeks to incentivize Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) hospitals to reduce 30-day readmissions for selected inpatient cohorts including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Performance-based penalties, which take the form of a percentage reduction in Medicare reimbursement for all inpatient care services, have a risk of unintended financial burden on hospitals that care for a larger proportion of Medicare patients. To examine the role of this unintended risk on 30-day readmissions, we estimated the association between the extent of their Medicare share of total hospital bed days and changes in 30-day readmissions. METHODS: We used publicly available nationwide hospital level data for 2009-2016 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program, CMS Final Impact Rule, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach, we compared pre- vs. post-HRRP changes in 30-day readmission rate in hospitals with high and moderate Medicare share of total hospital bed days ("Medicare bed share") vs. low Medicare bed share hospitals. RESULTS: We grouped the 1904 study hospitals into tertiles (low, moderate and high) by Medicare bed share; the average bed share in the three tertile groups was 31.2, 47.8 and 59.9%, respectively. Compared to low Medicare bed share hospitals, high bed share hospitals were more likely to be non-profit, have smaller bed size and less likely to be a teaching hospital. High bed share hospitals were more likely to be in rural and non-large-urban areas, have fewer lower income patients and have a less complex patient case-mix profile. At baseline, the average readmissions rate in the low Medicare bed share (control) hospitals was 20.0% (AMI), 24.7% (HF) and 18.4% (pneumonia). The observed pre- to post-program change in the control hospitals was - 1.35% (AMI), - 1.02% (HF) and - 0.35% (pneumonia). Difference in differences model estimates indicated no differential change in readmissions among moderate and high Medicare bed share hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: HRRP penalties were not associated with any change in readmissions rate. The CMS should consider alternative options - including working collaboratively with hospitals - to reduce readmissions.

Temporal trends in pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after hip and knee replacement in older adults.

Trends in prescription for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR) since the approval of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the 2012 guideline endorsement of aspirin are unknown, as are the risks of adverse events. We examined practice patterns in the prescription of prophylaxis agents and the risk of adverse events during the in-hospital period (the 'in-hospital sample') and 90 days following discharge (the 'discharge sample') among adults aged ⩾ 65 undergoing THR and TKR in community hospitals in the Institute for Health Metrics database over a 30-month period during 2011 to 2013. Eligible medications included fondaparinux, DOACs, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), other heparin products, warfarin, and aspirin. Outcomes were validated by physician review of source documents: VTE, major hemorrhage, cardiovascular events, and death. The in-hospital and the discharge samples included 10,503 and 5722 adults from 65 hospitals nationwide, respectively (mean age 73, 74 years; 61%, 63% women). Pharmacologic prophylaxis was near universal during the in-hospital period (93%) and at discharge (99%). DOAC use increased substantially and was the prophylaxis of choice for nearly a quarter (in-hospital) and a third (discharge) of the patients. Aspirin was the sole discharge prophylactic agent for 17% and 19% of patients undergoing THR and TKR, respectively. Warfarin remained the prophylaxis agent of choice for patients aged 80 years and older. The overall risk of adverse events was low, at less than 1% for both the in-hospital and discharge outcomes. The low number of adverse events precluded statistical comparison of prophylaxis regimens.

Disparities in complementary alternative medicine use and asthma exacerbation in the United States.

Background: Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are associated with poor asthma medication adherence, a major risk factor for asthma exacerbation. However, previous studies showed inconsistent relationships between CAM use and asthma control due to small sample sizes, demographic differences across populations studied, and poor differentiation of CAM types.Methods: We examined associations between CAM use and asthma exacerbation using a cross-sectional analysis of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. We included adults ≥18 years with current asthma (n = 2,736) to analyze racial/ethnic differences in CAM use as well as the association between CAM use and both asthma exacerbation and emergency department (ED) visit for asthma exacerbation across racial/ethnic groups. We ran descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regressions.Result: Blacks (OR = 0.63 [0.49-0.81]) and Hispanics (OR = 0.66 [0.48-0.92]) had decreased odds of using CAM compared to Whites. Overall, there was no association between CAM use and asthma exacerbation (OR = 0.99 [0.79-1.25]) but the subgroup of 'other complementary approaches' was associated with increased odds of asthma exacerbation among all survey respondents (1.90 [1.21-2.97]), Whites (OR = 1.90 [1.21-2.97]), and Hispanics (OR = 1.43 [0.98-2.09). CAM use was associated with decreased odds of an ED visit for asthma exacerbation (OR = 0.65 [0.45-0.93]). These associations were different among racial/ethnic groups with decreased odds of ED visit among Whites (OR = 0.50 [0.32-0.78]) but no association among Blacks and Hispanics.Conclusion: We found that both CAM use and the association between CAM use and asthma exacerbation varied by racial/ethnic group. The different relationship may arise from how CAM is used to complement or to substitute for conventional asthma management.

Is insurance instability associated with hypertension outcomes and does this vary by race/ethnicity?

BACKGROUND: Stable health insurance is often associated with better chronic disease care and outcomes. Racial/ethnic health disparities in outcomes are prevalent and may be associated with insurance instability, particularly in the context of health insurance reform. METHODS: We examined whether insurance instability was associated with uncontrolled blood pressure (UBP) and whether this association varied by race/ethnicity. We used a retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with hypertension who obtained care within two health systems in Massachusetts. We measured the UBP, insurance instability, and race of 43,785 adult primary care patients, age 21-64 with visits from 1/2005-12/2013. RESULTS: We found higher rates of UBP for blacks and Hispanics at each time point over the entire 9 years. Insurance instability was associated with greater rates of UBP. Always uninsured black patients fared worst, while white and Hispanic patients with consistent public insurance fared best. CONCLUSIONS: Stable insurance of any type was associated with better hypertension control than no or unstable insurance.

Racial Differences in Insurance Stability After Health Insurance Reform.

BACKGROUND: One of the potential benefits of insurance reform is greater stability of insurance and reduced coverage disparities by race and ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: We examined the temporal trends in insurance coverage by racial/ethnic group before and after Massachusetts Insurance Reform by abstracting records across 2 urban safety net hospital systems. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined adjusted odds of being uninsured and incident rate ratios of gaining and losing insurance over time by race and ethnicity. We used billing records to capture the payer for each episode of care. SUBJECTS: We included data from January 2005 through December 2013 on patients with hypertension between the ages of 21 and 64 years. We compared 4 racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic. MEASURES: We examined individual patients' insurance coverage status in 6-month intervals. We compared odds of being uninsured in the transition and postinsurance reform period to the prereform period, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities practice location and education, and income by Census tract. RESULTS: Among 48,291 patients with hypertension, reduction in rates of uninsurance with insurance reform was greater for Hispanic (29.7%), non-Hispanic Black (24.8%), and non-Hispanic Asian (26.8%) than non-Hispanic white (14.9%) patients. The odds of becoming uninsured were reduced in all racial and ethnic groups (odds ratio, 0.27-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Massachusetts Insurance Reform resulted in stable insurance coverage and a reduction in disparities in insurance instability by race and ethnicity.

Disparities in Emergency Department Visits Among Collocated Racial/Ethnic Medicare Enrollees.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We estimate emergency department (ED) use differences across Medicare enrollees of different race/ethnicity who are residing in the same zip codes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we stratified all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years and older (2006 to 2012) by residence zip code and identified zip codes with racial/ethnic diversity, defined as containing at least 1 enrollee from each of 3 racial/ethnic groups: Hispanics, (non-Hispanic) blacks, and (non-Hispanic) whites. Our primary study population consisted of a stratified random sample of approximately equal number of each racial/ethnic group from each zip code with racial/ethnic diversity (N=1,563,631). We identified ED visits, comorbidities, primary-care-treatable status, and patient disposition. We characterized socioeconomic status by zip code poverty rate. The main outcome measure was the ratio of ED visit rate (number of visits/100 person-years) between each minority group and whites. RESULTS: Of 38,423 zip codes nationally, 41% met the racial/ethnic diversity criterion; these zip codes contained 85% of the Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Among enrollees from zip codes with racial/ethnic diversity, the ED visit rate among whites was 45.4 (95% confidence interval 45.1 to 45.6), and the ED visit rate ratio was 1.34 (95% confidence interval 1.33 to 1.36) among blacks and 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.24) among Hispanics. ED visit rate ratios for both minority groups were greater than 1.00 among all subgroups by age, comorbidity, zip code poverty rate, urban/rural area, and primary-care-treatable and disposition status. CONCLUSION: Among Medicare enrollees, blacks and Hispanics had higher ED use rates than whites overall and among subgroups by demographics and socioeconomic status.

Association between degree of exposure to the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program and 30-day mortality: experience from the first four years of Medicare's pay-for-performance program.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) in the United States, announced in 2010 and implemented since 2013 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), introduced payment penalties and bonuses based on hospital performance on patient 30-day mortality and other indicators. Evidence on the impact of this program is limited and reliant on the choice of program-exempt hospitals as controls. As program-exempt hospitals may have systematic differences with program-participating hospitals, in this study we used an alternative approach wherein program-participating hospitals are stratified by their financial exposure to penalty, and examined changes in hospital performance on 30-day mortality between hospitals with high vs. low financial exposure to penalty. METHODS: Our study examined all hospitals reimbursed through the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) - which include most community and tertiary acute care hospitals - from 2009 to 2016. A hospital's financial exposure to HVBP penalties was measured by the share of its annual aggregate inpatient days provided to Medicare patients ("Medicare bed share"). The main outcome measures were annual hospital-level 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) and pneumonia patients. Using difference-in-differences models we estimated the change in the outcomes in high vs. low Medicare bed share hospitals following HVBP. RESULTS: In the study cohort of 1902 US hospitals, average Medicare bed share was 61 and 41% in high (n = 540) and low (n = 1362) Medicare bed share hospitals, respectively. High Medicare bed share hospitals were more likely to have smaller bed size and less likely to be teaching hospitals, but ownership type was similar among both Medicare bed share groups.. Among low Medicare bed share (control) hospitals, baseline (pre-HVBP) 30-day mortality was 16.0% (AMI), 10.9% (HF) and 11.4% (pneumonia). In both high and low Medicare bed share hospitals 30-day mortality experienced a secular decrease for AMI, increase for HF and pneumonia; differences in the pre-post change between the two hospital groups were small (< 0.12%) and not significant across all three conditions. CONCLUSIONS: HVBP was not associated with a meaningful change in 30-day mortality across hospitals with differential exposure to the program penalty.

Is 30-Day Posthospitalization Mortality Lower Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities?: A Reexamination.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have reported that risk-adjusted rates of 30-day mortality after hospitalization for an acute condition are lower among blacks compared with whites. OBJECTIVE: To examine if previously reported lower mortality for minorities, relative to whites, is accounted for by adjustment for do-not-resuscitate status, potentially unconfirmed admission diagnosis, and differential risk of hospitalization. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using inpatient discharge and vital status data for patients aged 18 and older in California, we examined all admissions from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, acute stroke, gastrointestinal bleed, and hip fracture and estimated relative risk of mortality for Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic Asians, and non-Hispanic whites. Multiple mortality measures were examined: inpatient, 30-, 90-, and 180 day. Adding census data we estimated population risks of hospitalization and hospitalization with inpatient death. RESULTS: Across all mortality outcomes, blacks had lower mortality rate, relative to whites even after exclusion of patients with do-not-resuscitate status and potentially unconfirmed diagnosis. Compared with whites, the population risk of hospitalization was 80% higher and risk of hospitalization with inpatient mortality was 30% higher among blacks. Among Hispanics and Asians, disparities varied with mortality measure. CONCLUSIONS: Lower risk of posthospitalization mortality among blacks, relative to whites, may be associated with higher rate of hospitalizations and differences in unobserved patient acuity. Disparities for Hispanics and Asians, relative to whites, vary with the mortality measure used.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diagnosis of Chronic Medical Conditions in the USA.

BACKGROUND: There exist racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of chronic medical illnesses. However, it is unclear if the disparities arise from patients' self-reported estimates on these diseases and whether there is an association between healthcare utilization and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To estimate national racial/ethnic prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, and kidney disease and identify characteristics associated with undiagnosed diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of multi-year survey data. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years and older who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during 2011-2014 (n = 10,403). MAIN OUTCOMES: Undiagnosed hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 on physical examination with no history of hypertension), undiagnosed diabetes (hgba1c ≥ 6.5% with no history of diabetes), undiagnosed high cholesterol (LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL with no history of high cholesterol), and undiagnosed kidney disease (eGFR ≤ 30 with no history of kidney disease). RESULTS: The study sample was categorized into Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Other. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, Asians had increased odds of undiagnosed hypertension (OR = 1.41 [1.06-1.86]) and diabetes (OR = 6.16 [3.76-10.08]) compared to Whites. Blacks (OR = 2.53 [1.71-3.73]) and Hispanics (OR = 1.88 [1.19-2.99]) had increased odds of undiagnosed diabetes compared to Whites. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that not having any health insurance was associated with increased odds of undiagnosed diabetes and hyperlipidemia (OR = 1.56 [1.00-2.44] and OR = 2.08 [1.44-3.00], respectively). A recent healthcare visit was associated with a lower likelihood of having undiagnosed hypertension (OR = 0.58 [0.41-0.83]) and diabetes (OR = 0.35 [0.18-0.69]). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative cohort, Asians had higher rates of undiagnosed hypertension and diabetes, and all minorities were more likely to have undiagnosed diabetes compared to Whites. Healthcare utilization was associated with undiagnosed medical conditions. Our study showed that reliance on self-reported data may systemically underestimate the prevalence of chronic illnesses among minorities and further research is needed to understand the significance of healthcare utilization in health outcomes.

Racial/ethnic disparities among Asian Americans in inpatient acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common high-risk disease with inpatient mortality of 5% nationally. But little is known about this outcome among Asian Americans (Asians), a fast growing racial/ethnic minority in the country. The objectives of the study are to obtain near-national estimates of differences in AMI inpatient mortality between minorities (including Asians) and non-Hispanic Whites and identify comorbidities and sociodemographic characteristics associated with these differences. METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis of 2010-2011 state inpatient discharge data from 10 states with the largest share of Asian population. We identified hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of AMI using the ICD-9 code and used self-reported race/ethnicity to identify White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian. We performed descriptive analysis of sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, type of AMI, and receipt of cardiac procedures. Next, we examined overall inpatient AMI mortality rate based on patients' race/ethnicity. We also examined the types of AMI and a receipt of invasive cardiac procedures by race/ethnicity. Lastly, we used sequential multivariate logistic regression models to study inpatient mortality for each minority group compared to Whites, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Over 70% of the national Asian population resides in the 10 states. There were 496,472 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of AMI; 75% of all cases were Whites, 10% were Blacks, 12% were Hispanics, and 3% were Asians. Asians had a higher prevalence of cardiac comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, and kidney failure compared to Whites (p-value< 0.01). There were 158,623 STEMI (ST-elevation AMI), and the proportion of hospitalizations for STEMI was the highest for Asians (35.2% for Asians, 32.7% for Whites, 25.3% for Blacks, and 32.1% for Hispanics). Asians had the highest rates of inpatient AMI mortality: 7.2% for Asians, 6.3% for Whites, 5.4% for Blacks, and 5.9% for Hispanics (ANOVA p-value < 0.01). In adjusted analyses, Asians (OR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.04-1.19]) and Hispanics (OR = 1.14 [1.09-1.19]) had a higher likelihood of inpatient mortality compared to Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Asians had a higher risk-adjusted likelihood of inpatient AMI mortality compared to Whites. Further research is needed to identify the underlying reasons for this finding to improve AMI disparities for Asians.

Disparities in Hypertension Associated with Limited English Proficiency.

BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with poor health status and worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine disparities in hypertension between National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) respondents with LEP versus adequate English proficiency. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of multi-year survey data. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years of age and older who participated in the NHANES survey during the period 2003-2012. MAIN MEASURES: We defined participants with LEP as anyone who completed the NHANES survey in a language other than English or with the support of an interpreter. Using logistic regression, we estimated the odds ratio for undiagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg) among LEP participants relative to those with adequate English proficiency. We adjusted for sociodemographic, acculturation-related, and hypertension-related variables. KEY RESULTS: Fourteen percent (n = 3,269) of the participants had limited English proficiency: 12.4% (n = 2906) used a Spanish questionnaire and 1.6% (n = 363) used an interpreter to complete the survey in another language. Those with LEP had higher odds of elevated blood pressure on physical examination (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.47 [1.07-2.03]). This finding persisted among participants using an interpreter (AOR = 1.88 [1.15-3.06]) but not among those using the Spanish questionnaire (AOR = 1.32 [0.98-1.80]). In a subgroup analysis, we found that the majority of uncontrolled hypertension was concentrated among individuals with a known diagnosis of hypertension (AOR = 1.80 [1.16-2.81]) rather than those with undiagnosed hypertension (AOR = 1.14 [0.74-1.75]). Interpreter use was associated with increased odds of uncontrolled hypertension, especially among patients who were not being medically managed for hypertension (AOR = 6.56 [1.30-33.12]). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample, participants with LEP were more likely to have poorly controlled hypertension than those with adequate English proficiency. LEP is an important driver of disparities in hypertension management and outcomes.

Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evidence on variability in emergency medical services use is limited. We obtain national evidence on geographic variation in the use of ambulance transport to the emergency department (ED) among Medicare enrollees and assess the role of health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability. METHODS: We used 2010 Medicare claims data for a random sample of 999,999 enrollees aged 66 years and older, and identified ambulance transport and ED use. The main outcome measures were number of ambulance transports to the ED per 100 person-years (ambulance transport rate) and proportion (percentage) of ED visits by ambulance transport by hospital referral regions. RESULTS: The national ambulance transport rate was 22.2 and the overall proportion of ED visits by ambulance was 36.7%. Relative to hospital referral regions in the lowest rate quartile, those in the highest quartile had a 75% higher ambulance transport rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 1.81) and a 15.5% higher proportion of ED visits by ambulance (IRR 1.155; 95% CI 1.146 to 1.164). Adjusting for health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability reduced quartile 1 versus quartile 4 difference in ambulance transport rate by 43% (IRR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.48) and proportion of ED visits by ambulance by 7% (IRR 1.145; 95% CI 1.135 to 1.155). Among the 3 covariate domains, health status was associated with the largest variability in ambulance transport rate (30.1%), followed by socioeconomic status (12.8%) and provider availability (2.9%). CONCLUSION: Geographic variability in ambulance use is large and associated with variation in patient health status and socioeconomic status.