Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 81(3): 163-166, 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Certain workers are at increased risk for acquiring Legionnaires' disease compared with other workers. This study aims to identify occupations at increased risk for acquiring Legionnaires' disease. METHODS: Using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Supplemental Legionnaires' Disease Surveillance System, this study identified Legionnaires' disease confirmed patients ≥16 years of age in 39 states with reported symptom onset during 2014-2016. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) stratified by occupation group were calculated by comparing Legionnaires' disease patients in an occupation group (eg, transportation) to those in all other occupation groups (eg, non-transportation). RESULTS: A total of 2553 patients had a known occupation group. The two occupations with the highest burden were transportation (N=287; IRR=2.11) and construction (N=269; IRR=1.82). Truck drivers comprised the majority (69.7%) of the transportation occupation group and construction labourers comprised almost half (49%) of the construction occupation group. The healthcare support occupation had the highest IRR (N=75; IRR=2.16). CONCLUSION: Transportation and construction workers, who are generally not covered by guidance related to building water systems, have increased risk of Legionnaires' disease compared with other workers. One hypothesised risk factor for truck drivers is the use of non-genuine windshield cleaner in their vehicles. A simple intervention is to use genuine windshield cleaner with bactericidal properties (ie, includes isopropanol/methanol) which can reduce the risk of Legionella growth and transmission. To improve surveillance of Legionnaires' disease and identification of similar exposures, the authors encourage the collection of occupation and industry information for all patients with Legionnaires' disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de los Legionarios , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/etiología , Ocupaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Transportes , Industrias , Brotes de Enfermedades
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(7): 587-600, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37153939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While the occupational risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection for healthcare personnel in the United States has been relatively well characterized, less information is available on the occupational risk for workers employed in other settings. Even fewer studies have attempted to compare risks across occupations and industries. Using differential proportionate distribution as an approximation, we evaluated excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupation and industry among non-healthcare workers in six states. METHODS: We analyzed data on occupation and industry of employment from a six-state callback survey of adult non-healthcare workers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and population-based reference data on employment patterns, adjusted for the effect of telework, from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. We estimated the differential proportionate distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupation and industry using the proportionate morbidity ratio (PMR). RESULTS: Among a sample of 1111 workers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, significantly higher-than-expected proportions of workers were employed in service occupations (PMR 1.3, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5) and in the transportation and utilities (PMR 1.4, 99% CI 1.1-1.8) and leisure and hospitality industries (PMR 1.5, 99% CI 1.2-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of significant differences in the proportionate distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupation and industry among respondents in a multistate, population-based survey, highlighting the excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection borne by some worker populations, particularly those whose jobs require frequent or prolonged close contact with other people.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Ocupaciones , Industrias , Personal de Salud
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 2): S216-S224, 2022 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surveillance systems lack detailed occupational exposure information from workers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health partnered with 6 states to collect information from adults diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection who worked in person (outside the home) in non-healthcare settings during the 2 weeks prior to illness onset. METHODS: The survey captured demographic, medical, and occupational characteristics and work- and non-work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reported close contact with a person known or suspected to have SARS-CoV-2 infection was categorized by setting as exposure at work, exposure outside of work only, or no known exposure/did not know. Frequencies and percentages of exposure types are compared by respondent characteristics and risk factors. RESULTS: Of 1111 respondents, 19.4% reported exposure at work, 23.4% reported exposure outside of work only, and 57.2% reported no known exposure/did not know. Workers in protective service occupations (48.8%) and public administration industries (35.6%) reported exposure at work most often. More than one third (33.7%) of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 coworkers per day and 28.8% of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 customers/clients per day reported exposures at work. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to occupational SARS-CoV-2 was common among respondents. Examining differences in exposures among different worker groups can help identify populations with the greatest need for prevention interventions. The benefits of recording employment characteristics as standard demographic information will remain relevant as new and reemerging public health issues occur.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Exposición Profesional , Salud Laboral , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 2022 Jun 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35738891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To use industry-specific denominators to more accurately examine trends in prevalence rates for occupational cases of elevated blood lead levels (eBLLs) in Pennsylvania. METHODS: We used adult (aged ≥16 years) blood lead level data from Pennsylvania (2007-2018) and industry-specific denominator data from the US Census Bureau's County Business Patterns to calculate prevalence rates for eBLLs, defined as ≥25 µg/dL. RESULTS: Of the 19 904 cases with eBLLs, 92% were due to occupational lead exposure, with 83% from workers in the battery manufacturing industry. In 2018, the prevalence rate of eBLLs for battery manufacturing (8036.4 cases per 100 000 employed battery manufacturing workers) was 543 times the overall Pennsylvania prevalence rate. The prevalence rate for battery manufacturing steeply declined 71% from 2007 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The battery manufacturing industry had the highest burden of occupational lead exposure in Pennsylvania, illustrating the importance of using industry-specific denominators to accurately identify sources of lead exposure. Although the prevalence rate of eBLLs declined over time, lead exposure remains a major concern among battery manufacturing workers.

5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(4): 109-113, 2020 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999683

RESUMEN

On April 25, 2019, a farm tractor towing two 2-ton ammonia tanks on a county road in Lake County, Illinois, experienced a mechanical failure that resulted in the release of anhydrous ammonia, a colorless, pungent, irritating gas that can cause severe respiratory and ocular damage (1). Approximately 80% of anhydrous ammonia produced in the United States is used as a fertilizer in agriculture (1). Eighty-three persons, including first responders, motorists, and neighborhood residents, were evaluated at area hospitals because of exposure to the gas. Two weeks after the release, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and CDC's National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) collaborated with the Lake County Health Department and the Illinois Department of Public Health on an investigation using ATSDR's Assessment of Chemical Exposures program to describe the release, review the emergency response, and determine health effects associated with the exposure. First responders, community residents, and hospital personnel reported communication challenges related to the nature of the gas release and effective protective measures. Among the 83 persons evaluated at six area hospitals for effects of the chemical release, 14 (17%) were hospitalized, including eight (10%) who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), seven (8%) of whom required endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation; no deaths occurred. In addition, ICU health care providers experienced symptoms of secondary exposure. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Emergency Responder Health Monitoring and Surveillance Program has specific recommendations and tools to protect responders during all phases of a response (2). Hospitals also need to review institutional policies and procedures for chemical mass casualty events, including decontamination (3). Prompt and correct identification of hazardous material (hazmat) events, and clear communication among responding entities, including on-scene and hospital responders, is important to ensure effective response after a chemical release.


Asunto(s)
Amoníaco/toxicidad , Liberación de Peligros Químicos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Heridas y Lesiones/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Lactante , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto Joven
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(28): 904-908, 2020 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32673296

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first detected in the United States in January 2020 (1), and by mid-July, approximately 3.4 million cases had been reported in the United States (2). Information about symptoms among U.S. COVID-19 patients is limited, especially among nonhospitalized patients. To better understand symptom profiles of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in the United States, CDC used an optional questionnaire to collect detailed information on a convenience sample of COVID-19 patients from participating states. Symptom data were analyzed by age group, sex, hospitalization status, and symptom onset date relative to expansion of testing guidelines on March 8, 2020 (3). Among 164 symptomatic patients with known onset during January 14-April 4, 2020, a total of 158 (96%) reported fever, cough, or shortness of breath. Among 57 hospitalized adult patients (aged ≥18 years), 39 (68%) reported all three of these symptoms, compared with 25 (31%) of the 81 nonhospitalized adult patients. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and other symptoms, such as chills, myalgia, headache, and fatigue, also were commonly reported, especially after expansion of testing guidelines. To aid prompt recognition of COVID-19, clinicians and public health professionals should be aware that COVID-19 can cause a wide variety of symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Síntomas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Tos/virología , Disnea/virología , Femenino , Fiebre/virología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 62(7): 568-579, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of worker's compensation (WC) as payer underestimates work-related (WR) injuries. We evaluated three methods to identify WR injuries: WC as payer, ICD-9-CM work-status codes E000.0/E000.1, and other ICD-9-CM external cause codes. METHODS: We identified injury-related emergency department visits from North Carolina's syndromic surveillance system (2010-2013). Characteristics were compared by indicator. We manually reviewed 800 admission notes to confirm if the visit was WR or non-WR; WR keywords from the review were applied to all visits. RESULTS: 133 156 injury-related visits (age, 16 years or older) were identified: WC = 69%, work-status codes = 18%, other ICD-9-CM codes = 13%. Among manually reviewed visits: few visits identified by WC (0.3%) or work-status codes (2%) were non-WR, while 12% of other ICD-9-CM code identified visits were non-WR; 53%, 46%, and 31% of visits identified by WC, work-status codes, and other ICD-9-CM codes were WR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support use of WC and work-status codes to capture WR injuries; other ICD-9-CM codes should be used with caution or in combination with other indicators.


Asunto(s)
Codificación Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/diagnóstico , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/economía , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Guardia , Adulto Joven
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(33): 925-930, 2018 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30138306

RESUMEN

The opioid epidemic affects multiple segments of the U.S. population (1). Occupational patterns might be critical to understanding the epidemic. Opioids are often prescribed for specific types of work-related injuries, which vary by occupation* (2). CDC used mortality data from the National Occupational Mortality Surveillance (NOMS) system to examine unintentional or undetermined drug overdose mortality within 26 occupation groups. This study included data from the 21 U.S. states participating in NOMS during 2007-2012.† Drug overdose mortality was compared with total mortality using proportional mortality ratios (PMRs) indirectly standardized for age, sex, race, year, and state. Mortality patterns specific to opioid-related overdose deaths were also assessed. Construction occupations had the highest PMRs for drug overdose deaths and for both heroin-related and prescription opioid-related overdose deaths. The occupation groups with the highest PMRs from methadone, natural and semisynthetic opioids, and synthetic opioids other than methadone were construction, extraction (e.g., mining, oil and gas extraction), and health care practitioners. The workplace is an integral part of life for the majority of the adult U.S. population; incorporating workplace research and interventions likely will benefit the opioid epidemic response.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto , Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Occup Environ Med ; 72(2): 90-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200855

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the persistence of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus and multidrug-resistant S. aureus over 14 days of follow-up among industrial hog operation workers in North Carolina. METHODS: Workers anticipating at least 24 h away from work were enrolled June-August 2012. Participants self-collected a nasal swab and completed a study journal on the evening of day 1, and each morning and evening on days 2-7 and 14 of the study. S. aureus isolated from nasal swabs were assessed for antibiotic susceptibility, spa type and absence of the scn gene. Livestock association was defined by absence of scn. RESULTS: Twenty-two workers provided 327 samples. S. aureus carriage end points did not change with time away from work (mean 49 h; range >0-96 h). Ten workers were persistent and six were intermittent carriers of livestock-associated S. aureus. Six workers were persistent and three intermittent carriers of livestock-associated multidrug-resistant S. aureus. One worker persistently carried livestock-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Six workers were non-carriers of livestock-associated S. aureus. Eighty-two per cent of livestock-associated S. aureus demonstrated resistance to tetracycline. A majority of livestock-associated S. aureus isolates (n=169) were CC398 (68%) while 31% were CC9. No CC398 and one CC9 isolate was detected among scn-positive isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal carriage of livestock-associated S. aureus, multidrug-resistant S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus can persist among industrial hog operation workers over a 14-day period, which included up to 96 h away from work.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Ganado/microbiología , Exposición Profesional , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Porcinos/microbiología , Adulto , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Nariz/microbiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
10.
J Agromedicine ; 29(2): 155-161, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953628

RESUMEN

Farming is one of the top industries in Michigan and has the highest fatality rate. National sources of non-fatal farm injuries underestimate the burden, especially among children. In this paper, we provide a more accurate estimate of non-fatal farm injuries in Michigan by using an ongoing multi-source surveillance system. Michigan's farm-injury surveillance system includes abstractions of hospital-based medical records, poison control center calls, ambulance runs, and workers' compensation claims for individuals with a farm-related injury. For this analysis, injury onset occurred in 2015 to 2021 and included all injuries regardless of age or occupation. We identified 4,306 injuries in adults and 336 injuries in youth. For those 0-13 years of age all but two were family members. For those 14-15 and 16-17 years of age, 19% and 45%, respectively were hired hands. For adults, 51% were owner/operators, 43% were hired hands, and 5% were family members. For all ages, the most frequent injury source was cattle. Lacerations/cuts/punctures were the most common type of injury for those < 14 years of age while for older individuals it was contusions/bruises. The plurality of injuries occurred in the summer months. Children working on a farm are in unique situation and tracking injuries and identifying injury sources provide necessary information to protect their health and well-being. Michigan's farm-injury surveillance system will continue to provide a comprehensive count of work-related injuries among Michigan's farming population. The information is used to direct public health intervention both at the individual and population level.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo , Heridas y Lesiones , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Bovinos , Niño , Humanos , Agricultura , Granjas , Michigan/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA