Frequency of discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapies in US patients over 2 years.

Little is known about treatment patterns with injectable osteoporosis therapies. At 12 months, the probability of discontinuation was 69.1% among patients using ibandronate, followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment. The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation. INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess the frequency of treatment discontinuation over time among patients who initiate injectable osteoporosis therapies. METHODS: This retrospective observational study utilized an administrative claims database to measure discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapy, reported at 6-month intervals over 2 years. Eligible patients were aged ≥55 years, had newly initiated injectable osteoporosis therapy between January 2008 and June 2012, and were continuously enrolled in the health plan for ≥1 year prior to and ≥1.5 years after the date the first injectable medication was received (the index date). Follow-up time ranged from 18 to 24 months. Injectable osteoporosis treatments included in the analysis were denosumab, ibandronate, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid. Discontinuation was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and was defined at each time point as the percentage of patients who did not receive the dose scheduled for that time point. A 90-day grace period was allowed to accommodate flexibility in the scheduling of post-index re-administrations. Sensitivity analyses assessed discontinuation using grace periods of 60 and 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 4756 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, with 617 utilizing denosumab, 233 ibandronate, 778 teriparatide, and 3128 zoledronic acid. At 12 months, discontinuation was highest among patients using ibandronate (69.1%), followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment: 87.5% for ibandronate, 87.9% for teriparatide, 79.8% for zoledronic acid, and 64.3% for denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation.

The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group.

UNLABELLED: Osteoporosis causes an elevated fracture risk. We propose the continued use of T-scores as one means for diagnosis but recommend that, alternatively, hip fracture; osteopenia-associated vertebral, proximal humerus, pelvis, or some wrist fractures; or FRAX scores with ≥3% (hip) or 20% (major) 10-year fracture risk also confer an osteoporosis diagnosis. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a common disorder of reduced bone strength that predisposes to an increased risk for fractures in older individuals. In the USA, the standard criterion for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men is a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the lumbar spine, femur neck, or total hip by bone mineral density testing. METHODS: Under the direction of the National Bone Health Alliance, 17 clinicians and clinical scientists were appointed to a working group charged to determine the appropriate expansion of the criteria by which osteoporosis can be diagnosed. RESULTS: The group recommends that postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years should be diagnosed with osteoporosis if they have a demonstrable elevated risk for future fractures. This includes having a T-score of less than or equal to -2.5 at the spine or hip as one method for diagnosis but also permits a diagnosis for individuals in this population who have experienced a hip fracture with or without bone mineral density (BMD) testing and for those who have osteopenia by BMD who sustain a vertebral, proximal humeral, pelvic, or, in some cases, distal forearm fracture. Finally, the term osteoporosis should be used to diagnose individuals with an elevated fracture risk based on the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Algorithm, FRAX. CONCLUSIONS: As new ICD-10 codes become available, it is our hope that this new understanding of what osteoporosis represents will allow for an appropriate diagnosis when older individuals are recognized as being at an elevated risk for fracture.

Vertebral Fractures: Clinical Importance and Management.

Vertebral fractures are common and can result in acute and chronic pain, decreases in quality of life, and diminished lifespan. The identification of vertebral fractures is important because they are robust predictors of future fractures. The majority of vertebral fractures do not come to clinical attention. Numerous modalities exist for visualizing suspected vertebral fracture. Although differing definitions of vertebral fracture may present challenges in comparing data between different investigations, at least 1 in 5 men and women aged >50 years have one or more vertebral fractures. There is clinical guidance to target spine imaging to individuals with a high probability of vertebral fracture. Radiology reports of vertebral fracture need to clearly state that the patient has a "fracture," with further pertinent details such as the number, recency, and severity of vertebral fracture, each of which is associated with risk of future fractures. Patients with vertebral fracture should be considered for antifracture therapy. Physical and pharmacologic modalities of pain control and exercises or physiotherapy to maintain spinal movement and strength are important components in the care of vertebral fracture patients.

The effects of estrone (Ogen) on spinal bone density of postmenopausal women.

The effects of cyclical treatment with estrone sulfate (0.3, 0.625, or 1.25 mg), plus calcium carbonate, on spinal trabecular bone density were compared with placebo in 120 postmenopausal women in this 2-year, multicenter, double-blind study. While the placebo and 0.3-mg treatment groups lost bone density (-3.6% and -5.1%), the 0.625- and 1.25-mg treatment groups experienced no significant change from baseline at 24 months (-0.8% and +0.7%). The 1.25-mg treatment group was significantly different from the placebo group at 12, 18, and 24 months. Although the 0.625-mg treatment group was significantly different from the placebo group only at 18 months, the data suggest that 0.625 and 1.25 mg of estrone sulfate had different effects than placebo and 0.3 mg of estrone sulfate and, given with supplemental calcium, are effective doses for the prevention of spinal bone loss.

Monitoring bone resorption in early postmenopausal women by an immunoassay for cross-linked collagen peptides in urine.

A new immunoassay using an ELISA approach for measuring urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen was evaluated as a specific measure of bone resorption. The assay was applied to 65 early postmenopausal women who participated in a placebo-controlled trial of the aminobisphosphonate, alendronate sodium. Eight blood and urine samples were collected over a 9 month interval. Baseline cross-linked peptide excretion varied from 26 to 216 pmol BCE (bone collagen/mumol Cr. Within-subject variability (CV) for cross-linked peptide excretion was 20.2% over the 9 months in placebo-treated subjects, substantially less than that observed for other biochemical markers of bone resorption: 45, 53, and 63% for fasting urinary calcium and hydroxyproline and 24 h urinary lysylpyridinoline (HPLC assay), respectively. Baseline cross-linked peptide excretion correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with baseline total urine lysylpyridinoline and serum osteocalcin, but not with the other biochemical markers. Initial peptide excretion also correlated inversely with lumbar spine bone mineral density at entry (r = -0.26, p < 0.05). Treatment for 6 weeks with alendronate produced a dose-dependent suppression of cross-linked peptide excretion (0 +/- 8, 29 +/- 6, 56 +/- 5, and 64 +/- 3% for 0, 5, 20, and 40 mg, respectively, p < 0.01 versus placebo for treatment effect), with a return toward pretreatment values during follow-up. Measurement of the urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen by this new ELISA approach appears promising as a simple and reliable method to assess overall bone resorption.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Progestin antagonism of estrogen stimulated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels.

Progestins are frequently used in combination with estrogen to prevent or treat postmenopausal osteoporosis. Progestins protect against the undesirable hyperplastic effects of estrogen on the endometrium. The possibility that progestins might antagonize the beneficial effects of estrogen on calcium homeostasis has received little attention. In this study we determined whether the addition of progestin to estrogen would alter the ability of estrogen to raise serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D] levels. Women within 5 yr of menopause were treated with three cycles of oral unopposed estrogen [1 or 2 mg/day (3.67 or 7.34 mumol/day) 17 beta-estradiol (E2) for 25/30 days of each cycle] followed by three cycles of E2 plus progestin [10 mg/day (29 mumol/day) medroxyprogesterone on days 12-25]. E2 increased both total and free 1,25-(OH)2D concentrations in a dose-dependent fashion. These levels increased progressively over the three cycles of unopposed estrogen treatment. In contrast the vitamin D binding protein concentration reached maximal levels after one cycle of E2. With the addition of progestin, the levels of total and free 1,25-(OH)2D returned toward baseline although vitamin D binding protein levels remained elevated. PTH levels rose with both doses of E2 as serum calcium levels fell. Progestin did not significantly alter the effects of E2 on PTH or calcium. Our results raise the possibility that progestin may antagonize part of the salubrious effects of estrogen on calcium homeostasis.

The effect of short term treatment with alendronate on vertebral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in early postmenopausal women.

The effects of oral alendronate treatment on spinal bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed in women in the early postmenopausal period. Sixty-five women were treated with placebo or 5, 20, or 40 mg alendronate daily for 6 weeks in a double blind study. Treatment with alendronate decreased both urinary markers of bone resorption (pyridinolines, hydroxyproline, and calcium) and serum markers of bone formation (osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase) in a dose-dependent fashion. This short term treatment with alendronate also produced a dose-dependent increase in lumbar bone mineral density measured 7.5 months after the completion of therapy. Median percent changes in integral spinal bone mineral density, as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry, were -2.3, -1.2, +0.7, and +1.2 after treatment with placebo and 5, 20, and 40 mg alendronate, respectively. Treatment with alendronate was well tolerated and produced no fever; gastrointestinal intolerance was no more common than with placebo treatment. Short term alendronate treatment in early postmenopausal women decreased bone turnover and increased vertebral density.

Addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Alendronate and estrogen are effective therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis, but their efficacy and safety as combined therapy are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 428 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, who had been receiving HRT for at least 1 yr, were randomized to receive either alendronate (10 mg/day) or placebo. HRT was continued in both groups. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed. Compared with HRT alone, at 12 months, alendronate plus HRT produced significantly greater increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (3.6% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and hip trochanter (2.7% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001); however, the between-group difference in BMD at the femoral neck was not significant (1.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.072). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urine N-telopeptide) decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months with alendronate plus HRT, and they remained within premenopausal levels. Addition of alendronate to ongoing HRT was generally well tolerated, with no significant between-group differences in upper gastrointestinal adverse events or fractures. This study demonstrated that, in postmenopausal women with low bone density despite ongoing treatment with estrogen, alendronate added to HRT significantly increased bone mass at both spine and hip trochanter and was generally well tolerated.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with dichloromethane diphosphonate treatment of Paget's disease.

Six patients with extensive polyostotic Paget's disease were treated for 3 months with dichloromethane diphosphonate (CL2MDP; 1600 mg/day, orally). Serum alkaline phosphatase and urinary hydroxyproline excretion decreased 60-80% in each patient. Blood ionized calcium (ca++) and immunoreactive PTH (iPTH) were measured weekly during the first month of therapy and monthly thereafter. As an index of parathyroid function, PTH secretory reserve was assessed by EDTA infusions before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 months after Cl2 MDP therapy was stopped. Before therapy, iPTH and Ca++ were normal in all patients. During treatment, Ca++ decreased and iPTH increased in all patients; mean iPTH approximately doubled (95% confidence limits, 1.5- to 2.7-fold increase). At the end of 3 months of treatment, EDTA infusion raised iPTH in each patient to a level higher than that in the control infusion, indicating augmented PTH secretory reserve. Ca++, iPTH, and the iPTH response to EDTA-induced hypocalcemia returned toward baseline by 3 months after the end of CL2MDP treatment. The results indicate that secondary hyperparathyroidism developed as a result of Cl2MDP therapy. The cause of the parathyroid-gland adaptation is not known; the hyperparathyroidism is, however, at least partly reversible. Cl2MDP inhibits bone resorption while allowing bone mineralization to continue; this differential effect could lead to the hypocalcemia and parathyroid hyperfunction.

Effect of combined risedronate and hormone replacement therapies on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Both hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combined therapy with bisphosphonate and HRT is likely to be used in clinical practice, and limited data are available regarding its efficacy and safety. This was a 1-yr, double blind, placebo-controlled study in which 524 postmenopausal women received daily treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg) alone or in combination with risedronate (5 mg). Women who had not undergone hysterectomy received medroxyprogesterone acetate (up to 5 mg, daily or cyclically) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 yr. Changes in BMD at the proximal femur and forearm, bone turnover markers, and histology and histomorphometry were also assessed. At 12 months, significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were observed in both treatment groups (HRT-only, 4.6%; combined risedronate-HRT, 5.2%); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies led to significant increases in BMD at 12 months at the femoral neck (1.8% and 2.7%, respectively), femoral trochanter (3.2% and 3.7%), distal radius (1.7% and 1.6%), and midshaft radius (0.4% and 0.7%). The differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. Both combined risedronate-HRT and HRT-only produced significant decreases in the biochemical markers of bone turnover, with somewhat greater decreases in the combined treatment group. Bone biopsy data showed normal bone structure and normal mineralization with either treatment. Expected decreases in bone turnover were observed and were greater in the combined treatment group (68-79% reduction relative to baseline values, P < 0.005). Overall, combined treatment had a safety profile similar to that of HRT-only, including bone and gastrointestinal safety profiles. In conclusion, the combined treatment with risedronate and HRT had a favorable effect on BMD similar to that of HRT alone at the lumbar spine and slightly, but significantly, greater than that of HRT alone at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and there were no adverse effects on the skeleton.

Dose-response relationships for alendronate treatment in osteoporotic elderly women. Alendronate Elderly Osteoporosis Study Centers.

Alendronate (ALN) is an aminobisphosphonate employed as an antiresorptive agent in the treatment of osteoporosis. The present study was carried out to determine dose-response relationships, particularly the effects of relatively low doses of ALN, on bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical indexes of bone and mineral metabolism, and bone histology, with particular attention to effects in elderly women. This prospective, randomized, double blind, 2-yr multicenter study compared the effects of placebo with those of 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg ALN daily. All subjects received supplemental calcium (500 mg daily) as the carbonate. We studied 359 women with lumbar spine BMD at least 2.0 SD below the peak young adult mean. Subjects were stratified by age, with 135 aged 60-69 yr and 224 aged 70-85 yr. Histomorphometry was performed on transiliac bone biopsies obtained from 104 subjects after 1 yr and from 83 subjects after 2 yr. This study elucidated the previously uninvestigated lower region of the dose-response curve for ALN in osteoporosis. Over 2 yr, treatment with 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg/day increased lumbar spine BMD, on the average, by 0.65%, 3.54%, and 5.67%, respectively, compared with that in the placebo group (P < 0.001 vs. placebo for the 2.5 and 5 mg groups). Significant dose-related increases were also seen in BMD at appendicular sites and in total body BMD. Dose-dependent reductions in bone turnover to new steady states were indicated by serum and urine biochemical markers as well as by histomorphometry. There was also a dose-related reduction in the proportion of subjects suffering nonvertebral fractures (P < 0.05). Safety profiles were similar for the ALN and placebo groups and for both age strata. Efficacy was similar for both age strata. There was no evidence of impaired mineralization or other histological abnormalities due to ALN treatment. We conclude that treatment with ALN over a period of 2 yr was well tolerated and produced dose-dependent increases in BMD without evidence of a plateau over the dose range of 1.0-5.0 mg daily. One milligram daily did not result in a significant effect on BMD, and 5.0 mg daily produced favorable effects at all sites measured. Other studies have demonstrated somewhat greater effects on 10 mg daily. ALN, was equally effective and well tolerated in osteoporotic women over 70 yr old as in younger women with the same condition.

Four-year study of intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: three years of blinded therapy followed by one year of open therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of long-term intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment on spinal bone density and vertebral fracture rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal osteoporotic women (n = 423) were randomized initially into a 2-year, double-blind, multicenter study; it was extended to a third year of blinded treatment followed by open-label treatment: 357 patients continued treatment in Year 3 (305 receiving blinded therapy and 52 receiving calcium supplementation) and 277 in Year 4. During Years 1 through 3, patients received double-blind treatment with phosphate (1.0 g) or placebo twice daily for 3 days, etidronate (400 mg) or placebo daily for 14 days, and calcium (500 mg) daily for the remainder of each 91-day treatment cycle. During Year 4, open-label intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy (without preceding phosphate) was administered to all patients. Spinal bone density and vertebral fracture rates were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: During Year 3, etidronate therapy maintained the significant increases in spinal bone mineral density of the first 2 years. Over the 3-year period, proximal femur bone density increased in etidronate-treated patients. Etidronate therapy for 3 years significantly decreased the vertebral fracture rate in patients at higher risk for fracture (low spinal bone density and three or more vertebral fractures at study entry), as compared with nonetidronate treatment (228 versus 412 fractures per 1,000 patient-years, respectively; p < 0.05). After 1 year of open-label treatment, patients previously treated with etidronate maintained bone mass, and vertebral fracture rates in all groups were lower than in any other study period. There were no apparent serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Three years of intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy produced significant increases in spinal and hip bone density, with a significant reduction in vertebral fracture rates in patients at higher fracture risk. Maintenance of bone mass and low fracture rate were observed when etidronate was continued for an additional year.

Alendronate treatment of the postmenopausal osteoporotic woman: effect of multiple dosages on bone mass and bone remodeling.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the aminobisphosphonate alendronate sodium on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study, 188 postmenopausal women, aged 42 to 75 years, with low bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 daily treatment groups: placebo for 2 years, alendronate 5 or 10 mg for 2 years, alendronate 20 or 40 mg for 1 year followed by placebo for 1 year, or alendronate 40 mg for 3 months followed by 2.5 mg for 21 months. All subjects were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium as calcium carbonate. RESULTS: At each dose, alendronate produced significant reductions in markers of bone resorption and formation, and significantly increased bone mass at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, as compared with decreases (significant at lumbar spine) in subjects receiving placebo. In the 10-mg group, mean urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine had declined by 47% at 3 months, and mean serum osteocalcin by 53% at 6 months. Mean changes in BMD over 24 months with 10 mg alendronate were +7.21% +/- 0.49% for the lumbar spine, +5.27% +/- 0.70% for total hip, and +2.53% +/- 0.68% for total body (each P < 0.01) compared to changes of -1.35% +/- 0.61%, -1.20% +/- 0.64% and -0.31% +/- 0.44% at these sites, respectively, with placebo treatment. Progressive increases in BMD of both lumbar spine and total hip were observed in the second year of treatment with 10 mg alendronate (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Alendronate, a potent inhibitor of bone resorption, reduces markers of bone remodeling and significantly increases BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, and is well tolerated at therapeutic doses (5 or 10 mg daily) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Increments in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip and suppression of bone turnover are maintained after discontinuation of alendronate in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Previously we have reported a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the hip and reductions in biochemical indices of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with alendronate at various doses over 1 to 2 years. We have followed BMD and biochemical parameters in these patients for 1 or 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate to determine resolution of alendronate effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received daily oral doses of placebo, 5 or 10 mg of alendronate for 2 years, or 20 or 40 mg of alendronate for 1 year followed by 1 year of placebo. No treatment was given in the third year of study. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changes in the 5- and 10-mg groups (-1.4 and -0.4%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-1.2%) 1 year after discontinuation of drug and lumbar spine BMD changes in the 20- and 40-mg groups (-1.2% and 0.8%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-0.9%) 2 years after discontinuation of drug. BMD of the total hip followed the same pattern of resolution. The difference in BMD between alendronate and placebo groups at the end of alendronate treatment was maintained up to 2 years. Residual reductions in the bone resorption markers urinary deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) and collagen type 1 cross-linked N telopeptides and the bone formation markers serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin remained for 1 year after discontinuation of 5 and 10 mg of alendronate and for 2 years after discontinuation of 20 and 40 mg of alendronate, other than return of D-Pyr to baseline 1 year after cessation of treatment with the 5- and 10-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: A residual decrease in bone turnover may be found up to 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate. Accelerated bone loss is not observed when treatment is discontinued. However, continuous therapy with alendronate is required to achieve a continuous gain in BMD.

Cyclical etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: efficacy and safety after seven years of treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs. RESULTS: The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy.

Effect of estrone sulfate on postmenopausal bone loss.

Estrogen replacement therapy confers many beneficial effects to postmenopausal women, such as slowing the rate of bone loss and decreasing the risk of coronary artery disease. This multicenter, placebo-controlled study evaluated the lowest effective daily dose of estrone sulfate (0.3, 0.625, or 1.25 mg) combined with 1000 mg elemental calcium supplementation for preventing bone loss in the immediate supplementation for preventing bone loss in the immediate postmenopausal period. Spinal bone mineral density was measured using quantitative computed tomography. Compared with baseline, bone mineral density increased significantly (P less than .05) after 12 months of 0.625 mg daily (+ 1.9%) or 1.25 mg daily (+ 2.5%). The difference between the 0.625-mg and 1.25-mg doses was not statistically significant. Estrone sulfate administration (0.625 and 1.25 mg) produced significant changes in various lipid measurements at both the 6- and 12-month observation points. The prevalence rates for adverse events were comparable among the estrone sulfate groups and the placebo group. Estrone sulfate 0.625 mg daily, combined with 1000 mg elemental calcium supplementation, was the minimum effective dosage to prevent loss of spinal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women over a 12-month period.

Two-year efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once-a-week dosing (35 and 50mg) were compared with risedronate daily dosing (5mg) in a 2-year study in women with osteoporosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) as the primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older, postmenopausal for at least 5 years, and had either a BMD T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or total proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. In addition to risedronate treatment, the subjects received 1000 mg daily of elemental calcium supplementation and received vitamin D if the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) level was low. RESULTS: The results after 1 year of treatment were previously published. Of the 1456 women who were randomized and received study medication, 1127 (77%) completed the 2-year study. Over the 2 years of treatment, the incidence of both new vertebral fractures (2.9, 1.5, and 1.7% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who p = 0.298) and osteoporosis-related non-vertebral fractures reported as adverse events (5.0, 4.9, and 4.5% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; p = 0.918) was similar for all 3 treatment groups. The reduction from baseline at Month 24 in bone turnover markers was similar based on an analysis of variance for the 5 mg daily and the 35 mg once-a-week groups. The mean percentage change in lumbar spine BMD after 24 months was 5.17, 4.74, and 5.47% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively. Both the 35 and 50 mg once-a-week treatment groups met the pre-specified criterion of non-inferiority to the 5 mg daily treatment group. No apparent difference in the pattern or distribution of serious and upper gastrointestinal adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year data agree with the 1-year results demonstrating that the risedronate once-a-week doses are comparable in efficacy and safety to the 5 mg daily dose. Risedronate 35 mg once a week is considered the optimal dose want a once-a-week dosing regimen.

An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems.

In order to measure the clinical consequences of spinal osteoporosis, we correlated a number of physical and psychosocial dysfunctions with the degree of vertebral deformity in 204 women aged 55-75 yr. We employed 5 standardized questionnaire instruments: the physical dimension of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), an analog back pain scale, a 24-question instrument eliciting back-related disabilities, and assessments of self-esteem and mastery. Using these results as the dependent variables, we performed 5 separate stepwise regression analyses; independent variables were vertebral deformity score and 11 possible confounders. Using Pearson correlation coefficients, we found a high degree of correlation between each of the 5 primary outcome variables. Vertebral deformity score played a small but statistically significant role in the 3 models whose dependent variable was related to physical dysfunction, but it accounted for only 4-10% of the variance of these models. Mastery and self-esteem were related to overall poor health and attendant physical disabilities but not to vertebral deformity score. In this selected cohort of women, the occurrence of mild to moderate vertebral deformities caused little loss of physical function or function of psychosocial problems because of vertebral deformity. Although we were able to demonstrate a statistically significant handicap related to the total vertebral deformity score, several other clinical variables appeared to have a greater impact.

The crisis in Bosnia: breaking down barriers.

Since the outbreak of war in the former Yugoslavia, the British Government has accepted a number of people with special humanitarian needs from Bosnia. In October 1992, seven families, comprising of ten adults aged between 24 and 42 years old and 13 children aged between 18 months and 15 years old, arrived in Surrey having sought the status of 'war refugee' by the Home Office.

Hot-Pack and 1-MHz Ultrasound Treatments Have an Additive Effect on Muscle Temperature Increase.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic ultrasound is an effective deep heating modality commonly applied alone or after cooling or heating of the treatment area. The purpose of this study was to examine the tissue temperature rise in the human triceps surae muscle group after ultrasound with prior heating via a silicate gel hot pack. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study was designed as a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial with repeated measures on two factors (depth and time). Independent variables were temperature of pack (hot and room temperature), depth of measurement (1 cm and 3 cm), and time (beginning, after pack application, and after ultrasound). The dependent variable was tissue temperature. Subjects were assigned to one of two treatment groups: ultrasound preceded by a 15-minute hot pack treatment or ultrasound preceded by a 15-minute application with a silicate gel pack at room temperature. Measurements were taken while subjects were treated in a university training room. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one uninjured male and female college student volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the two pack groups. MEASUREMENTS: The hot packs were stored in 75 degrees C water. A 1-MHz ultrasound treatment was administered for 10 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm(2). Tissue temperature was measured every 30 seconds using 23-gauge hypodermic microprobes interfaced with a telethermometer and inserted 1 and 3 cm below the surface of anesthetized triceps surae muscle. RESULTS: At both tissue depths, there was a 0.8 degrees C greater increase in tissue temperature with hot packs and ultrasound. At 1 cm, ultrasound increased temperature 3.5 degrees C after a 0.5 degrees C rise during the room temperature-pack application, but only 0.6 degrees C after a 3.8 degrees C increase during hot-pack application. At 3 cm, ultrasound increased temperature 3.85 degrees C following a slight (-0.26 degrees C) decrease during the room temperature-pack application and 3.68 degrees C after a 0.74 degrees C increase during hot-pack application. CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous increases in deep muscle temperature (>/=4 degrees C) can be reached with 2 to 3 minutes less total sonation time when preheated with a hot pack. Thus, ultrasound and hot packs have an additive effect on intramuscular temperature, but the characteristics of the additive effect are different, primarily because there appears to be a tissue temperature plateau.