Impact of body mass index on omalizumab response in adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of asthma treatment, including biologics, may be different in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate response to omalizumab (dosed by serum immunoglobulin E level and weight) by BMI category. METHODS: Pooled data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma were analyzed by BMI category (<25 kg/m2 [normal or underweight], n = 397; 25 to <30 kg/m2 [overweight], n = 330; ≥ 30 kg/m2 [obese], n = 268). Placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions were evaluated by Poisson regression modeling. Changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) dose, Total Asthma Symptom Score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Greater placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions (95% confidence interval) were observed with increasing BMI (normal or underweight, -37.4% [-69.0% to 26.8%]; overweight, -52.7% [-78.4% to 3.7%]; obese, -71.9% [-86.9% to -39.5%]). There were no differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvement between BMI categories at week 16 (normal or underweight, 76.2 [5.3-147.1] mL; overweight, 98.1 [13.9-182.4] mL; obese, 69.1 [-18.9 to 157.2] mL). No differences in BDP dose reduction (µg) were noted between BMI categories (normal or underweight, 23.0 [15.7-30.3]; overweight, 22.5 [13.5-31.5]; obese, 16.6 [5.8-27.3]). Fewer patients in the higher BMI categories eliminated BDP use. There were trends for smaller improvements with higher BMI in Total Asthma Symptom Score (normal/underweight, -0.52 [-0.82 to -0.22]; overweight, -0.50 [-0.80 to -0.20]; obese, -0.39 [-0.77 to 0.00]) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (normal or underweight, 0.34 [0.16-0.52]; overweight, 0.34 [0.13-0.55]; obese, 0.15 [-0.08 to 0.39]). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab provides benefit to patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, regardless of BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Studies 008/009 were conducted before clinical trial registration was required, and therefore clinical trial registration numbers are not available.

The global burden of illness of peanut allergy: A comprehensive literature review.

Peanut allergy (PA) currently affects approximately 2% of the general population of Western nations and may be increasing in prevalence. Patients with PA and their families/caregivers bear a considerable burden of self-management to avoid accidental peanut exposure and to administer emergency medication (adrenaline) if needed. Compared with other food allergies, PA is associated with higher rates of accidental exposure, severe reactions and potentially fatal anaphylaxis. Approximately 7%-14% of patients with PA experience accidental peanut exposure annually, and one-third to one-half may experience anaphylaxis, although fatalities are rare. These risks impose considerably high healthcare utilization and economic costs for patients with PA and restrictions on daily activities. Measures to accommodate patients with PA are often inadequate, with inconsistent standards for food labelling and inadequate safety policies in public establishments such as restaurants and schools. Children with PA are often bullied, resulting in sadness, humiliation and anxiety. These factors cumulatively contribute to significantly reduced health-related quality of life for patients with PA and families/caregivers. Such factors also provide essential context for risk/benefit assessments of new PA therapies. This narrative review comprehensively assessed the various factors comprising the burden of PA.

No difference in omalizumab efficacy in patients with asthma by number of asthma-related and allergic comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are common in asthma and may complicate treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To examine response to omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma by asthma-related and allergic comorbidities. METHODS: Patients aged 12 years or more from placebo-controlled 008/009 (n = 1071), EXTRA (n = 848), and INNOVATE (n = 419), and single-armed PROSPERO (n = 801) omalizumab studies were included. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate adjusted exacerbation rates and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) change from baseline after omalizumab initiation for subgroups by number of comorbidities (0, 1 [008/009]; 0, 1, ≥2 [EXTRA and INNOVATE]; 0, 1, 2, ≥3 [PROSPERO]). Self-reported comorbidities included allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, recurrent acute sinusitis, nasal polyps, atopic and contact dermatitis, urticaria, food allergy, anaphylaxis, other allergies, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. RESULTS: In the EXTRA and INNOVATE studies, no consistent pattern was observed for placebo-corrected relative rate reduction in normalized asthma exacerbations among omalizumab-treated comorbidity subgroups. In PROSPERO, on-study exacerbation rates in the comorbidity subgroups were similar (0, 0.68; 1, 0.70; 2, 0.77; ≥3, 0.80). FEV1 improvements were observed throughout the study for omalizumab vs placebo for all comorbidity subgroups. There were no consistent differences in FEV1 improvements among comorbidity subgroups in 008/009, EXTRA, or INNOVATE. Similarly, no among-group differences were observed for FEV1 change from baseline at month 12 in PROSPERO (0, 0.05 L; 1, 0.08 L; 2, 0.00 L; ≥3, 0.04 L). The 95% confidence intervals overlapped substantially in all instances. CONCLUSION: In these analyses of placebo-controlled/single-armed studies, on-study exacerbation rates and FEV1 improvements with omalizumab treatment were similar irrespective of comorbidity burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers are as follows: EXTRA, NCT00314574 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00314574); INNOVATE, NCT00046748 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00046748); and PROSPERO, NCT01922037 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01922037).

Effect of omalizumab on lung function and eosinophil levels in adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with asthma. Several studies have shown lung function improvements with omalizumab; however, this has not been examined exclusively in adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of omalizumab on lung function and eosinophil counts in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, data from adolescents aged 12 to 17 years from 8 randomized trials of omalizumab were pooled (studies 008, 009, and 011, and SOLAR, INNOVATE, ALTO, ETOPA, and EXTRA). Changes from baseline to end of study in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and blood eosinophil counts were assessed by fitting an analysis of covariance model and calculating least squares mean (LSM) difference for omalizumab vs placebo. RESULTS: A total of 340 adolescents were identified (omalizumab, n = 203 [59.7%]; placebo, n = 137 [40.3%]). Omalizumab increased all baseline lung function variables more than placebo by end of study: LSM treatment differences (95% confidence interval) were 3.0% (0.2%-5.7%; P = .035), 120.9 mL (30.6-211.2 mL; P = .009), and 101.5 mL (8.3-194.6 mL; P = .033) for ppFEV1, absolute FEV1, and FVC, respectively. The LSM difference demonstrated a greater reduction in eosinophil counts for omalizumab vs placebo: -85.9 cells/µL (-137.1 to -34.6 cells/µL; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab was associated with lung function improvements and circulating eosinophil counts reductions in adolescents with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. Findings emphasize the effect of omalizumab in young patients and the need to optimize treatment early in the disease course. https://clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00314574, NCT00046748, NCT00401596.

More than a decade follow-up in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma: The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) II.

BACKGROUND: The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR I) study demonstrated high morbidity in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma despite standard-of-care treatment. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the long-term natural history of disease and outcomes in patients in TENOR I after more than a decade. METHODS: TENOR I was a multicenter observational study (2001-2004) of 4756 patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR II was a follow-up study of TENOR I patients using a single cross-sectional visit in 2013/2014. Overall, the sites participating in TENOR II originally enrolled 1230 patients in TENOR I. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed, including very poorly controlled asthma based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 341 (27.7%) patients were enrolled in TENOR II and were representative of the TENOR I cohort. The most frequent comorbidities were rhinitis (84.0%), sinusitis (47.8%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (46.3%). Mean percent predicted prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV1 were 72.7% (SD, 21.4%) and 78.2% (SD, 20.7%), respectively. A total of 231 (72.9%) of 317 patients had positive test responses to 1 or more allergen-specific IgEs. The mean blood eosinophil count was 200/µL (SD, 144/µL). Eighty-eight (25.8%) patients experienced an asthma exacerbation in the prior 3 months requiring hospital attention, oral corticosteroids, or both. More than half (197/339 [58.1%]) had very poorly controlled asthma. Medication use suggested undertreatment. CONCLUSION: TENOR II provides longitudinal data to characterize disease progression, heterogeneity, and severity in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Findings show continued morbidity, including a high degree of comorbid conditions, allergic sensitization, exacerbations, and very poorly controlled asthma, including reduced lung function.

Physician characteristics associated with treatment initiation patterns in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Pirfenidone and nintedanib are oral antifibrotic agents approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Real-world data on factors that influence IPF treatment decisions are limited. Physician characteristics associated with antifibrotic therapy initiation following an IPF diagnosis were examined in a sample of US pulmonologists. An online, self-administered survey was fielded to pulmonologists between April 10, 2017, and May 17, 2017. Pulmonologists were included if they spent >20% of their time in direct patient care and had ≥5 patients with IPF receiving antifibrotics. Participants answered questions regarding timing and reasons for considering the initiation of antifibrotic therapy after an IPF diagnosis. A total of 169 pulmonologists participated. The majority (81.7%) considered initiating antifibrotic therapy immediately after IPF diagnosis all or most of the time (immediate group), while 18.3% considered it only some of the time or not at all (delayed group). Pulmonologists in the immediate group were more likely to work in private practice (26.1%), have a greater mean percentage of patients receiving antifibrotic therapy (60.8%), and decide to initiate treatment themselves (31.2%) versus those in the delayed group (16.1%, 30.5%, and 16.1%, respectively). Most pulmonologists consider initiating antifibrotic treatment immediately after establishing an IPF diagnosis all or most of the time versus using a "watch-and-wait" approach. Distinguishing characteristics between pulmonologists in the immediate group versus the delayed group included practice setting, percentage of patients receiving antifibrotic therapy, and the decision-making dynamics between the patient and the pulmonologist.

A multicenter, retrospective medical record review of X-linked myotubular myopathy: The recensus study.

INTRODUCTION: X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), characterized by severe hypotonia, weakness, respiratory distress, and early mortality, is rare and natural history studies are few. METHODS: RECENSUS is a multicenter chart review of male XLMTM patients characterizing disease burden and unmet medical needs. Data were collected between September 2014 and June 2016. RESULTS: Analysis included 112 patients at six clinical sites. Most recent patient age recorded was ≤18 months for 40 patients and >18 months for 72 patients. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 3.7 (3.7) months and 54.3 (77.1) months, respectively. Mortality was 44% (64% ≤18 months; 32% >18 months). Premature delivery occurred in 34/110 (31%) births. Nearly all patients (90%) required respiratory support at birth. In the first year of life, patients underwent an average of 3.7 surgeries and spent 35% of the year in the hospital. DISCUSSION: XLMTM is associated with high mortality, disease burden, and healthcare utilization. Muscle Nerve 57: 550-560, 2018.

Omalizumab in children with uncontrolled allergic asthma: Review of clinical trial and real-world experience.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. Allergen sensitization and high frequencies of comorbid allergic diseases are characteristic of severe asthma in children. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE mAb, is the first targeted biologic therapeutic approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma (AA) that remains uncontrolled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus other controller medications. Since its initial licensing for use in adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older, the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of omalizumab have been demonstrated in several published clinical trials in children aged 6 to less than 12 years with moderate-to-severe AA. These studies supported the approval of the pediatric indication (use in children aged ≥6 years) by the European Medicines Agency in 2009 and the US Food and Drug Administration in 2016. After this most recent change in licensing, we review the outcomes from clinical trials in children with persistent AA receiving omalizumab therapy and observational studies from the past 7 years of clinical experience in Europe. Data sources were identified by using PubMed in 2016. Guidelines and management recommendations and materials from the recent US Food and Drug Administration's Pediatric Advisory Committee meeting are also reviewed.

Omalizumab adherence in an observational study of patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to omalizumab is not well characterized and its association with asthma control has not been well established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence in patients initiating omalizumab in the Epidemiologic Study of Xolair (omalizumab): Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-term Safety in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma (EXCELS) observational study. METHODS: Adherence was assessed over 5 years using the proportion of patients who missed any dose, rates of doses missed, and proportions of patients with good (<10% doses missed) or poor (≥30% doses missed) adherence. Multivariable analyses identified independent predictors of good adherence. Associations between adherence and asthma control were assessed using the minimum important difference for the Asthma Control Test at various time points. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients newly initiated on omalizumab completed 5 years of EXCELS. Of these, 83.0% on the 2-week dosing regimen (n = 152) and 65.0% on the 4-week dosing regimen (n = 137) missed at least 1 dose. More frequent dosing was associated with a larger number of missed doses. Older age (odds ratio per year 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.03) and lower prebronchodilator percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (<76; odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.24) were independent predictors of good adherence. CONCLUSION: Adherence to omalizumab is characterized by distinct factors. Patients receiving the 4-week dosing regimen achieved better adherence than those treated every 2 weeks. Improved adherence could be associated with better asthma control. Age and lung function could interact with dosing frequency to affect patient adherence, thus warranting prospective planning at the time of prescribing to support long-term adherence.

Phenotypes determined by cluster analysis in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma phenotyping can facilitate understanding of disease pathogenesis and potential targeted therapies. OBJECTIVE: To further characterize the distinguishing features of phenotypic groups in difficult-to-treat asthma. METHODS: Children ages 6-11 years (n = 518) and adolescents and adults ages ≥12 years (n = 3612) with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study were evaluated in this post hoc cluster analysis. Analyzed variables included sex, race, atopy, age of asthma onset, smoking (adolescents and adults), passive smoke exposure (children), obesity, and aspirin sensitivity. Cluster analysis used the hierarchical clustering algorithm with the Ward minimum variance method. The results were compared among clusters by χ(2) analysis; variables with significant (P < .05) differences among clusters were considered as distinguishing feature candidates. Associations among clusters and asthma-related health outcomes were assessed in multivariable analyses by adjusting for socioeconomic status, environmental exposures, and intensity of therapy. RESULTS: Five clusters were identified in each age stratum. Sex, atopic status, and nonwhite race were distinguishing variables in both strata; passive smoke exposure was distinguishing in children and aspirin sensitivity in adolescents and adults. Clusters were not related to outcomes in children, but 2 adult and adolescent clusters distinguished by nonwhite race and aspirin sensitivity manifested poorer quality of life (P < .0001), and the aspirin-sensitive cluster experienced more frequent asthma exacerbations (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Distinct phenotypes appear to exist in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, which is related to outcomes in adolescents and adults but not in children. The study of the therapeutic implications of these phenotypes is warranted.

A healthcare claims analysis to identify and characterize patients with suspected X-Linked Myotubular Myopathy (XLMTM) in the Brazilian Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a rare, life-threatening congenital disease, which is not well-defined. To our knowledge, no studies characterizing the XLMTM disease burden have been conducted in Brazil. We identified and described patients with suspected XLMTM using administrative claims data from the Brazilian public healthcare system. METHODS: Data from 2015 to 2019 were extracted from the DATASUS database. As no XLMTM-specific ICD-10 code was available, a stepwise algorithm was applied to identify patients with suspected XLMTM by selecting male patients with a congenital myopathies code (G71.2), aged < 18 years at index date (first claim of G71.2), with an associated diagnostic procedure (muscle biopsy/genetic test) and without spinal muscular atrophy or Duchenne muscular dystrophy. We attempted to identify patients with suspected severe XLMTM based on use of both respiratory and feeding support, which are nearly universal in the care of XLMTM patients. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and stratified by age at index date < 5 years old and ≥ 5 years old. RESULTS: Of 173 patients with suspected XLMTM identified, 39% were < 5 years old at index date. Nearly all (N = 166) patients (96%) were diagnosed by muscle biopsy (91% of patients < 5 years old and 99% of patients ≥ 5 years old), six (3.5%) were diagnosed by clinical evaluation (8% of patients < 5 years old and 1% of patients ≥ 5 years old), and one was diagnosed by a genetic test. Most patients lived in Brasilia (n = 55), São Paulo (n = 33) and Minas Gerais (n = 27). More than 85% of patients < 5 years old and approximately 75% of patients ≥ 5 years old had physiotherapy at the index date. In both age groups, nearly 50% of patients required hospitalization at some point and 25% required mobility support. Respiratory and feeding support were required for 3% and 12% of patients, respectively, suggesting that between 5 and 21 patients may have had severe XLMTM. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, genetic testing for XLMTM appears to be underutilized in Brazil and may contribute to underdiagnosis of the disease. Access to diagnosis and care is limited outside of specific regions with specialized clinics and hospitals. Substantial use of healthcare resources included hospitalization, physiotherapy, mobility support, and, to a lesser extent, feeding support and respiratory support.

Key findings and clinical implications from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study.

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are an understudied population but account for considerable asthma morbidity, mortality, and costs. The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study was a large, 3-year, multicenter, observational cohort study of 4756 patients (n=3489 adults ≥ 18 years of age, n=497 adolescents 13-17 years of age, and n=770 children 6-12 years of age) with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR's primary objective was to characterize the natural history of disease in this cohort. Data assessed semiannually and annually included demographics, medical history, comorbidities, asthma control, asthma-related health care use, medication use, lung function, IgE levels, self-reported asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life. We highlight the key findings and clinical implications from more than 25 peer-reviewed TENOR publications. Regardless of age, patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma demonstrated high rates of health care use and substantial asthma burden despite receiving multiple long-term controller medications. Recent exacerbation history was the strongest predictor of future asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines' impairment domain, was highly prevalent and predictive of future asthma exacerbations; this assessment can be used to identify high-risk patients. IgE and allergen sensitization played a role in the majority of severe or difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients.

Dupilumab-Treated Patients with Asthma in the Real World: The RAPID Global Registry.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. In clinical studies, dupilumab reduced the risk of severe asthma exacerbations, and improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s and quality of life in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of RAPID (NCT04287621) are to characterize patients with asthma initiating dupilumab in routine clinical practice and to collect information on long-term effectiveness and safety in these patients. METHODS: RAPID is a global, prospective, observational registry that will enroll approximately 1000 patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with asthma from 150 sites globally. Dupilumab treatment will be initiated in routine clinical practice according to country-specific prescribing information, per physician discretion as part of routine care. Patients will be followed prospectively for up to 3 years, with postbaseline assessments at months 1 and 3, and every 3 months thereafter. PLANNED OUTCOMES: Baseline data collected will include patient demographics, disease characteristics, and medication history. Patient adherence and persistence will be recorded alongside health-care resource utilization, and effectiveness of dupilumab will be assessed (clinician assessment) as per standard of care. Quality of life, asthma control, type 2 inflammatory comorbidities, work productivity, and physical activity limitation will be assessed. Incidence and severity of adverse events will be recorded. CONCLUSION: RAPID is the first global registry to characterize patients beginning dupilumab treatment for asthma in clinical practice and will expand on prior clinical studies by providing real-world data. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04287621.

Real-world analysis of healthcare resource utilization by patients with X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) in the United States.

BACKGROUND: X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a rare, life-threatening congenital myopathy with multisystem involvement, often requiring invasive ventilator support, gastrostomy tube feeding, and wheelchair use. Understanding healthcare resource utilization in patients with XLMTM is important for development of targeted therapies but data are limited. METHODS: We analyzed individual medical codes as governed by Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, Current Procedural Terminology, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) for a defined cohort of XLMTM patients within a US medical claims database. Using third-party tokenization software, we defined a cohort of XLMTM patient tokens from a de-identified dataset in a research registry of diagnostically confirmed XLMTM patients and de-identified data from a genetic testing company. After approval of an ICD-10 diagnosis code for XLMTM (G71.220) in October 2020, we identified additional patients. RESULTS: A total of 192 males with a diagnosis of XLMTM were included: 80 patient tokens and 112 patients with the new ICD-10 code. From 2016 to 2020, the annual number of patients with claims increased from 120 to 154 and the average number of claims per patient per year increased from 93 to 134. Of 146 patients coded with hospitalization claims, 80 patients (55%) were first hospitalized between 0 and 4 years of age. Across all patients, 31% were hospitalized 1-2 times, 32% 3-9 times, and 14% ≥ 10 times. Patients received care from multiple specialty practices: pulmonology (53%), pediatrics (47%), neurology (34%), and critical care medicine (31%). The most common conditions and procedures related to XLMTM were respiratory events (82%), ventilation management (82%), feeding difficulties (81%), feeding support (72%), gastrostomy (69%), and tracheostomy (64%). Nearly all patients with respiratory events had chronic respiratory claims (96%). The most frequent diagnostic codes were those investigating hepatobiliary abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative medical claims analysis shows substantial healthcare resource use in XLMTM patients that increased over the last 5 years. Most patients required respiratory and feeding support and experienced multiple hospitalizations throughout childhood and beyond for those that survived. This pattern delineation will inform outcome assessments with the emergence of novel therapies and supportive care measures.

Evaluation of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines impairment domain for classifying asthma control and predicting asthma exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of asthma control may help predict future asthma exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate asthma guidelines impairment domain components as predictors of exacerbations in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma. METHODS: Children (aged 6-11 years; n = 289) and adolescents/adults (aged ≥ 12 years; n = 2,094) with complete baseline and 12-month data from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study were included. Asthma was categorized as very poorly controlled, not well-controlled, and well-controlled using impairment domain components. Effects of omitting each component on very poorly controlled and not well controlled groups were examined. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship of components in predicting asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: Omission of individual impairment domain components led to misclassification of asthma control in 11% to 39% of patients. A baseline exacerbation was the strongest independent predictor of exacerbation at month 12 in children (odds ratio = 2.94; P < .001) and adolescents/adults (odds ratio = 2.93; P < .001). In children, very poorly controlled asthma-based short-acting ß2-agonist use was associated with a 2-fold higher exacerbation risk (odds ratio = 2.03; P = .011). In adolescents/adults, not well controlled or very poorly controlled asthma based on short-acting ß2-agonist use (odds ratio = 1.49), lung function (odds ratio = 1.66), and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (odds ratio = 1.94) were also independent predictors of exacerbations (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the combined use of individual components of the impairment domain increases the sensitivity of identifying patients at high risk for future asthma exacerbations, specific components may be more important than others in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma. Prior exacerbations, short-acting ß2-agonist use, lung function, and (in adolescents/adults) the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire were independent predictors of exacerbations.

Omalizumab in Asthma with Fixed Airway Obstruction: Post Hoc Analysis of EXTRA.

BACKGROUND: Although asthma is typically characterized by bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) occurs in ∼50% of patients with severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: Do FAO/BDR associate with efficacy of omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE? METHODS: In EXTRA, patients aged 12-75 years with inadequately controlled severe allergic asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß2-agonists were randomized to omalizumab (n = 427) or placebo (n = 423) for 48 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, high/low BDR were defined as ≥12%/<12% increases in baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after bronchodilator administration, respectively. FAO presence (+)/absence (-) were defined as baseline postbronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity <70%/≥70%, respectively. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate exacerbation relative rate reductions (RRRs)/least-squares mean changes in FEV1, respectively. RESULTS: In patients with high BDR, omalizumab reduced exacerbations more than placebo over the 48-week treatment period regardless of FAO status (RRR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: FAO+, 59.8% [17.7-80.4%]; FAO-, 44.3% [16.6-62.8%]). Omalizumab improved FEV1 compared with placebo in the FAO-, high BDR subgroup (FEV1 change from baseline [95% CI] for omalizumab vs placebo, 0.065 L [-0.071 to 0.201 L] to 0.236 L [0.112-0.359 L]) across 48 weeks. This was not observed in patients with low BDR, irrespective of FAO. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab was more efficacious than placebo at reducing exacerbations in patients with high, but not low, BDR, regardless of the presence of FAO. Lung function improvement primarily occurred in FAO-, high BDR patients, suggesting that asthma with low BDR may represent a difficult-to-treat phenotype.

Economic burden of impairment in children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma.

BACKGROUND: The cost associated with asthma impairment in children with severe asthma has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the asthma cost burden in children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma based on asthma impairment. METHODS: Children aged 6 to 12 years in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study with available data at baseline (n = 628), month 12 (n = 385), and month 24 (n = 280) corresponding to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute asthma guidelines' impairment domain were included. Children were categorized as either very poorly controlled (VPC), not well controlled (NWC), or well controlled (WC) and assessed cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Mean total asthma costs based on direct (medication usage, unscheduled office visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations) and indirect (school/work days lost) asthma costs were assessed. RESULTS: Mean annual total asthma costs were more than twice as high in the VPC group compared with NWC and WC groups (baseline: $7,846, $3,526, $3,766.44, respectively; month 12: $7,326, $2,959, $2,043, respectively; month 24: $8,879, $3,308, $1,861, respectively (all P < .001). Indirect costs accounted for approximately half the total asthma costs for VPC asthma patients at each time point. Significantly lower costs were observed for patients whose impairment status improved or temporarily improved from VPC after baseline. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of severe or difficult-to-treat asthma in children is associated with VPC asthma and improvement in asthma control and is associated with reducing cost. Further attention to patients with poorly controlled asthma, through better management strategies or more effective medications, may significantly reduce this burden of illness.