Clinical characteristics and genome epidemiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen increasingly responsible for difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections. OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary clinical characteristics and genome epidemiology of patients colonized or infected by S. maltophilia in a multicentre, prospective cohort. METHODS: All patients with a clinical culture growing S. maltophilia were enrolled at six tertiary hospitals across Japan between April 2019 and March 2022. The clinical characteristics, outcomes, antimicrobial susceptibility and genomic epidemiology of cases with S. maltophilia were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients were included representing 34 infection and 44 colonization cases. The median age was 72.5 years (IQR, 61-78), and males accounted for 53 cases (68%). The most common comorbidity was localized solid malignancy (39%). Nearly half of the patients (44%) were immunosuppressed, with antineoplastic chemotherapy accounting for 31%. The respiratory tract was the most common site of colonization (86%), whereas bacteraemia accounted for most infection cases (56%). The 30 day all-cause mortality rate was 21%, which was significantly higher in infection cases than colonization cases (35% versus 9%; adjusted HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.22-11.96). Susceptibility rates to ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim were 14%, 65%, 87% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of infection ranged from 13% in the unclassified group to 86% in genomic group 6A. The percentage of non-susceptibility to ceftazidime ranged from 33% in genomic group C to 100% in genomic groups 6 and 7 and genomic group geniculate. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary multicentre cohort, S. maltophilia primarily colonized the respiratory tract, whereas patients with bacteraemia had the highest the mortality from this pathogen. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim remained consistently active, but susceptibility to levofloxacin was relatively low. The proportions of cases representing infection and susceptibility to ceftazidime differed significantly based on genomic groups.

Epidemiology of post-COVID conditions beyond 3 years and factors associated with their persistence longer than 2 years: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) conditions (PCCs) beyond 3 years and identify factors associated with their persistence longer than 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. METHODS: We surveyed patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and visited our institution from February 2020 to November 2021. Demographic and clinical data and information on the presence and duration of PCCs were obtained. We identified factors associated with the persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years using multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 935 patients surveyed, 407 completed the survey. Among them, 360 patients had mild disease in the acute phase. The proportions of participants with at least one symptom at 1, 2, and 3 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis were 33.2%, 29.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. The numbers of participants with and without any residual symptoms 2 years after the onset of COVID-19 were 87 and 193, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years was associated with lower body mass index, presence of any underlying medical conditions, and number of symptoms lasting for more than 1 month ≥ 5. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PCCs decreased 2 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis. We also identified factors associated with PCC persistence longer than 2 years, which could help primary care physicians and patients with PCCs predict the duration of PCCs and better understand their natural history, thus reducing patients' anxiety about their duration.

Comparison of the effects of cefmetazole and meropenem on microbiome: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cefmetazole (CMZ) is a carbapenem-sparing option in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacterial infection. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the effects of antimicrobial treatment (meropenem [MP] and CMZ) with those of no antimicrobial treatment (control group) on the microbiome. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022. Feces and saliva samples were collected for microbiome analyses at two time points (early-period: days 1-3; and late-period: days 4-30) for the antimicrobial treatment group, and at one time point for the control group. RESULTS: Five feces (MP-F and CMZ-F) and five saliva (MP-S and CMZ-S) samples were included in the MP and the CMZ groups. Ten feces (C-F) and saliva (C-S) samples were included in the control group. Group α diversity was notably lower in the late-period MP-F group than the control group as determined with the Shannon richness index. ß diversity analysis of the feces samples based on weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances revealed distinctions in both the late-period CMZ-F and MP-F groups compared with the control group. Weighted UniFrac analysis showed that only the early-period MP-F group differed from the control group. In the saliva samples, weighted and unweighted UniFrac analyses showed significant differences between the control group and the early CMZ, late CMZ, and late MP groups. CONCLUSIONS: MP treatment may cause larger impact on the feces microbiome than CMZ in Japanese patients.

Bloodstream infections in the elderly Japanese population: Current reality and countermeasures.

We reviewed bloodstream infections in the elderly in Japan, referring to data recently reported from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Tokyo. We divided the locations of bloodstream infections into Hospital-onset (HO), healthcare-associated (HCA), and CA (community-acquired), as the elderly reside in different places. The study focused on the fact that the general condition and underlying diseases of the elderly differ by age group. And thus, we divided them into three groups: Pre-old (65-74 years), Old (75-89 years), and Super-old (≥ 90 years), and compared their characteristics of bloodstream infections. HO bacteremia was most common in the pre-old group. On the other hand, HCA bloodstream infections tended to increase as the population aged, and it was most prevalent in super-old group. According to the study results, early intervention through infectious diseases (ID) consultation may improve the prognosis of bloodstream infections even in the elderly. Since the rate of ID consultation is lower in the super-old group than in other groups, this group may be a significant target. In conclusion, a study of a cohort of elderly patients with bloodstream infections in Japan indicates that bloodstream infections in patients over 65 years is not uniform.

Real-world effectiveness of full and booster mRNA vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 against disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases: A propensity score-matched cohort study using the nationwide registry data in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies from the Asian region have reported the effectiveness of messenger ribonucleic acid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against disease progression and death after hospitalization. METHODS: We evaluated the data from the COVID-19 registry in Japan during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases. A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted between the incompletely (0-1 dose) and fully (2 doses) vaccinated groups during the delta-dominant phase and among the incompletely, fully, and booster (3 doses) vaccinated groups during the omicron-dominant phase. RESULTS: In the delta-dominant phase, 411 pairs were matched. The fully vaccinated group showed a significantly lower oxygen supplementation rate (24.1 % vs. 41.1 %, p < 0.001) but little difference in the mortality rate (2.2 % vs. 2.9 %, p = 0.66). In the omicron-dominant phase, 1494 pairs from the incompletely and fully vaccinated groups, and 425 pairs from the fully and booster vaccinated groups were matched. Full vaccination reduced both the oxygen supplementation rate (18.6 % vs 25.7 %, p < 0.001) and mortality rate (0.7 % vs 2.3 %, p < 0.001). Booster vaccination showed little difference in either the rate of oxygen supplementation (21.2 % vs. 24.7 %, p = 0.25) or mortality (1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, p = 0.21) compared with full vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Full vaccination reduced disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases; booster vaccination did not further enhance the protective effects against disease progression during the omicron-dominant phase compared to full vaccination. Future vaccine strategies and policy decisions should consider preventing infection or disease progression in the target population, as well as the characteristics of the dominant variant in that phase.

Evaluation of antimicrobial selective pressure using the multicenter semiautomatic surveillance system Japan surveillance for infection prevention and healthcare epidemiology.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the selective pressure of antimicrobials on bacteria is important for promoting antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The aim of this study was to assess the selective pressure of antimicrobials by evaluating their use (carbapenem [CBP] and CBP-sparing therapy) over time and the detection status of CBP-resistant organisms using multicenter data. METHODS: Among the facilities whose data were registered in the Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology from 2017 to 2020, those that had data on the use of CBP and CBP-sparing therapy (fluoroquinolones [FQs], cefmetazole [CMZ], piperacillin-tazobactam [PIP/TAZ], ampicillin-sulbactam [ABPC/SBT], ceftriaxone/cefotaxime [CTRX/CTX], CAZ (ceftazidime), cefepime [CFPM], and aminoglycosides [AGs]) as well as on CBP-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and CBP-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) detection were included. Alcohol-based hand rubbing (ABHR) usage was also analyzed. Regression analyses, including multivariable regression analysis, were performed to evaluate trends. The association of antimicrobial use density (AUD) with CRE and CRPA detection rates was evaluated. RESULTS: In 28 facilities nationwide, CBP, FQ, CAZ, AG, and PIP/TAZ use decreased over the 3-year period, whereas the use of CMZ, ABPC/SBT, CTRX/CTX, CFPM, and ABHR as well as the rates of CRE and CRPA detection increased. The average AUD did not significantly correlate with CRE and CRPA detection rates. The multivariable regression analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between each AUD or ABHR and CRE or CRPA detection. CONCLUSION: CBP and ABHR use showed a decreasing and an increasing trend, respectively, while CRPA and CRE detection rates exhibited a gradual increase. The considerably low CRE and CRPA detection rates suggest that slight differences in numbers may have been observed as excessive trend changes. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate selective pressure while considering the characteristics of ASP and the mechanisms underlying resistance.

Unfractionated Heparin Safety in COVID-19: Incidence and Risks of Bleeding Complications in Japan.

AIM: Several studies have shown the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but that of unfractionated heparin (UFH) has not been investigated. We investigated the prevalence of bleeding complications during UFH administration, its impact on mortality, and the risk factors of bleeding outcomes associated with UFH. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital, including hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The primary outcomes were measured as the prevalence of bleeding complications during hospitalization, and the secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and 60-day mortality rates. Logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching were used to assess risk factors for bleeding complications and their impact on mortality. RESULTS: Among 1035 included patients, 516 patients were treated with UFH. Twelve (2.3%) patients in the UFH group experienced major bleeding. The prevalence of major bleeding in patients treated with therapeutic-dose UFH was 9.2%. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-15.0; P＜.05) and COVID-19 severity (aOR, 35.9; 95% CI, 4.57-282; P＜.05) were associated with major bleeding complications. After propensity score matching, 11 major and 11 non-major bleeding cases (including minor bleeding) were matched. The 60-day cumulative mortality rate between the two groups did not differ significantly (P=.13, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major bleeding in COVID-19 patients using therapeutic-dose UFH was relatively high. Critical COVID-19 and older age were risk factors for bleeding complications.

Relationship between 2nd-generation angiotensin receptor blockers and the risk of hypotension in COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital.

It has not yet been established whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), statins, and multiple drugs affect the severity of COVID-19. Therefore, we herein performed an observational study on the effects of 1st- and 2nd-generation ARB, statins, and multiple drugs, on COVID-19 in patients admitted to 15 Japanese medical facilities. The results obtained showed that ARB, statins, and multiple drugs were not associated with the primary outcome (odds ratio: 1.040, 95% confidence interval: 0.688-0.571; 0.696, 0.439-1.103; 1.056, 0.941-1.185, respectively), each component of the primary outcome (in-hospital death, ventilator support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and admission to the intensive care unit), or the secondary outcomes (oxygen administration, disturbed consciousness, and hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg). ARB were divided into 1st- and 2nd-generations based on their approval for use (before 2000 and after 2001), with the former consisting of losartan, candesartan, and valsartan, and the latter of telmisartan, olmesartan, irbesartan, and azilsartan. The difference of ARB generation was not associated with the primary outcome (odds ratio with 2nd-generation ARB relative to 1st-generation ARB: 1.257, 95% confidence interval: 0.613-2.574). The odd ratio for a hypotension as one of the secondary outcomes with 2nd-generation ARB was 1.754 (95% confidence interval: 1.745-1.763) relative to 1st-generation ARB. These results suggest that patients taking 2nd-generation ARB may be at a higher risk of hypotension than those taking 1st-generation ARB and also that careful observations are needed. Further studies are continuously needed to support decisions to adjust medications for co-morbidities.