ßII-Spectrin (SPTBN1) suppresses progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and Wnt signaling by regulation of Wnt inhibitor kallistatin.

UNLABELLED: ßII-Spectrin (SPTBN1) is an adapter protein for Smad3/Smad4 complex formation during transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) signal transduction. Forty percent of SPTBN1(+/-) mice spontaneously develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and most cases of human HCC have significant reductions in SPTBN1 expression. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanisms by which loss of SPTBN1 may contribute to tumorigenesis. Livers of SPTBN1(+/-) mice, compared to wild-type mouse livers, display a significant increase in epithelial cell adhesion molecule-positive (EpCAM(+)) cells and overall EpCAM expression. Inhibition of SPTBN1 in human HCC cell lines increased the expression of stem cell markers EpCAM, Claudin7, and Oct4, as well as decreased E-cadherin expression and increased expression of vimentin and c-Myc, suggesting reversion of these cells to a less differentiated state. HCC cells with decreased SPTBN1 also demonstrate increased sphere formation, xenograft tumor development, and invasion. Here we investigate possible mechanisms by which SPTBN1 may influence the stem cell traits and aggressive behavior of HCC cell lines. We found that HCC cells with decreased SPTBN1 express much less of the Wnt inhibitor kallistatin and exhibit decreased ß-catenin phosphorylation and increased ß-catenin nuclear localization, indicating Wnt signaling activation. Restoration of kallistatin expression in these cells reversed the observed Wnt activation. CONCLUSION: SPTBN1 expression in human HCC tissues is positively correlated with E-cadherin and kallistatin levels, and decreased SPTBN1 and kallistatin gene expression is associated with decreased relapse-free survival. Our data suggest that loss of SPTBN1 activates Wnt signaling, which promotes acquisition of stem cell-like features, and ultimately contributes to malignant tumor progression.

Phase 1 Study of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Adjuvant Pancreatic Cancer (PROTON-PANC).

PURPOSE: Despite improvement in systemic therapy, patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently experience local recurrence. We sought to determine the safety of hypofractionated proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) during adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients were enrolled in a single-institution phase 1 trial (NCT03885284) between 2019 and 2022. Patients had PDAC of the pancreatic head and underwent R0 or R1 resection and adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the dosing schedule of adjuvant PBT (5 Gy × 5 fractions) using limited treatment volumes given between cycles 6 and 7 of mFFX. Patients received PBT on days 15 to 19 in a 28-day cycle before starting cycle 7 (dose level 1, DL1) or on days 8 to 12 in a 21-day cycle before starting cycle 7 (DL2). RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years (range, 52-78), and the follow-up time from mFFX initiation was 12.5 months (range, 6.2-37.4 months). No patients received preoperative therapy. Four had R1 resections and 5 had node-positive disease. Three patients were enrolled on DL1 and 6 patients on DL2. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at DL2 (prolonged grade 3 neutropenia resulting in discontinuation of mFFX after cycle 7). No other DLTs were observed. Four patients completed 12 cycles of mFFX (range, 7-12; median, 11). No patients have had local recurrence. Five of 9 patients had recurrence: 3 in the liver, 1 in the peritoneum, and 1 in the bone. Six patients are still alive, 4 of whom are recurrence-free. The median time to recurrence was 12 months (95% CI, 4 to not reached [NR]), and median overall survival was NR (95% CI, 6 to NR; 2-year survival rate, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: PBT integrated within adjuvant mFFX was well tolerated, and no local recurrence was observed. These findings warrant further exploration in a phase 2 trial.

Patterns of Failure Following Preoperative Chemotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Resection for Patients with Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is controversial and the optimal target volumes and dose-fractionation are unclear. The aim of this study is to report on treatment outcomes and patterns of failure of patients with borderline resectable (BL) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer following preoperative chemotherapy and SBRT. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of patients with BL or LA PDAC. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT was prescribed to 30 Gy over 5 fractions to the pancreas planning tumor volume (PTV). A subset of patients received a simultaneous integrated boost to the high risk vascular PTV and/or elective nodal irradiation (ENI). Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, all patients underwent subsequent resection. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMPFS), and locoregional control (LRC) estimates were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with BL (18) or LA (4) PDAC were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT followed by resection from 2011-2022. Following neoadjuvant treatment, 5 patients (23%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) and 16 patients (73%) had R0 resection. At 24 months, there were no isolated locoregional recurrences (LRRs), 9 isolated distant recurrences (DRs), and 5 combined LRRs and DRs. Two LRRs were in-field, 2 LRRs were marginal, and 1 LRR was both in-field and marginal. 2-year median LRC, LRRFS, DMPFS, PFS, and OS were 77.3%, 45.5%, 31.8%, 31.8%, and 59.1%, respectively. For BL and LA cancers, 2-year LRC, DMPFS, and OS were 83% vs. 75%, (p = 0.423), 39% vs. 0% (p = 0.006), and 61% vs. 50% (p = 0.202), respectively. ENI was associated with improved LRC (p = 0.032) and LRRFS (p = 0.033). Borderline resectability (p = 0.018) and lower tumor grade (p = 0.027) were associated with improved DMPFS. CONCLUSIONS: Following preoperative chemotherapy and SBRT, locoregional failure outside of the target volume occurred in 3 of 5 recurrences; ENI was associated with improved LRC and LRRFS. Further studies are necessary to define the optimal techniques for preoperative radiation therapy.

Mechanistically based blood proteomic markers in the TGF-ß pathway stratify risk of hepatocellular cancer in patients with cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of death from cancer worldwide but is often diagnosed at an advanced incurable stage. Yet, despite the urgent need for blood-based biomarkers for early detection, few studies capture ongoing biology to identify risk-stratifying biomarkers. We address this gap using the TGF-ß pathway because of its biological role in liver disease and cancer, established through rigorous animal models and human studies. Using machine learning methods with blood levels of 108 proteomic markers in the TGF-ß family, we found a pattern that differentiates HCC from non-HCC in a cohort of 216 patients with cirrhosis, which we refer to as TGF-ß based Protein Markers for Early Detection of HCC (TPEARLE) comprising 31 markers. Notably, 20 of the patients with cirrhosis alone presented an HCC-like pattern, suggesting that they may be a group with as yet undetected HCC or at high risk for developing HCC. In addition, we found two other biologically relevant markers, Myostatin and Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2), which were significantly associated with HCC. We tested these for risk stratification of HCC in multivariable models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, as well as batch and site. These markers reflect ongoing biology in the liver. They potentially indicate the presence of HCC early in its evolution and before it is manifest as a detectable lesion, thereby providing a set of markers that may be able to stratify risk for HCC.

Clinical outcomes by Child-Pugh Class in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a community oncology setting.

Aim: Many pivotal trials in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) require participants to have Child-Pugh A disease. However, many patients in real-world practice are Child-Pugh B or C. This study examined treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC treated with first-line systemic therapy. Materials & methods: In this retrospective study, patients with HCC treated with first-line systemic therapy (2010-2017) were identified from US Oncology Network records. Outcomes included overall survival and progression-free survival, by Child-Pugh Class and prior liver-directed therapy. Results: Of 352 patients, 78.7% were Child-Pugh A or B, 96.6% received first-line sorafenib, and 33.8% received first-line-prior liver-directed therapy. Survival outcomes were similar for Child-Pugh A or B, and longer after first-line prior liver-directed therapy. Conclusion: First-line systemic therapy is beneficial in patients with Child-Pugh A or B, and after first-line prior liver-directed therapy. These findings may help position systemic therapy in the community setting.

Phase I trial of ixabepilone administered as three oral doses each separated by 6 hours every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ixabepilone, which stabilizes microtubules, has low susceptibility to drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein or ßIII-tubulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral ixabepilone when administered every 6 h for three doses, every 3 weeks, to patients with refractory advanced cancers. Eighteen patients were treated with escalating doses of ixabepilone: three at cohort 1 (30 mg/dose; 90 mg on Day 1), nine at cohort 2 (40 mg/dose; 120 mg on Day 1), and six at cohort 3 (50 mg/dose; 150 mg on Day 1). Serial plasma samples were collected during cycle 1 for pharmacokinetic (PK) measurements. RESULTS: Of the 18 treated patients, eight were male and ten were female. The median age was 59 years, and most had an excellent performance status (KPS 90-100; 61%). There were two dose limiting toxicities (DLT): Grade 4 febrile neutropenia at the 120 mg dose and Grade 4 neutropenic sepsis at the 150 mg dose. Because of the severity and duration of neutropenic sepsis at level 3, level 2 (120 mg) was defined as the MTD and this cohort was expanded to nine patients. High inter-individual variability in plasma drug concentrations was observed during the study, with particularly high levels in two patients with DLT. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this safety profile, the MTD of oral ixabepilone was defined as 120 mg given as three 40 mg doses each separated by 6 h on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle. However, the PK variability observed makes further development of this oral formulation unlikely.

Immunotherapy Use Prior to Liver Transplant in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and its incidence has increased rapidly in the United States over the past two decades. Liver transplant is considered curative, but is not always possible, and pre-transplant immunotherapy is of great interest as a modality for downstaging the tumor burden. We present a review of the literature on pre-liver transplant immunotherapy use in patients with HCC. Our literature search queried publications in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science, and ultimately identified 24 original research publications to be included for analysis. We found that the role of PD-1 and PD-L1 in risk stratification for rejection is of special interest to researchers, and ongoing randomized clinical trials PLENTY and Dulect 2020-1 will provide insight into the role of PD-1 and PD-L1 in liver transplant management in the future. This literature search and the resulting review represents the most thorough collection, analysis, and presentation of the literature on the subject to date.

Homologous Recombination Repair in Biliary Tract Cancers: A Prime Target for PARP Inhibition?

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that make up ~7% of all gastrointestinal tumors. It is notably aggressive and difficult to treat; in fact, >70% of patients with BTC are diagnosed at an advanced, unresectable stage and are not amenable to curative therapy. For these patients, chemotherapy has been the mainstay treatment, providing an inadequate overall survival of less than one year. Despite the boom in targeted therapies over the past decade, only a few targeted agents have been approved in BTCs (i.e., IDH1 and FGFR inhibitors), perhaps in part due to its relatively low incidence. This review will explore current data on PARP inhibitors (PARPi) used in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), particularly with respect to BTCs. Greater than 28% of BTC cases harbor mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). We will summarize the mechanisms for PARPi and its role in synthetic lethality and describe select genes in the HRR pathway contributing to HRD. We will provide our rationale for expanding patient eligibility for PARPi use based on literature and anecdotal evidence pertaining to mutations in HRR genes, such as RAD51C, and the potential use of reliable surrogate markers of HRD.

The current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal malignancies.

This is a review of the current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and what to expect from this evolving field in the future. Individualized medicine is moving from broad panel testing of numerous genes or gene products in tumor biopsy samples, identifying biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response, to relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy assays, building on what we have learned in our tumor analysis and growing into its own evolving predictive and prognostic subspecialty. Hence, the field of GI precision oncology is exploding, and this review endeavors to summarize where we are now in preparation for the journey ahead.

Utomilumab in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Refractory Melanoma and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Section Head: Clinical/translational cancer immunotherapy. Background: The goal of this study was to estimate the objective response rate for utomilumab in adults with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-refractory melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Utomilumab was dosed intravenously every 4 weeks (Q4W) and adverse events (AEs) monitored. Tumor responses by RECIST1.1 were assessed by baseline and on-treatment scans. Tumor biopsies were collected for detection of programmed cell death ligand 1, CD8, 4-1BB, perforin, and granzyme B, and gene expression analyzed by next-generation sequencing. CD8+ T cells from healthy donors were stimulated with anti-CD3 ± utomilumab and compared with control. Results: Patients with melanoma (n=43) and NSCLC (n=20) received utomilumab 0.24 mg/kg (n=36), 1.2 mg/kg (n=26), or 10 mg/kg (n=1). Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 55 (87.3%) patients and serious TEAEs in 18 (28.6%). Five (7.9%) patients discontinued owing to TEAEs. Thirty-two (50.8%) patients experienced treatment-related AEs, mostly grade 1-2. Objective response rate: 2.3% in patients with melanoma; no confirmed responses for patients with NSCLC. Ten patients each with melanoma (23.3%) or NSCLC (50%) had stable disease; respective median (95% confidence interval, CI) progression-free survival was 1.8 (1.7-1.9) and 3.6 (1.6-6.5) months. Utomilumab exposure increased with dose. The incidences of antidrug and neutralizing antibodies were 46.3% and 19.4%, respectively. Efficacy was associated with immune-active tumor microenvironments, and pharmacodynamic activity appeared to be blunted at higher doses. Conclusions: Utomilumab was well tolerated, but antitumor activity was low in patients who previously progressed on ICIs. The potential of 4-1BB agonists requires additional study to optimize efficacy while maintaining the tolerable safety profile.

Using quantitative immunohistochemistry in patients at high risk for hepatocellular cancer.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary form of liver cancer and a major cause of cancer death worldwide. Early detection is key to effective treatment. Yet, early diagnosis is challenging, especially in patients with cirrhosis, who are at high risk of developing HCC. Dysfunction or loss of function of the transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) pathway is associated with HCC. Here, using quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis of samples from a multi-institutional repository, we evaluated if differences in TGF-ß receptor abundance were present in tissue from patients with only cirrhosis compared with those with HCC in the context of cirrhosis. We determined that TGFBR2, not TGFBR1, was significantly reduced in HCC tissue compared with cirrhotic tissue. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based process that correctly identified cirrhotic and HCC tissue and confirmed the significant reduction in TGFBR2 in HCC tissue compared with cirrhotic tissue. Thus, we propose that a reduction in TGFBR2 abundance represents a useful biomarker for detecting HCC in the context of cirrhosis and that incorporating this biomarker into an AI-based automated imaging pipeline could reduce variability in diagnosing HCC from biopsy tissue.

Circulating Tumor Cells: Technologies and Their Clinical Potential in Cancer Metastasis.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are single cells or clusters of cells within the circulatory system of a cancer patient. While most CTCs will perish, a small proportion will proceed to colonize the metastatic niche. The clinical importance of CTCs was reaffirmed by the 2008 FDA approval of CellSearch®, a platform that could extract EpCAM-positive, CD45-negative cells from whole blood samples. Many further studies have demonstrated the presence of CTCs to stratify patients based on overall and progression-free survival, among other clinical indices. Given their unique role in metastasis, CTCs could also offer a glimpse into the genetic drivers of metastasis. Investigation of CTCs has already led to groundbreaking discoveries such as receptor switching between primary tumors and metastatic nodules in breast cancer, which could greatly affect disease management, as well as CTC-immune cell interactions that enhance colonization. In this review, we will highlight the growing variety of isolation techniques for investigating CTCs. Next, we will provide clinically relevant context for CTCs, discussing key clinical trials involving CTCs. Finally, we will provide insight into the future of CTC studies and some questions that CTCs are primed to answer.

Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention.

Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.

Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation-part one: curative intention.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) offers unique management challenges as it commonly occurs in the setting of underlying chronic liver disease. The management of HCC is directed primarily by the clinical stage. The most commonly used staging system is the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer system, which considers tumor burden based on imaging, liver function and the patient's performance status. Early-stage HCC can be managed with therapies of curative intent including surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablative therapies. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a curative intent, such as locablative therapy types, surgical resection, and transplant. Indications, contraindications and outcomes of the various treatment options are reviewed. Multiple concepts relating to liver transplant are discussed including Milan criteria, OPTN policy, MELD exception points, downstaging to transplant and bridging to transplant.

Multicenter randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab with or without cobimetinib in biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.

A Phase I Study of Ribociclib Plus Everolimus in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Refractory to Chemotherapy.

Purpose: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC) has a poor prognosis. CDK4/6 is often deregulated in mPC due to CDKN2A loss, resulting in the loss of p16INK4a that inhibits CDK4/6. CDK4/6 inhibitor monotherapy is ineffective due to RAS-mediated activation of alternative pathways, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-mTOR). We conducted a phase I study combining CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibition in patients with mPC refractory to standard chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: The combination of ribociclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) and everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) was investigated in a phase I study in patients with mPC and progression on 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. A 3 + 3 design was used to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ribociclib (250 or 300 mg daily for days 1-21) in combination with everolimus (2.5 mg daily for days 1-28) every 28 days. Secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), response rate, safety, and effect on the retinoblastoma pathway. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled, six at each dose level. Only one patient had a dose-limiting toxicity of a grade 3 rash at the 250 mg dose. The RP2D of ribociclib was 300 mg. mPFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.6-2.1]), and mOS was 3.7 months (95% CI [2.3-5.6]). Two patients (17%) had stable disease at 8 weeks. Pharmacodynamic evaluation demonstrated that CDK4/6-regulated gene expression was significantly decreased on treatment (n = 6, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Ribociclib 300 mg daily for days 1-21 plus everolimus 2.5 mg daily was well tolerated and associated with decreased CDK4/6-regulated gene expression. This combination was not effective as a third-line therapy but does pharmacologically target CDK4/6 in mPC, revealing the potential for benefit in other settings.

Systemic Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a poor prognosis. First-line sorafenib has been the standard of care for a decade, but the treatment landscape is expanding. This review provides a practical overview of current and future systemic treatment options for advanced HCC and their place in clinical practice. SUMMARY: First-line sorafenib and lenvatinib have shown to improve the survival of patients with advanced HCC. In the second line, regorafenib provides benefit for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib. Anti-PD1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, recently became available for second-line use in the US. Ramucirumab (for patients with α-fetoprotein [AFP] levels ≥400) and cabozantinib present potential future second-line treatment options. Combinations of systemic and locoregional treatment, such as radiofrequency ablation or selective internal radiotherapy, require further research. Precision medicine has not yet been translated into clinical practice, as the most common driver mutations (TERT promoter, CTNNB1, TP53, and ARID1A mutations) have not yet been shown to be suitable therapeutic targets. However, our growing understanding of signaling pathways and efforts in drug development are expected to pave the way for precision medicine in HCC in the future. Evaluating the place for the current and novel systemic treatment options in clinical practice can be challenging due to the diverse toxicity profiles of the treatment options and characteristics of the patient population. Sorafenib data elucidate the effect patient characteristics (such as the performance score, Child-Pugh class, AFP, etiology of the underlying disease, and level of macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread) may have on outcomes in advanced stages. KEY MESSAGES: Lenvatinib is expected to join sorafenib as a preferred first-line treatment in advanced HCC. In the second line, the treatment of choice, regorafenib, is soon expected to be accompanied by cabozantinib and ramucirumab in patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL, whereas nivolumab and pembrolizumab present second-line alternatives in the US.

A phase I study of HER1, HER2 dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib plus the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, safety and preliminary efficacy of lapatinib, a HER1, HER2 dual kinase inhibitor plus bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced malignancies. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a standard 3 + 3 design with lapatinib (L) 750, 1000, 1250 or 1500 mg daily, and bortezomib (B) 0.7, 1.0, 1.3 or 1.6 mg/m2 for 3 weeks with 1 week off. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were assessed during the first 28 days RESULTS: Fifteen patients received the combination of lapatinib and bortezomib in three different cohorts and ten were evaluable for DLT. There were no DLTs. Anorexia was the most common adverse event. Biomarker analysis showed upregulation of p27 expression with lapatinib and the combination. No tumor response was observed and thus the study was closed early. CONCLUSION: The combination of lapatinib and bortezomib was well tolerated but no complete or partial tumor responses were observed at the dose levels tested. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01497626.

Phase I Study of Single-Agent Utomilumab (PF-05082566), a 4-1BB/CD137 Agonist, in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Purpose: Utomilumab (PF-05082566) is an agonistic mAb that engages the immune costimulatory molecule 4-1BB/CD137. In this first-in-human, phase I, open-label, multicenter, multiple-dose study (NCT01307267) we evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, preliminary clinical activity, and pharmacodynamics of single-agent utomilumab in patients with advanced malignancies.Experimental Design: Dose escalation was based on a standard 3+3 design for doses of utomilumab from 0.006 to 0.3 mg/kg every 4 weeks and a time-to-event continual reassessment method for utomilumab 0.6 to 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary study endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first two cycles.Results: Utomilumab demonstrated a well-tolerated safety profile (N = 55). None of the patients experienced a DLT at the dose levels evaluated. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, pyrexia, decreased appetite, dizziness, and rash (<10% of patients). Only one (1.8%) patient experienced a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event (fatigue), and no clinically relevant elevations in transaminases were noted. Utomilumab demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics at doses ranging from 0.006 to 10 mg/kg, with similar safety and pharmacokinetics in anti-drug antibody (ADA)-negative and ADA-positive patients. The overall objective response rate was 3.8% (95% CI, 0.5%-13.0%) in patients with solid tumors and 13.3% in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, including a complete response and a partial response. Circulating biomarkers support 4-1BB/CD137 engagement by utomilumab and suggest that circulating lymphocyte levels may influence probability of clinical benefit.Conclusions: The favorable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity demonstrated by utomilumab warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1816-23. ©2018 AACR.

Maintenance therapy with capecitabine in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after adjuvant therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The 5-year survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is below 25%. The original Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) adjuvant study demonstrated a survival benefit attributed to weekly intravenous boluses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 2 years in addition to chemoradiation compared to surgery alone. In theory, the prolonged exposure to therapy could maintain pressure on dormant cancer cells that remain in G0 arrest and kill them as they infrequently enter the G1/S phase. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance capecitabine compared with those who received only adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone surgical resection with curative intent and received adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed. Those who subsequently received maintenance capecitabine therapy were compared to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy only. The primary end points were disease recurrence and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) of patients receiving maintenance capecitabine was greater than 48.4 months (the exact estimate was not available, since the survival probability curve does not cross 0.5). It was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6-29.2) in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy only (P < .001 by log-rank test). The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was also longer in the maintenance capecitabine group: 54.3 (95% CI, 22.2-Inf) compared to 14.1 (95% CI, 11.6-16.7) months (P < .001, by log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant chemotherapy had improved OS and RFS with additional maintenance therapy with capecitabine. These findings should be confirmed with a randomized, controlled trial.