Venetoclax for pediatric patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

This retrospective study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center evaluated frontline venetoclax combination therapy in 11 pediatric/adolescent patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the small sample size and retrospective nature, the treatment demonstrated safety and potential efficacy, with most patients achieving early complete remission. Adverse events were consistent with other AML therapies, and no discontinuations due to toxicity occurred. While acknowledging study limitations, including selection bias and diverse concurrent therapies, this research underscores the promising role of venetoclax in pediatric AML. Further investigation is crucial to validate its long-term efficacy in this population.

Biological Markers of High-Risk Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has witnessed substantial improvements in prognosis; however, a subset of patients classified as high-risk continues to face higher rates of relapse and increased mortality. While the National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria have traditionally guided risk stratification based on initial clinical information, recent advances highlight the pivotal role of biological markers in shaping the prognosis of childhood ALL. This review delves into the emerging understanding of high-risk childhood ALL, focusing on molecular, cytogenetic, and immunophenotypic markers. These markers not only contribute to unraveling the underlying mechanisms of the disease, but also shed light on specific clinical patterns that dictate prognosis. The paradigm shift in treatment strategies, exemplified by the success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia, underscores the importance of recognizing and targeting precise risk factors. Through a comprehensive exploration of high-risk childhood ALL characteristics, this review aims to enhance our comprehension of the disease, offering insights into its molecular landscape and clinical intricacies in the hope of contributing to future targeted and tailored therapies.

The Emerging Field of Viroimmunotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Pediatric brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Even to date, with the advances in multimodality therapeutic management, survival outcomes remain dismal in some types of tumors, such as pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas or central nervous system (CNS) embryonal tumors. Failure to understand the complex molecular heterogeneity and the elusive tumor and microenvironment interplay continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Developing a strategy that would improve survival for these fatal tumors remains unmet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as a feasible, safe, and promising therapy for brain tumors. The new paradigm in virotherapy implies that the direct cytopathic effect is followed, under certain circumstances, by an antitumor immune response responsible for the partial or complete debulking of the tumor mass. OVs alone or combined with other therapeutic modalities have been primarily used in adult neuro-oncology. A surge in encouraging preclinical studies in pediatric brain tumor models recently led to the clinical translation of OVs with encouraging results in these tumors. In this review, we summarize the different virotherapy tested in preclinical and clinical studies in pediatric brain tumors, and we discuss the limitations and future avenues necessary to improve the response of these tumors to this type of therapy.