Netarsudil Improves Trabecular Outflow Facility in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction is key to controlling primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Pharmacotherapies for POAG or ocular hypertension (OHT) commonly lower IOP by increasing uveoscleral outflow or decreasing aqueous humor production. Netarsudil (Rhopressa), a Rho kinase inhibitor, reduces IOP by improving trabecular outflow facility, which is reduced in POAG. We investigated the effects of netarsudil on aqueous humor dynamics in patients with POAG or OHT. DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, Phase 2 trial. METHODS: Netarsudil 0.02% was instilled in 1 eye and vehicle into the contralateral eye of 20 patients once daily in the morning for 7 days. The primary endpoint was change in mean diurnal outflow facility on day 8 versus that on day 1 (baseline). Outflow facility was measured by using Schiøtz tonography, IOP by pneumotonometry, and episcleral venous pressure (EVP) by automated venomanometry. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (90%) completed the study. Mean diurnal outflow facility increased 0.039 versus 0.007 µL/min/mm Hg from baseline in the netarsudil- and the vehicle-treated groups, respectively (P < .001 vs. baseline for netarsudil), a treatment difference of 0.03 µL/min/mm Hg (P ≤ .001). Mean diurnal IOP change from baseline at day 8 was -4.52 mm Hg for netarsudil versus -0.98 mm Hg for vehicle, a treatment difference of -3.54 mm Hg (P < .0001). Mean diurnal EVP change from baseline was -0.79 mm Hg in the netarsudil-treated group versus 0.10 mm Hg for vehicle, a treatment difference of -0.89 mm Hg (P < .001). All patients reporting an adverse event reported conjunctival hyperemia of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS: Netarsudil acts on the conventional outflow pathway, both proximal and distal, to significantly reduce IOP in POAG and OHT by improving trabecular outflow facility and decreasing EVP.

Effects of Netarsudil on the Corneal Endothelium: Three-Month Findings from a Phase 3 Trial.

PURPOSE: To describe the changes in endothelial cell density (ECD), the coefficient of variation (CV), and the percent of hexagonal cells (%HEX) after 3 months of therapy with netarsudil (Rhopressa; Aerie Pharmaceuticals Inc, Durham, NC) 0.02% dosed once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) and to compare these changes with those seen with timolol 0.5% BID in eyes with ocular hypertension (OHTN) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a phase 3 evaluation of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of netarsudil 0.02% versus timolol 0.5%. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of study subjects underwent corneal endothelial cell imaging by specular microscopy at baseline and after 3 months of therapy. METHODS: Images were evaluated in a masked fashion at an independent reading center. The ECD, CV, and %HEX were determined using a standardized protocol for image analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in ECD, CV, and %HEX from baseline to 3 months were compared between treatment groups using 2-sample t tests. RESULTS: Data from 386 subjects from whom analyzable specular microscopy images were obtained at both baseline and month 3 were included in this analysis. Mean ECD, CV, and %HEX values were comparable between groups at baseline. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in changes from baseline to month 3 in ECD, CV, or %HEX between either of the netarsudil groups and the timolol group. Within groups, CV declined in a statistically significant fashion from baseline to month 3 in all 3 groups by 1.4% to 2.1% (P < 0.001), and %HEX increased by a statistically significant amount (0.7%, P = 0.030) in the timolol group. These small changes were unlikely to be of clinical significance. No statistically significant changes in ECD were seen in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Netarsudil 0.02% showed no clinically significant effects on ECD, CV, or %HEX when dosed QD or BID for 3 months in eyes with OHTN or OAG.

Effects of Netarsudil and Latanoprost Alone and in Fixed Combination on Corneal Endothelium and Corneal Thickness: Post-Hoc Analysis of MERCURY-2.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the changes in endothelial cell density (ECD), the coefficient of variation (CV), the percentage of hexagonal cells (%HEX), and central corneal thickness (CCT) following 3 months of therapy with netarsudil 0.02%/latanoprost 0.005% fixed combination, and to compare these changes with those seen with netarsudil 0.02% or latanoprost 0.005% in eyes with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: A subset of subjects enrolled in a Phase 3 evaluation of the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of netarsudil 0.02%/latanoprost 0.005% fixed combination once daily (QD) versus each of its individual components underwent corneal endothelial cell imaging by specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry at baseline and following 3 months of therapy. Images were evaluated in masked fashion at an independent reading center. Changes from baseline to 3 months in ECD, CV, %HEX, and CCT were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: Data from 415 subjects obtained at both baseline and Month 3 were included in this post hoc analysis. Changes from baseline to Month 3 in ECD, CV, and %HEX were clinically insignificant in all three groups, and the changes in the netarsudil/latanoprost fixed combination group demonstrated no statistical difference from those seen in the netarsudil and latanoprost groups. Mean CCT decreased more in the fixed combination group (- 6.4 µm) than in either the netarsudil group (- 3.3 µm, p = 0.0248) or the latanoprost group (- 1.2 µm, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Netarsudil 0.2%/latanoprost 0.005% fixed combination QD for 3 months in eyes with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma had no clinically significant effects on endothelial cell density or morphology. The significant decrease in CCT in the fixed combination group compared to the two individual component groups may indicate that the potential effects of each drug on CCT are additive, although the magnitude of the observed effects is likely of negligible clinical significance. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02674854.

The Tie2 signaling pathway in retinal vascular diseases: a novel therapeutic target in the eye.

BACKGROUND: Retinal vascular diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion with macular edema-share several key pathophysiologic aspects including neovascularization, vascular permeability, and inflammation. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in these processes, and the therapeutic benefits of VEGF inhibition, have been well characterized. Anti-VEGF therapy is highly effective for many patients but is not uniformly effective in all patients and imposes a significant treatment burden. More recently, the role of the Tie2 signaling pathway in the pathophysiology of retinal vascular diseases has been investigated, and the Tie2 pathway represents a novel therapeutic target for these conditions. AREAS COVERED: The index review describes the Tie2 pathway and its complementary role to the VEGF pathway in the angiogenesis cascade and will summarize studies of molecules in development to therapeutically modulate the Tie2 pathway in retinal vascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of the Tie2 pathway leads to downstream signaling that promotes vascular health and stability and decreases vascular permeability and inflammation. AXT107 is a collagen IV-derived synthetic peptide with a dual mechanism of action that involves suppression of VEGF signaling and activation of the Tie2 pathway; these actions are accomplished by AXT107 binding to and disrupting different integrin, leading to blockade of the VEGF receptor and rearrangement of cellular Tie2 rendering it susceptible to Ang2 agonism. Other Tie2 agonist compounds are also in development, including faricimab and razuprotafib. Tie2 activation only modestly impacts angiogenesis on its own but significantly potentiates VEGF suppression. Co-regulation of the VEGF and Tie2 signaling pathways has the potential to improve functional and structural outcomes in eyes with retinal vascular diseases.

Fixed-Dose Combination of Netarsudil and Latanoprost in Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Pooled Efficacy/Safety Analysis of Phase 3 MERCURY-1 and -2.

INTRODUCTION: New open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) therapies that reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes relative to currently available agents are needed. Netarsudil, a novel Rho kinase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing trabecular outflow. Two phase 3 superiority studies compared a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of netarsudil and the prostaglandin latanoprost with each active component for IOP-lowering efficacy. METHODS: Pooled efficacy and safety data were analyzed from MERCURY-1 and -2 studies in patients with OAG or OHT. Patients instilled one drop of netarsudil (0.02%)/latanoprost (0.005%) FDC (n = 483), netarsudil (0.02%, n = 499), or latanoprost (0.005%, n = 486) into each eye once-daily between 20:00 and 22:00. IOP was measured at 08:00, 10:00, and 16:00 at weeks 2, 6, and the primary endpoint at month 3. RESULTS: Baseline mean diurnal IOP was 23.6, 23.6, and 23.5 mmHg in netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil, and latanoprost groups, respectively. Mean diurnal IOP in each group was 15.3, 18.1, and 17.5 mmHg at week 2, 15.7, 18.4, and 17.4 mmHg at week 6, and 15.8, 18.4, and 17.3 mmHg at week 12. The netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met criteria for superiority compared with each active component (p < 0.0001 for all nine time points). At month 3, among patients randomized to netarsudil/latanoprost FDC or latanoprost, 58.4% vs 37.3% (p < 0.0001) achieved IOP ≤ 16 mmHg. Among patients randomized to netarsudil/latanoprost FDC or netarsudil or latanoprost, 30.9% vs 5.9% (p < 0.0001) vs 8.5% (p < 0.0001) achieved at least a 40% reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP. Pooled safety results were consistent with individual MERCURY studies. CONCLUSION: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC produced statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in mean IOP that were statistically superior to IOP reductions achieved by netarsudil and latanoprost monotherapy. Results of the pooled efficacy and safety analyses were consistent with the individual studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02558400 and NCT02674854.

In patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), treatment to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) is needed to prevent optic nerve damage and vision loss. Many patients do not achieve sufficient IOP lowering with a single drug. The use of multiple IOP-lowering agents, which may have different dose regimens, can be complex and reduce patient adherence. Combination treatments that incorporate multiple agents are available, but until recently none included a prostaglandin analogue, the most widely prescribed first-line therapy. A once-daily, fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy (ROCKLATAN^®) has been approved in the USA that contains the prostaglandin analogue latanoprost and netarsudil, a novel Rho kinase inhibitor. The netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated efficacy and safety in lowering IOP among patients with OAG and OHT in the 12-month MERCURY-1 and the 3-month MERCURY-2 clinical trials. To better characterize efficacy and safety, we pooled and analyzed the data from each trial. The pooled data support the findings of the individual studies:Efficacy: 1. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated statistical superiority to the individual components netarsudil and latanoprost in decreasing IOP at all time points assessed over 3 months. 2. Nearly twice as many patients receiving FDC achieved at least a 30% reduction from baseline in IOP, as recommended by the American Academy of Ophthalmology for a first-line treatment, compared to the IOP reduction achieved by netarsudil and latanoprost monotherapy.Safety: No new safety signals were identified. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC was associated with no treatment-related serious adverse events, minimal systemic adverse events, and manageable ocular adverse events.

One Year of Netarsudil and Latanoprost Fixed-Dose Combination for Elevated Intraocular Pressure: Phase 3, Randomized MERCURY-1 Study.

PURPOSE: A phase 3 trial (MERCURY-1) investigated efficacy and safety of a once-daily, fixed-dose combination (FDC) of netarsudil and latanoprost, compared with each active component, in reducing elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). A planned 3-month analysis demonstrated the superiority of netarsudil/latanoprost FDC over its individual active components at every assessment. Herein, the 12-month efficacy and safety of netarsudil/latanoprost FDC are reported. DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients had unmedicated IOP >20 to <36 mmHg in both eyes at 8:00 am and met other standard criteria for OAG or OHT. METHODS: Randomization to once-daily netarsudil 0.02%/latanoprost 0.005% FDC (n = 238), netarsudil 0.02% only (n = 243), or latanoprost 0.005% only (n = 237). Patients instilled study drug into each eye between 8:00 pm and 10:00 pm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP was obtained at 8:00 am, 10:00 am, and 4:00 pm on day 1 (baseline); at weeks 2 and 6; and at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Ocular and systemic safety were evaluated up to month 12. RESULTS: Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC maintained statistically superior IOP lowering compared to its components at every assessment for 12 months. Least squares mean diurnal IOP (± standard error) at month 12 was 16.2 ± 0.23 mmHg for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 17.9 ± 0.20 mmHg for netarsudil, and 17.6 ± 0.18 mmHg for latanoprost (P < 0.05 for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC versus each comparator). The safety profile of netarsudil/latanoprost FDC was consistent with its individual components. The proportion of patients who experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE) was 82.8% (197/238) in the netarsudil/latanoprost FDC group, 78.2% (190/243) in the netarsudil group, and 54.0% (128/237) in the latanoprost group. The most common AE was conjunctival hyperemia, mostly of mild severity, with an incidence of 63.0% in the netarsudil/latanoprost FDC treatment group compared with 51.4% in the netarsudil group and 21.9% in the latanoprost group. CONCLUSIONS: Results at 12 months revealed superior efficacy for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC compared with the individual components, netarsudil and latanoprost, at every time point assessed and an ocular tolerability profile similar to that of netarsudil alone.

Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

PRECIS: In pooled phase III analyses, once-daily netarsudil 0.02% resulted in intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction that was noninferior to twice-daily timolol 0.5%, with minimal treatment-related serious or systemic adverse events (AEs). Ocular AEs were generally tolerable. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the Rho kinase inhibitor netarsudil in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled analysis of data from the ROCKET-1 to 4 phase III studies of once-daily (PM) netarsudil or twice-daily timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The primary efficacy measure was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3 in patients with baseline IOP <25 mm Hg. RESULTS: In the pooled primary efficacy population (netarsudil, n=494; timolol, n=510), once-daily netarsudil was noninferior to twice-daily timolol at all 9 timepoints through month 3. Mean treated IOP ranged from 16.4 to 18.1 mm Hg among netarsudil-treated patients and 16.8 to 17.6 mm Hg among timolol-treated patients. In the pooled safety population (n=839 in each treatment group), treatment-related serious AEs occurred at similar frequencies in each treatment group (netarsudil, 0.1%; timolol, 0%). The most common ocular AE, conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil, 54.4%; timolol, 10.4%), was graded as mild in 77.6% (354/456) of affected netarsudil-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily netarsudil resulted in IOP lowering that was noninferior to twice-daily timolol, with tolerable ocular AEs that were generally mild and self-resolving. As a first-in-class agent in the United States, with a novel mechanism of action, netarsudil may provide a useful therapeutic option for patients who would benefit from IOP lowering.

Netarsudil/Latanoprost Fixed-Dose Combination for Elevated Intraocular Pressure: Three-Month Data from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the Rho kinase inhibitor netarsudil and latanoprost vs monotherapy with netarsudil or latanoprost. DESIGN: Three-month primary endpoint analysis of a randomized, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: Adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (unmedicated intraocular pressure [IOP] >20 and <36 mm Hg at 8:00 AM) were randomized to receive once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil 0.02%, or latanoprost 0.005% for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3. RESULTS: Mean treated IOP ranged from 14.8-16.2 mm Hg for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 17.2-19.0 mm Hg for netarsudil, and 16.7-17.8 mm Hg for latanoprost. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met the criteria for superiority to each active component at all 9 time points (all P < .0001), lowering IOP by an additional 1.8-3.0 mm Hg vs netarsudil and an additional 1.3-2.5 mm Hg vs latanoprost. At month 3, the proportion of patients achieving mean diurnal IOP ≤15 mm Hg was 43.5% for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 22.7% for netarsudil, and 24.7% for latanoprost. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported; treatment-related systemic adverse events were minimal. The most frequent ocular adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 53.4%; netarsudil, 41.0%; latanoprost, 14.0%), which led to treatment discontinuation in 7.1% (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC), 4.9% (netarsudil), and 0% (latanoprost) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated IOP reductions that were statistically and clinically superior to netarsudil and latanoprost across all 9 time points through month 3, with acceptable ocular safety.

Once-Daily Netarsudil/Latanoprost Fixed-Dose Combination for Elevated Intraocular Pressure in the Randomized Phase 3 MERCURY-2 Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of a once-daily (pm) fixed-dose combination (FDC) product containing netarsudil 0.02% and latanoprost 0.005% with monotherapy with netarsudil or latanoprost. Netarsudil is a Rho kinase inhibitor that lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) primarily by increasing trabecular (conventional) outflow. Latanoprost is the most frequently prescribed of the prostaglandin analogs, which lower IOP primarily by increasing uveoscleral outflow. DESIGN: Three-month, double-masked, randomized (1:1:1), phase 3, superiority study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients had unmedicated IOP > 20 to <36 mmHg at 8:00 am and met other standard criteria for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Randomization to once-daily (pm) netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil, or latanoprost for 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean IOP at 8:00 am, 10:00 am, and 4:00 pm at week 2, week 6, and month 3 (intent-to-treat). Statistical superiority was concluded if the P value for the comparison of netarsudil/latanoprost FDC with each component was <0.05 and the difference in mean IOP (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC minus comparator) was <0 for all time points at all visits. Safety was recorded throughout the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 750 patients were enrolled, with 90.2%, 89.4%, and 94.4% completing 3 months of treatment with netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil, and latanoprost, respectively. Least-squares mean treated IOP ranged from 15.3 to 16.5 mmHg for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 17.4 to 19.8 mmHg for netarsudil, and 17.1 to 18.1 mmHg for latanoprost. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met the criteria for superiority to each active component at all 9 time points (all P < 0.0001), lowering IOP by an additional 2.2 to 3.3 mmHg versus netarsudil and an additional 1.5 to 2.4 mmHg versus latanoprost. At month 3, the proportion of patients achieving mean diurnal IOP ≤ 15 mmHg was 42.1% for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 15.8% for netarsudil, and 18.3% for latanoprost. No treatment-related serious adverse event (AE) was observed. Treatment-related systemic AEs were minimal. The most frequent ocular AE was conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 54.5%; netarsudil, 42.7%; latanoprost, 22.3%), which was generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated IOP reductions that were statistically and clinically superior to its individual components at all 9 time points over 3 months, with tolerable ocular safety. This FDC offers a reduced treatment burden that may improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Once-Daily Netarsudil Versus Twice-Daily Timolol in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure: The Randomized Phase 3 ROCKET-4 Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of netarsudil once daily (QD) and timolol twice daily (BID). DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, phase 3, noninferiority study. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (unmedicated baseline IOP >20 to <30 mm Hg at 8:00 AM) were randomized to netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% QD (PM) or timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% BID. The primary endpoint was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3 in patients with baseline IOP <25 mm Hg (per-protocol population). Safety was recorded over the 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients from each treatment arm were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Netarsudil QD met the criteria for noninferiority to timolol BID. Mean treated IOP ranged from 16.3 to 17.9 mm Hg for netarsudil and 16.7 to 17.6 for timolol, with mean reductions from baseline of 3.9 to 4.7 mm Hg and 3.8 to 5.2 mm Hg, respectively. In prespecified secondary analyses, netarsudil demonstrated noninferiority to timolol in patients with baseline IOP <27 mm Hg and <30 mm Hg. The IOP-lowering effects of netarsudil were sustained over 6 months of treatment. No treatment-related serious adverse event (AE) was reported for either study drug. However, statistically significant reductions in mean heart rate were recorded at all study visits for the timolol group. The most frequent ocular AE among netarsudil-treated patients was conjunctival hyperemia (47.9%), which was predominately mild. CONCLUSIONS: Netarsudil QD (PM), a first-in-class IOP-lowering medication, was noninferior to timolol BID and was associated with tolerable ocular AEs.

Long-term Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy Evaluation of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution: Rho Kinase Elevated IOP Treatment Trial (ROCKET-2).

PURPOSE: To evaluate netarsudil 0.02% ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, noninferiority clinical study. METHODS: After a washout of all prestudy ocular hypotensive medications, 756 eligible patients with elevated IOP were randomized to receive netarsudil 0.02% once a day (q.d.) (251); netarsudil 0.02% twice a day (b.i.d.) (254); or timolol 0.5% b.i.d. (251) for 12 months, as well as a noninterventional Corneal Observation Study (COS) for patients manifesting cornea verticillata. RESULTS: On treatment, mean IOP at 8:00 AM decreased from a baseline IOP of 22.5-22.6 mm Hg to 17.9-18.8 mm Hg, 17.2-18.0 mm Hg, and 17.5-17.9 mm Hg for netarsudil q.d., netarsudil b.i.d., and timolol, respectively, over 12 months. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were ocular, with the most frequent ocular AE being conjunctival hyperemia, with an incidence of 61%, 66%, and 14%, respectively. The next most frequent AEs were corneal deposits (corneal verticillata), with an incidence of 26%, 25%, and 1%, respectively, and conjunctival hemorrhage (typically petechial), with an incidence of 20%, 19%, and 1%, respectively. All 3 AEs were generally scored as mild, with conjunctival hyperemia and/or hemorrhage appearing sporadically during the study. In the observational follow-up component of this study, there was no clinically meaningful impact of corneal verticillata on visual function in affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, double-masked trial, once-daily dosing of netarsudil 0.02% was effective, consistently lowering IOP through 12 months, and was tolerated by the majority of patients.

The Effects of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution on Aqueous Humor Dynamics in a Randomized Study in Humans.

PURPOSE: Netarsudil, an inhibitor of Rho kinase and a norepinephrine transporter, has been shown to lower elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in controlled studies of patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, and in healthy volunteers. The mechanism of this ocular hypotensive effect in humans is unknown. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of netarsudil 0.02% on aqueous humor dynamics (AHD) parameters. In this double-masked, vehicle-controlled, paired-eye comparison study, 11 healthy volunteers received topical netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% or its vehicle once daily for 7 days (morning dosing). The primary endpoints were the change in AHD parameters, compared between active and vehicle-treated eyes. RESULTS: In netarsudil-treated eyes, diurnal outflow facility increased from 0.27 ± 0.10 µL/min/mmHg to 0.33 ± 0.11 µL/min/mmHg (+22%; P = 0.02) after 7 days of treatment. In placebo-treated eyes, diurnal outflow facility did not significantly change (P = 0.94). The difference between netarsudil and placebo eyes in diurnal change of outflow facility was 0.08 µL/min/mmHg (P < 0.001). Diurnal episcleral venous pressure (EVP) in netarsudil-treated eyes decreased from 7.9 ± 1.2 mmHg to 7.2 ± 1.8 (-10%; P = 0.01). Diurnal EVP was not significantly different between netarsudil- and placebo-treated eyes. There was a trend toward decreasing aqueous humor flow rate (-15%; P = 0.08). No treatment changes were seen in uveoscleral outflow rate. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dosing of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% lowered IOP through increasing trabecular outflow facility and reducing EVP. This suggests a combination of mechanisms that affect both the proximal and distal outflow pathways.

Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Netarsudil to Timolol in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure: Rho Kinase Elevated IOP Treatment Trial 1 and 2 (ROCKET-1 and ROCKET-2).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and ocular and systemic safety of netarsudil 0.02% ophthalmic solution, a rho-kinase inhibitor and norepinephrine transporter inhibitor, in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized noninferiority clinical trials: Rho Kinase Elevated IOP Treatment Trial 1 and 2 (ROCKET-1 and ROCKET-2). METHODS: After a washout of all pre-study ocular hypotensive medications, eligible patients were randomized to receive netarsudil 0.02% once daily (q.d.), timolol 0.5% twice a day (b.i.d.), and (ROCKET-2 only) netarsudil 0.02% b.i.d. Data through 3 months from both studies are provided in this report. RESULTS: Enrolled into the 2 studies were 1167 patients. Treatment with netarsudil q.d. produced clinically and statistically significant reductions from baseline intraocular pressure (P < .001), and was noninferior to timolol in the per-protocol population with maximum baseline IOP < 25 mm Hg in both studies (ROCKET-2, primary outcome measure and population, ROCKET-1, post hoc outcome measure). Netarsudil b.i.d. was also noninferior to timolol (ROCKET-2). The most frequent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, the incidence of which ranged from 50% (126/251, ROCKET-2) to 53% (108/203, ROCKET-1) for netarsudil q.d., 59% (149/253, ROCKET-2) for netarsudil b.i.d., and 8% (17/208, ROCKET-1) to 11% (27/251, ROCKET-2) for timolol (P < .0001 for netarsudil vs timolol). CONCLUSIONS: In 2 large, randomized, double-masked trials reported here, once-daily dosing of netarsudil 0.02% was found to be effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. The novel pharmacology and aqueous humor dynamic effects of this molecule suggest it may be a useful addition to the armamentarium of ocular hypotensive medications.

Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Real-life anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy use in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) was assessed in a retrospective, observational study in Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, UK and Venezuela. METHODS: Medical records of patients with wAMD, who started ranibizumab treatment between 1 January 2009 and 31 August 2009, were evaluated. Data were collected until the end of treatment and/or monitoring or until 31 August 2011. RESULTS: 2227 patients who received ≥1 anti-VEGF injection with a baseline visual acuity assessment and ≥1 postbaseline visual acuity assessment for the treated eye were evaluated. Visual acuity improved until about day 120; thereafter, visual acuity gains were not maintained. Mean change in visual acuity score from baseline to years 1 and 2 was +2.4 and +0.6 letters, respectively. Patients received a mean of 5.0 and 2.2 injections in the first and second year, respectively. There were substantial differences in visual outcomes and injection frequency between countries. More frequent visits and injections were associated with greater improvements in visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, fewer injections are administered than in clinical trials. Anti-VEGF treatment resulted in an initial improvement in visual acuity; however, this was not maintained over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01447043.