Beta-arrestin2 as a competitor for GRK2 interaction with the GLP-1 receptor upon receptor activation.

The signaling of seven transmembrane receptors/G-protein- coupled receptors (GPCRs) is regulated by a number of receptor interacting proteins, including ßarrestins (ßarrs) and GPCR kinases (GRKs). In the present report, we have analyzed the interaction pattern between the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R), ßarr2, and GRK2 using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays. We found that ßarr2 interacts with the GLP-1R in a biphasic manner with a phosphorylation-independent and a phosphorylation-dependent component. In competition experiments, we observed ßarr2 competing with GRK2 for interaction with GLP-1R. We propose a model were ßarr2 competes with GRK2 for interaction with the activated and GRK phosphorylated GLP-1R, suggesting a new role of ßarr2 in regulating the orchestration of GRK2 functionality.

Beta-arrestin-based Bret2 screening assay for the "non"-beta-arrestin binding CB1 receptor.

CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists have been demonstrated to be effective in treating obesity and related disorders. This study has been focused on establishing a beta-arrestin 2-based screening assay for the CB1R using BRET2 technology. When the existing BRET2 screening platform was applied to the CB1R, the authors discovered that the receptor interacted weakly with beta-arrestin 2, resulting in unsatisfactory assay performance. To enhance the beta-arrestin binding capacity, they replaced the C-terminal tail of the CB1R with tails from either the V2 or BRS3 receptors, both of which interact strongly with beta-arrestin 2. Using this chimeric approach, the authors screened a small compound library and identified 21 antagonist and inverse agonist hits with IC50 and EC50 values ranging from 0.3 nM to 7.5 microM. Both primary and secondary screening were performed with Z'>0.5, suggesting that the assay is a robust and cost-effective alternative to existing cell-based assays.

The effect of a high-MUFA, low-glycaemic index diet and a low-fat diet on appetite and glucose metabolism during a 6-month weight maintenance period.

We aimed to test the effects of three different weight maintenance diets on appetite, glucose and fat metabolism following an initial low-energy diet (LED) induced body weight loss. Following an 8-week LED and a 2-3-week refeeding period, 131 subjects were randomized to three diets for 6 months: MUFA, moderate-fat (35-45 energy percentage (E%) fat), high in MUFA with low glycaemic index; LF, low fat (20-30 E% fat) or CTR, control (35 E% fat). A meal test study was performed in a subgroup, before and after the 6-month dietary intervention, with forty-two subjects completing both meal tests. No difference in body weight, energy intake or appetite ratings were observed between diets. Both the LF and MUFA diets compared to CTR diet reduced postprandial glycaemia and insulinaemia and lowered fasting insulin from month 0 to month 6. Following the 8-week LED period lower levels of the appetite regulating peptides, pancreatic polypeptide, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon-like peptide-2, along with increased appetite scores were seen in comparison to measurements performed after the 6-month dietary intervention. In conclusion, the two competing diets, MUFA and LF, were equally good with respect to glucose metabolism, whereas the CTR diet resembling the typical Western diet, high in SFA, sugar and high glycaemic carbohydrates, indicated associations to lowering of insulin sensitivity. Lower levels of appetite regulatory peptides along with increased appetite scores following an 8-week LED and 2-3-week refeeding period, suggest that strategies for physiological appetite control following a LED period are needed, in order to prevent weight regain.

Characterization of G-protein coupled receptor kinase interaction with the neurokinin-1 receptor using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer.

To analyze the interaction between the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor and G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), we performed bioluminescence resonance energy transfer(2) (BRET(2)) measurements between the family A NK-1 receptor and GRK2 and GRK5 as well as their respective kinase-inactive mutants. We observed agonist induced interaction of both GRK5 and GRK2 with the activated NK-1 receptor. In saturation experiments, we observed GRK5 to interact with the activated receptor in a monophasic manner while GRK2 interacted in a biphasic manner with the low affinity phase corresponding to receptor affinity for GRK5. Agonist induced GRK5 interaction with the receptor was dependent on intact kinase-activity, whereas the high affinity phase of GRK2 interaction was independent of kinase activity. We were surprised to find that the BRET(2) saturation experiments indicated that before receptor activation, the full-length NK-1 receptor, but not a functional C-terminal tail-truncated receptor, is preassociated with GRK5 in a relatively low-affinity state. We demonstrate that GRK5 can compete for agonist induced GRK2 interaction with the NK-1 receptor, whereas GRK2 does not compete for receptor interaction with GRK5. We suggest that GRK5 is preassociated with the NK-1 receptor and that GRK5, rather than GRK2, is a key player in competitive regulation of GRK subtype specific interaction with the NK-1 receptor.

Cooperative binding of insulin-like Peptide 3 to a dimeric relaxin family peptide receptor 2.

Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) binds to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) called relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2). RXFP2 belongs to the leucine-rich repeat-containing subgroup (LGR) of class A GPCRs. Negative cooperativity has recently been demonstrated in other members of the LGR subgroup. In this work, the kinetics of INSL3 binding to HEK293 cells stably transfected with RXFP2 (HEK293-RXFP2) have been investigated in detail to study whether negative cooperativity occurs and whether this receptor functions as a dimer. Our results show that negative cooperativity is present and that INSL3-RXFP2 binding shows both similarities and differences with insulin binding to the insulin receptor. A dose-response curve for the negative cooperativity of INSL3 binding had a reverse bell shape reminiscent of that seen for the negative cooperativity of insulin binding to its receptor. This suggests that binding of INSL3 may happen in a trans rather than in a cis way in a receptor dimer. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) experiments confirmed that RXFP2 forms constitutive homodimers. Heterodimerization between RXFP2 and RXFP1 was also observed.

Negative cooperativity in H2 relaxin binding to a dimeric relaxin family peptide receptor 1.

H2 relaxin, a member of the insulin superfamily, binds to the G-protein-coupled receptor RXFP1 (relaxin family peptide 1), a receptor that belongs to the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing subgroup (LGRs) of class A GPCRs. We recently demonstrated negative cooperativity in INSL3 binding to RXFP2 and showed that this subgroup of GPCRs functions as constitutive dimers. In this work, we investigated whether the binding of H2 relaxin to RXFP1 also shows negative cooperativity, and whether this receptor functions as a dimer using BRET(2). Both binding and dissociation were temperature dependent, and the pH optimum for binding was pH 7.0. Our results showed that RXFP1 is a constitutive dimer with negative cooperativity in ligand binding, that dimerization occurs through the 7TM domain, and that the ectodomain has a stabilizing effect on this interaction. Dimerization and negative cooperativity appear to be general properties of LGRs involved in reproduction as well as other GPCRs.

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer as a screening assay: Focus on partial and inverse agonism.

The reported data for compound screening with the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET2) assay is very limited, and several questions remain unaddressed, such as the behavior of agonists. Eleven beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2-AR) agonists were tested for full or partial agonism in an improved version of the receptor/beta-arrestin2 BRET2 assay and in 2 cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) assays (column cAMP assay and ALPHAscreen cAMP assay). Tested in the highly sensitive ALPHAscreen cAMP assay, all selected agonists behaved as full agonists, using isoproterenol as a reference compound. In the less sensitive column cAMP assay, ephedrine and dopamine had a clear partial response. For the BRET2 assay, a highly graded picture was obtained. Moreover, beta2-AR antagonists were tested for inverse agonism. Pronounced inverse agonism was detected in the ALPHAscreen cAMP assay. Only marginal inverse agonistic responses were seen for alprenolol and pindolol in the column cAMP assay, and no inverse agonism was seen in the BRET2 assay. For the beta2-AR, the BRET2 assay may be superior for secondary screening of agonists where a separation of full and partial agonists is needed and the ALPHAscreen cAMP assay may be preferred for primary screening of agonists where all receptor activating compounds are desired.

Nonpeptide and peptide growth hormone secretagogues act both as ghrelin receptor agonist and as positive or negative allosteric modulators of ghrelin signaling.

Two nonpeptide (L692,429 and MK-677) and two peptide [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6 and ghrelin] agonists were compared in binding and in signal transduction assays: calcium mobilization, inositol phosphate turnover, cAMP-responsive element (CRE), and serum-responsive element (SRE) controlled transcription, as well as arrestin mobilization. MK-677 acted as a simple agonist having an affinity of 6.5 nm and activated all signal transduction systems with similar high potency (0.2-1.4 nm). L-692,429 also displayed a very similar potency in all signaling assays (25-60 nm) but competed with a 1000-fold lower apparent affinity for ghrelin binding and surprisingly acted as a positive allosteric receptor modulator by increasing ghrelin's potency 4- to 10-fold. In contrast, the potency of GHRP-6 varied 600-fold (0.1-61 nm) depending on the signal transduction assay, and it acted as a negative allosteric modulator of ghrelin signaling. Unexpectedly, the maximal signaling efficacy for ghrelin was increased above what was observed with the hormone itself during coadministration with the nonendogenous agonists. It is concluded that agonists for the ghrelin receptor vary both in respect of their intrinsic agonist properties and in their ability to modulate ghrelin signaling. A receptor model is presented wherein ghrelin normally only activates one receptor subunit in a dimer and where the smaller nonendogenous agonists bind in the other subunit to act both as coagonists and as either neutral (MK-677), positive (L-692,429), or negative (GHRP-6) modulators of ghrelin function. It is suggested that an optimal drug candidate could be an agonist that also is a positive modulator of ghrelin signaling.

GLP-1 Induces Barrier Protective Expression in Brunner's Glands and Regulates Colonic Inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial roles for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)/GLP-1R signaling have recently been described in diseases, where low-grade inflammation is a common phenomenon. We investigated the effects of GLP-1 in Brunner's glands and duodenum with abundant expression of GLP-1 receptors, as well as GLP-1 effect on colonic inflammation. METHODS: RNA from Brunner's glands of GLP-1R knockout and wild-type mice were subjected to full transcriptome profiling. Array results were validated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in wild-type mice and compared with samples from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and controls. In addition, we performed a detailed investigation of the effects of exogenous liraglutide dosing in a T-cell driven adoptive transfer (AdTr) colitis mouse model. RESULTS: Analyses of the Brunner's gland transcriptomes of GLP-1R knockout and wild-type mice identified 722 differentially expressed genes. Upregulated transcripts after GLP-1 dosing included IL-33, chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20), and mucin 5b. Biopsies from IBD patients and controls, as well as data from the AdTr model, showed deregulated expression of GLP-1R, CCL20, and IL-33 in colon. Circulating levels of GLP-1 were found to be increased in mice with colitis. Finally, the colonic cytokine levels and disease scores of the AdTr model indicated reduced levels of colonic inflammation in liraglutide-dosed animals. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that IL-33, GLP-1R, and CCL20 are deregulated in human IBD, and that prophylactic treatment with 0.6 mg/kg liraglutide improves disease in AdTr colitis. In addition, GLP-1 receptor agonists upregulate IL-33, mucin 5b, and CCL20 in murine Brunner's glands. Taken together, our data indicate that GLP-1 receptor agonists affect gut homeostasis in both proximal and distal parts of the gut.

Internalization kinetics of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor.

This study quantified the agonist-induced endocytotic and recycling events of the mammalian gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) and investigated the role of the intracellular carboxyl (C)-terminal tail in regulating agonist-induced receptor internalization kinetics. The rate of internalization for the rat GnRH-R was found to be exceptionally low when compared with G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) which possess a cytoplasmic C-terminal tail (thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (TRH-R), catfish GnRH-R (cfGnRH-R) and GnRH/TRH-R chimeric receptor). These data provide evidence that the presence of a functional intracellular cytoplasmic C-terminal tail is essential for rapid internalization of the studied GPCRs.

Development of a BRET2 screening assay using beta-arrestin 2 mutants.

This study has focused on enhancing the signal generated from the interaction between a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and beta-arrestin 2 (beta-arr2), measured by the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) technology. Both class A (beta(2)-adrenergic receptor [beta(2)-AR]) and class B (neurokinin-type 1 receptor [NK1-R]) GPCRs, classified based on their internalization characteristics, have been analyzed. It was evaluated whether the BRET(2) signal can be enhanced by using (1) beta-arr2 phosphorylation-independent mutant (beta-arr2 R169E) and (2) beta-arr2 mutants deficient in their ability to interact with the components of the clathrin-coated vesicles (beta-arr2 R393E, R395E and beta-arr2 373 stop). For the class B receptor, there was no major difference in the agonist-promoted BRET(2) signal when comparing results obtained with wild-type (wt) and mutant beta-arr2. However, with the class A receptor, a more than 2-fold increase in the BRET(2) signal was observed with beta-arr2 mutants lacking the AP-2 or both AP-2 and clathrin binding sites. This set of data suggests that the inability of these beta-arr2 mutants to interact with the components of the clathrin-coated vesicle probably prevents their rapid dissociation from the receptor, thus yielding an increased and more stable BRET(2) signal. The beta-arr2 R393E, R395E mutant also enhanced the signal window with other members of the GPCR family (neuropeptide Y type 2 receptor [NPY2-R] and TG1019 receptor) and was successfully applied in full-plate BRET(2)-based agonist and antagonist screening assays.

Use of the BRET 7TM receptor/beta-arrestin assay in drug discovery and screening.

To perform functional cell-based screening assays on seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, also known as G-protein coupled receptors, at least three distinct assays are currently needed to screen for G(alphas), G(alphai/0) or G(alphaq/11) signaling receptors. Therefore, there has long been a desire for a universal screening assay that could be used to screen all 7TM receptors independent of their signaling pathway. The receptor/beta-arrestin interaction is common to virtually all 7TM receptors. Therefore, an assay based on this interaction should achieve just that. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technology can be used to measure the receptor/beta-arrestin interaction in living cells but due to various technical and biological reasons, the use of the technology for compound screening has been limited. The recent development of beta-arrestin mutants that significantly improve the assay signal, in combination with new improved instrumentation, has transformed bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technology from being a highly specialized research tool in molecular pharmacology to a more drug screening-friendly technique that is useful in an industrial setting.

Direct demonstration of NCAM cis-dimerization and inhibitory effect of palmitoylation using the BRET2 technique.

Biological activity of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) depends on both adhesion and activation of intra-cellular signaling. Based on in vitro experiments with truncated extra-cellular domains, several models describing homophilic NCAM trans- and cis-interactions have been proposed. However, cis-dimerization in living cells has not been shown directly and the role of the cytoplasmic part in NCAM dimerization is poorly understood. Here, we used the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) technique to directly demonstrate that full-length NCAM cis-homodimerizes in living cells. Based on BRET(2)50 values we suggest that the intra-cellular part of NCAM inhibits cis-dimerization, an effect mainly dependent on the palmitoylation sites.

Dimerization and negative cooperativity in the relaxin family peptide receptors.

Peptides of the relaxin family bind to the relaxin family peptide receptors or RXFPs, members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. For many years, ligand binding to GPCRs was thought to take place as monomeric complexes, ignoring early evidence of negative cooperativity. However, recent research has shown that most GPCRs form constitutive dimers or larger oligomers. The connection between dimerization and negative cooperativity has now been shown for several GPCRs, including the thyroid-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone receptors, which like RXFP1 and -2 belong to the leucine-rich repeat-containing subgroup of class A GPCRs. We recently demonstrated homodimerization and negative cooperativity for RXFP1 and RXFP2 as well as their heterodimerization. Another study showed that RXFP1 has to homodimerize in order to be transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell membrane.

Evidence for a role of caveolin-1 in neurokinin-1 receptor plasma-membrane localization, efficient signaling, and interaction with beta-arrestin 2.

This study was focused on the relationship between the plasma-membrane localization of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1-R) and its endocytic and signaling properties. First, we employed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to study the domain structure of HEK-293 cells and NK1-R microlocalization. EPR spectra and the GHOST condensation routine demonstrated that NK1-R was distributed in a well-ordered domain of HEK-293 cells possibly representing lipid raft/caveolae microdomains, whereas the impairment of caveolae changed the NK1-R plasma-membrane distribution. Internalization and second messenger assays combined with bioluminescence resonance energy transfer were employed subsequently to evaluate the functional importance of the NK1-R microlocalization in lipid raft/caveolae microdomains. The internalization pattern was delineated through the use of dominant-negative mutants (DNM) of caveolin-1 S80E (Cav1 S80E), dynamin-1 K44A (Dyn K44A), and beta-arrestin (beta-arr 319-418) and by means of cell lines that expressed various endogenous levels of beta-arrestins. NK1-R displayed rapid internalization that was substantially reduced by DNMs of dynamin-1 and beta-arrestin and even more profoundly in cells lacking both beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2. These internalization data were highly suggestive of the predominant use of the clathrin-mediated pathway by NK1-R, even though NK1-R tended to reside constitutively in lipid raft/caveolae microdomains. Evidence was also obtained that the proper clustering of the receptor in these microdomains was important for effective agonist-induced NK1-R signaling and for its interaction with beta-arrestin2.

Opsin oligomerization in a heterologous cell system.

Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) we studied opsin oligomerization in heterologous expression systems and quantitatively assessed its oligomerization state. BRET2 saturation and competition experiments were performed with live COS-7 cells expressing Rluc-and GFP2-tagged receptor constructs. BRET2 saturation curves obtained were hyperbolic, and the calculated oligomerization state (N = 1 for dimers) suggested that opsin (N = 1.34 +/- 0.25) forms higher oligomers. Very high BRET2 values obtained for the opsin homo-dimer pair indicated a large energy transfer efficiency (E) and for cases where E >> 0.1 a modified saturation curve was proposed. The existence of homo-dimer complexes was additionally supported by competition assay results and was also observed in HEK-293 cells. Furthermore, evidence was provided for homo-and hetero-dimerization of family A (beta2-adrenergic) and B (gastric inhibitory polypeptide, GIP) receptors. In summary, these experiments demonstrate homo-and hetero-dimerization for opsin, beta 2-adrenergic, and GIP receptors.

Dimerization of ADAR2 is mediated by the double-stranded RNA binding domain.

Members of the family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) can catalyze the hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine and thereby change the sequence of specific mRNAs with highly double-stranded structures. The ADARs all contain one or more repeats of the double-stranded RNA binding motif (DRBM). By both in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that the DRBMs of rat ADAR2 are necessary and sufficient for dimerization of the enzyme. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) demonstrates that ADAR2 also exists as dimers in living mammalian cells and that mutation of DRBM1 lowers the dimerization affinity while mutation of DRBM2 does not. Nonetheless, the editing efficiency of the GluR2 Q/R site depends on a functional DRBM2. The ADAR2 DRBMs thus serve differential roles in RNA dimerization and GluR2 Q/R editing, and we propose a model for RNA editing that incorporates the new findings.