A Prospective, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Study of Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite to Treat Decollete Wrinkles.

BACKGROUND: Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) dermal filler is used for a variety of aesthetic treatments; however, the safety and effectiveness of diluted CaHA for the treatment of décolleté wrinkles have not been established. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of diluted CaHA (Radiesse; 1:2 CaHA:saline) injection for the improvement of décolleté wrinkles in females. METHODS: Eligible females with moderate or severe ratings on the Merz Aesthetic Scale (MAS) Decollete Wrinkles - At Rest received up to 3 injection cycles of diluted CaHA either 8 weeks apart (3 injection cycles) or 16 weeks apart (2 injection cycles). Effectiveness was evaluated by improvement on the MAS. Adverse events were recorded over a 52 week period. RESULTS: Sixteen weeks after the last treatment, the response rate (1-point improvement or greater) on the MAS Decollete Wrinkles - At Rest was 73.5% (P<0.0001; pooled sample) for all patients. The use of diluted CaHA in the decollete also demonstrated a favorable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Diluted CaHA is a safe and effective treatment for the improvement of decollete wrinkles in females.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):551-556.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8261.

Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine CaHA (+) for Soft Tissue Augmentation: Results from an Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a versatile technique for line filling, skin tightening, lifting, contouring, and volumizing. The present study was designed to confirm safety and effectiveness of the product with lidocaine (CaHA (+)) in a holistic treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs), marionette lines, and/or cheeks. METHODS: A total of 207 subjects with moderate to severe facial volume deficit were treated with CaHA(+) in this open-label study. Effectiveness assessments included Merz Aesthetics Scales® (MAS), investigator- and subject-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales (iGAIS/sGAIS), and FACE-QTM questionnaires. Responder rates were defined as at least one-point improvement on MAS according to blinded rating. Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting. RESULTS: Primary endpoint was evaluated 12 weeks after last injection. Responder rates were 93.6%, 88.7%, and 81.9% in the NLFs, marionette lines, and cheeks, respectively, and were statistically significant above the pre-defined 60% threshold (P< 0.0001). Investigator- and subject-assessed GAIS were consistent and showed high rates of improvement throughout the study, with peak values of 98.0% at week 4 on iGAIS and 93.5% at 12 weeks after last injection on sGAIS. After 18 months, the majority of subjects (52.5%) still perceived improvement via sGAIS. Moreover, total FACE-Q scores demonstrated high subject satisfaction with treatment. All related treatment emergent adverse events were transient and expected injection-site reactions mostly of mild to moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: CaHA (+) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness in the treatment of NLFs, marionette lines, and cheek volume loss in real-life conditions up to 18 months. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):481-487. doi:10.36849/JDD.6737.