Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases-an Augsburg University Medical Center experience.

PURPOSE: External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x­rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x­ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x­ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5-5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3­monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1­year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1­year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1­year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: IORT with 50-kV x­rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.

Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.

BACKGROUND: Standard microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) is a short operation with minimal blood loss, and a low rate of peri- and intraoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate intraoperative findings, complications, and early postoperative neurological outcome (< 105 days) in patients undergoing MLD with or without implantation of an annular closure device (ACD). METHODS: This study is based on data analysis of a post-marketing, prospective, multicenter RCT in Europe including patients undergoing standard MLD with or without implantation of an ACD (Barricaid®, Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., Woburn, MA). Enrollment of 554 patients in 21 centers in Europe (Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands, and France) started in 2010 and was completed in October 2014, with 276 patients randomized to the ACD group and 278 to the control group. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 70 min in the ACD group and 52 min in the control group (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 24 s in the ACD group and 7 s in the control group (p < 0.0001). Average blood loss was 94.2 ml in the ACD group and 64.7 ml in the control group (p = 0.0001). Serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred in 3.7% (10/272) of the ACD group and 7.9% (22/278) of the control group. Dural injuries occurred in 13 (4.8%) patients in the ACD group and 7 (2.5%) in the control group. There was one device-related nerve root injury resulting in a nerve root amputation. Surgical complications included 3 hematomas in the ACD group and 4 in the control group; 3 infections occurred in both groups. Device migrations were documented in 3 patients in the ACD group. Patients in the ACD group (n = 7, 2.6%) underwent fewer reoperations compared with that in the control group (n = 16, 5.8%, OR = 2.3 (0.9-5.7)). Mean VAS leg pain at 3 months was 11.9 in the ACD and 15.1 in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Short-term outcome after MLD with or without implantation of ACD was similar in both groups. Patients included in the ACD group underwent fewer reoperations in the first 3 months after surgery. Nevertheless, longer operation time, higher amount of blood loss, and risk of nerve root lesion during device implantation should be considered additional risks in patients undergoing ACD implantation after MLD.

Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is an underdiagnosed condition. Several published cohorts have reported favorable midterm outcomes after SIJ fusion using titanium implants placed across the SIJ. Herein, we report 12-month follow-up from SIJ fusion in a standard clinic setting. METHODS: A carefully selected group of 160 consecutive patients with painful SIJ dysfunction were diagnosed at a single center and underwent unilateral or staged bilateral SIJ fusion using triangular titanium implants. Patients were routinely seen in clinic for follow-up every 3 months where they completed visual analog scale (0-10 range) pain ratings and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Follow-up CT scan was performed at 1 year. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 years, and 68% were women. 30% underwent staged bilateral SIJ fusion. By month 12, SIJ pain decreased from 8.0 to 2.5 (p < 0.0001) and disability (ODI) decreased from 45.3 to 16.4 (p < 0.0001). The proportion with clinically significant improvements in SIJ pain and ODI was high (> 95%). Perioperative adverse events were mild and decreased with increasing surgical experience with the procedure. Subgroup analysis showed slightly smaller improvements in those undergoing bilateral surgery and those with a spinal cord stimulator in place. CT scan at 1 year showed reabsorption along one or more implants in 16% of cases, but there were no breakages or implant removals. CONCLUSIONS: In standard clinical practice, SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants produces significant improvement in pain and disability related to SIJ dysfunction. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Three-year results from a randomized trial of lumbar discectomy with annulus fibrosus occlusion in patients at high risk for reherniation.

BACKGROUND: A larger defect in the annulus fibrosus following lumbar discectomy is a well-known risk factor for reherniation. Procedures intended to prevent reherniation by sealing or occluding the annular defect warrant study in high-risk patients. This study sought to determine 3-year results of lumbar discectomy with a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD) or lumbar discectomy only (controls) in patients at high risk for reherniation. METHODS: This multicenter randomized trial enrolled patients with sciatica due to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who failed conservative treatment. Patients with large annular defects after lumbar limited microdiscectomy were intraoperatively randomly assigned to receive ACD or control. Clinical and imaging follow-up was performed at routine intervals over 3 years. Main outcomes included rate of reherniations, reoperations, and endplate changes; leg and back pain scores on a visual analogue scale; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36; and adverse events adjudicated by a data safety monitoring board. RESULTS: Among 554 randomized patients, the modified intent-to-treat population consisted of 272 patients in which ACD implantation was attempted and 278 receiving control; device implantation was not attempted in 4 patients assigned to ACD. Outcomes at 3 years favored ACD for symptomatic reherniation (14.8% vs. 29.5%; P < 0.001), reoperation (11.0% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.007), leg pain (21 vs. 30; P < 0.01), back pain (23 vs. 30; P = 0.01), ODI (18 vs. 23; P = 0.02), PCS (47 vs. 44; P < 0.01), and MCS (52 vs. 49; P < 0.01). The frequency of all-cause serious adverse events was comparable between groups (42.3% vs. 44.5%; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a bone-anchored ACD in patients with large annular defects following lumbar discectomy reduces the risk of reherniation and reoperation, and has a similar safety profile over 3-year follow-up compared with lumbar limited discectomy only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01283438.

Long-Term Survival after Primary Ewing's Sarcoma of the Skull with Intracranial Extension.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull is a very rare malignant neoplasm, predominantly occurring in children and adolescents. We describe here the clinical, neuroradiologic, and histopathologic features of a patient with primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull and discuss the standards of therapy for this type of tumor. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: This 18-year-old male patient presented with a primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull, involving the dura of the frontal and parietal lobes of the left cerebral hemisphere. He was treated with gross total surgical excision of tumor, skull reconstruction, chemotherapy, and irradiation. Twelve years after the surgery, the patient has no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastases. Radical surgical excision of the primary tumor with safety margins is thought to play a role in the favorable clinical course. CONCLUSION: The presented case is the longest surviving patient after treatment of primary Ewing's sarcoma of the skull bone. This rare type of tumor may allow better survival rates under adequate management than sarcoma elsewhere in the body.

Early cranioplasty may improve outcome in neurological patients with decompressive craniectomy.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is an effective therapy to relieve intractable intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury. However, little is known about the optimal timing for cranioplasties in the sub-acute phase. The objective of the present study was to analyse the effect of cranioplasty timing on neurological outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Single-centre observational study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty during the course of inpatient neurorehabilitation were identified by means of a retrospective hospital database search. This database contains the following prospectively-entered weekly scores: Barthel-Index (BI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Coma Remission Scale (CRS). Additional clinical data were taken retrospectively from patient charts. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that influenced the end-of-rehabilitation outcome. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Patients with shorter delays to cranioplasty (<86 days) had a better functional outcome than patients with longer delays of >85 days (60 ± 29.5 versus 25 ± 24.1 BI points; p < 0.01, respectively). Age, pre-operative BI and CRS scores were additional independent outcome factors. Complication rates were not different between early and late cranioplasty groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with decompressive craniectomy for management of intracranial hypertension may benefit from early cranioplasty.

Comparison of treatments for lumbar disc herniation: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient outcomes of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure (LD + AC), lumbar discectomy (LD), and continuing conservative care (CC) for treatment of lumbar disc herniation refractory to initial conservative management. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several treatment options are available to patients with refractory symptoms of lumbar disc herniation, but their comparative efficacy is unclear. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to compare efficacy of LD + AC, LD, and CC for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Outcomes included leg pain, back pain, disability (each reported on a 0-100 scale), reherniation, and reoperation. Data were analyzed using random effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS: This review included 14 comparative studies (8 randomized) involving 3947 patients-11 studies of LD versus CC (3232 patients), 3 studies of LD + AC versus LD (715 patients), and no studies of LD + AC versus CC. LD was more effective than CC in reducing leg pain (mean difference [MD] -10, P < .001) and back pain (MD -7, P < .001). LD + AC was more effective than LD in reducing risk of reherniation (odds ratio 0.38, P < .001) and reoperation (odds ratio 0.33, P < .001). There was indirect evidence that LD + AC was more effective than CC in reducing leg pain (MD -25, P = .003), back pain (MD -20, P = .02), and disability (MD -13, P = .02) although the treatment effect was smaller in randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS: Results of a network meta-analysis show LD is more effective than CC in alleviating symptoms of lumbar disc herniation refractory to initial conservative management. Further, LD + AC lowers risk of reherniation and reoperation versus LD and may improve patient symptoms more than CC.

Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with large annular defects after lumbar discectomy for disc herniation are at high risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device, in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy, resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates plus increased overall success compared with lumbar microdiscectomy alone. DESIGN: This is a multicenter, randomized superiority study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with symptoms of lumbar disc herniation for at least 6 weeks with a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) after lumbar microdiscectomy were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary end points determined a priori were recurrent herniation and a composite end point consisting of patient-reported, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Study success required superiority of annular closure on both end points at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients received lumbar microdiscectomy with additional bone-anchored annular closure device (n=276 participants) or lumbar microdiscectomy only (control; n=278 participants). This research was supported by Intrinsic Therapeutics. Two authors received study-specific support morethan $10,000 per year, 8 authors received study-specific support less than $10,000 per year, and 11 authors received no study-specific support. RESULTS: Among 554 randomized participants, 550 (annular closure device: n=272; control: n=278) were included in the modified intent-to-treat efficacy analysis and 550 (annular closure device: n=267; control: n=283) were included in the as-treated safety analysis. Both co-primary end points of the study were met, with recurrent herniation (50% vs. 70%, P<.001) and composite end point success (27% vs. 18%, P=.02) favoring annular closure device. The frequency of symptomatic reherniation was lower with annular closure device (12% vs. 25%, P<.001). There were 29 reoperations in 24 patients in the annular closure device group and 61 reoperations in 45 control patients. The frequency of reoperations to address recurrent herniation was 5% with annular closure device and 13% in controls (P=.001). End plate changes were more prevalent in the annular closure device group (84% vs. 30%, P<.001). Scores for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life at regular visits were comparable between groups over 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at high risk of herniation recurrence after lumbar microdiscectomy, annular closure with a bone-anchored implant lowers the risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation. Additional study to determine outcomes beyond 2 years with a bone-anchored annular closure device is warranted.

Overall survival in patients with malignant glioma may be significantly longer with tumors located in deep grey matter.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of overall survival with tumor location (lobar vs. deep grey matter) and with other clinical and imaging variables in a cohort of patients with high grade gliomas. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial WHO grade 3 and 4 gliomas were evaluated. Clinical data included demographics, symptoms at presentation, treatment variables, and overall survival. Radiological data included tumor side, site (deep vs. lobar) and size, extent of peritumoral edema, and presence of midline shift. Biostatistics were carried out using log rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were investigated, 23 (19.0%) with WHO grade 3 and 98 (81.0%) with WHO grade 4 gliomas. Tumors had lobar location in 96 cases (79.3%) and deep grey matter location in 25 cases (20.7%). Median survival time for all patients was 26 weeks (IQR: 14-53). Patients with deep tumors survived significantly longer than those with lobar gliomas (log rank test, p=0.0083). Extensive brain edema significantly shortened survival (log rank test, p=0.0003). Presence of midline shift (>1 cm) was a statistically significant risk factor for shorter survival (log rank test, p<0.0001). The univariate Cox regression model demonstrated statistical significance for the variables age, side, site and size of tumor, presence of extensive edema, and presence of mass effect (>1 cm). In the multivariate Cox models, tumor grade, site and size showed statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with deep grey matter gliomas may survive significantly longer after the initial diagnosis than those with tumors in a lobar location. This is a potentially novel finding, which may corroborate the theory of differential invasion of glioma cells in different microenvironments of the brain, but remains to be confirmed in future prospective studies.

Motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic facial pain.

Facial neuralgia is the last common pathway for a variety of pathological conditions with different etiology. Neuropathic facial pain is often refractory to routine medical or surgical treatments. We present here a long-term follow-up of two patients with unilateral facial neuropathic pain due to idiopathic trigeminal neuropathy or to surgical trauma to the glossopharyngeal nerve, respectively. These patients have been treated by other modalities for several years without obtaining satisfactory pain relief. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex (MCS) with a quadripolar electrode contralateral to the painful area of the face was attempted in both cases for control of the facial pain, and resulted in immediate analgesia with more than 50% pain reduction. During a follow-up period of 72 months, a sufficient (> 50%) and stable analgesic effect of MCS was observed. These cases are discussed and the recent literature on MCS is reviewed in an attempt to identify indications for MCS as well as key structures in the brain for mediating the MCS effect.

NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.

PURPOSE: NovoTTF-100A is a portable device delivering low-intensity, intermediate frequency electric fields via non-invasive, transducer arrays. Tumour Treatment Fields (TTF), a completely new therapeutic modality in cancer treatment, physically interfere with cell division. METHODS: Phase III trial of chemotherapy-free treatment of NovoTTF (20-24h/day) versus active chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Primary end-point was improvement of overall survival. RESULTS: Patients (median age 54 years (range 23-80), Karnofsky performance status 80% (range 50-100) were randomised to TTF alone (n=120) or active chemotherapy control (n=117). Number of prior treatments was two (range 1-6). Median survival was 6.6 versus 6.0 months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-year survival rate was 20% and 20%, progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 21.4% and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTF and active control patients. Responses were more common in the TTF arm (14% versus 9.6%, p=0.19). The TTF-related adverse events were mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin rash beneath the transducer arrays. Severe adverse events occurred in 6% and 16% (p=0.022) of patients treated with TTF and chemotherapy, respectively. Quality of life analyses favoured TTF therapy in most domains. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first controlled trial evaluating an entirely novel cancer treatment modality delivering electric fields rather than chemotherapy. No improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, however efficacy and activity with this chemotherapy-free treatment device appears comparable to chemotherapy regimens that are commonly used for recurrent glioblastoma. Toxicity and quality of life clearly favoured TTF.

Targeted biological therapies for pain.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is often resistant to currently used drugs. The effect of these is frequently self-limiting, with increasing level of side effects caused by increased doses. Biological pain therapies provide a means to target molecules to specific types of neural cells in spatially limited areas. Targeted biological therapies utilize agents acting at specific sites, or virus or cell vectors allowing expression and secretion of transgenic substances in small anatomical compartments. Biological approaches to treatment of chronic pain may be able to provide greater analgesic efficacy, avoiding many of the limitations associated with current analgesics. AREAS COVERED: The most important targets and tools for biological therapy of pain. Basic approaches, preclinical trials and the clinical studies successfully completed. The rationale and tools for biological therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Biological therapy of pain holds great promise and is rapidly developing. Despite the significant numbers of preclinical studies in the last two decades only a single biological agent, the cone snail toxin ziconotide, has been advanced through all stages and licensed for clinical use. Biological therapy of pain is thus here to stay, but will need more substantial proof of efficacy and safety before being widely accepted and routinely used.

Clinical development of experimental therapies for malignant glioma.

Advances in medical and surgical treatments in the last two to three decades have resulted in quantum leaps in the overall survival of patients with many types of non-central nervous system (CNS) malignant disease, while survival of patients with malignant gliomas (WHO grades 3 and 4) has only moderately improved. Surgical resection, external fractionated radiotherapy and oral chemotherapy, during and after irradiation, remain the pillars of malignant glioma therapy and have shown significant benefits. However, numerous clinical trials with adjuvant agents, most of them administered systemically and causing serious complications and side effects, have not achieved a noteworthy extension of survival, or only with considerable deterioration in patients' quality of life. Significant attention was focussed in the last decades on the cell biology and molecular genetics of gliomas. Improved understanding of the fundamental features of tumour cells has resulted in the introduction and increasing clinical use of local therapies, which employ spatially defined delivery methods and tumour-selective agents specifically designed to be used in the environment of a glioma-invaded brain. This review summarises the key findings of some of the most recent and important clinical studies of locally administered novel treatments for malignant glioma. Several such therapies have shown considerable anti-tumour activity and a favourable profile of local and systemic side effects. These include biodegradable polymers for interstitial chemotherapy, targeted toxins administered by convection enhanced delivery, and intra- and peritumourally injected genetically modified viruses conferring glioma-selective toxicity. Areas of possible improvement of these therapies and essential future developments are also outlined.

Clinical development of experimental virus-mediated gene therapy for malignant glioma.

Advances in medical and surgical treatments in the last decades have resulted in quantum leaps in the overall survival of patients with many types of malignant disease, while survival of patients with malignant gliomas (WHO histological grades 3 and 4) has been only moderately improved. Maximum surgical resection, external fractionated radiotherapy, and oral chemotherapy during and after irradiation currently represent the pillars of malignant glioma therapy. Novel and experimental modalities aimed at a more selective and more effective treatment are however being increasingly developed and tested in clinical studies. Improved understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of glioma growth, resistance, and recurrence has resulted in the introduction of biologically and molecularly targeted therapies such as virus-mediated gene therapy, often in combination with spatially defined delivery methods specifically designed to be used in the local environment of the brain, such as convection-enhanced delivery. This review summarizes the key findings of the most important phase I and II clinical studies employing gene therapy with naturally occurring or genetically modified non-replicating or conditionally replicating (oncolytic) viruses, such as retrovirus, adenovirus, herpes-simplex-virus, Newcastle disease virus, or reovirus, in patients with primary or recurrent malignant gliomas. In addition, the two phase III gene therapy studies carried out to date in glioma patients and employing retrovirus or adenovirus vectors are presented in detail and critically discussed. Areas of necessary improvements and possible future developments of viruses and delivery methods are outlined.