Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Med ; 27(9): 1525-1529, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34262158

RESUMEN

Currently approved viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccine approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) consider only homologous prime-boost vaccination. After reports of thromboembolic events, several European governments recommended using AstraZeneca's ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (ChAd) only in individuals older than 60 years, leaving millions of already ChAd-primed individuals with the decision to receive either a second shot of ChAd or a heterologous boost with mRNA-based vaccines. However, such combinations have not been tested so far. We used Hannover Medical School's COVID-19 Contact Study cohort of healthcare professionals to monitor ChAd-primed immune responses before and 3 weeks after booster with ChAd (n = 32) or BioNTech/Pfizer's BNT162b2 (n = 55). Although both vaccines boosted prime-induced immunity, BNT162b2 induced significantly higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and, in particular, high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 variants of concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162 , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA