[Palliative aspects in pulmonary oncology]. / Palliativmedizinische Aspekte der Pneumo-Onkologie.

Palliative medicine is an essential part in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. A structured palliative approach beginning from diagnoses improves quality of life and maybe even prolong survival. Besides symptom control, the disease trajectory and prognosis should regularly be re-evaluated and discussed with the patient and his loved ones.

Crizotinib.

Crizotinib is an ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) C-Met, ALK and ROS1. There is a robust effectiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring EML4-ALK-rearrangements resulting in constitutional activation of the ALK-RTK. The drug is approved for this entity, which represents no more than 3-5% of all NSCLC. However, in this population, impressive response rates are generated. The same is true for ROS-1 rearrangements; however, these only occur in approximately 1% of all NSCLC. In small series, efficacy is also reported in patients, whose tumours harbour a MET Exon 4 skipping mutation (approx. 3% of all NSCLC). Toxicities include visual impairment, nausea, peripheral edema, QT-prolongation and liver-enzyme elevation. Also, the occurrence of renal cysts is reported. The detection of ALK-protein by immunohistochemistry is a predictor of efficacy for crizotinib. In cases of doubt, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) detecting the ALK-rearrangement has to be performed on tumour tissue. FISH is also the method of choice to detect ROS1-rearrangement, whereas MET-mutations are detected by sequencing methods. The high efficacy of crizotinib in ALK- and ROS-rearranged as well as MET mutated lung cancer as new molecular targets beside the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) underscores the importance of molecular typing in NSCLC.

Immunotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: emerging evidence.

Treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has changed little over the past few decades; available therapies have failed to extend survival in advanced disease. In recent years, immunotherapy with treatments such as interferons, TNFs, vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors has advanced and shown promise in the treatment of several tumor types. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab and ulocuplumab are at the forefront of immunotherapy and have achieved approvals for certain cancer types, including melanoma (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), non-SCLC (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and renal cell carcinoma (nivolumab). Clinical trials are investigating different immunotherapies in patients with other solid and hematologic malignancies, including SCLC. We review emerging evidence supporting the use of immunotherapy in SCLC patients.

Afatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations Pretreated With Reversible EGFR Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, is approved for treatment of patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Efficacy of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve (TKI-naïve) patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (other than exon 19 deletions or exon 21 point mutations) has been reported; however, efficacy in TKI-pretreated patients with uncommon EGFR mutations is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the afatinib compassionate use program (CUP), patients with advanced or metastatic, histologically confirmed NSCLC progressing after at least one line of chemotherapy and one line of EGFR-TKI treatment were enrolled. Demographic data, mutation type, response rates, time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety in patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were reported. RESULTS: In 60 patients (63% female, median age 63 years [range: 30-84 years]), a total of 66 uncommon EGFR mutations including 30 T790M mutations were reported (18.4% and 11%, respectively, of known EGFR mutations within the CUP). Most patients (67%) received afatinib as third- or fourth-line treatment. Median TTF was 3.8 months (range: 0.2 to >24.6 months; p = .244) in patients with uncommon mutations compared with 5.1 months (range: 0.1 to >21.1 months) in patients with common mutations (n = 165). Pronounced activity was observed with E709X mutations (TTF >12 months). No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSION: Afatinib is clinically active and well tolerated in many TKI-pretreated NSCLC patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. Compared with results reported in TKI-naïve patients, activity was also indicated in patients with T790M and exon 20 insertion mutations.

Novel angiogenesis inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The fact that growth and spread of tumours are dependent on angiogenesis has led to the investigation of the role of antiangiogenic agents in the therapeutic strategies for thoracic tumours such as nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review summarizes and evaluates the recent developments in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Bevacizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC of nonsquamous histology in combination with a platinum-containing chemotherapy. Like in other cancer entities, the antiangiogenic concept in NSCLC comprises maintenance therapy with the antiangiogenic compound until disease progression. Moreover, over the last years, new antiangiogenic agents have been tested in clinical trials in NSCLC patients. Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents in combination with docetaxel in the second-line setting. SUMMARY: These studies - together with experiences from other cancer entities - have revived the field of antiangiogenic treatment in lung cancer.

Management of non-small-cell lung cancer: recent developments.

Non-small-cell lung cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths from cancer worldwide. Therefore, improvements in diagnostics and treatments are urgently needed. In this review, we will discuss the evolution of lung cancer staging towards more non-invasive, endoscopy-based, and image-based methods, and the development of stage-adapted treatment. A special focus will be placed on the role of novel surgical approaches and modern radiotherapy strategies for early stages of disease, the effect of multimodal treatment in locally advanced disease, and ongoing developments in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease. In particular, we will include an emphasis on targeted therapies, which are based on the assumption that a treatable driver mutation or gene rearrangement is present within the tumour. Finally, the position of lung cancer treatment on the pathway to personalised therapy will be discussed.

Crizotinib.

Crizotinib is an ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) c-Met, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and ROS1. There is convincing clinical evidence for the effectiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EML4-ALK rearrangements resulting in constitutional activation of the ALK-RTK. The drug is approved for this entity, which represents no more than 3-5% of all NSCLC. However, in this population, impressive response rates are generated. The same seems to be true for ROS-1 rearrangements; however, these only occur in approximately 1% of all NSCLC. The role in c-Met altered cancers needs to be determined. Toxicities include visual impairment, nausea, peripheral edema, QT-prolongation, and liver enzyme elevation. Also, the occurrence of renal cysts is reported. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detecting the ALK rearrangement has to be performed on tumor tissue to predict crizotinib efficacy. The role of immunohistochemistry in this setting needs to be determined. It has high concordance with FISH results when strongly positive or completely negative. The high efficacy of crizotinib in ALK- and ROS-positive lung cancer as new molecular targets beside the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) underscores the importance of molecular typing in NSCLC.

Comparative evaluation of PD-L1 expression in cytology imprints, circulating tumour cells and tumour tissue in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Alternative sources of tumour information need to be explored in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we compared programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on cytology imprints and circulating tumour cells (CTCs) with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) from immunohistochemistry staining of tumour tissue from patients with NSCLC. We evaluated PD-L1 expression using a PD-L1 antibody (28-8) in representative cytology imprints, and tissue samples from the same tumour. We report good agreement rates on PD-L1 positivity (TPS ≥ 1%) and high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%). Considering high PD-L1 expression, cytology imprints showed a PPV of 64% and a NPV of 85%. CTCs were detected in 40% of the patients and 80% of them were PD-L1+ . Seven patients with PD-L1 expression of < 1% in tissue samples or cytology imprints had PD-L1+ CTCs. The addition of PD-L1 expression in CTCs to cytology imprints markedly improved the prediction capacity for PD-L1 positivity. A combined analysis of cytological imprints and CTCs provides information on the tumoural PD-L1 status in NSCLC patients, which might be used when no tumor tissue is available.

Non-small cell lung cancer in never-smokers: a new disease entity?

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in never-smokers is an increasing entity. It seems that it has a different pathogenesis, at least in some cases, making it more sensitive to targeted therapies. Two promising targets have so far been identified. This article gives an overview on the biologic background and latest developments in the treatment of this particular entity.

Incidence of febrile neutropenia and myelotoxicity of chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of biosimilar G-CSF studies in breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies, conducted with breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, was to compare a new granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar, XM02, with filgrastim in terms of its prophylactic effect on the development of febrile neutropenia (FN) during the first chemotherapy cycle in relation to the myelotoxic potency of the applied chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 608 patients (363 under XM02 and 245 under filgrastim) were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of patients were allocated to the chemotherapy categories docetaxel-doxorubicin (45.4%) and cyclophosphamide-hydroxy daunomycin (adriamycin)-oncovin (vincristine)-prednisolone (CHOP)/platinum(Pt)-vinorelbine or Pt-vinblastine/ Pt-etoposide (43.1%); another 11.5% were allocated to the category Pt-gemcitabine/Pt-docetaxel or Pt-paclitaxel. RESULTS: FN in the XM02 and filgrastim groups was reported for 12.1 and 12.5% of patients, respectively, under docetaxeldoxorubicin, for 13.5 and 11.9% under CHOP/Pt-vinorelbine or Pt-vinblastine/Pt-etoposide, and for 15.6 and 12.0% under Pt-gemcitabine/Pt-docetaxel or Pt-paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of FN in the first cycle of chemotherapy under primary G-CSF prophylaxis is low (in the range of 12-16%) and not directly correlated with the myelotoxic potency of the applied chemotherapy regimen. XM02 demonstrated to be non-inferior to filgrastim regarding the incidence of FN, irrespective of the myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Chance for Cure?

Immune checkpoint inhibition of programmed-death receptor 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) has become a standard in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, either as monotherapy or in combination. Recently, it could be shown that immunotherapy works as consolidation after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease if the tumours express PD-L1. A significant and meaningful survival benefit for consolidation with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy compared to chemoradiotherapy alone was observed in the PACIFIC trial. In addition, there is a growing body of evidence that this treatment modality is also effective in a neoadjuvant setting in early stages, whereas the role as adjuvant treatment after surgery needs to be determined. The impact of combination therapies in non-metastatic stages-either neoadjuvant or adjuvant-needs to be evaluated in future trials. It is yet unclear whether PD-L1 and tumour mutational burden are predictive biomarkers as randomised trials are missing.

Immune checkpoint blockade in small cell lung cancer.

Despite the highly immunogenic potential of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), progress in evaluating the therapeutic value of immune checkpoint agents has lagged behind that of non-small cell lung cancer. Results from a number of phase I-III clinical trials that specifically address the use of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents in SCLC have now been reported. This review will focus on the available evidence for immune checkpoint blockade in SCLC and review current biomarker strategies with the aim of providing perspective and interpretation of this data for clinical practice.

Redefining Treatment Paradigms in First-line Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer is still a devastating disease; however, treatment options have diversified dramatically in the past two decades. From unselected platinum-based chemotherapy for all patients, several different treatment groups have evolved, that is, those with "druggable" targets, those with a promising immune signature, and those without any predicting factors outlined in this article. Challenge includes the intersections between these groups and the optimal treatment path. These issues will be addressed in this review.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the role of PD-L1 inhibitors.

PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors were both developed to combat a huge array of cancers. Both classes of agents block the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Unlike PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors do also block the B-7.1-receptor and leave the PD-L2/PD-1 axis unaffected. Whether these differences enhance efficacy and tolerability is not clear yet. There are three PD-L1 inhibitors approved or in late clinical development: Atezolizumab, approved in 2nd-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, durvalumab, showing promising results as a consolidation therapy in stage III disease and avelumab, the only drug exploiting antigen-dependent cytotoxicity. Future directions are the combination of these compounds with chemotherapy or other immuno-oncologic drugs.

[Non-small cell lung cancer - diagnostics and stage-adapted therapy]. / Nichtkleinzelliges Lungenkarzinom - Diagnostik und stadienadaptierte Therapie.

Non-small cell lung cancer is a common disease. Adeno- and squamous-cell type are the most frequent subtypes, the former with rising incidence. The clinical picture is nonspecific until late in the course of the disease. The most important diagnostic tools are chest X-ray, computed tomogram of the chest, and bronchoscopy. Additional tests often used for staging are abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography of the abdomen, bone scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging of the head. Positron emission tomography is of rising importance. Therapy is guided by stage. Stage I disease is a domain of surgery, in stage II combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. In stage III, multimodality treatment, mostly chemoradiotherapy, is indicated. Stage IV disease is treated with palliative chemotherapy. Newer, so-called targeted therapies are more and more implemented into therapy. There are three substances approved for second-line therapy with response rates of just under 10%.

Second-Line Treatment Selection in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer of Adenocarcinoma Histology: Findings From a European Survey of Treating Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines provide treatment recommendations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but physicians must also consider other factors. We surveyed physicians treating NSCLC to determine their therapy goals, drivers of treatment choice, current prescribing behavior, and therapy expectations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2015, an online survey was conducted of 500 pulmonologists/oncologists treating lung adenocarcinoma in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, comprising screening and therapy decision questions. RESULTS: On average, physicians had 14.7 years of experience and treated 79 patients/3 months with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC. In patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1, "prolonged survival/extending life" was the main therapy goal of physicians for first- (63%) and second-line (40%) patients; improvement in quality of life (QoL) was the main goal of 14% of physicians for second-line patients. For patients with ECOG ≥2, the main goal of second-line therapy was improvement in QoL (26%) or tumor-related symptoms (23%). Most (57%) physicians strongly agreed that they preferred a second-line treatment that extends overall survival (OS) while maintaining QoL; their greatest dissatisfaction with available second-line treatment options was the inability to "stop tumor progression over the long term" (66%). Physicians expected new therapies to become available within 12 months that would provide improvements in progression-free survival (83%) or OS (69%). CONCLUSION: OS is important for second-line treatments in patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, although QoL improvements should not be underestimated. This survey highlights the wait faced by patients and physicians as treatments transition from clinical trials to clinical practice.

[Chemotherapy in the Elderly with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Non-Interventional, Prospective, Multicentric Observational Study]. / Chemotherapie beim älteren Patienten mit nicht kleinzelligem Lungenkarzinom: Eine nicht-interventionelle, prospektive, multizentrische Beobachtungsstudie.

Background Elderly patients (70 years or older) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do benefit from systemic chemotherapy as shown in many studies. We prospectively collected multicentric data on therapeutic decisions from patients 70 years or older to reflect the reality in the German health care system. Material and Methods Patients 70 years or older with NSCLC Stage IIIB or IV were eligible. No more than 20 consecutive patients from each center were included. Comorbidities, weighted by the Charlson-comorbidity-index, and survival data were collected. Results 253 patients were documented. Median age was 75.5 years (range 70 to 92) and 75 % were male. 2 % had no comorbidities, 5 % one, 15 % two, 24 % three and 55 % more than three. 237 patients (94 %) received systemic chemotherapy: 172 (73 %) as a combination and 58 (24 %) as monotherapy. Data from seven patients regarding therapy are missing. Combination regimens were in 66 % carboplatin- and in 30 % cisplatin-based. The most frequently given monotherapy was vinorelbin in 50 % of cases. In the group of the patients older than 80 years (n = 38), 53 % received mono therapy, 29 % a carboplatin-based regimen and 16 % no chemotherapy. Cisplatin was not administered in this age group. Median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months. Patients with a Charlson-score ≤ 6 had 17.9 months, those > 6 12.0 months. With combination chemotherapy median OS was 23.5 months. Patients > 80 years had a median OS of 5.7 months. Conclusion A high percentage of patients older than 70 years received systemic therapy. Survival depended more on comorbidities than on age.

Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib Plus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: Complementary and Exploratory Analyses of the Phase III LUME-Lung 1 Study.

BACKGROUND: Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor approved with docetaxel for adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer after first-line chemotherapy (FLT). In the phase III LUME-Lung 1 study, overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with nintedanib/docetaxel than with placebo/docetaxel in all adenocarcinoma patients and those with time from start of FLT (TSFLT) <9 months. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to extend analyses from the LUME-Lung 1 study, specifically for adenocarcinoma patients, to explore the impact of clinically relevant characteristics on outcomes such as time to progression after FLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exploratory analyses were conducted of the overall and European LUME-Lung 1 adenocarcinoma population according to age, prior therapy, and tumor dynamics. Analyses also used TSFLT and time from end of FLT (TEFLT). RESULTS: Treatment with nintedanib/docetaxel significantly improved OS in European patients independently of age or prior therapy. Analyses of several patient subgroups showed improvements in median OS: TSFLT <6 months, 9.5 versus 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.98); chemorefractory to FLT, 9.1 versus 6.9 months (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99); progressive disease (PD) as best response to FLT, 9.8 versus 6.3 months (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94); TEFLT ≤6 months, 11.3 versus 8.2 months (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92); and TEFLT <3 months, 11.0 versus 8.0 months (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Nintedanib/docetaxel demonstrated significant OS benefits in adenocarcinoma patients, which were more pronounced in patients with shorter TSFLT or TEFLT, or with PD as best response to FLT. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805194.

Measurement of quality of life in second-line patients with advanced NSCLC without targetable mutations: a review.

Quality of life (QoL) is important to cancer patients and is increasingly included as a trial end point. The methodologies/findings of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of second-line treatments approved for use in the EU in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, without known targetable mutations, were evaluated. Seven trials were identified; five compared active treatments and two compared active treatment to placebo. Methodologies used and reporting varied. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer lung cancer questionnaire was the most commonly used assessment method (n = 4). There was no evidence to suggest differences in QoL between active treatments. Consistent and appropriate use of standard QoL instruments in future would increase the reliability of results and their applicability to clinical decision-making.

Exploring the potential of immuno-oncology-based treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune evasion is recognized as a key strategy for cancer survival and progression. With increased understanding of immune escape mechanisms, the development of immunotherapies to restore anti-tumor immune responses has flourished. Immuno-oncology (I-O) agents targeting checkpoints in the immune regulation cascade currently form the mainstay of approaches of cancer immunotherapy. Since initial success in melanoma, evidence for the notable effects of the I-O modality has been expanding, with numerous clinical studies underway or completed in a variety of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer. This review highlights the rationale and potential role of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer management, with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss the potential for I-O-based combination therapy.