The association between performance parameters of physical fitness and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: An evaluation of care data.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by cardiopulmonary testing or estimated using the less sophisticated incremental shuttle walk test, timed up-and-go test or stair climb test is known to be associated with postoperative outcome. This study aimed to evaluate whether parameters of physical fitness are associated with postoperative outcome in patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for elective resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Perioperative data of patients who underwent colorectal resection at Maastricht University Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative variables (e.g., age, body mass index, comorbidities, physical fitness, tumour characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, level of perceived fatigue and nutritional status) were compared with postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 80 consecutive cases, 75 (93.8%) were available for analysis (57.3% male, median ± interquartile range age 69.2 ± 11.7 years). A higher Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio (OR) of 1.604, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.120-2.296), worse functional exercise capacity (in meters, OR of 0.995, 95% CI 0.991-1.000), a lower physical activity level (in min/day, OR of 0.994, 95% CI 0.988-1.000), and a higher level of perceived fatigue (OR of 1.047, 95% CI 1.016-1.078), were associated with a slower time to recovery of physical functioning. A better functional exercise capacity was associated with a lower OR (OR of 0.995, 95% CI 0.991-1.000) for non-surgical complications. CONCLUSION: There is an association between preoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for resection. Patients benefit from an optimal preoperative physical fitness level. Specific interventions can target this physical fitness level.

Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a physical exercise training program during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in individual patients with rectal cancer prior to major elective surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diverse fractions of patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). NACRT is known to decrease physical fitness, an undesirable side effect. This pilot aimed to determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a supervised outpatient physical exercise training program during NACRT in these patients. METHODS: We included 13 out of 20 eligible patients (11 males, mean ± SD age: 59.1 ± 19.7 years) with rectal cancer who participated in the exercise training program during NACRT. Feasibility was determined by adherence and number of adverse events. Physical fitness was compared at baseline (B), after five (T1) and ten weeks (T2) of training, and eight weeks postoperatively (T3) using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Nine patients (69.2%) completed the program without adverse events. Four patients dropped out. The program was feasible and safe, with a total attendance rate of 95.7%. Leg muscle strength (mean ± SD: 104.0 ± 32.3 versus 144.8 ± 45.6 kg; P < 0.001) and arm muscle strength (mean ± SD: 48.7 ± 13.8 kg versus 36.1 ± 11.0 kg, P = 0.002) increased significantly between B and T2, respectively. A slight, non-significant, increase in functional exercise capacity was found. CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrated that a supervised outpatient physical exercise training program for individual patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer during NACRT is feasible for a large part of the patients, safe and seems able to prevent an often seen decline in physical fitness during NACRT. A larger study into the cost-effectiveness of this approach is warranted.