RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Objective: Host genetics can influence susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection. This study examined two genetic variants in human protein disulfide isomerase A2 (PDIA2), a member of a family of protein chaperones that participate in the chlamydial life cycle. Methods: A total of 278 male and female subjects, positive or negative for C. trachomatis infection, were genotyped for PDIA2 polymorphisms (rs400037 and rs419949) using real-time PCR and pyrosequencing. Results: There was a significant odds ratio of 8.21 (95% CI: 1.77-38.16) for rs400037 and 9.89 (95% CI: 1.19-82.10) for rs419949, for the AA genotypes. Conclusion: This indicates that individuals with the PDIA2 AA genotypes have significantly increased susceptibility to C. trachomatis infection as compared to the other PDIA2 genotypes (GG, GA). This correlation may be explained by an interactive role of host protein disulfide isomerases in the attachment and entry of C. trachomatis into cells.
RESUMEN
RUSH-1alpha(beta) transcription factors were cloned by recognition site screening with an 85-bp region (-170/-85) of the rabbit uteroglobin gene. Deletion analysis showed this region was essential to prolactin (PRL) action, but conclusions were limited by the complexity of the large deletion. Cyclic amplification and selection of targets (CASTing) was used to identify the RUSH-binding site (-126/-121). Endometrial nuclear proteins were incubated with a pool of degenerate oligonucleotides and immunoprecipitated with RUSH-1alpha(beta) antibodies. Bound DNA was amplified by PCR. The consensus motif (MCWTDK) was identified after five rounds of CASTing, authenticated by CASTing with RUSH-1alpha-specific antibodies and recombinant protein, and refined with EMSA. Dissociation rate constants (K(d) = 0.1-1.0 nM; r = 0.99) revealed high-affinity binding. Chromatin immunoprecipitation confirmed in vivo binding of RUSH to the transcriptionally active uteroglobin promoter. CASTing also revealed RUSH-GATA transcription factor interactions. Endometrial GATA-4 expression is progesterone dependent (Northern analysis) and preferentially localized in the epithelium (in situ hybridization). Although physically affiliated with RUSH, uterine forms of GATA-4 were not required for RUSH-DNA binding. Site-directed mutagenesis and transient transfection assays showed the RUSH motif mediates the ability of PRL to augment progesterone-dependent uteroglobin transcription. RUSH is central to the mechanism whereby PRL augments progesterone-dependent gene transcription.
Asunto(s)
Secuencia de Consenso , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Progesterona/farmacología , Prolactina/farmacología , Uteroglobina/genética , Secuencias de Aminoácidos , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Secuencia de Bases , Sitios de Unión , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/química , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Ensayo de Cambio de Movilidad Electroforética , Endometrio/metabolismo , Femenino , Factor de Transcripción GATA4 , Hibridación in Situ , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Unión Proteica , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Conejos , Elementos de Respuesta/genética , Eliminación de Secuencia/genética , Termodinámica , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
Molecular diagnostics is a rapidly growing specialty in the clinical laboratory assessment of pathology. Educational programs in medical laboratory science and specialized programs in molecular diagnostics must address the training of clinical scientists in molecular diagnostics, but the educational curriculum for this field is not well defined. Moreover, our understanding of underlying genetic contributions to specific diseases and the technologies used in molecular diagnostics laboratories change rapidly, challenging providers of training programs in molecular diagnostics to keep their curriculum current and relevant. In this article, we provide curriculum recommendations to molecular diagnostics training providers at both the baccalaureate and master's level of education. We base our recommendations on several factors. First, we considered National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences guidelines for accreditation of molecular diagnostics programs, because educational programs in clinical laboratory science should obtain its accreditation. Second, the guidelines of several of the best known certifying agencies for clinical laboratory scientists were incorporated into our recommendations. Finally, we relied on feedback from current employers of molecular diagnostics scientists, regarding the skills and knowledge that they believe are essential for clinical scientists who will be performing molecular testing in their laboratories. We have compiled these data into recommendations for a molecular diagnostics curriculum at both the baccalaureate and master's level of education.