Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the gold standard technique for rectal cancer as Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) may be safely performed either by open or minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic approach, however, may carry technical difficulties. For this reason, a novel technique has emerged in the last decade combining a dual laparoscopic dissection (abdominal and transanal) to perform the TME technique (TaTME). When focusing on oncological outcomes, there is a lack of literature regarding mid-long term results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the mid-term oncological impact of TaTME for treating rectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was performed in four tertiary centres including consecutive patients who underwent TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer by the same group of experienced surgeons. The analysed data included pathological results on the quality of TME and mid-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 173 patients were included throughout a study period of 6 years. Our series included 70% males and 68% of patients with neoadjuvant treatments. The median follow-up was 23 [15-37.5] months. Regarding pathological results, a complete TME was achieved in 72.8%, while circumferential and distal margins were affected in 1.4 and 1.1%, respectively. Five patients developed local recurrences (3%) and 8.1% presented distant disease during the follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival and the overall survival rates were 88% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a lack of evidence in the literature regarding TaTME and oncological outcomes with no data available from randomized clinical trials. In the meantime, the reported results from different multicentre series are controversial. This study showed positive mid-term outcomes at 2 years of follow-up and supported notable oncological outcomes with TaTME. However, it must be emphasized that previous experience in minimally invasive and transanal surgeries is essential for surgeons before intending to perform TaTME.

Rectal cancer treatment by transanal total mesorectal excision: Results in 100 consecutive patients. / Tratamiento del cáncer de recto mediante escisión completa del mesorrecto por vía transanal. Resultados en 100 pacientes consecutivos.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate our clinical short-term surgical results of laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision. METHODS: Analysis of 100 consecutive patients with mid and lower rectal cancer who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision from November 2013 to September 2018. Main outcomes described are operative data, morbidities, mortality and quality of the specimen. A comparative analysis was done between gender and simultaneous vs. non simultaneous abdominal-perineal surgery. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67 years (56-75), and 67% were male. On MRI, 50% were stage T3 tumors, and 52% had positive nodes. Mean distance of the tumor from anal verge was 4.9±1.3cm. A total of 58% underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Mean operative time was 262±40.7min; it was shorter in females (P<.001) and in simultaneous 2-field surgery. Median specimen distal free margin was 1.5cm (0.5-2.4). A total of 89% of the specimens were with complete mesorectum, with better results when a simultaneous approach was used (P=.047). The mean number of retrieved lymph-nodes was 15.2±11.6, and 26% of patients had positive nodes. Median length of stay was 5.5 days (4-8). Morbidities occurred in 36% of cases, and one patient died. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision is safe and effective with adequate circumferential and distal free margins and high quality of the resected mesorectum specimen. Post-operative morbidity is acceptable, according to the current literature.

Tratamiento del cáncer de recto mediante escisión completa del mesorrecto por vía transanal. Resultados en 100 pacientes consecutivos / Rectal cancer treatment by transanal total mesorectal excision: Results in 100 consecutive patients

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio es analizar los resultados quirúrgicos a corto plazo de la escisión completa del mesorrecto por vía transanal laparoscópica. Métodos: Análisis en 100 pacientes con cáncer de recto medio e inferior, intervenidos consecutivamente entre noviembre de 2013 y septiembre de 2018. Se describen los datos operatorios, la morbimortalidad y la calidad de la pieza quirúrgica. Se realiza un análisis comparativo entre sexos y la cirugía a uno y a 2 campos simultáneos. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 67 años (56-75), siendo el 67% varones. El 50% fueron tumores T3 y el 52% con afectación ganglionar, por RMN. La media de distancia al margen anal fue de 4,9 ± 1,3 cm. El 58% recibió neoadyuvancia. La media de tiempo quirúrgico fue de 262 ± 40,7 min, siendo menor en mujeres (p < 0,001) y en la cirugía simultánea a 2 campos (p = 0,008). La mediana de margen distal fue de 1,5cm (0,5-2,4). Se obtuvo un mesorrecto completo en el 89%, con mejores resultados en la cirugía a 2 campos (p = 0,047). La media de ganglios aislados fue de 15,2 ± 11,6. El 26% de los pacientes tuvieron afectación ganglionar. La mediana de estancia fue de 5,5 días (4-8). Hubo una morbilidad del 36% y un paciente falleció. Conclusiones: La escisión completa del mesorrecto por vía transanal laparoscópica es segura, consiguiendo un adecuado margen circunferencial y distal, con una alta calidad del mesorrecto. Ofrece una morbilidad aceptable para el tipo de intervención quirúrgica, según la literatura actual

Introduction: The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate our clinical short-term surgical results of laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision. Methods: Analysis of 100 consecutive patients with mid and lower rectal cancer who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision from November 2013 to September 2018. Main outcomes described are operative data, morbidities, mortality and quality of the specimen. A comparative analysis was done between gender and simultaneous vs. non simultaneous abdominal-perineal surgery. Results: Mean patient age was 67 years (56-75), and 67% were male. On MRI, 50% were stage T3 tumors, and 52% had positive nodes. Mean distance of the tumor from anal verge was 4.9 ± 1.3cm. A total of 58% underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Mean operative time was 262 ± 40.7 min; it was shorter in females (P < .001) and in simultaneous 2-field surgery. Median specimen distal free margin was 1.5 cm (0.5-2.4). A total of 89% of the specimens were with complete mesorectum, with better results when a simultaneous approach was used (P = .047). The mean number of retrieved lymph-nodes was 15.2 ± 11.6, and 26% of patients had positive nodes. Median length of stay was 5.5 days (4-8). Morbidities occurred in 36% of cases, and one patient died. Conclusions: According to our experience, laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision is safe and effective with adequate circumferential and distal free margins and high quality of the resected mesorectum specimen. Post-operative morbidity is acceptable, according to the current literature