Bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles collected by 3 different techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare levels of bacterial contamination of autogenous bone collected when using low-speed drilling, a back-action chisel, and a bone filter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone tissue samples were taken from 31 patients who underwent surgical extraction of their third lower molars. Before surgical removal of the molar, bone particles were collected by a low-speed drill or a back-action chisel. Then, a stringent aspiration protocol was applied during the ostectomy to collect particulate bone by a bone filter. Processing of samples commenced immediately by incubation in an anaerobic or a CO2-rich atmosphere. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was determined at 48 hours of culture. RESULTS: No significant difference in the number of CFUs per milliliter was observed between the low-speed drilling group and the back-action chisel group in the anaerobic or CO2-rich condition (P = .34). However, significantly more micro-organisms were found in the bone filter group than in the low-speed drilling group or the back-action chisel group in the anaerobic and CO2-rich conditions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Particulate bone harvested with low-speed drilling or a back-action chisel is safer for use as an autograft than are bone particles collected with a bone filter. These results suggest that bone obtained from low-speed drilling is safe and straightforward to harvest and could be the method of choice for collecting particulate bone. Further research is needed to lower the bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles used as graft material.

Factors Affecting Dental Implant Stability Measured Using the Ostell Mentor Device: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the literature on factors that may affect dental implant stability as measured with the Ostell mentor device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases using dental implants, stability, and resonance frequency analysis as key words. RESULTS: The most relevant randomized controlled trials and clinical trials (n = 39) were selected from among 264 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors can affect dental implant stability as measured with the Ostell mentor device. This may be a useful instrument for deciding the timing of implant loading, but additional research is required to establish the reliability and predictability of resonance frequency analysis for the future osseointegration of dental implants, which remains controversial.

Update on immediate implant loading: a review of the literature.

The treatment of totally or partially edentulous patients with osseointegrated implants is an increasing part of daily dental practice. The greater aesthetic and functional demands made by these patients have created a constant pressure to reduce the waiting time before implants are loaded. In some cases, however, a shortening of the waiting period may compromise the osseointegration of the fixtures. The present review aims to inform the clinician about the continuing controversy on this issue. Data from the reviewed studies allow comparisons to be made between the different success rates obtained after immediate implant loading, offering a more objective basis for our advice to patients on this type of treatment. According to our review, the type and quality of the bone and the surface of the implant are the factors that determine the selection of patients who can undergo the premature loading of implants.

Puesta al día sobre implantes de carga inmediata. Revisión bibliográfica / Update on immediate implant loading: a review of the literature

El tratamiento del paciente desdentado total o parcial con implantes osteointegrados es cada vez más frecuente en nuestra práctica habitual. Una mayor demanda estética y funcional de estos pacientes, hace que cada día se intenten disminuir más los tiempos de espera para cargar dichos implantes, disminución que en algunos casos podría perjudicar el proceso de osteointegración de las fijaciones. Con este trabajo de revisión bibliográfica pretendemos demostrar al clínico la controversia que aún existe en este tema, pudiendo comparar en los distintos estudios revisados las diferentes tasas de éxito en implantes sometidos a carga inmediata, lo que nos puede dar una visión objetiva a la hora de ofrecer este tipo de tratamiento a nuestros pacientes. Según esta revisión el tipo de hueso y su calidad, así como la superficie del implante serán los parámetros que determinen en qué casos podría realizarse la carga prematura de los implantes (AU)

No disponible