Reducing energy consumption in musculoskeletal MRI using shorter scan protocols, optimized magnet cooling patterns, and deep learning sequences.

OBJECTIVES: The unprecedented surge in energy costs in Europe, coupled with the significant energy consumption of MRI scanners in radiology departments, necessitates exploring strategies to optimize energy usage without compromising efficiency or image quality. This study investigates MR energy consumption and identifies strategies for improving energy efficiency, focusing on musculoskeletal MRI. We assess the potential savings achievable through (1) optimizing protocols, (2) incorporating deep learning (DL) accelerated acquisitions, and (3) optimizing the cooling system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Energy consumption measurements were performed on two MRI scanners (1.5-T Aera, 1.5-T Sola) in practices in Munich, Germany, between December 2022 and March 2023. Three levels of energy reduction measures were implemented and compared to the baseline. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction was conducted to evaluate the impact of sequence scan times and energy consumption. RESULTS: Our findings showed significant energy savings by optimizing protocol settings and implementing DL technologies. Across all body regions, the average reduction in energy consumption was 72% with DL and 31% with economic protocols, accompanied by time reductions of 71% (DL) and 18% (economic protocols) compared to baseline. Optimizing the cooling system during the non-scanning time showed a 30% lower energy consumption. CONCLUSION: Implementing energy-saving strategies, including economic protocols, DL accelerated sequences, and optimized magnet cooling, can significantly reduce energy consumption in MRI scanners. Radiology departments and practices should consider adopting these strategies to improve energy efficiency and reduce costs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI scanner energy consumption can be substantially reduced by incorporating protocol optimization, DL accelerated acquisition, and optimized magnetic cooling into daily practice, thereby cutting costs and environmental impact. KEY POINTS: Optimization of protocol settings reduced energy consumption by 31% and imaging time by 18%. DL technologies led to a 72% reduction in energy consumption of and a 71% reduction in time, compared to the standard MRI protocol. During non-scanning times, activating Eco power mode (EPM) resulted in a 30% reduction in energy consumption, saving 4881 € ($5287) per scanner annually.

Deep Learning Reconstruction for Accelerated Spine MRI: Prospective Analysis of Interchangeability.

Background Deep learning (DL)-based MRI reconstructions can reduce examination times for turbo spin-echo (TSE) acquisitions. Studies that prospectively employ DL-based reconstructions of rapidly acquired, undersampled spine MRI are needed. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic interchangeability of an unrolled DL-reconstructed TSE (hereafter, TSEDL) T1- and T2-weighted acquisition method with standard TSE and to test their impact on acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic confidence. Materials and Methods This prospective single-center study included participants with various spinal abnormalities who gave written consent from November 2020 to July 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI examinations: standard fully sampled T1- and T2-weighted TSE acquisitions (reference standard) and prospectively undersampled TSEDL acquisitions with threefold and fourfold acceleration. Image evaluation was performed by five readers. Interchangeability analysis and an image quality-based analysis were used to compare the TSE and TSEDL images. Acquisition time and diagnostic confidence were also compared. Interchangeability was tested using the individual equivalence index regarding various degenerative and nondegenerative entities, which were analyzed on each vertebra and defined as discordant clinical judgments of less than 5%. Interreader and intrareader agreement and concordance (κ and Kendall τ and W statistics) were computed and Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used. Results Overall, 50 participants were evaluated (mean age, 46 years ± 18 [SD]; 26 men). The TSEDL method enabled up to a 70% reduction in total acquisition time (100 seconds for TSEDL vs 328 seconds for TSE, P < .001). All individual equivalence indexes were less than 4%. TSEDL acquisition was rated as having superior image noise by all readers (P < .001). No evidence of a difference was found between standard TSE and TSEDL regarding frequency of major findings, overall image quality, or diagnostic confidence. Conclusion The deep learning (DL)-reconstructed turbo spin-echo (TSE) method was found to be interchangeable with standard TSE for detecting various abnormalities of the spine at MRI. DL-reconstructed TSE acquisition provided excellent image quality, with a 70% reduction in examination time. German Clinical Trials Register no. DRKS00023278 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hallinan in this issue.

Background enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): are there qualitative and quantitative differences between imaging systems?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the digital mammography imaging system on overall background enhancement on recombined contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images, the overall background enhancement of two different mammography systems was compared. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, CESM images of n = 129 female patients who underwent CESM between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed independently by two radiologists. Two mammography machines of different manufacturers were compared qualitatively using a Likert-scale from 1 (minimal) to 4 (marked overall background enhancement) and quantitatively by placing a region of interest and measuring the intensity enhancement. Lesion conspicuity was analyzed using a Likert-scale from 1 (lesion not reliably distinguishable) to 5 (excellent lesion conspicuity). A multivariate regression was performed to test for potential biases on the quantitative results. RESULTS: Significant differences in qualitative background enhancement measurements between machines A and B were observed for both readers (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). The quantitative evaluation showed significant differences in background enhancement with an average difference of 75.69 (99%-CI [74.37, 77.02]; p < 0.001). Lesion conspicuity was better for machine A for the first and second reader respectively (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001). The factor machine was the only influencing factor (p < 0.001). The factors contrast agent, breast density, age, and menstrual cycle could be excluded as potential biases. CONCLUSION: Mammography machines seem to significantly influence overall background enhancement qualitatively and quantitatively; thus, an impact on diagnostic accuracy appears possible. KEY POINTS: • Overall background enhancement on CESM differs between different vendors qualitatively and quantitatively. • Our retrospective single-center study showed consistent results of the qualitative and quantitative data analysis of overall background enhancement. • Lesion conspicuity is higher in cases of lower background enhancement on CESM.

Combining virtual monoenergetic imaging and iterative metal artifact reduction in first-generation photon-counting computed tomography of patients with dental implants.

OBJECTIVES: While established for energy-integrating detector computed tomography (CT), the effect of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) in photon-counting detector (PCD) CT lacks thorough investigation. This study evaluates VMI, iMAR, and combinations thereof in PCD-CT of patients with dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 patients (25 women; mean age 62.0 ± 9.9 years), polychromatic 120 kVp imaging (T3D), VMI, T3DiMAR, and VMIiMAR were compared. VMIs were reconstructed at 40, 70, 110, 150, and 190 keV. Artifact reduction was assessed by attenuation and noise measurements in the most hyper- and hypodense artifacts, as well as in artifact-impaired soft tissue of the mouth floor. Three readers subjectively evaluated artifact extent and soft tissue interpretability. Furthermore, new artifacts through overcorrection were assessed. RESULTS: iMAR reduced hyper-/hypodense artifacts (T3D 1305.0/-1418.4 versus T3DiMAR 103.2/-46.9 HU), soft tissue impairment (106.7 versus 39.7 HU), and image noise (16.9 versus 5.2 HU) compared to non-iMAR datasets (p ≤ 0.001). VMIiMAR ≥ 110 keV subjectively enhanced artifact reduction over T3DiMAR (p ≤ 0.023). Without iMAR, VMI displayed no measurable artifact reduction (p ≥ 0.186) and facilitated no significant denoising over T3D (p ≥ 0.366). However, VMI ≥ 110 keV reduced soft tissue impairment (p ≤ 0.009). VMIiMAR ≥ 110 keV resulted in less overcorrection than T3DiMAR (p ≤ 0.001). Inter-reader reliability was moderate/good for hyperdense (0.707), hypodense (0.802), and soft tissue artifacts (0.804). CONCLUSION: While VMI alone holds minimal metal artifact reduction potential, iMAR post-processing enabled substantial reduction of hyperdense and hypodense artifacts. The combination of VMI ≥ 110 keV and iMAR resulted in the least extensive metal artifacts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Combining iMAR with VMI represents a potent tool for maxillofacial PCD-CT with dental implants achieving substantial artifact reduction and high image quality. KEY POINTS: • Post-processing of photon-counting CT scans with an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm substantially reduces hyperdense and hypodense artifacts arising from dental implants. • Virtual monoenergetic images presented only minimal metal artifact reduction potential. • The combination of both provided a considerable benefit in subjective analysis compared to iterative metal artifact reduction alone.

Application of deep learning-based super-resolution to T1-weighted postcontrast gradient echo imaging of the chest.

OBJECTIVES: A deep learning-based super-resolution for postcontrast volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) of the chest was investigated in this study. Aim was to improve image quality, noise, artifacts and diagnostic confidence without change of acquisition parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients who received VIBE postcontrast imaging of the chest at 1.5 T were included in this retrospective study. After acquisition of the standard VIBE (VIBES), a novel deep learning-based algorithm and a denoising algorithm were applied, resulting in enhanced images (VIBEDL). Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated both datasets independently, rating sharpness of soft tissue, vessels, bronchial structures, lymph nodes, artifacts, cardiac motion artifacts, noise levels and overall diagnostic confidence, using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. In the presence of lung lesions, the largest lesion was rated regarding sharpness and diagnostic confidence using the same Likert scale as mentioned above. Additionally, the largest diameter of the lesion was measured. RESULTS: The sharpness of soft tissue, vessels, bronchial structures and lymph nodes as well as the diagnostic confidence, the extent of artifacts, the extent of cardiac motion artifacts and noise levels were rated superior in VIBEDL (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the diameter or the localization of the largest lung lesion in VIBEDL compared to VIBES. Lesion sharpness as well as detectability was rated significantly better by both readers with VIBEDL (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The application of a novel deep learning-based super-resolution approach in T1-weighted VIBE postcontrast imaging resulted in an improvement in image quality, noise levels and diagnostic confidence as well as in a shortened acquisition time.

Prospective intraindividual comparison of a standard 2D TSE MRI protocol for ankle imaging and a deep learning-based 2D TSE MRI protocol with a scan time reduction of 48.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan time remains a limited and valuable resource. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep learning (DL)-based accelerated TSE study protocol compared to a standard TSE study protocol in ankle MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2020 and July 2021 forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study for an intraindividual comparison of a standard TSE study protocol and a DL TSE study protocol either on a 1.5 T or a 3 T scanner. Two radiologists evaluated the examinations regarding structural pathologies and image quality categories (5-point-Likert-scale; 1 = "non diagnostic", 5 = "excellent"). RESULTS: Both readers showed almost perfect/perfect agreement of DL TSE with standard TSE in all analyzed structural pathologies (0.81-1.00) with a median "good" or "excellent" rating (4-5/5) in all image quality categories in both 1.5 T and 3 T MRI. The reduction of total acquisition time of DL TSE compared to standard TSE was 49% in 1.5 T and 48% in 3 T MRI to a total acquisition time of 5 min 41 s and 5 min 46 s. CONCLUSION: In ankle MRI the new DL-based accelerated TSE study protocol delivers high agreement with standard TSE and high image quality, while reducing the acquisition time by 48%.

Feasibility of an accelerated 2D-multi-contrast knee MRI protocol using deep-learning image reconstruction: a prospective intraindividual comparison with a standard MRI protocol.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of a deep-learning (DL)-accelerated two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) MRI of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T in clinical routine in comparison to standard MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty participants, who underwent knee MRI at 1.5 and 3 T between October/2020 and March/2021 with a protocol using standard 2D-TSE (TSES) and DL-accelerated 2D-TSE sequences (TSEDL), were enrolled in this prospective institutional review board-approved study. Three radiologists assessed the sequences regarding structural abnormalities and evaluated the images concerning overall image quality, artifacts, noise, sharpness, subjective signal-to-noise ratio, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale (1-5, 5 = best). RESULTS: Overall image quality for TSEDL was rated to be excellent (median 5, IQR 4-5), significantly higher compared to TSES (median 5, IQR 4 - 5, p < 0.05), showing significantly lower extents of noise and improved sharpness (p < 0.001). Inter- and intra-reader agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.92-1.00) for the detection of internal derangement and substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.58-0.98) for the assessment of cartilage defects. No difference was found concerning the detection of bone marrow edema and fractures. The diagnostic confidence of TSEDL was rated to be comparable to that of TSES (median 5, IQR 5-5, p > 0.05). Time of acquisition could be reduced to 6:11 min using TSEDL compared to 11:56 min for a protocol using TSES. CONCLUSION: TSEDL of the knee is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared to TSES, reducing the acquisition time about 50%. KEY POINTS: • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging is able to almost halve the acquisition time of a three-plane knee MRI with proton density and T1-weighted images, from 11:56 min to 6:11 min at 3 T. • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging of the knee provided significant improvement of noise levels (p < 0.001), providing higher image quality (p < 0.05) compared to conventional TSE imaging. • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging of the knee had similar diagnostic performance for internal derangement of the knee compared to standard TSE.

Shortening Acquisition Time and Improving Image Quality for Pelvic MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5 T.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 ± 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWIS) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWIDL). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b-values (0 and 800 s/mm2) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWIS and DWIDL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P < .05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P < .001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P > .05). Acquisition time for DWIS was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWIDL was 1:12 minutes. CONCLUSION: DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible.

Ultra-high resolution photon-counting CT with tin prefiltration for bone-metal interface visualization.

PURPOSE: To investigate the metal artifact suppression potential of combining tin prefiltration and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) for osseous microarchitecture depiction in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting CT (PCCT) of the lower extremity. METHOD: Derived from tin-filtered UHR scans at 140 kVp, polychromatic datasets (T3D) and VMI reconstructions at 70, 110, 150, and 190 keV were compared in 117 patients with lower extremity metal implants (53 female; 62.1 ± 18.0 years). Three implant groups were investigated (total arthroplasty [n = 48], osteosynthetic material [n = 43], and external fixation [n = 26]). Image quality was assessed with regions of interest placed in the most pronounced artifacts and adjacent soft tissue, measuring the respective attenuation. Additionally, artifact extent, bone-metal interface interpretability and overall image quality were independently evaluated by three radiologists. RESULTS: Artifact reduction was superior with increasing keV level of VMI. While T3D was superior to VMI70keV (p ≥ 0.117), artifacts were more severe in T3D than in VMI ≥ 110 keV (all p ≤ 0.036). Image noise was highest for VMI70keV (all p < 0.001) and lowest for VMI110keV with comparable results for VMI110keV - VMI190keV. Subjective image quality regarding artifacts was superior for VMI ≥ 110 keV (all p ≤ 0.042) and comparable for VMI110keV - VMI190keV. Bone-metal interface interpretability was superior for VMI110keV (all p ≤ 0.001), while T3D, VMI150keV and VMI190keV were comparable. Overall image quality was deemed best for VMI110keV and VMI150keV. Interreader reliability was good in all cases (ICC ≥ 0.833). CONCLUSIONS: Tin-filtered UHR-PCCT scans of the lower extremity combined with VMI reconstructions allow for efficient artifact reduction in the vicinity of bone-metal interfaces.

Deep Learning Reconstruction of Prospectively Accelerated MRI of the Pancreas: Clinical Evaluation of Shortened Breath-Hold Examinations With Dixon Fat Suppression.

OBJECTIVE: Deep learning (DL)-enabled magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstructions can enable shortening of breath-hold examinations and improve image quality by reducing motion artifacts. Prospective studies with DL reconstructions of accelerated MRI of the upper abdomen in the context of pancreatic pathologies are lacking. In a clinical setting, the purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of a novel DL-based reconstruction algorithm in T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examinations with partial Fourier sampling and Dixon fat suppression (hereafter, VIBE-DixonDL). The objective is to analyze its impact on acquisition time, image sharpness and quality, diagnostic confidence, pancreatic lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). METHODS: This prospective single-center study included participants with various pancreatic pathologies who gave written consent from January 2023 to September 2023. During the same session, each participant underwent 2 MRI acquisitions using a 1.5 T scanner: conventional precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted VIBE acquisitions with Dixon fat suppression (VIBE-Dixon, reference standard) using 4-fold parallel imaging acceleration and 6-fold accelerated VIBE-Dixon acquisitions with partial Fourier sampling utilizing a novel DL reconstruction tailored to the acquisition. A qualitative image analysis was performed by 4 readers. Acquisition time, image sharpness, overall image quality, image noise and artifacts, diagnostic confidence, as well as pancreatic lesion conspicuity and size were compared. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis of SNR and CNR was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants were evaluated (mean age ± SD, 62 ± 19 years; 20 men). The VIBE-DixonDL method enabled up to 52% reduction in average breath-hold time (7 seconds for VIBE-DixonDL vs 15 seconds for VIBE-Dixon, P < 0.001). A significant improvement of image sharpness, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and pancreatic lesion conspicuity was observed in the images recorded using VIBE-DixonDL (P < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant reduction of image noise and motion artifacts was noted in the images recorded using the VIBE-DixonDL technique (P < 0.001). In addition, for all readers, there was no evidence of a difference in lesion size measurement between VIBE-Dixon and VIBE-DixonDL. Interreader agreement between VIBE-Dixon and VIBE-DixonDL regarding lesion size was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, >90). Finally, a statistically significant increase of pancreatic SNR in VIBE-DIXONDL was observed in both the precontrast (P = 0.025) and postcontrast images (P < 0.001). Also, an increase of splenic SNR in VIBE-DIXONDL was observed in both the precontrast and postcontrast images, but only reaching statistical significance in the postcontrast images (P = 0.34 and P = 0.003, respectively). Similarly, an increase of pancreas CNR in VIBE-DIXONDL was observed in both the precontrast and postcontrast images, but only reaching statistical significance in the postcontrast images (P = 0.557 and P = 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prospectively accelerated, DL-enhanced VIBE with Dixon fat suppression was clinically feasible. It enabled a 52% reduction in breath-hold time and provided superior image quality, diagnostic confidence, and pancreatic lesion conspicuity. This technique might be especially useful for patients with limited breath-hold capacity.

Fast 5-minute shoulder MRI protocol with accelerated TSE-sequences and deep learning image reconstruction for the assessment of shoulder pain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol. Methods: Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSES) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols. Results: A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSEDL versus TSES (p<0.001). Noise and edge sharpness were evaluated to be significantly superior in TSEDL versus TSES (noise: p<0.001, edge sharpness: p<0.05). No difference was found concerning qualitative diagnostic confidence, assessability of anatomical structures (p>0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences. Conclusions: A fast 5-minute TSEDL MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSES protocol.

Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning Reconstruction Facilitates Highly Accelerated Upper Abdominal MRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare a conventional T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) with SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR) fat saturation and a deep learning (DL)-reconstructed accelerated VIBE sequence with SPAIR fat saturation achieving a 50 % reduction in breath-hold duration (hereafter, VIBE-SPAIRDL) in terms of image quality and diagnostic confidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients referred for upper abdominal MRI from November 2023 to December 2023 at a single tertiary center. Patients underwent upper abdominal MRI with acquisition of non-contrast and gadobutrol-enhanced conventional VIBE-SPAIR (fourfold acceleration, acquisition time 16 s) and VIBE-SPAIRDL (sixfold acceleration, acquisition time 8 s) on a 1.5 T scanner. Image analysis was performed by four readers, evaluating homogeneity of fat suppression, perceived signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), edge sharpness, artifact level, lesion detectability and diagnostic confidence. A statistical power analysis for patient sample size estimation was performed. Image quality parameters were compared by a repeated measures analysis of variance, and interreader agreement was assessed using Fleiss' κ. RESULTS: Among 450 consecutive patients, 45 patients were evaluated (mean age, 60 years ± 15 [SD]; 27 men, 18 women). VIBE-SPAIRDL acquisition demonstrated superior SNR (P < 0.001), edge sharpness (P < 0.001), and reduced artifacts (P < 0.001) with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement for non-contrast (κ: 0.70-0.91) and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI (κ: 0.68-0.87). No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding homogeneity of fat suppression, lesion detectability, or diagnostic confidence (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Deep learning reconstruction of VIBE-SPAIR facilitated a reduction of breath-hold duration by half, while reducing artifacts and improving image quality. SUMMARY: Deep learning reconstruction of prospectively accelerated T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination for upper abdominal MRI enabled a 50 % reduction in breath-hold time with superior image quality. KEY RESULTS: 1) In a prospective analysis of 45 patients referred for upper abdominal MRI, accelerated deep learning (DL)-reconstructed VIBE images with spectral fat saturation (SPAIR) showed better overall image quality, with better perceived signal-to-noise ratio and less artifacts (all P < 0.001), despite a 50 % reduction in acquisition time compared to conventional VIBE. 2) No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and accelerated VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding lesion detectability or diagnostic confidence.

Thin-Slice Prostate MRI Enabled by Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Thin-slice prostate MRI might be beneficial for prostate cancer diagnostics. However, prolongation of acquisition time is a major drawback of thin-slice imaging. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a thin-slice deep learning accelerated T2-weighted (w) TSE imaging sequence (T2DLR) of the prostate as compared to conventional T2w TSE imaging (T2S). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were included in this prospective study at one university center after obtaining written informed consent. T2S (3 mm slice thickness) was acquired first in three orthogonal planes followed by thin-slice T2DLR (2 mm slice thickness) in axial plane. Acquisition time of axial conventional T2S was 4:12 min compared to 4:37 min for T2DLR. Imaging datasets were evaluated by two radiologists using a Likert-scale ranging from 1-4, with 4 being the best regarding the following parameters: sharpness, lesion detectability, artifacts, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, preference of T2S versus T2DLR was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 68 ± 8 years. Sharpness of images and lesion detectability were rated better in T2DLR with a median of 4 versus a median of 3 in T2S (p < 0.001 for both readers). Image noise was evaluated to be significantly worse in T2DLR as compared to T2S (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively). Overall image quality was also evaluated to be superior in T2DLR versus T2S with a median of 4 versus 3 (p < 0.001 for both readers). Both readers chose T2DLR in 29 cases as their preference. CONCLUSIONS: Thin-slice T2DLR of the prostate provides a significant improvement of image quality without significant prolongation of acquisition time.

Acquisition time reduction of diffusion-weighted liver imaging using deep learning image reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of deep learning accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWIDL) in 1.5-T liver MRI on image quality, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred patients who underwent liver MRI at 1.5-T including DWI with two different b-values (50 and 800 s/mm²) between February and April 2022 were retrospectively included. There were 54 men and 46 women, with a mean age of 59 ± 14 (SD) years (range: 21-88 years). The single average raw data were retrospectively processed using a deep learning (DL) image reconstruction algorithm leading to a simulated acquisition time of 1 min 28 s for DWIDL as compared to 2 min 31 s for standard DWI (DWIStd) via reduction of signal averages. All DWI datasets were reviewed by four radiologists using a Likert scale ranging from 1-4 using the following criteria: noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, quantitative assessment of noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was performed via regions of interest. RESULTS: No significant differences were found regarding artifacts and overall image quality (P > 0.05). Noise measurements for the spleen, liver, and erector spinae muscles revealed significantly lower noise for DWIDL versus DWIStd (P < 0.001). SNR measurements in the above-mentioned tissues also showed significantly superior results for DWIDL versus DWIStd for b = 50 s/mm² and ADC maps (all P < 0.001). For b = 800 s/mm², significantly superior results were found for the spleen, right hemiliver, and erector spinae muscles. CONCLUSIONS: DL image reconstruction of liver DWI at 1.5-T is feasible including significant reduction of acquisition time without compromised image quality.

[Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: requirements and principles regarding diagnostic reporting]. / Die multiparametrische MRT der Prostata: Anforderungen und Grundlagen der Befundung.

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is one of the primary diagnostic tools for detecting clinically relevant prostate cancer. It should be routinely used in addition to urological investigations owing to its higher diagnostic yield than systematic biopsies. However, combining targeted and systematic biopsies achieves the highest diagnostic rate. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS Version 2.1) standardizes the acquisition and interpretation of mpMRI of the prostate. It consists of high-resolution T2- and diffusion-weighted images, the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and a dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence. Reports describe the increasing likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS categories 1-5. The MRI sequence determining the PI-RADS category of a lesion depends on its location within the prostate: in the transitional zone, the T2-weighted sequence and, in the peripheral zone, the diffusion-weighted sequence are the primary determinants. The diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced sequences provide secondary classification for the transitional and peripheral zones, respectively. This review summarizes and illustrates the diagnostic criteria defined in PI-RADS 2.1. In addition, evidence for mpMRI of the prostate, its indication and implementation are described.

Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Accelerated 2D Hip MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction Based on a Deep Iterative Hierarchical Network.

OBJECTIVES: Hip MRI using standard multiplanar sequences requires long scan times. Accelerating MRI is accompanied by reduced image quality. This study aimed to compare standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with accelerated 2D TSE sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (TSEDL) for routine clinical hip MRI at 1.5 and 3 T in terms of feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective, monocentric study, TSEDL was implemented clinically and evaluated in 14 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing a clinically indicated hip MRI at 1.5 and 3T between October 2020 and May 2021. Each patient underwent two examinations: For the first exam, we used standard sequences with generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSES). For the second exam, we implemented prospectively undersampled TSE sequences with DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists assessed the TSEDL and TSES regarding image quality, artifacts, noise, edge sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using an ordinal five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = moderate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). Both sequences were compared regarding the detection of common pathologies of the hip. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between TSEDL and TSES. RESULTS: Compared with TSES, TSEDL was rated to be significantly superior in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.020) with significantly reduced noise (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly improved edge sharpness (p = 0.003). No difference was found between TSES and TSEDL concerning the extent of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, or the delineation of anatomical structures (p > 0.05). Example acquisition time reductions for the TSE sequences of 52% at 3 Tesla and 70% at 1.5 Tesla were achieved. CONCLUSION: TSEDL of the hip is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared with TSES, reducing the acquisition time significantly.

Faster Elbow MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality, Diagnostic Confidence, and Anatomy Visualization Compared to Standard Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the elbow regarding image quality and visualization of anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2020 and June 2021, seventeen participants (eight patients, nine healthy subjects; mean age: 43 ± 16 (20-70) years, eight men) were prospectively included in this study. Each patient underwent two examinations: standard MRI, including TSE sequences reconstructed with a generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSESTD), and prospectively undersampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using a 5-point Likert scale, and rated the images concerning the detection of common pathologies. RESULTS: Image quality was significantly improved in TSEDL (mean 4.35, IQR 4-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.76, IQR 3-4, p = 0.008). Moreover, TSEDL showed decreased noise (mean 4.29, IQR 3.5-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.35, IQR 3-4, p = 0.004). Ratings for delineation of anatomical structures, artifacts, edge sharpness, and diagnostic confidence did not differ significantly between TSEDL and TSESTD (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.628-0.904). No difference was found concerning the detection of pathologies between the readers and between TSEDL and TSESTD. Using DL, the acquisition time could be reduced by more than 35% compared to TSESTD. CONCLUSION: TSEDL provided improved image quality and decreased noise while receiving equal ratings for edge sharpness, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, diagnostic confidence, and detection of pathologies compared to TSESTD. Providing more than a 35% reduction of acquisition time, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for elbow imaging due to increased patient comfort and higher patient throughput.

Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate using deep learning image reconstruction: A retrospective comparison with standard diffusion-weighted imaging.

PURPOSE: Routine multiparametric MRI of the prostate reduces overtreatment and increases sensitivity in the diagnosis of the most common solid cancer in men. However, the capacity of MRI systems is limited. Here we investigate the ability of deep learning image reconstruction to accelerate time consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisition while maintaining diagnostic image quality. METHOD: In this retrospective study, raw data of DWI sequences of consecutive patients undergoing MRI of the prostate at a tertiary care hospital in Germany were reconstructed using standard and deep learning reconstruction. To simulate a shortening of acquisition times by 39 %, one instead of two and six instead of ten averages were used in the reconstruction of b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 images, respectively. Image quality was assessed by three radiologists and objective image quality metrics. RESULTS: After the application of exclusion criteria, 35 out of 147 patients examined between September 2022 and January 2023 were included in this study. The radiologists perceived less image noise on deep learning reconstructed images at b = 0 s/mm2 images and ADC maps with good inter-reader agreement. Signal-to-noise ratios were similar overall with discretely reduced values in the transitional zone after deep learning reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: An acquisition time reduction of 39 % without loss in image quality is feasible in DWI of the prostate when using deep learning image reconstruction.

Combined Deep Learning-based Super-Resolution and Partial Fourier Reconstruction for Gradient Echo Sequences in Abdominal MRI at 3 Tesla: Shortening Breath-Hold Time and Improving Image Sharpness and Lesion Conspicuity.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of a prototypical deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction algorithm tailored to partial Fourier acquisitions on acquisition time and image quality for abdominal T1-weighted volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBESR) at 3 Tesla. The standard T1-weighted images were used as the reference standard (VIBESD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with diverse abdominal pathologies, who underwent a clinically indicated contrast-enhanced abdominal VIBE magnetic resonance imaging at 3T between March and June 2021 were retrospectively included. Following the acquisition of the standard VIBESD sequences, additional images for the non-contrast, dynamic contrast-enhanced and post-contrast T1-weighted VIBE acquisition were retrospectively reconstructed using the same raw data and employing a prototypical deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction algorithm. The algorithm was designed to enhance edge sharpness by avoiding conventional k-space filtering and to perform a partial Fourier reconstruction in the slice phase-encoding direction for a predefined asymmetric sampling ratio. In the retrospective reconstruction, the asymmetric sampling was realized by omitting acquired samples at the end of the acquisition and therefore corresponding to a shorter acquisition. Four radiologists independently analyzed the image datasets (VIBESR and VIBESD) in a blinded manner. Outcome measures were: sharpness of abdominal organs, sharpness of vessels, image contrast, noise, hepatic lesion conspicuity and size, overall image quality and diagnostic confidence. These parameters were statistically compared and interrater reliability was computed using Fleiss' Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Finally, the rate of detection of hepatic lesions was documented and was statistically compared using the paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients aged 59 ± 16 years (23 men (72%), 9 women (28%)) were included. For VIBESR, breath-hold time was significantly reduced by approximately 13.6% (VIBESR 11.9 ± 1.2 seconds vs. VIBESD: 13.9 ± 1.4 seconds, p < 0.001). All readers rated sharpness of abdominal organs, sharpness of vessels to be superior in images with VIBESR (p values ranged between p = 0.005 and p < 0.001). Despite reduction of acquisition time, image contrast, noise, overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were not compromised, as there was no evidence of a difference between VIBESR and VIBESD (p > 0.05). The inter-reader agreement was substantial with a Fleiss' Kappa of >0.7 in all contrast phases. A total of 13 hepatic lesions were analyzed. The four readers observed a superior lesion conspicuity in VIBESR than in VIBESD (p values ranged between p = 0.046 and p < 0.001). In terms of lesion size, there was no significant difference between VIBESD and VIBESR for all readers. Finally, there was an excellent inter-reader agreement regarding lesion size (ICC > 0.9). For all readers, no statistically significant difference was observed regarding detection of hepatic lesions between VIBESD and VIBESR. CONCLUSION: The deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction with partial Fourier in the slice phase-encoding direction enabled a reduction of breath-hold time and improved image sharpness and lesion conspicuity in T1-weighted gradient echo sequences in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. Faster acquisition time without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence was possible by using this deep learning-based reconstruction technique.

Deep learning-based super-resolution gradient echo imaging of the pancreas: Improvement of image quality and reduction of acquisition time.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a deep learning-based super-resolution technique on T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination; VIBE) on the assessment of pancreatic MRI at 1.5 T compared to standard VIBE imaging (VIBESTD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted between April 2021 and October 2021. Fifty patients with a total of 50 detectable pancreatic lesion entities were included in this study. There were 27 men and 23 women, with a mean age of 69 ± 13 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 33-89 years). VIBESTD (precontrast, dynamic, postcontrast) was retrospectively processed with a deep learning-based super-resolution algorithm including a more aggressive partial Fourier setting leading to a simulated acquisition time reduction (VIBESR). Image analysis was performed by two radiologists regarding lesion detectability, noise levels, sharpness and contrast of pancreatic edges, as well as regarding diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert-scale with 5 being the best. RESULTS: VIBESR was rated better than VIBESTD by both readers regarding lesion detectability (5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 5 [IQR: 4, 5], for reader 1; 5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 4 [IQR: 4, 5]) for reader 2; both P <0.001), noise levels (5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 5 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 1; 5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 4 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 2; both P <0.001), sharpness and contrast of pancreatic edges (5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 5 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 1; 5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 4 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 2; both P <0.001), as well as regarding diagnostic confidence (5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 5 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 1; 5 [IQR: 5, 5] vs. 4 [IQR: 4, 5] for reader 2; both P <0.001). There were no significant differences between lesion sizes as measured by the two readers on VIBESR and VIBESTD images (P > 0.05). The mean acquisition time for VIBESTD (15 ± 1 [SD] s; range: 11-16 s) was longer than that for VIBESR (13 ± 1 [SD] s; range: 11-14 s) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the newly developed deep learning-based super-resolution algorithm adapted to partial Fourier acquisitions has a positive influence not only on shortening the examination time but also on improvement of image quality in pancreatic MRI.