Is there a role for preoperative liver reducing diet in hepatectomy? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Preoperative very low-calorie diets (VLCDs) have been shown to reduce liver volume, reduce the risk of liver injury and improve safety during bariatric surgery. Hepatic steatosis (HS) has been associated with poorer outcomes in liver resection. VLCD can be used to improve HS. We aim to explore if preoperative VLCD could improve outcomes for patients with HS undergoing liver resection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they were full-text articles investigating the effect of a preoperative dietary intervention in patients undergoing liver resection on intra-operative and post-operative outcomes. The last search was performed on 11 Jun 2020. Evidence quality was assessed by "GRADE". A narrative review was undertaken. RESULTS: Five studies were found: one RCT and four cohort studies including 133 patients in intervention groups and 181 controls. Three used diet-only strategies and two diet and exercise strategies with varying time courses and monitoring. The quality of evidence assessed by GRADE was "high" for the RCT and "low" for the four cohort studies. Steatosis objectively improved in three studies, with evidence of reduced liver volume and increased attenuation on imaging in one. All studies showed a reduction in body weight and body mass index (BMI). Intra-operative blood loss was decreased following a diet-only intervention in two studies, and liver mobility improved in one. No difference was found in morbidity, mortality or hospital length of stay between intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of poorer outcomes in liver resection patients with existing HS. There is an expected role for a preoperative VLCD to optimise these patients for surgery. Existing publications support this, but diet interventions and outcome measures are inconsistent, and patient numbers are small. There is scope for a well-designed, multi-centre randomised trial to investigate this further.

LAP-VEGaS Practice Guidelines for Reporting of Educational Videos in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Joint Trainers and Trainees Consensus Statement.

OBJECTIVE: Consensus statement by an international multispecialty trainers and trainees expert committee on guidelines for reporting of educational videos in laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instructive laparoscopy videos with appropriate exposition could be ideal for initial training in laparoscopic surgery, but there are no guidelines for video annotation or procedural educational and safety evaluation. METHODS: Delphi questionnaire of 45 statements prepared by a steering group and voted on over 2 rounds by committee members using an electronic survey tool. Committee selection design included representative surgical training experts worldwide across different laparoscopic specialties, including general surgery, lower and upper gastrointestinal surgery, gynecology and urology, and a proportion of aligned surgical trainees. RESULTS: All 33 committee members completed both the first and the second round of the Delphi questionnaire related to 7 major domains: Video Introduction/Authors' information; Patient Details; Procedure Description; Procedure Outcome; Associated Educational Content; Peer Review; and Use in Educational Curriculae. The 17 statements that did not reach at least 80% agreement after the first round were revised and returned into the second round. The committee consensus approved 37 statements to at least an 82% agreement. CONCLUSION: Consensus guidelines on how to report laparoscopic surgery videos for educational purposes have been developed. We anticipate that following our guidelines could help to improve video quality.These reporting guidelines may be useful as a standard for reviewing videos submitted for publication or conference presentation.

Non-technical skills and gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) have gained increasing recognition in recent years for their role in safe, effective team performance in healthcare. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is a procedure-based specialty with rapidly advancing technology, significant operational pressures and rapidly changing 'teams of experts'. However, to date there has been little focus on the effect of NTS in this field. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to examine the existing literature on NTS in gastrointestinal endoscopy and identify areas for further research. METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus and PubMed databases was performed using search terms Non-Technical Skills, Team Performance or Team Skills, and Endoscopy, Colonoscopy, OGD, Gastroscopy, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography or Endoscopic Ultrasound. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant publications were found. NTS are deemed an essential component of practice, but so far there is little evidence of their integration into training or competency assessment. Those studies examining the effects of NTS and team training in endoscopy are small and have variable outcome measures with limited evidence of improvement in skills or clinical outcomes. NTS assessment in endoscopy is in its early phases with a few tools in development. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature on NTS in gastrointestinal endoscopy is limited. NTS, however, are deemed an essential component of practice, with potential positive effects on team performance and clinical outcomes. A validated reliable tool would enable evaluation of training and investigation into the effects of NTS on outcomes. There is a clear need for further research in this field.