Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 475(3): 656-665, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020433

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary malignant tumors located near the acetabulum are usually managed by resection of the tumor with wide margins that include the acetabulum. These resections are deemed P2 resections by the Enneking and Dunham classification. There are various methods to perform the subsequent hip reconstruction. Unfortunately, there is no consensus as to the best management. In general, patients undergoing resection at this level will have substantial levels of pain and disability as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. We believe there is a subset of patients whose tumors in this location can be resected while preserving all or most of the weightbearing acetabulum using navigation and careful surgical planning. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What complications were associated with this resection; (2) what oncological outcomes (histological margins and local recurrence) were achieved; and (3) what is the function achieved by these patients? METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with periacetabular primary malignancy. From 2008 to 2014, we treated 12 patients who had periacetabular primary malignant tumors and in five, we performed resection with the weightbearing portion spared. During this period, our general indications to perform a resection that spared the acetabulum were the tumor with its resection margin not involving the weightbearing portion of the acetabulum. However, we did not perform this procedure in patients who had more cranial lesion involving the weightbearing portion or whose hip stability might be in question after the tumor excision. Three patients were women and the other two were men. Four were chondrosarcomas, whereas the other one was synovial sarcoma. Ages ranged from 46 to 60 years (average, 53 years). Minimum followup was 14 months (median, 37 months; range, 14-88 months); no patients were lost to followup before a 1-year minimum was achieved, and all patients have been seen within the last 9 months. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. None of the five patients had a positive margin by histological assessment. No local recurrences were detected. The median functional score by MSTS was 28 out of 30 (range, 27-30). CONCLUSIONS: The roof of the acetabulum is the weightbearing portion of the acetabulum. It also maintains the stability of the hip. With precise preoperative planning of the resection and accurate execution of the procedure, the hip-sparing approach through partial acetabular resection can be performed in selected patients with malignant periacetabular neoplasms. Navigation makes it possible to minimize the amount of bone resection. In this preliminary report of a small number of patients, we had adequate short-term local tumor control. We believe the function is good, but we do not have a comparison group of patients to document improved function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/patología , Acetábulo/fisiopatología , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Anatómicos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias Pélvicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Soporte de Peso
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 82: 105910, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957402

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Frozen autograft recycling has been used for biological reconstruction of bone defects following tumor excision, more commonly in extremities. We report on the histological outcome of a pelvic recycled frozen autograft. CASE PRESENTATION: We investigated the pelvic frozen autograft removed in 2 years and 8 months after surgery because of soft tissue recurrence in pelvic floor. The autograft bone showed no evidence of revitalization and was non-viable with patchy inflammation, and no residual tumor. There was only fibrous union but the autograft bone remained mechanically stable. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: We confirmed the clearance of tumor cells with the treatment with liquid nitrogen. The union at the host-graft junction might be affected by the previous radiotherapy, the presence of infection, the small contact area limited by the anatomy, and the inadequate compression across the osteotomy interface with the fixation. CONCLUSION: Frozen autograft treated by liquid nitrogen can be used safely for biological reconstructions after pelvic tumor excision.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA