Beclabuvir in combination with asunaprevir and daclatasvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daclatasvir, asunaprevir (ASV), and beclabuvir (BCV) are direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of this three-drug combination in HCV genotype 1 infection. Eleven electronic search engines were searched for relevant publications. Studies were screened for eligibility and data was extracted. The outcomes were pooled as event rate and risk ratio (RR). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017054391). Among the included six studies, five studies were included for the meta-analysis (n = 1261). The three-drug combination showed a high response rate in naïve patients with sustained virologic response at week-12 posttreatment (SVR12 ) rate = 95.7% (95%CI [93.8-97.1]) and no difference detected by adding ribavirin (RBV) (the pooled RR = 0.98, 95%CI [0.90-1.08], P = 0.70) or comparing with interferon-experienced patients (RR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.98-1.07], P = 0.31) regardless the genotype 1 subtypes or IL28B genotype. Treatment failure was minimal and showed no difference regarding the previous comparisons. Increasing the dose or the duration did not show a significant increase in the efficacy. In conclusion, this analysis showed high response rates in HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with daclatasvir, ASV, and BCV irrespective of RBV use, prior interferon-based therapy, or restriction on non-cirrhotic patients, IL28B genotype, or baseline resistance-associated variants.

Priorities to inform research on marine plastic pollution in Southeast Asia.

Southeast Asia is considered to have some of the highest levels of marine plastic pollution in the world. It is therefore vitally important to increase our understanding of the impacts and risks of plastic pollution to marine ecosystems and the essential services they provide to support the development of mitigation measures in the region. An interdisciplinary, international network of experts (Australia, Indonesia, Ireland, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam) set a research agenda for marine plastic pollution in the region, synthesizing current knowledge and highlighting areas for further research in Southeast Asia. Using an inductive method, 21 research questions emerged under five non-predefined key themes, grouping them according to which: (1) characterise marine plastic pollution in Southeast Asia; (2) explore its movement and fate across the region; (3) describe the biological and chemical modifications marine plastic pollution undergoes; (4) detail its environmental, social, and economic impacts; and, finally, (5) target regional policies and possible solutions. Questions relating to these research priority areas highlight the importance of better understanding the fate of marine plastic pollution, its degradation, and the impacts and risks it can generate across communities and different ecosystem services. Knowledge of these aspects will help support actions which currently suffer from transboundary problems, lack of responsibility, and inaction to tackle the issue from its point source in the region. Being profoundly affected by marine plastic pollution, Southeast Asian countries provide an opportunity to test the effectiveness of innovative and socially inclusive changes in marine plastic governance, as well as both high and low-tech solutions, which can offer insights and actionable models to the rest of the world.