Comparison of the performance of serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection with European and Asian study populations.

Most commercial kits for the detection of Helicobacter pylori were developed and validated with Western populations, and some have been found to perform less well with Asian populations. This study compared the performances of three serological kits with Swedish and Vietnamese peptic ulcer patients and asymptomatic individuals. The Pyloriset EIA-GIII and HM-CAP ELISA kits indicated that Asian populations had lower antibody titres to H. pylori than European populations. Despite the difference, the Pyloriset EIA-GIII kit performed well with Vietnamese peptic ulcer patients and population controls. The HM-CAP ELISA kit had a significantly lower performance with Asian populations that could not be improved by adjustments to the cut-off level. The Helicoblot 2.1 immunoblot kit performed equally well with Vietnamese and Swedish populations, although the response rate to the 35-kDa band was significantly lower with Vietnamese individuals.

Long-term follow-up of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Vietnam: reinfection and clinical outcome.

AIM: To assess the long-term Helicobacter pylori reinfection rates, as well as the clinical outcome in peptic ulcer disease patients in Vietnam. METHOD: At a 1-year evaluation of H. pylori eradication treatment in 226 peptic ulcer patients, long-term H. pylori status was assessed with serology and/or culture, peptic ulcer status by gastroscopy, and DNA-fingerprinting performed with random amplified polymorphic DNA and restriction fragment polymorphism. RESULT: Follow-up was performed a mean 11 months after the post-treatment evaluation on day 30 after beginning of treatment. The overall reinfection rate was 23.5%, with 58.8% of the strains being identical to the pre-treatment isolates and 41.2% being different. Peptic ulcer was found in 22.9% of the reinfected patients and in 6.3% of the non-reinfected. At the long-term follow-up of successful eradication cases, 89.8% of the patients were free of peptic ulcer disease. The corresponding result was 58.7% in patients in whom H. pylori eradication failed. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, reinfection with H. pylori in patients in Vietnam was found to be higher than in industrialized countries but the long-term recurrence of peptic ulcer disease was still low. Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment is therefore of value also in developing countries as the rate of peptic ulcer disease was low at the 1-year follow-up.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and peptic ulcer healing: the impact of deleting the proton pump inhibitor and using a once-daily treatment.

AIM: To compare cheaper and simpler once-daily regimens, with and without a proton pump inhibitor, with standard, twice-daily, triple therapy. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, treatment trial in Vietnam allocated 296 Helicobacter pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer of >or= 5 mm to one of three regimens: (i) twice-daily: lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and tinidazole 500 mg; (ii) once-daily: lansoprazole 60 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 1000 mg; (iii) once-daily: placebo, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 1000 mg. H. pylori status was assessed by culture and immunoblot, ulcer healing by endoscopy and side-effects by structured questionnaires. RESULTS: Per protocol eradication (N = 256) was higher with standard therapy (87%) than with once-daily therapy (72%), and both were better than once-daily therapy without proton pump inhibitor (39%). Per protocol ulcer healing after standard therapy (83%) was not significantly better than that after once-daily therapy (73%), but better than that after therapy without proton pump inhibitor (65%). Side-effects were reported at similar rates in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitor was needed for optimal eradication and ulcer healing. Twice-daily administration showed improved success rates when compared with once-daily therapies. Peptic ulcer healing was achieved even in patients treated with antibiotics only, confirming the central role of H. pylori in the pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease.

The importance of the level of metronidazole resistance for the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIMS: To evaluate the role of antibiotic susceptibility for the treatment outcome of proton pump inhibitor-dependent and independent Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled clinical study of peptic ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily with lansoprazole or with placebo. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by culture and antibiotic susceptibility by E-test minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 205 clinical isolates. RESULTS: Primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole was 1 and 76%, respectively. In metronidazole susceptible strains eradication rates were similar at > 90% for all treatment groups (P = 0.49). With low-level metronidazole resistance (4 microg/mL < MIC < 256 microg/mL), eradication rates were similar at >75% (P = 0.80). The major difference was found at high-level metronidazole resistance (MIC >or= 256 microg/mL) with 95%, 58% and 21% eradication in the lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily and placebo, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the absence of antibiotic resistance, a once-daily therapy of only clarithromycin and tinidazole can achieve a high rate of H. pylori eradication. Such a combination could offer a simpler and cheaper treatment option for developing countries. The standard, twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was shown to be efficient in H. pylori eradication even in the presence of high-level metronidazole resistance.