RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS). The objective was to summarise the current evidence for management of PSS with explicit attention to the clinical outcomes of different management strategies. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for reports published between January 1990 and December 2021. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The primary endpoint was the proportion of symptom free patients at last follow up. Secondary outcomes were success of initial treatment, recurrence of thrombosis or persistent occlusion, and patency at last follow up. Meta-analyses of the primary endpoint were performed for non-comparative and comparative reports. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Sixty reports were included (2 653 patients), with overall moderate quality. The proportions of symptom free patients in non-comparative analysis were: anticoagulation (AC), 0.54; catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) + AC, 0.71; AC + first rib resection (FRR), 0.80; and CDT + FRR, 0.96. Pooled analysis of comparative reports confirmed the superiority of CDT + FRR compared with AC (OR 13.89, 95% CI 1.08 - 179.04; p = .040, I2 87%, very low certainty of evidence), AC + FRR (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.21 - 4.35; p = .010, I2 0%, very low certainty of evidence), and CDT + AC (OR 8.44, 95% CI 1.12 - 59.53; p = .030, I2 63%, very low certainty of evidence). Secondary endpoints were in favour of CDT + FRR. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management of PSS with AC alone results in persistent symptoms in 46% of patients, while 96% of patients managed with CDT + FFR were symptom free at end of follow up. Superiority of CDT + FRR compared with AC, CDT + AC, and AC + FRR was confirmed by meta-analysis. The overall quality of included reports was moderate, and the level of certainty was very low.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/etiología , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In Paget-Schroetter Syndrome (PSS), subclavian vein thrombosis is caused by external compression of the subclavian vein at the costoclavicular junction. Paget-Schroetter Syndrome can be treated nonoperatively, surgically, or with a combination of treatments. Nonoperative management consists, in most cases, of anticoagulation (AC) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). With surgical management, decompression of the subclavian vein is performed by resection of the first rib. No prospective randomized trials are available to determine whether nonoperative or surgical management is superior. We report our long-term outcomes of both nonoperative and surgically treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with PSS who were treated between January 1990 and December 2015. Patients were divided based on primary nonoperative or primary surgical therapy. Long-term outcomes regarding functional outcomes were assessed by questionnaires using the "Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (DASH) questionnaire, a modified Villalta score, and a disease-specific question regarding lifestyle changes. RESULTS: In total, 91 patients (95 limbs) were included. Seventy patients (73 limbs) were treated nonoperatively and 21 patients (22 limbs) surgically. Questionnaires were returned by 67 patients (70 limbs). The mean follow-up was 184 months (range, 43-459 months). All functional outcomes were better in the surgical group compared with the nonoperatively treated group (DASH general 3.11 vs 9.86; DASH work 0.35 vs 11.47; DASH sport 5.85 vs 17.98, and modified Villalta score 1.11 vs 3.20 points). Surgically treated patients were more likely to be able to continue their original lifestyle and sports activities (84% vs 40%, p=0.005). Patients with recurrence of thrombosis or the need for surgical intervention after primary nonoperative management reported worse functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of PSS with immediate CDT followed by first rib resection leads to excellent functional outcomes with low risk of complications. The results of nonoperative management in our non-matched retrospective comparative series were satisfactory, but resulted in worse functional outcomes and more patients needing to adjust their lifestyle compared with surgically treated patients. CLINICAL IMPACT: Patients with Paget-Schroetter Syndrome and their attending physicians are burdened by the lack of evidence concerning the optimal treatment of this entity. Case series comparing the outcomes of non-operative treatment with surgical treatment are scarce and often not focussed on functional outcomes. Data from this series can aid in the shared decision making after diagnosis of Paget-Schroetter Syndrome. Functional outcomes of non-operative management can be satisfying although high demand patient who are not willing to alter their daily activities are probably better off with surgical management.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is caused by external compression of the subclavian vein at the costoclavicular junction. It can be subdivided in McCleery Syndrome and Paget-Schroetter Syndrome (PSS). To improve the venous outflow of the arm and to prevent recurrent thrombosis, first rib resection with venolysis of the subclavian vein can be performed. Open transaxillary, supraclavicular, infraclavicular or combined paraclavicular approaches are well known, but more recent robot-assisted techniques are introduced. We report our short- and long-term results of a minimal invasive transthoracic approach for resection of the anteromedial part of the first rib using the DaVinci surgical robot, performed through three trocars. METHODS: We analyzed all patients with vTOS who were scheduled to undergo robot-assisted transthoracic first rib resection in the period July 2012 to May 2016. Outcomes were: technical success, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, 30-day complications and patency. Functional outcomes were assessed using the "Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand" (DASH) questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8 male, 7 female; mean age 32.9 years, range 20-54 years) underwent robot-assisted transthoracic first rib resection. Conversion to transaxillary resection was necessary in three patients. Average operation time was 147.9 min (range 88-320 min) with a mean blood loss of 79.5 cc (range 10-550 cc). Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (range 2-9). In three patients, complications were reported (Clavien-Dindo grade 2-3a). Patency was 91% at 15.5 months' follow-up. DASH scores at one and three years showed excellent functional outcomes (7.1 (SD= 6.9, range 0-20.8) and 6.0 (SD= 6.4, range 0-25)) and are comparable to the scores of the normative general population. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted transthoracic first rib resection with only three trocars is a feasible minimal invasive approach for first rib resection in the management of vTOS. This technique enables the surgeon to perform venolysis under direct 3D vision with good patency and long-term functional outcome. Studies with larger cohort size are needed to compare the outcomes of this robot-assisted technique with other more established approaches.
Asunto(s)
Robótica , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Adulto , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Costillas/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the long term results of Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy (ETS) in the management of upper limb ischemia (ULI). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all consecutive patients who underwent ETS for ULI between January 1994 and May 2009. A standardized questionnaire was used to evaluate the long term success, morbidity and overall patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (20 female, mean age 49 years (range 23-79)) underwent bilateral (n = 9) and unilateral (n = 27) ETS procedures, respectively. Six patients had Primary (idiopathic) Raynaud Disease. Twenty-nine patients had upper limb ischemia secondary to systemic disorders (n = 12), embolic disease (n = 10), occlusion of the arteries of the arm (n = 5) or hypothenar hammer syndrome (n = 2). Tissue loss at time of surgery was present in nineteen patients. Short term beneficial effects were reported by 12 patients (63%). Eleven of the 35 patients experienced a total of 13 complications or adverse events, whereof 11 were minor or transient. Limb salvage was unsuccessful in three patients because of major amputations (n = 2) or severe functional impairment (n = 1). Necrotectomies or minor amputations without functional impairment were performed in 9 patients. Medium or long term follow up (mean 98 months (range 18-198) was available in 19 out of 22 living patients(86%). Long term beneficial effects were reported by 10 (53%). Overall patient satisfaction was 56%. Compensatory sweating was experienced by 11 patients (58%). CONCLUSION: Although the long term efficacy of ETS in our study was moderate (53%), due to its low invasiveness ETS is a valuable option in the management of ULI.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia , Simpatectomía , Nervios Torácicos/cirugía , Toracoscopía , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Simpatectomía/métodos , Toracoscopía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracic sympathectomy is used in the management of a variety of upper limb disorders. We have analyzed the evidence for thoracic sympathectomy in the management of digital ischemia. METHODS: We reviewed the English literature between 1980 and 2010. Our analysis included reports with the clinical end points of relief, recurrence of symptoms or healing of ulcers, or both. Primary Raynaud disease (PRD) and secondary Raynaud phenomenon (SRP) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: An initial postoperative positive effect was reported in 92% of PRD patients and in 89% of SRP patients. Long-term beneficial effect was 58% for PRD and 89% for SRP. Ulcer healing or improvement was achieved in 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that thoracic sympathectomy has a role in the treatment of severe PRD and SRP, albeit with better results in SRP patients than in PRD patients. In case of digital ulceration, thoracic sympathectomy may maximize tissue preservation or prevent amputation.
Asunto(s)
Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/cirugía , Enfermedad de Raynaud/cirugía , Úlcera Cutánea/cirugía , Simpatectomía , Nervios Torácicos/cirugía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Isquemia/patología , Enfermedad de Raynaud/patología , Úlcera Cutánea/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Thoracic sympathectomy is performed in the management of a variety of disorders of the upper extremity. To evaluate the contemporary results of thoracic sympathectomy for upper extremity ischemia a systematic review of the literature was conducted. EVIDENCE AQUISITION: We performed a PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane search of the literature written in the English language from January 1975 to December 2015. All articles presenting original patient data regarding the effect of treatment on symptoms or on the healing of ulcers were eligible for inclusion. Individual analyses for Primary Raynaud's Disease (PRD) and Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon (SRP) were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 6 prospective and 23 retrospective series with a total of 753 patients and 1026 affected limbs. Early beneficial effects of thoracic sympathectomy were noticed in 63-100% (median 94%) of all patients, in 73-100% (median 98%) of PRD patients and in 63-100% (median 94%) of SRP patients. The beneficial effect was noted to lessen over time. Long-term beneficial effects were reported in 13-100% (median 75%) of all patients, in 22-100% (median 58%) of PRD patients, and in 13-100% (median 79%) of SRD patients. Complete or improved ulcer healing was achieved in 33-100% and 25-67% respectively, of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic sympathectomy can be beneficial in the treatment of upper extremity ischemia in select patients. Although the effect in patients with PRD will lessen over time, it may still reduce the severity of symptoms. In SRD, effects are more often long-lasting. In addition, thoracic sympathectomy may maximize tissue preservation or prevent amputation in cases of digital ulceration.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia/cirugía , Simpatectomía/métodos , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Humanos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
Symptomatic aneurysms of the popliteal vein are uncommon, with the majority resulting in thromboembolic complications. Neurologic symptoms are extremely rare. We present a case of a 53-year-old man with a footdrop resulting from a saccular popliteal venous aneurysm. Compression of the peroneal nerve caused the neurologic deficit. After aneurysmectomy and lateral venorrhaphy, the patient regained full strength of his lower leg muscles. Neurologic complications caused by a popliteal venous aneurysm should be considered in patients with a swelling in the popliteal fossa and a neurologic deficit of the lower extremity.