Does race matter in universal healthcare? Stroke cost and outcomes in US military health care.

Introduction: It is well documented in the US civilian healthcare system that race is correlated with different outcomes for ischemic stroke patients. That healthcare system has wide variations in access to and quality of care. In contrast, the US military healthcare system (MHS) a universal healthcare system where every member has access to the same healthcare benefits. Do racial disparities evident in the civilian healthcare system transfer to the MHS? Methods: Data was collected from the MHS Military Mart (M2) database from calendar years 2010 through 2015. All adult patients with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke upon discharge were reviewed. Race was compared across primary outcomes of: (1) IV tPA administration and (2) Disposition destination 'poor disposition destination or in-hospital mortality'. And secondary outcomes of: (1) Total cost of hospitalization and (2) Length of hospital stay. Relevant demographic and co-morbidities were adjusted with regression analysis. Results: A total of 3623 patients met this study's parameters. Race was identified in 2661 (73.5%) admissions. Racial composition of this patient sample was: White 1767 (48.8%), African Americans 619 (17.1%), Asian 275 (7.6%), Other or Unknown 962 (26.5%). There was no correlation between race and administration of IV tPA, poor disposition destination or in-hospital mortality. There was a correlation between African Americans and increased cost of hospitalization. This finding was correlated with costs for radiological studies but was not correlated with any increase in the length of stay. Conclusion: Racial disparities evident in the civilian healthcare system do not appear to transfer the universal healthcare system represented by the MHS. Universal healthcare mitigates racial disparities in ischemic stroke admissions.

A Case for Telestroke in Military Medicine: A Retrospective Analysis of Stroke Cost and Outcomes in U.S. Military Health-Care System.

BACKGROUND: The development of primary stroke centers has improved outcomes for stroke patients. Telestroke networks have expanded the reach of stroke experts to underserved, geographically remote areas. This study illustrates the outcome and cost differences between neurology and primary care ischemic stroke admissions to demonstrate a need for telestroke networks within the Military Health System (MHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult admissions with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the MHS Military Mart database from calendar years 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. Neurology, primary care, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were compared across primary outcomes of (1) disposition status and (2) intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration and for secondary outcomes of (1) total cost of hospitalization and (2) length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 3623 admissions met the study's parameters. The composition was neurology 462 (12.8%), primary care 2324 (64.1%), ICU 677 (18.7%), and other/unknown 160 (4.4%). Almost all neurology admissions (97%) were at the 3 neurology training programs, whereas a strong majority of primary care admissions (80%) were at hospitals without a neurology admitting service. Hospitals without a neurology admitting service had more discharges to rehabilitation facilities and higher rates of in-hospital mortality. LOS was also longer in primary care admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic stroke admissions to neurology had better outcomes and decreased LOS when compared to primary care within the MHS. This demonstrates a possible gap in care. Implementation of a hub and spoke telestroke model is a potential solution.

Decrease Hospital Spending: There's an App for That! A Retrospective Analysis of Implementation of a Mobile Resident Handbook on Hospital Costs and Disposition.

BACKGROUND: Patient care involves time sensitive decisions. Matching a patient's presenting condition with possible diagnoses requires proper assessment and diagnostic tests. Timely access to necessary information leads to improved patient care, better outcomes, and decreased costs. INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated objective outcomes of the implementation of a novel Resident Handbook Application (RHAP) for smart phones. METHODS: The RHAP included tools necessary to make proper assessments and to order appropriate tests. The RHAPs effectiveness was accessed using the Military Health System Military Mart database. This database includes patient specific aggregate data, including diagnosis, patient demographics, itemized cost, hospital days, and disposition status. Multivariable analysis was used to compare before and after RHAP implementation, controlling for patient demographics and diagnosis. Internal medicine admission data were used as a control group. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in laboratory costs and a strong trend toward statistically significant decreases in the cost of radiology performed after implementation of RHAP (p value of <0.02 and <0.07, respectively). There was also a decrease in hospital days (3.66-3.30 days), in total cost per admission ($18,866-$16,305), and in cost per hospital day per patient ($5,140-$4,936). During the same time period a Control group had no change or increases in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the RHAP resulted in decreases in costs in a variety of areas and a decrease in hospital bed days without any apparent negative effect upon patient outcomes or disposition status.

Concussion in the Military: an Evidence-Base Review of mTBI in US Military Personnel Focused on Posttraumatic Headache.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as an alteration in brain function caused by an external force. Mild TBI or concussion is now well recognized to be a risk of military service as well as participation in athletic sports such as football. Posttraumatic headache (PTH) is the most common symptom after mTBI in US service members. PTH most commonly presents with migraine-like headache features. The following is an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical course, prognosis, complications, and treatment of mTBI and associated comorbidities with a focus on PTH. There is a particular emphasis on emerging evidence-based clinical practice. One important medical consequence of the recognition that mTBI is a highly prevalent among military service members is that the Department of Defense (DoD) is dedicating significant financial and intellectual resources to better understanding and developing treatments for TBI. The identification of the importance of TBI among the US military population has had the added benefit of increasing awareness of this condition among civilian populations, particularly those engaged in both professional and youth sports. The NIH and NSF are also supporting important TBI research. President Obama's Brain Initiative is also providing additional impetus for these efforts. Unfortunately, the understanding of the acute and chronic effects of mTBI on the brain remains limited. Gratefully, there is hope that through innovative research, there will be advances in elucidating the underlying pathophysiology, which will lead to clinical and prognostic indicators, ultimately resulting in new treatment options for this very complicated set of disorders.

Socioeconomic class and universal healthcare: Analysis of stroke cost and outcomes in US military healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: Do socioeconomic disparities exist in the US military healthcare system with ischemic stroke admissions? METHODS: Civilian healthcare in the United States is paid for by a variety of payers. Significant disparities exist in this system based upon socioeconomic status (SES). In contrast, the military healthcare system (MHS) is a universal healthcare system. Military rank is a SES surrogate. Data was collected from the MHS database for years 2010 through 2015. All admissions to military health care facilities with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke were reviewed. Military rank was compared for primary outcomes of: Disposition (In-hospital mortality and discharge destination setting) and IV tPA administration and for secondary outcomes of: Total cost of hospitalization and Length of hospital stay (LoS). All adjusted for relevant demographics and co-morbidities. RESULTS: Military rank was identified with 1895 (52.3%) of the 3623 admissions. The ranks identified were: Junior Enlisted 100 (2.7%), Senior Enlisted/Warrant Officers 1390 (38.4%), Junior Officers 59 (1.6%) and Senior Officers 346 (9.6%). Statistically significant results included: Lower SES group/ranks were more likely to have poor discharge destination setting while the highest SES group/ranks and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter lengths of stay and higher hospitalization costs after controlling for relevant variables. CONCLUSION: Higher military ranks (Higher SES) had shorter hospitalization stays, higher costs and less in-hospital mortality in the military's universal healthcare system. This suggests aggregate characteristics of SES plays a large role in the outcomes among SES groups.