RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIM: In hospitalized patients, daily protein intake remains far below WHO requirements for healthy adults (0.8 g·kg-1·d-1) as well as ESPEN guidelines for patients (1.2-1.5 g·kg-1·d-1). Providing access to a pre-sleep protein dense snack between dinner and going to bed may serve as a great opportunity to increase daily energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. However, it remains to be assessed whether protein provision prior to sleep effectively increases protein intake, or may reduce food intake throughout the remainder of the day(s). The present study evaluated the impact of giving access to a pre-sleep snack on daily energy and protein intake in patients throughout their hospitalization. METHODS: Patients admitted to the surgical wards of the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ were randomly allocated to usual care (n = 51) or given access to a pre-sleep snack (n = 50). The pre-sleep snack consisted of 103 g cheese cubes (30 g protein) provided between 7:30 and 9:30 PM, prior to sleep. All food provided and all food consumed was weighed and recorded throughout (2-7 days) hospitalization. Daily energy and protein intake and distribution were calculated. Data were analyzed by independent T-Tests with P < 0.05 considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: Daily energy intake was higher in the pre-sleep group (1353 ± 424 kcal d-1) when compared to the usual care group (1190 ± 402 kcal·d-1; P = 0.049). Providing patients access to a pre-sleep snack resulted in a 17% (11 ± 9 g) higher daily protein intake (0.81 ± 0.29 g·kg-1·d-1) when compared to the usual care group (0.69 ± 0.28 g·kg-1·d-1; P = 0.045). Protein intake at breakfast, lunch, and dinner did not differ between the pre-sleep and usual care groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Providing access to a pre-sleep protein snack, in the form of protein dense food items such as cheese, represents an effective dietary strategy to increase daily energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. Patients consuming pre-sleep protein snacks do not compensate by lowering energy or protein intake throughout the remainder of the days. Pre-sleep protein dense food provision should be implemented in hospital food logistics to improve the nutritional intake of patients. TRIAL REGISTER NO: NL8507 (https://trialsearch.who.int/).
Asunto(s)
Proteínas en la Dieta , Ingestión de Energía , Hospitalización , Sueño , Bocadillos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Sueño/fisiología , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hemodialysis removes amino acids from the circulation, thereby stimulating muscle proteolysis. Protein ingestion during hemodialysis can compensate for amino acid removal but may also increase uremic toxin production. Branched-chain ketoacid (BCKA) co-ingestion may provide an additional anabolic stimulus without adding to uremic toxin accumulation. In the present study we assessed the impact of BCKA co-ingestion with protein on forearm amino acid balance and amino acid oxidation during hemodialysis. METHODS: Nine patients (age: 73 ± 10 y) on chronic hemodialysis participated in this crossover trial. During two 4-h hemodialysis sessions, patients ingested 18 g protein with (PRO + BCKA) or without (PRO) 9 g BCKAs in a randomized order. Test beverages were labeled with L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine and provided throughout the last 3 h of hemodialysis as 18 equal sips consumed with 10-min intervals. Arterial and venous plasma as well as breath samples were collected frequently throughout hemodialysis. RESULTS: Arterial plasma total amino acid (TAA) concentrations during PRO and PRO + BCKA treatments were significantly lower after 1 h of hemodialysis (2.6 ± 0.3 and 2.6 ± 0.3 mmol/L, respectively) when compared to pre-hemodialysis concentrations (4.2 ± 1.0 and 4.0 ± 0.5 mmol/L, respectively; time effect: P < 0.001). Arterial plasma TAA concentrations increased throughout test beverage ingestion (time effect: P = 0.027) without differences between treatments (time∗treatment: P = 0.62). Forearm arteriovenous TAA balance during test beverage ingestion did not differ between timepoints (time effect: P = 0.31) or treatments (time∗treatment: P = 0.34). Whole-body phenylalanine oxidation was 33 ± 16% lower during PRO + BCKA when compared to PRO treatments (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BCKA co-ingestion with protein during hemodialysis does not improve forearm net protein balance but lowers amino acid oxidation.