Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 75: 29-32, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897917

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Falls are the leading cause of injuries in the US for older adults. Follow-up after an ED-related fall visit is essential to initiate preventive strategies in these patients who are at very high risk for recurrent falls. It is currently unclear how frequently follow-up occurs and whether preventive strategies are implemented. Our objective is to determine the rate of follow-up by older adults who sustain a fall related head injury resulting in an ED visit, the rate and type of risk assessment and adoption of preventive strategies. METHODS: This 1-year prospective observational study was conducted at two South Florida hospitals. All older ED patients with an acute head injury due to a fall were identified. Telephone surveys were conducted 14 days after ED presentation asking about PCP follow-up and adoption of fall prevention strategies. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared between patients with and without follow up. RESULTS: Of 4951 patients with a head injury from a fall, 1527 met inclusion criteria. 905 reported follow-up with their PCP. Of these, 72% reported receiving a fall assessment and 56% adopted a fall prevention strategy. Participants with PCP follow-up were significantly more likely to have a history of cancer or hypertension. CONCLUSION: Only 60% of ED patients with fall-related head injury follow-up with their PCP. Further, 72% received a fall assessment and only 56% adopted a fall prevention strategy. These data indicate an urgent need to promote PCP fall assessment and adoption of prevention strategies in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Anciano , Humanos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Estudios de Seguimiento , Evaluación Geriátrica , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 5(3): e13223, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38903766

RESUMEN

Traditionally, emergency medicine (EM) residency programs teach non-adult emergency department activities (such as pediatric EM, point-of-care ultrasound [PoCUS], emergency medical services, and others) in a block format. In this way, a resident may have a 1-month pediatric EM rotation and then not have any further pediatric EM exposure until their next pediatric rotation 6‒9 months later. Furthermore, some rotations are only allotted for 1-month during the entire residency. A first-year EM resident may have their only formal PoCUS rotation early in the first year of training when their overall skills are developing, and their level of understanding and retention of information may not be optimal at that juncture of their residency training. This is far from ideal from an educational perspective. Learning scientists have now suggested that a longitudinal interleaved curriculum has substantial advantages over the traditional block format. This curriculum allows for a "spaced retrieval" practice that enhances retention of material and develops thinking processes that are important in clinical practice. The increased continuity of clinical experience has been shown to improve educational outcome and learner satisfaction. We developed a novel longitudinal interleaved curriculum for our EM resident trainees. This curriculum encompasses the entire 3 years of residency training and has the goals of increasing EM knowledge and clinical skills and being excellent preparation for board certification examinations. This concept has clear educational benefits. While adapting an existing medical training program would be challenging, a longitudinal curriculum could be phased in to replace a traditional EM curriculum.

4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959158

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several clinical decision rules have been devised to guide head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injuries, but none have been validated in patients 65 years or older. We aimed to derive and validate a head injury clinical decision rule for older adults. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of an existing dataset of consecutive emergency department (ED) patients >65 years old with blunt head trauma. The main predictive outcomes were significant intracranial injury and Need for Neurosurgical Intervention on CT. The secondary outcomes also considered in the model development and validation were All Injuries and All Intracranial Injuries. Predictor variables were identified using multiple variable logistic regression, and clinical decision rule models were developed in a split-sample derivation cohort and then tested in an independent validation cohort. RESULTS: Of 5776 patients, 233 (4.0%) had significant intracranial injury and an additional 104 (1.8%) met CT criteria for Need for Neurosurgical Intervention. The best performing model, the Florida Geriatric Head Trauma CT Clinical Decision Rule, assigns points based on several clinical variables. If the points totaled 25 or more, a CT scan is indicated. The included predictors were arrival via Emergency Medical Services (+30 points), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <15 (+20 points), GCS <14 (+50 points), antiplatelet medications (+17 points), loss of consciousness (+16 points), signs of basilar skull fracture (+50 points), and headache (+20 points). Utilizing this clinical decision rule in the validation cohort, a point total ≥25 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 96.0-100) and 12.3% (95% CI: 10.9-13.8), respectively, for significant intracranial injury and Need for Neurosurgical Intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The Florida Geriatric Head Trauma CT Clinical Decision Rule has the potential to reduce unnecessary CT scans in older adults, without compromising safe emergency medicine practice.

5.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 5(4): e13245, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086794

RESUMEN

Objectives: Falls are common in adults aged 65 years and older and are the leading cause of traumatic brain injuries in this age group. Alcohol use may increase the risk of falls as well as the severity of resultant injuries. The aim of this study was to examine the association between self-reported alcohol use and the prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in this patient group. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Geriatric Head Trauma Short Term Outcomes Project (GREAT STOP), a study of older adults with blunt head trauma from a fall. We determined the characteristics of every fall event, including patient demographics and medical history, and clinical signs and symptoms related to head trauma. Self-reported alcohol use was categorized as none, occasionally, weekly, or daily. We defined ICH as any acute ICH detected by computed tomography scan. We evaluated the association between alcohol use frequency and ICH, adjusted for patient factors and head injury risk factors. Results: Of 3128 study participants, 18.2% (n = 567) reported alcohol use: 10.3% with occasional use, 1.9% with weekly use, and 6.0% with daily use. ICH was more common in patients who used alcohol (20.5%, 22.0%, and 25.1% for occasional, weekly, and daily alcohol users, respectively, vs. 12.0% for non-users, p < 0.001). The frequency of alcohol use was independently associated with ICH, adjusted for patient and head injury risk factors. The adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for occasional, weekly, and daily alcohol users increased from 2.0 (1.5‒2.8) to 2.1 (1.1‒4.1) and 2.5 (1.7‒3.6), respectively, and showed the characteristics of dose‒response effect. Conclusions: Alcohol use in older adult emergency department patients with head trauma is relatively common. Self-reported alcohol use appears to be associated with a higher risk of ICH in a dose-dependent fashion. Fall prevention strategies may need to consider alcohol mitigation as a modifiable risk factor.

6.
Cureus ; 15(12): e50611, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38226095

RESUMEN

Background and objective The risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during nebulization is unclear. In this study, we aimed to address this issue. Methods Fugitive emissions of aerosolized saline during nebulization were observed using a standard jet nebulizer fitted with unfiltered and filtered mouthpieces connected via a mannequin to a breathing simulator. Fugitive emissions were observed by using a laser sheet and captured on high-definition video, and they were measured by using optical particle counters positioned where a potential caregiver may be administering nebulization and three other locations in the sagittal plane at various distances downstream of the mannequin. Results The use of a standard unfiltered mouthpiece resulted in significant emission of fugitive aerosols ahead of and above the mannequin (spread over 2 m in front). A mouthpiece with a filter-adaptor effectively suppressed the emissions, with only minor leakage from the nebulizer cup. Particle count measurements supported the visual observations, providing total particle count levels and aerosol concentration levels at the measurement locations. The levels decayed slowly with downstream distance. Conclusions The visualization described above captured the dispersion of emitted aerosols in the plane of the laser sheet, aligned with the sagittal plane. The particle count measurements provided temporal and spatial distributions of the aerosol concentration levels over the time and locations considered. However, the exhaled air and aerosolized droplets spread three-dimensionally in front of and above the mannequin. The results visually highlight the effectiveness of using a filtered mouthpiece in suppressing the fugitive aerosols and identify an approach for limiting the occupational exposure of healthcare workers to these emissions while administering nebulized therapies.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA