Assessing life-space mobility : A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND: Life-space mobility (LSM), as the extent of mobility within one's environment, is a key for successful aging and has become a relevant concept in gerontology and geriatric research. Adequate assessment instruments are needed to identify older persons with LSM restrictions, and to initiate, adapt or evaluate intervention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify, describe and analyze the psychometric properties of LSM questionnaires, with a special focus on their availability in the German language. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies that examined at least one psychometric property of LSM questionnaires published up to August 2021 were included and evaluated based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: This study included 37 validation studies describing 13 different LSM questionnaires. Methodological quality and comprehensiveness of validations were heterogeneous. Based on comprehensive and high-quality results, four LSM questionnaires stood out: the University of Alabama at Birmingham life-space assessment (UAB-LSA), life-space assessment in persons with cognitive impairment (LSA-CI), interview-based and proxy-based versions of the life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS), all of them available in the German language. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a concise overview of available LSM questionnaires and their psychometric properties to facilitate the selection for use in clinical practice and research. The UAB-LSA and LSA-CI for community settings and the interview-based or proxy-based LSA-IS for institutional settings were found to be the most appropriate LSM questionnaires.

Validity, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Feasibility of the Life-Space Assessment Administered via Telephone in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The life-space assessment (LSA) is the most commonly used questionnaire to assess life-space mobility (LSM) in older adults, with well-established psychometric properties for face-to-face (FF) administration. However, these properties have not yet been explicitly studied when the LSA is administered by telephone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concurrent and construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of a telephone-based LSA version (TE-LSA) in older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty community-dwelling older adults (age = 79.3 ± 5.3 years) participated in the study. Concurrent validity was assessed against the FF-LSA construct validity by testing 15 a priori hypotheses on expected associations with LSM determinants, test-retest reliability via 2 telephone surveys 1 week apart, responsiveness after 8.5 ± 1.8 months in participants with improved, stable, and worsened mobility defined by 2 external criteria, and feasibility by the completion rate/time and ceiling/floor effects. RESULTS: Good to excellent agreement between the 2 different administration methods was found (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.73-0.98). Twelve of 15 (80%) hypotheses on construct validity were confirmed. ICCs for test-retest reliability were good to excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.62-0.94). Minimal detectable change for the TE-LSA total score was 20 points. Standardized response means were large for worsened (0.88), moderate for improved (0.68), and trivial for stable participants (0.04). Completion rate was 100% and mean completion time was 5.5 ± 3.3 min. No ceiling or floor effects were observed for the TE-LSA total score. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Telephone administration of the LSA is valid, reliable, responsive, and feasible for assessing LSM in community-dwelling older adults.