Automated Data Cleanup for Mass Cytometry.

Mass cytometry is an emerging technology capable of 40 or more correlated measurements on a single cell. The complexity and volume of data generated by this platform have accelerated the creation of novel methods for high-dimensional data analysis and visualization. A key step in any high-level data analysis is the removal of unwanted events, a process often referred to as data cleanup. Data cleanup as applied to mass cytometry typically focuses on elimination of dead cells, debris, normalization beads, true aggregates, and coincident ion clouds from raw data. We describe a probability state modeling (PSM) method that automatically identifies and removes these elements, resulting in FCS files that contain mostly live and intact events. This approach not only leverages QC measurements such as DNA, live/dead, and event length but also four additional pulse-processing parameters that are available on Fluidigm Helios™ and CyTOF® (Fluidigm, Markham, Canada) 2 instruments with software versions of 6.3 or higher. These extra Gaussian-derived parameters are valuable for detecting well-formed pulses and eliminating coincident positive ion clouds. The automated nature of this new routine avoids the subjectivity of other gating methods and results in unbiased elimination of unwanted events. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Sometimes simpler is better: VLog, a general but easy-to-implement log-like transform for cytometry.

The fundamental purpose of log and log-like transforms for cytometry is to make measured population variabilities as uniform as possible. The long-standing success of the log transform was its ability to stabilize linearly increasing gain-dependent uncertainties and the success of the log-like transforms is that they extend this notion to include zero and negative measurement values. This study derives and examines a transform called VLog that stabilizes the three general sources of variability: (1) gain-dependent variability, (2) photo-electron counting error, and (3) signal-independent sources of error. Somewhat surprisingly, this transform has a closed-form solution and therefore is relatively simple to implement. By including some quantitation elements in its formulation, the shape-dependent arguments, α and ß, usually do not require optimization for different datasets. The simplicity and generality of the transform may make it a useful tool for cytometry and possibly other technologies. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Probability state modeling theory.

As the technology of cytometry matures, there is mounting pressure to address two major issues with data analyses. The first issue is to develop new analysis methods for high-dimensional data that can directly reveal and quantify important characteristics associated with complex cellular biology. The other issue is to replace subjective and inaccurate gating with automated methods that objectively define subpopulations and account for population overlap due to measurement uncertainty. Probability state modeling (PSM) is a technique that addresses both of these issues. The theory and important algorithms associated with PSM are presented along with simple examples and general strategies for autonomous analyses. PSM is leveraged to better understand B-cell ontogeny in bone marrow in a companion Cytometry Part B manuscript. Three short relevant videos are available in the online supporting information for both of these papers. PSM avoids the dimensionality barrier normally associated with high-dimensionality modeling by using broadened quantile functions instead of frequency functions to represent the modulation of cellular epitopes as cells differentiate. Since modeling programs ultimately minimize or maximize one or more objective functions, they are particularly amenable to automation and, therefore, represent a viable alternative to subjective and inaccurate gating approaches.

Multi-site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system.

High-dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30-marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2-week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay-specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter-site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping.

Automated analysis of flow cytometric data for measuring neutrophil CD64 expression using a multi-instrument compatible probability state model.

BACKGROUND: Leuko64™ (Trillium Diagnostics) is a flow cytometric assay that measures neutrophil CD64 expression and serves as an in vitro indicator of infection/sepsis or the presence of a systemic acute inflammatory response. Leuko64 assay currently utilizes QuantiCALC, a semiautomated software that employs cluster algorithms to define cell populations. The software reduces subjective gating decisions, resulting in interanalyst variability of <5%. We evaluated a completely automated approach to measuring neutrophil CD64 expression using GemStone™ (Verity Software House) and probability state modeling (PSM). METHODS: Four hundred and fifty-seven human blood samples were processed using the Leuko64 assay. Samples were analyzed on four different flow cytometer models: BD FACSCanto II, BD FACScan, BC Gallios/Navios, and BC FC500. A probability state model was designed to identify calibration beads and three leukocyte subpopulations based on differences in intensity levels of several parameters. PSM automatically calculates CD64 index values for each cell population using equations programmed into the model. GemStone software uses PSM that requires no operator intervention, thus totally automating data analysis and internal quality control flagging. Expert analysis with the predicate method (QuantiCALC) was performed. Interanalyst precision was evaluated for both methods of data analysis. RESULTS: PSM with GemStone correlates well with the expert manual analysis, r(2) = 0.99675 for the neutrophil CD64 index values with no intermethod bias detected. The average interanalyst imprecision for the QuantiCALC method was 1.06% (range 0.00-7.94%), which was reduced to 0.00% with the GemStone PSM. The operator-to-operator agreement in GemStone was a perfect correlation, r(2) = 1.000. CONCLUSION: Automated quantification of CD64 index values produced results that strongly correlate with expert analysis using a standard gate-based data analysis method. PSM successfully evaluated flow cytometric data generated by multiple instruments across multiple lots of the Leuko64 kit in all 457 cases. The probability-based method provides greater objectivity, higher data analysis speed, and allows for greater precision for in vitro diagnostic flow cytometric assays.

Automated analysis of GPI-deficient leukocyte flow cytometric data using GemStone™.

BACKGROUND: Flow Cytometry is the standard for the detection of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-deficient clones in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and related disorders. Although the International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS) and the International PNH Interest Group (IPIG) have published guidelines for PNH assays, data analysis has not been standardized. Current analyses use manual gating to enumerate PNH cells. We evaluate an automated approach to identify GPI-deficient leukocytes using a GemStone™ (Verity Software House) probability state model (PSM). METHODS: Five hundred and thirty patient samples were assayed on BD Canto II flow cytometers using a stain-lyse-wash technique. Populations were defined using CD15, CD45, CD64 and side scatter. GPI-deficient myeloid cells were recognized as FLAER-, CD24-, and dim or absent CD16. GPI-deficient monocytic cells were identified as FLAER- and CD14-. The data were not censored in any way. A PSM was designed to enumerate monocytic and myeloid cells by adjusting the peaks and line spreads of the data, and recording the normal and GPI-deficient counts. No operator adjustments were made to the automated analysis. RESULTS: By human analysis, 53 of 530 samples showed GPI-deficient clones. Automated analysis identified the same 53 clones; there were 0 false positives and 0 false negatives. Sensitivity was 100% and specificity 100%. Gating and automated results (percent GPI-deficient cells) were highly correlated: r² = 0.997 for monocytic cells, and r² = 0.999 for myeloids. Mean absolute differences were 0.94% for monocytes and 0.78% for myeloid cells. CONCLUSIONS: Automated analysis of GPI-deficient leukocytes produces results that agree strongly with gate-based results. The probability-based approach provides higher speed, objectivity, and reproducibility.