Trial Evaluating Ambulatory Therapy of Travelers' Diarrhea (TrEAT TD) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 3 Single-Dose Antibiotic Regimens With Loperamide.

BACKGROUND: Recommended treatment for travelers' diarrhea includes the combination of an antibiotic, usually a fluoroquinolone or azithromycin, and loperamide for rapid resolution of symptoms. However, adverse events, postdose nausea with high-dose azithromycin, effectiveness of single-dose rifaximin, and emerging resistance to front-line agents are evidence gaps underlying current recommendations. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in 4 countries (Afghanistan, Djibouti, Kenya, and Honduras) between September 2012 and July 2015. US and UK service members with acute watery diarrhea were randomized and received single-dose azithromycin (500 mg; 106 persons), levofloxacin (500 mg; 111 persons), or rifaximin (1650 mg; 107 persons), in combination with loperamide (labeled dosing). The efficacy outcomes included clinical cure at 24 hours and time to last unformed stool. RESULTS: Clinical cure at 24 hours occurred in 81.4%, 78.3%, and 74.8% of the levofloxacin, azithromycin, and rifaximin arms, respectively. Compared with levofloxacin, azithromycin was not inferior (P = .01). Noninferiority could not be shown with rifaximin (P = .07). At 48 and 72 hours, efficacy among regimens was equivalent (approximately 91% at 48 and 96% at 72 hours). The median time to last unformed stool did not differ between treatment arms (azithromycin, 3.8 hours; levofloxacin, 6.4 hours; rifaximin, 5.6 hours). Treatment failures were uncommon (3.8%, 4.4%, and 1.9% in azithromycin, levofloxacin, and rifaximin arms, respectively) (P = .55). There were no differences between treatment arms with postdose nausea, vomiting, or other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose azithromycin, levofloxacin, and rifaximin with loperamide were comparable for treatment of acute watery diarrhea. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01618591.

Evaluation of the Biofire FilmArray BioThreat-E Test (v2.5) for Rapid Identification of Ebola Virus Disease in Heat-Treated Blood Samples Obtained in Sierra Leone and the United Kingdom.

Rapid Ebola virus (EBOV) detection is crucial for appropriate patient management and care. The performance of the FilmArray BioThreat-E test (v2.5) using whole-blood samples was evaluated in Sierra Leone and the United Kingdom and was compared with results generated by a real-time Ebola Zaire PCR reference method. Samples were tested in diagnostic laboratories upon availability, included successive samples from individual patients, and were heat treated to facilitate EBOV inactivation prior to PCR. The BioThreat-E test had a sensitivity of 84% (confidence interval [CI], 64% to 95%) and a specificity of 89% (CI, 73% to 97%) in Sierra Leone (n = 60; 44 patients) and a sensitivity of 75% (CI, 19% to 99%) and a specificity of 100% (CI, 97% to 100%) in the United Kingdom (n = 108; 70 patients) compared to the reference real-time PCR. Statistical analysis (Fisher's exact test) indicated there was no significant difference between the methods at the 99% confidence level in either country. In 9 discrepant results (5 real-time PCR positives and BioThreat-E test negatives and 4 real-time PCR negatives and BioThreat-E test positives), the majority (n = 8) were obtained from samples with an observed or probable low viral load. The FilmArray BioThreat-E test (v2.5) therefore provides an attractive option for laboratories (either in austere field settings or in countries with an advanced technological infrastructure) which do not routinely offer an EBOV diagnostic capability.

Diarrhea and associated illness characteristics and risk factors among British active duty service members at Askari Storm training exercise, Nanyuki, Kenya, January-June 2014.

Travelers' diarrhea (TD) has historically been common among deployed military personnel and remains a leading infectious disease threat to this population. The risk factors, work performance, and illness associated with TD among British active duty service members exercising at British Army Training Unit Kenya (BATUK) were assessed. Members of the British Army who were finishing a 6-week combined arms training exercise in Nanyuki, Kenya, completed routine public health surveillance questionnaires. Survey data included information on demographics, rank, risk factors, illness characteristics, and impact on work performance. Among 1,227 survey respondents, 21.9% (n=269) reported having diarrhea, with an estimated 824 days of total missed work and 1,215 days of work underperformance. The majority of cases (54.6%) had multiple diarrheal episodes. One quarter (24.9%) of the respondents with TD sought medical care and 19.7% were bedded down because of their illness. There were no statistically significant differences between the TD and no TD groups on the demographic characteristics examined. The strongest risk factor for diarrhea was having a colleague with diarrhea (adjusted odds ratio=51.78; 95% confidence interval: 29.44-91.06). TD had a notable impact on duty status and operational capability. Efforts are needed to improve BATUK's participant education on the importance of diarrheal disease prevention and management.

Epidemiology and etiology of diarrhea in UK military personnel serving on the United Nations Mission in South Sudan in 2017: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: . Diarrhea is a well-established problem in travellers, with military personnel at especially high risk. This study aimed to characterise the spectrum of pathogens causing diarrhea in UK military personnel in South Sudan, and assess the utility of culture-independent testing for etiology and antimicrobial resistance in a logistically challenging and austere environment. METHODS: . All military personnel presenting with diarrhea were admitted to the UK Level 2 Medical Treatment Facility in Bentiu, South Sudan. Samples were tested for etiology utilising multiplex PCR-based diagnostics (BioFire FilmArray). In addition, the presence of carbapenemase resistance genes was determined using the geneXpert Carba-R platform. RESULTS: . Over 5 months, 127 samples were tested. The vast majority of pathogens detected were diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. The presence of either enterotoxigenic (ETEC) or enteropathogenic (EPEC) E. coli was a significant predictor of the other being present. In this study patients presenting with vomiting were 32 times more likely to have norovirus than not (p < 0.001). No carbapenem resistance was detected. CONCLUSIONS: . Diarrhea in UK military personnel in South Sudan was determined to be predominantly bacterial, with norovirus presenting a distinct clinical and epidemiological pattern. Multiplex PCR and molecular resistance point of care testing were robust and effective in this environment.