RETINAL NONPERFUSION IN THE EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY SEVEN FIELDS COMPARED WITH WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Correlation and Use of Extrapolation Factor.

BACKGROUND: In previous landmark studies on central retinal vein occlusion, retinal nonperfusion assessments were obtained using 7-field (7F) angiography. The widespread current use of widefield imaging allows better visualization of the peripheral retina and more comprehensive estimation of the total area of nonperfusion. The relationship between nonperfusion measurement of 7F and widefield angiography (WFA) in central retinal vein occlusion has not been studied. We aim to identify the correlation of retinal nonperfusion measured within the 7F and on WFA in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Retinal nonperfusion in participants with central retinal vein occlusion was determined using a 7F Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study template and the concentric rings method. RESULTS: A total of 153 eyes were included. Pearson correlation test showed a near-perfect positive, linear correlation between the nonperfusion found in the 7F and total retinal nonperfusion on WFA (0.985 95% CI [0.793, 0.999]) The regression line equation for nonperfusion on 7F and WFA was y = 37 + 3.2x. Eyes with 0 disk areas (DA), >0 DA to 10 DA and >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7-fields had on average 23 DA 95% CI (19.20, 27.06), 45 DA 95% CI (35.75, 55.18), and 115 DA 95% CI (88.89, 142.05) on widefield respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a positive and linear relationship between nonperfusion measured by 7F and WFA in central retinal vein occlusion with more than 3-times the amount of nonperfusion identified on WFA. Despite <10 DA no areas of nonperfusion on 7F, there is typically at least 35 DA of nonperfusion on WFA whereas eyes with >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7F had at least 88 DA on WFA.

Genome-wide association studies for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are sight-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus and leading causes of adult-onset blindness worldwide. Genetic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been described previously, but have been difficult to replicate between studies, which have often used composite phenotypes and been conducted in different populations. This study aims to identify genetic risk factors for DME and PDR as separate complications in Australians of European descent with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Caucasian Australians with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to compare 270 DME cases and 176 PDR cases with 435 non-retinopathy controls. All participants were genotyped by SNP array and after data cleaning, cases were compared to controls using logistic regression adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: The top ranked SNP for DME was rs1990145 (p = 4.10 × 10- 6, OR = 2.02 95%CI [1.50, 2.72]) on chromosome 2. The top-ranked SNP for PDR was rs918519 (p = 3.87 × 10- 6, OR = 0.35 95%CI [0.22, 0.54]) on chromosome 5. A trend towards association was also detected at two SNPs reported in the only other reported GWAS of DR in Caucasians; rs12267418 near MALRD1 (p = 0.008) in the DME cohort and rs16999051 in the diabetes gene PCSK2 (p = 0.007) in the PDR cohort. CONCLUSION: This study has identified loci of interest for DME and PDR, two common ocular complications of diabetes. These findings require replication in other Caucasian cohorts with type 2 diabetes and larger cohorts will be required to identify genetic loci with statistical confidence. There is considerable overlap in the patient cohorts with each retinopathy subtype, complicating the search for genes that contribute to PDR and DME biology.

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the Treatment of Macular Edema Resulting from Uncommon Causes: Twelve-Month Findings from PROMETHEUS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with macular edema (ME) resulting from any cause other than diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: A phase 3, 12-month, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-eight eligible patients aged ≥18 years. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 118) or sham (n = 60) at baseline and month 1. From month 2, patients in both arms received open-label individualized ranibizumab treatment based on disease activity. A preplanned subgroup analysis was conducted on the primary end point on 5 predefined baseline ME etiologies (inflammatory/post-uveitis, pseudophakic or aphakic, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) from baseline to month 2 (primary end point) and month 12 and safety over 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients (87.6%) completed the study. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Overall, ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to month 2 (least squares mean BCVA, +5.7 letters vs. +2.9 letters; 1-sided P = 0.0111), that is, a treatment effect (TE) of +2.8 letters. The mean BCVA gain from baseline to month 12 was 9.6 letters with ranibizumab. The TE at month 2 was variable in the 5 predefined etiology subgroups, ranging from >5-letter gain to 0.5-letter loss. The safety findings were consistent with the well-established safety profile of ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point was met and ranibizumab showed superiority in BCVA gain over sham in treating ME due to uncommon causes, with a TE of +2.8 letters versus sham at month 2. At month 12, the mean BCVA gain was high (9.6 letters) in the ranibizumab arm; however, the TE was observed to be variable across the different etiology subgroups, reaching a >1-line TE in BCVA in patients with ME resulting from inflammatory conditions/post-uveitis or after cataract surgery. Overall, ranibizumab was well tolerated with no new safety findings up to month 12.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO UNCOMMON CAUSE: Twelve-Month Results of the MINERVA Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with choroidal neovascularization because of an uncommon cause enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study. METHODS: In this Phase III, double-masked study, adult (≥18 years) patients (N = 178) were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab (n = 119) or sham (n = 59) at baseline and, if needed, at Month 1 and open-label individualized ranibizumab from Month 2. Best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to Month 2 (primary endpoint) and Month 12, treatment exposure, and safety over 12 months were reported. Subgroup analysis was conducted on five predefined choroidal neovascularization etiologies (angioid streak, postinflammatory, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). RESULTS: Ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to Month 2 (adjusted least-squares mean best-corrected visual acuity: +9.5 vs. -0.4 letters; P < 0.001). At Month 12, the mean best-corrected visual acuity change was +11.0 letters (ranibizumab) and +9.3 letters (sham). Across the 5 subgroups, the treatment effect ranged from +5.0 to +14.6 letters. The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 5.8 (ranibizumab arm) with no new ocular or nonocular adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg resulted in clinically significant treatment effect versus sham at Month 2. Overall, ranibizumab was effective in treating choroidal neovascularization of various etiologies with no new safety findings.

Genome-wide association study for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy reveals association with genetic variation near the GRB2 gene.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic retinopathy is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and can lead to blindness. A genetic component, in addition to traditional risk factors, has been well described although strong genetic factors have not yet been identified. Here, we aimed to identify novel genetic risk factors for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy using a genome-wide association study. METHODS: Retinopathy was assessed in white Australians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Genome-wide association analysis was conducted for comparison of cases of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (n = 336) with diabetic controls with no retinopathy (n = 508). Top ranking single nucleotide polymorphisms were typed in a type 2 diabetes replication cohort, a type 1 diabetes cohort and an Indian type 2 cohort. A mouse model of proliferative retinopathy was used to assess differential expression of the nearby candidate gene GRB2 by immunohistochemistry and quantitative western blot. RESULTS: The top ranked variant was rs3805931 with p = 2.66 × 10(-7), but no association was found in the replication cohort. Only rs9896052 (p = 6.55 × 10(-5)) was associated with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in both the type 2 (p = 0.035) and the type 1 (p = 0.041) replication cohorts, as well as in the Indian cohort (p = 0.016). The study-wide meta-analysis reached genome-wide significance (p = 4.15 × 10(-8)). The GRB2 gene is located downstream of this variant and a mouse model of retinopathy showed increased GRB2 expression in the retina. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Genetic variation near GRB2 on chromosome 17q25.1 is associated with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Several genes in this region are promising candidates and in particular GRB2 is upregulated during retinal stress and neovascularisation.

Corticosteroid intravitreal implants vs. ranibizumab for the treatment of vitreoretinal disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three long-acting corticosteroid implants are now available for the treatment of retinal disease, offering control of macular edema and inflammation for between 6 months and up to 3 years. This review evaluates their efficacy and side-effect profile in comparison with the antivascular endothelial growth factor agent ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, pseudophakic macular edema, and uveitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Trials of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema have demonstrated excellent efficacy without serious safety concerns to date. Fluocinolone acetonide implants can be considered, but have a high risk of cataract and sequelae from intraocular pressure rise. In retinal vein occlusion, both ranibizumab and Ozurdex have been shown to be effective, although their relative efficacy has not been determined in head-to-head clinical trials. In pseudophakic and uveitic macular edema, steroid implants are probably the first choice therapy, although there is evidence that ranibizumab is effective. For choroidal neovascularization secondary to inflammatory disease, ranibizumab is indicated, whereas Retisert has been shown to reduce the risk of uveitis relapse. SUMMARY: In diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab has shown greater efficacy with fewer side-effects than steroid implants. Both ranibizumab and steroid implants can be considered in retinal vein occlusion, but trials are awaited to determine their relative efficacy.

Long-term follow-up of a case of posterior microphthalmos (PRSS56) with hyperautofluorescent retinal pigment epithelial deposits.

PURPOSE: To report a case of posterior microphthalomos (PM) related to PRSS56 gene mutation with long term follow up with multimodal imaging findings. METHODS: Single retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 43-year old male patient presented in 2009 with bilateral reduced vision. Clinical examination and multimodal imaging showed features consistent with posterior microphthalmos with prominent bilateral horizontal papillomacular retinal folds. Posterior pole hyperautofluorescent RPE deposits were present. Gradual worsening of visual acuity and rod and cone photoreceptor function more so on the left was demonstrated during the 8 years of follow up. CONCLUSION: Hyperautofluorescent RPE deposits may occur in patients with posterior microphthalmos and such patient's may experience only gradual disease progression over long term follow up.

The clinical relevance of ultra-widefield angiography findings in patients with central retinal vein occlusion and macular oedema receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

AIMS: To report, using ultra-widefield angiography (UWFA) the area, distribution, and change in retinal capillary nonperfusion (RCNP) at baseline and 100 weeks in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) receiving anti-VEGF for macula oedema. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort study. Adults with CRVO treated with anti-VEGF therapy for macular oedema underwent UWFA at baseline and week-100. The area, distribution, and change in total, peripheral and posterior pole RCNP were determined. RESULTS: Of 153 eyes at baseline, mean area of RCNP was 34.3DA and 12 (7.8%) had ≥75DA RCNP. More than 10DA RCNP was present in the temporal periphery in 75.8% of eyes vs. 10.5% in the nasal periphery. At week-100, mean RCNP was 42.1DA with a median change from baseline of 3.3DA 95% CI [0.4, 7.3]; p < 0.01. Of 146 eyes with ≤10DA of posterior pole RCNP at baseline, 16/146 (11.0%) progressed to >10DA at week-100. These eyes had a median increase in total RCNP of 69.7DA [95% CI 27.2-85.4] vs 0DA [0.0-1.4]; p < 0.001 for those who did not, and two developed neovascular glaucoma. Larger baseline area of RCNP and history of glaucoma were risk factors for posterior pole RCNP developing. CONCLUSIONS: With UWFA, significant baseline RCNP was identified in the majority of CRVO patients, notably in the temporal periphery, but large increases over 100 weeks were uncommon. Development of >10DA posterior pole RCNP is a marker for widespread RCNP and in such cases the risk of anterior segment neovascularisation is not abolished by concomitant anti-VEGF therapy.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema in real-world: 36-month visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess structural and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (®Eylea) for diabetic macular oedema in treatment-naïve patients. METHODS: Sixty-four eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in the data analysis of this retrospective, real-life study which follow-up was 3 years. Each patient had corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness and macular volume performed at baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months. Patients were initiated on a loading phase of five 1-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by injections if needed as per clinicians' discretion. RESULTS: The mean number of aflibercept injections received over 3 years was 12.59. At baseline, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 61.45 (16.30) (20/63) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, the mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 422 (138) µm, while the mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 9.51 (2.01) mm3. At 36 months, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 68.34 (13.66) (20/50) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = .0003). Mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 303 (106) µm (p < .0001) and mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 8.35 (1.62) mm3 (p = .0022) at 36 months. Sixteen (25%) eyes gained ≥15 ETDRS letters at month 36, and 33 (52%) eyes had a decrease in central foveal thickness of ≥ 100 µm at the same time. CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in aflibercept-treated eyes at 36 months after commencing treatment for diabetic macular oedema in real-life settings. The good vision and anatomical outcomes were maintained over second and third year of treatment with mean 2.93 and 2.57 intravitreal injections, respectively.

One-year real-life results on effect of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular oedema switched from ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To assess visual and optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in patients switched from intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®). DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety eyes (of 67 patients) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. METHODS: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. Each patient had visual acuity measurements and optical coherence tomography scans performed at baseline and 12 months after the first injection of aflibercept was given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured visual acuities in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, central foveal thickness and macular volume at baseline and at 12 months after the first aflibercept injection was given. RESULTS: Ninety switched eyes were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation) visual acuity was 63 (15.78) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) central foveal thickness was 417.7 (158.4) µm and the mean macular volume was 9.96 (2.44) mm3. Mean change in visual acuity was +4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = 0.0053). The mean change in macular volume was -1.53 mm3 in SW group (p = 0.21), while the change in central foveal thickness was -136.8 µm (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in the switched group at 12 months after commencing treatment with aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema.

RANIBIZUMAB 0.5 MG TREATMENT IN ADOLESCENTS WITH CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS DATA FROM THE MINERVA STUDY.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adolescent patients with any choroidal neovascularization etiology enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study. METHODS: In the open-label, non-randomized study arm, ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered to five adolescents (aged 13-17 years). The findings were assessed descriptively as individual case reports at Month 12. Best-corrected visual acuity changes, central subfield thickness, treatment exposure, and safety were described over 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline choroidal neovascularization etiologies of the study eye included choroidal neovascularization secondary to Best disease (n = 2), idiopathic chorioretinopathy (n = 2), and optic disk drusen (n = 1). At Months 2, 6, and 12, the observed mean best-corrected visual acuity changes in the study eye from baseline were +9.2, +16.6, and +16.6 letters, respectively, and the observed mean central subfield thickness change from baseline was -31.4, -87.6, and -116.4 µm, respectively. Adolescent patients received a mean of three (range, 2-5) ranibizumab injections in the study eye. No adverse events or serious adverse events related to ranibizumab were reported. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treatment was beneficial in improving visual acuity and stabilizing or reducing central subfield thickness in five adolescents with differing choroidal neovascularization etiologies requiring infrequent injection. No new safety findings were observed over 12 months.

A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2.

PURPOSE: To report the findings at 1 year of a study comparing repeated intravitreal bevacizumab (ivB) and modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) macular laser therapy (MLT) in patients with persistent clinically significant diabetic macular edema (CSME). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked, single-center, 2-year, 2-arm clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 eyes of 80 patients with center-involving CSME and at least 1 prior MLT. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to either ivB (6 weekly; minimum of 3 injections and maximum of 9 injections in the first 12 months) or MLT (4 monthly; minimum of 1 treatment and maximum of 4 treatments in the first 12 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the difference in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months between the bevacizumab and laser arms. RESULTS: The baseline mean ETDRS BCVA was 55.7+/-9.7 (range 34-69) in the bevacizumab group and 54.6+/-8.6 (range 36-68) in the laser arm. The mean ETDRS BCVA at 12 months was 61.3+/-10.4 (range 34-79) in the bevacizumab group and 50.0+/-16.6 (range 8-76) in the laser arm (P = 0.0006). Furthermore, the bevacizumab group gained a median of 8 ETDRS letters, whereas the laser group lost a median of 0.5 ETDRS letters (P = 0.0002). The odds of gaining > or =10 ETDRS letters over 12 months were 5.1 times greater in the bevacizumab group than in the laser group (adjusted odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-19.7; P = 0.019). At 12 months, central macular thickness decreased from 507+/-145 microm (range 281-900 microm) at baseline to 378+/-134 microm (range 167-699 microm) (P<0.001) in the ivB group, whereas it decreased to a lesser extent in the laser group, from 481+/-121 microm (range 279-844 microm) to 413+/-135 microm (range 170-708 microm) (P = 0.02). The median number of injections was 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-9) in the ivB group, and the median number of laser treatments was 3 (IQR 2-4) in the MLT group. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence to support the use of bevacizumab in patients with center-involving CSME without advanced macular ischemia.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema: Moorfields' real-world 12-month visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess structural and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in treatment-naive patients. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In all, 92 diabetic patients (102 eyes) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. A total of 99 aflibercept-treated eyes were included in the statistical analysis. Each patient had corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness and macular volume performed at baseline and 12 months. Patients were initiated on a loading phase of five monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by injections if needed as per clinicians' discretion. RESULTS: The mean number of aflibercept injections received was 6.92. At baseline, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation; Snellen) was 59.7 (16.1) (20/63) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, the mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 431 (129) µm, while the mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 9.53 (1.79) mm3. At 12 months, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation; Snellen) was 69.6 (15.2; 20/40) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p < .0001). Mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 306 (122) µm (p < .0001) and mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 8.43 (1.58) mm3 (p < .0001) at 12 months; 33 (33.67%) eyes gained ⩾15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at month 12, and 50 (55.55%) eyes had a decrease in central foveal thickness of ⩾100 µm. CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in aflibercept-treated eyes at 12 months after commencing treatment for diabetic macular oedema in real-life settings.

The Relationship Between Retinal Vessel Oxygenation and Spatial Distribution of Retinal Nonperfusion in Retinal Vascular Diseases.

Purpose: We study the relationship between retinal vessel oxygenation and the spatial distribution of retinal nonperfusion using ultrawide field angiography in eyes with retinal vascular diseases. Methods: This prospective single center study recruited 57 eligible eyes from 44 patients with retinal vascular diseases. Retinal oximetry measurements were obtained using the Oxymap T1 device to determine the arteriovenous (AV) difference. Retinal nonperfusion was measured from ultrawide field angiography images taken with the Optos 200TX system and superimposing the images with the concentric rings template to determine the area and distribution of retinal nonperfusion. Results: Seven (12.3%) eyes had a diagnosis of a branch or hemiretinal vein occlusion, 24 (42.1%) with central retinal vein occlusion and 26 (45.6%) with diabetic retinopathy (11 [19.3%] nonproliferative and 15 [26.3%] proliferative diabetic retinopathy). The correlation between the total area of retinal nonperfusion with the AV difference controlling for age was not statistically significant (R = -0.103, P = 0.449). However, when analyzing the correlation of AV difference with the area of retinal nonperfusion in the posterior pole controlling for age and peripheral nonperfusion, this was significant (R = -0.295, P = 0.029). This was not significant for the area of retinal nonperfusion in the periphery while controlling for posterior pole nonperfusion and age (R = 0.124, P = 0.368). Conclusions: Retinal nonperfusion has a negative correlation with AV difference measured on retinal oximetry. This correlation is significant in the posterior pole, but not in the peripheral retina.

Retinal Nonperfusion Characteristics on Ultra-Widefield Angiography in Eyes With Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: Threshold of retinal nonperfusion for the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is unclear. Objectives: To identify a threshold of retinal nonperfusion for the presence of retinal neovascularization and the distribution and area of retinal nonperfusion in eyes with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), PDR, neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD), and retinal neovascularization elsewhere (NVE). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional image analysis study was performed between September 24, 2018, and October 24, 2018, at a multicenter national study in the United Kingdom. Baseline images were obtained from 2 completed randomized clinical trials (Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Panretinal Photocoagulation [RDP] study and Clinical Efficacy of Intravitreal Aflibercept vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy at 52 Weeks [CLARITY] study). The RDP study recruited eyes with severe NPDR between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and the CLARITY study recruited eyes with PDR between August 22, 2014, and November 20, 2015. Ultra-widefield angiography images of eyes with no prior panretinal photocoagulation treatment were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total area of retinal nonperfusion, the area of posterior pole retinal nonperfusion, and the area of peripheral retinal nonperfusion were measured. Results: A total of 92 patients (92 eyes) were included in the study: 59 in the PDR group (mean [SD] age, 42 [15] years; 20 female [33.9%]) and 33 in the NPDR group (mean [SD] age, 63 [10] years; 3 female [9.1%]). Forty eyes had NVE and 19 had NVD with or without NVE. We identified a retinal nonperfusion threshold of 118.3 disc areas (DA) with a specificity of 84.9% (95% CI, 68.1% to 94.9%) for PDR. The median area of retinal nonperfusion was 67.8 DA (95% CI, 44.2 to 107.3 DA) in the NPDR eyes and 147.9 DA (95% CI, 127.4 to 173.5 DA) for eyes with proliferative changes, with a difference of 69.0 DA (95% CI, 42.2 to 97.7 DA; P < .001). No difference was found in the median area of posterior nonperfusion between NPDR and PDR, with a difference of 0 DA (95% CI, -6.7 to 5.2 DA; P = .56). As for peripheral nonperfusion, NPDR eyes measured 64.1 DA and PDR eyes measured 130.6 DA, with a difference of 70.8 DA (95% CI, 48.4 to 94.9 DA; P < .001). Eyes with NVD had the largest total area of retinal nonperfusion, with a difference of 65.1 DA (95% CI, 28.6 to 95.8 DA; P < .001) compared with eyes with only NVE. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest eyes with at least 107.3 DA of nonperfusion are at risk of proliferative disease, and eyes with NVD have the largest area of retinal nonperfusion.

Unilateral pigmentary retinopathy: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: To review the clinical characteristics and address the aetiology in a group of patients presenting with unilateral retinal pigmentary changes, best described as unilateral pigmentary retinopathy (UPR). METHODS: The cohort of 42 patients was identified retrospectively from the Moorfields Eye Hospital electrophysiology database. All had undergone full-field [electroretinography (ERG)] and pattern electroretinography (PERG), with 13 additionally having multifocal ERG (mfERG). The clinical findings, fundus photographs and fundus autofluorescence (AF) images were reviewed. RESULTS: All index eyes showed ERG evidence of generalized photoreceptor dysfunction with most showing a similar degree of rod and cone involvement. However, although the fellow eyes all had a normal fundus examination, there were bilateral but asymmetrical ERG abnormalities in eight patients and a further four patients had PERG evidence of macular dysfunction in the fellow eye. A relevant medical history or the diagnosis of an ophthalmologic entity that might be related to the unilateral fundus changes was ascertained in 15 cases (~36%) including acute zonal occult outer retinopathy, trauma, systemic malignancy or autoimmune disease, retinal vasculitis, presumed pregnancy-related choroidal ischaemia and meningitis. Two patients had a family history of retinitis pigmentosa (RP; 4.8%). CONCLUSION: The underlying aetiology in most cases of UPR cannot accurately be identified, but an heritable cause is unlikely. Aspects of the history clearly suggest an acquired disorder in some patients. Twenty-five patients (60%) with nongenetic UPR did not adhere to the pattern of rod greater than cone dysfunction that occurs in RP (rod-cone dystrophy), and the pattern of rod > cone dysfunction seen in true RP is thus not a feature of most patients with UPR.

Quantifying Retinal Area in Ultra-Widefield Imaging Using a 3-Dimensional Printed Eye Model.

PURPOSE: To study the effects of different axial lengths on ultra-widefield imaging to determine the presence of distortion in images despite software correction and calculate an enlargement factor based on angular location. DESIGN: Experimental image analysis study. STUDY OBJECTS: Three 3-dimensional printed model eyes simulating eyes with axial lengths of 22, 24, and 26 mm. Each model has a grid of rings 9° apart centered at the posterior pole. METHODS: Single-center study performed at the National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre (London, UK). Each model was imaged using Optos 200TX (Optos, Dunfermline, UK). Two images for each model eye that were corrected using V2 Vantage Pro software (Optos) were used for analysis and the average values obtained. Each image inter-ring area was measured using ImageJ to obtain a measured image area in pixel and square millimeters. This was compared with the true calculated object inter-ring area and an enlargement factor was determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measured image inter-ring area in pixels and square millimeters. True calculated object inter-ring area in square millimeters. RESULTS: The enlargement factor of the rings gradually increases toward the periphery with factors of 1.4 at 45° and 1.9 at the equator. The axial lengths did not affect the enlargement factor of the rings imaged in 3 different model eyes (P = 0.9512). The anterior equator exhibits a significant distortion despite the software correction. CONCLUSION: The enlargement factor depends on angular location and not axial length. The enlargement factors can be used in clinical practice to more accurately measure area in ultra-widefield imaging.

Mechanistic Evaluation of Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Aflibercept in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: CLARITY Substudy.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to study the effects of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal aflibercept on retinal vessel oxygen saturations, area of retinal nonperfusion, and area of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: This is a prospective randomized single center study. Forty patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomized to PRP or intravitreal aflibercept treatment for 52 weeks. Retinal oximetry and ultra-widefield angiography were performed at baseline and week 52. Ultra-widefield color fundus imaging was performed at baseline, week 12, and week 52. The outcomes were retinal arterio-venous oximetry differences (AVD), area of retinal nonperfusion, and area of neovascularization in disc areas (DA). Results: The AVD in the PRP group increased from 36.7% at baseline to 39.7%, whereas it decreased from 33.4% to 32.5% in the aflibercept group. The difference in AVD between groups at week 52 was 4.0% (95% confidence interval, -0.08, 8.8; P = 0.10). The baseline mean area of retinal nonperfusion of 125.1 DA and 131.2 DA in the PRP and aflibercept groups increased to 156.1 DA and 158.4 DA, respectively, at week 52 (P = 0.46). The median baseline area of neovascularization decreased from 0.98 DA to 0.68 DA in the PRP group and from 0.70 DA to 0 DA in the aflibercept group at week 12 (P = 0.019). At week 52, this measured 0.24 DA in the PRP group and 0 DA in the aflibercept group (P = 0.45). Conclusions: Intravitreal aflibercept achieved an earlier and complete regression of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy compared with PRP. There were no significant differences in global change in intravascular oxygen saturation or areas of retinal nonperfusion between the two groups by 52 weeks.