Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28 Suppl 2: S536-41, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23807062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Military sexual trauma (MST) is the Veteran Health Administration's (VHA) term for sexual assault and/or sexual harassment that occurs during military service. The experience of MST is associated with a variety of mental health conditions. Preliminary research suggests that MST may be associated with homelessness among female Veterans, although to date MST has not been examined in a national study of both female and male homeless Veterans. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of MST, examine the association between MST and mental health conditions, and describe mental health utilization among homeless women and men. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: National, cross-sectional study of 126,598 homeless Veterans who used VHA outpatient care in fiscal year 2010. MAIN MEASURES: All variables were obtained from VHA administrative databases, including MST screening status, ICD-9-CM codes to determine mental health diagnoses, and VHA utilization. KEY RESULTS: Of homeless Veterans in VHA, 39.7 % of females and 3.3 % of males experienced MST. Homeless Veterans who experienced MST demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of almost all mental health conditions examined as compared to other homeless women and men, including depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, other anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, bipolar disorders, personality disorders, suicide, and, among men only, schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Nearly all homeless Veterans had at least one mental health visit and Veterans who experienced MST utilized significantly more mental health visits compared to Veterans who did not experience MST. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of homeless Veterans using VHA services have experienced MST, and those who experienced MST had increased odds of mental health diagnoses. Homeless Veterans who had experienced MST had higher intensity of mental health care utilization and high rates of MST-related mental health care. This study highlights the importance of trauma-informed care among homeless Veterans and the success of VHA homeless programs in providing mental health care to homeless Veterans.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Personal Militar/psicología , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de los Veteranos , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
2.
J Trauma Dissociation ; 12(3): 232-43, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21534093

RESUMEN

The comprehensive Veterans Health Administration (VHA) policies on military sexual trauma (MST) include provider education and training at each VHA facility. No published data exist that indicate the settings in which VHA mental health patients with MST are treated. Such information could help set priorities for targeted MST-related education and training. The major aim of this article was to describe the VHA mental health outpatient settings in which patients with MST are most likely to be treated. National data from 79,903 female and 889,998 male veteran patients with at least one face-to-face outpatient mental health encounter at any VHA facility in fiscal year 2008 were analyzed. Among all veterans in VHA outpatient mental health care, 35.8% of women and 2.4% of men reported MST. The proportion of MST-positive patients ranged from 25.9% to 81.0% of women and from 1.5% to 56.1% of men across 9 major clinic setting categories. Proportions of women with MST were substantial across specialty MST clinics, specialty posttraumatic stress disorder clinics, psychosocial rehabilitation, and substance use disorder clinics, reflecting a wide range of settings. These settings should be prioritized for MST-related provider education and training. By contrast, male MST patients represented only a small proportion of patients in all clinics, with the exception of MST specialty clinics. Tailored conceptualizations of trauma-informed care are proposed for settings that encounter MST patients, even if these settings do not directly focus on the treatment of traumatic stress.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Servicios de Salud Mental , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , Delitos Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/psicología , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Capacitación en Servicio , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación Vocacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Delitos Sexuales/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/rehabilitación , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Estados Unidos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos
3.
J Psychol ; 145(3): 195-209, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21560804

RESUMEN

The authors surveyed 21 editors and reviewers from major psychology journals to identify and describe the statistical and design errors they encounter most often and to get their advice regarding prevention of these problems. Content analysis of the text responses revealed themes in 3 major areas: (a) problems with research design and reporting (e.g., lack of an a priori power analysis, lack of congruence between research questions and study design/analysis, failure to adequately describe statistical procedures); (b) inappropriate data analysis (e.g., improper use of analysis of variance, too many statistical tests without adjustments, inadequate strategy for addressing missing data); and (c) misinterpretation of results. If researchers attended to these common methodological and analytic issues, the scientific quality of manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychology journals might be significantly improved.


Asunto(s)
Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Políticas Editoriales , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Manuscritos como Asunto , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Psicología , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Control de Calidad , Proyectos de Investigación/normas
4.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(3): e12489, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34189522

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to determine whether there was a change in emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to prior years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using ED performance data 2018-2020 from 56 EDs across the United States. We used a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model to assess differences in ED LOS for admitted (LOS-A) and discharged (LOS-D) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic period compared to prior years. RESULTS: GEE modeling showed that LOS-A and LOS-D were significantly higher during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. LOS-A during the COVID-19 period was 10.3% higher compared to the pre-COVID-19 time period, which represents a higher geometric mean of 28 minutes. LOS-D during the COVID-19 period was 2.8% higher compared to the pre-COVID-19 time period, which represents a higher geometric mean of 2 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: ED LOS-A and LOS-D were significantly higher in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period despite a lower volume of patients in the COVID-19 period.

5.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(6): 15-23, 2020 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33052821

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States (US) prompted widespread containment measures such as shelter-in-place (SIP) orders. The goal of our study was to determine whether there was a significant change in overall volume and proportion of emergency department (ED) encounters since SIP measures began. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study using billing data from January 1, 2017-April 20, 2020. We received data from 141 EDs across 16 states, encompassing a convenience sample of 26,223,438 ED encounters. We used a generalized least squares regression approach to ascertain changes for overall ED encounters, hospital admissions, and New York University ED visit algorithm categories. RESULTS: ED encounters decreased significantly in the post-SIP period. Overall, there was a 39.6% decrease in ED encounters compared to expected volume in the pre-SIP period. Emergent encounters decreased by 35.8%, while non-emergent encounters decreased by 52.1%. Psychiatric encounters decreased by 30.2%. Encounters related to drugs and alcohol decreased the least, by 9.3% and 27.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a significant overall reduction in ED utilization in the post-SIP period. There was a greater reduction in lower acuity encounters than higher acuity encounters. Of all subtypes of ED encounters, substance abuse- and alcohol-related encounters reduced the least, and injury-related encounters reduced the most.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuarentena/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 58(5): 689-95, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17463351

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between social networks and mental health services utilization and expenditures. METHODS: A sample of 522 Medicaid mental health consumers was randomly selected from the administrative records of Colorado's Department of Health Care Policy and Financing. The administrative records contain information on utilization of services and expenditures of Medicaid beneficiaries within Colorado's Mental Health Services. In addition to the administrative records, social network and psychosocial data were gathered through longitudinal survey interviews. The interviews were conducted at six-month intervals between 1994 and 1997. Measures used in the regression analysis included demographic characteristics, clinical diagnoses, the social network index, expenditures, and utilization variables. RESULTS: The social network index was positively associated with utilization of and expenditures for inpatient services in local hospitals but negatively associated with expenditures for inpatient services in state hospitals or outpatient services. Relationships with family were negatively related to expenditures for outpatient services. Relationships with friends were positively associated with utilization of and expenditures for psychiatric inpatient services in local hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Consumers who had higher social network index scores utilized more inpatient psychiatric services in local hospitals and had higher expenditures than those who had lower scores. Consumers who had higher social network index scores also had lower expenditures for inpatient services in state hospitals and outpatient services than those who have lower scores. Findings suggest that social network is associated with mental health utilization and expenditures in various ways, associations that need to be researched further.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Medicaid , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Colorado , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
J Am Coll Health ; 56(2): 109-18, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17967756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE AND PARTICIPANTS: The authors examined the prevalence of mental health needs in international graduate students, their knowledge of mental health services, and their use of on-campus and off-campus counseling services. METHODS: All registered graduate students in the Spring 2004 semester received an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey. Of the 3,121 completed surveys, 551 completed surveys were from international graduate students. RESULTS: Approximately 44% of international graduate students responded that they had had an emotional or stress-related problem that significantly affected their well-being or academic performance within the past year. International students who reported a more functional relationship with their advisors were less likely to report having an emotional or stress-related problem in the past year and using counseling services. International students who reported higher financial confidence were also less likely to use counseling services. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet mental health need among international graduate students. Special mental health outreach efforts should be directed at international graduate students, with particular attention on the relationship between students and their advisors and on adequate financial support for students.


Asunto(s)
Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Intercambio Educacional Internacional , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud para Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Adulto , Asia/etnología , California/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Prevalencia , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades
8.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 32(11): 599-611, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17120919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been five years since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, Crossing the Quality Chasm, proposed systemwide changes to transform our health care system. What progress has been made? What lessons have been learned? How should we move forward? METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 16 health care providers and researchers at organizations involved in system redesign. The findings were supplemented with a focused literature review and discussions from a national expert meeting. RESULTS: Many promising and innovative examples of redesign were identified. However, even delivery systems that are redesigning care in pursuit of the six IOM aims face daunting challenges, reflecting the need to align system changes across multiple levels and to integrate redesign efforts with ongoing system features. Four success factors were reported by providers as crucial in overcoming redesign barriers: (1) directly involving top and middle-level leaders, (2) strategically aligning and integrating improvement efforts with organizational priorities, (3) systematically establishing infrastructure, process, and performance appraisal systems for continuous improvement, and (4) actively developing champions, teams, and staff. A framework that integrates these success factors to facilitate a systems approach to redesigning health care organizations and delivery systems for improved performance is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Successful system redesign requires coordinating and managing a complex set of changes across multiple levels rather than isolated projects.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Análisis de Sistemas , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Liderazgo , Informática Médica/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Innovación Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Investigadores/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
9.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 39(3): 220-33, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22396046

RESUMEN

Little research has examined factors associated with the utilization of outpatient health care services related to sexual assault experiences. The Veterans Health Administration provides free outpatient treatment services to veterans who report military sexual trauma (MST); this system provides a unique opportunity to examine factors related to the utilization of mental health and non-mental health outpatient services by patients with sexual trauma. The current study examined sociodemographic, military service factors, and primary diagnoses related to utilization and utilization intensity of MST-related care among 4,458 Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans in a 1-year period after reporting an experience of MST. Of the veterans who reported MST, 75.9% received MST-related care. The most notable factor that influenced receipt and intensity of MST-related care was gender, where male veterans used less care than female veterans. These results have important treatment implications for both veteran and civilian sexual trauma survivors.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal Militar/psicología , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , Acoso Sexual/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Delitos Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Acoso Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
10.
Womens Health Issues ; 22(2): e209-15, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22055987

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This exploratory study investigated organizational factors associated with receipt of military sexual trauma (MST) screening during an early timeframe of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) implementation of the universal MST screening policy. METHODS: The sample consisted of all VHA patients eligible for MST screening in fiscal year 2005 at 119 VHA facilities. Analyses were conducted separately by gender and by user status (i.e., new patients to the VHA health care system in FY 2005 and continuing users who had previously used the VHA health care system in the past year). Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used to assess the effects of facility-level characteristics and adjusted for person-level covariates. RESULTS: Facility-level mandatory universal MST screening policies were associated with increased odds of receiving MST screening among new female patients and both continuing and new male patients: Odds ratio (OR), 2.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-5.89) for new female patients; OR, 8.15 (95% CI, 2.93-22.69) for continuing male patients; and OR, 4.48 (95% CI, 1.79-11.20) for new male patients. Facility-level audit and feedback practices was associated with increased odds of receiving MST screening among new patients: OR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.26-2.91) for females and OR, 1.86 (95% CI, 1.22-2.84) for males. Although the facility-level effect for women's health clinic (WHC) did not emerge as significant, patient-level effects indicated that among these facilities, women who used a WHC had greater odds of being screened for MST compared with women who had not used a WHC: OR, 1.79 (95% CI, 1.18-2.71) for continuing patients and OR, 2.20 (95% CI, 1.59-3.04) for new patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that facility policies that promote universal MST screening, as well as audit and feedback practices at the facility, significantly improved the odds of patients receiving MST screening. Women veterans' utilization of a WHC was associated with higher odds of receiving MST screening. This study provides empirical support for the use of policies and audit and feedback practices which the VHA has used since the implementation of the MST screening directive to encourage compliance with VHA's MST screening policy and is likely associated with the present-day success in MST screening across all VHA facilities.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Organizacional , Delitos Sexuales/prevención & control , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , Acoso Sexual/prevención & control , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Acoso Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos
11.
Womens Health Issues ; 21(4 Suppl): S145-51, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although sexual trauma is associated with poorer patient perceptions of health care quality, few studies have investigated this relationship in settings with comprehensive policies surrounding detection and treatment of sexual trauma, such as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We examined the association of military sexual trauma (MST) with patient satisfaction with VHA outpatient care among men and women. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of a national representative sample of 164,632 VHA outpatients (5,758 women and 158,884 men) from fiscal year 2007. Measures included MST status, patients' ratings of overall satisfaction with VHA care in the last 2 months, and nine other dimensions of patient satisfaction. We assessed bivariate and multivariate associations between MST and overall satisfaction and each dimension of patient satisfaction. Multivariate models were adjusted for demographic characteristics, health status, and medical utilization. All analyses were stratified by gender. FINDINGS: The proportion of patients reporting very good or excellent overall satisfaction was 78.5% for men and 72.3% for women. Findings showed that, once confounding was controlled, men and women veterans' MST status was not associated with satisfaction ratings of VHA health care overall. However, women veterans with a history of MST rated the dimensions of overall coordination and education and information less favorably than women veterans without an MST history. Post hoc analysis of individual items in these domains suggested that areas of improvement might include greater attention to provider-patient communication, including communication across multiple providers. There was no association between men's MST status and subdomains of health care satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Patient ratings of overall satisfaction of VHA care are high. Opportunities exist, however, to educate providers on the special coordination needs of female veterans with histories of MST. These female veterans might benefit from care coordination. When investigating satisfaction in patients with histories of sexual trauma, our findings suggest the importance of adjusting analyses for important patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de la Mujer
12.
BMC Res Notes ; 4: 304, 2011 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assist educators and researchers in improving the quality of medical research, we surveyed the editors and statistical reviewers of high-impact medical journals to ascertain the most frequent and critical statistical errors in submitted manuscripts. FINDINGS: The Editors-in-Chief and statistical reviewers of the 38 medical journals with the highest impact factor in the 2007 Science Journal Citation Report and the 2007 Social Science Journal Citation Report were invited to complete an online survey about the statistical and design problems they most frequently found in manuscripts. Content analysis of the responses identified major issues. Editors and statistical reviewers (n = 25) from 20 journals responded. Respondents described problems that we classified into two, broad themes: A. statistical and sampling issues and B. inadequate reporting clarity or completeness. Problems included in the first theme were (1) inappropriate or incomplete analysis, including violations of model assumptions and analysis errors, (2) uninformed use of propensity scores, (3) failing to account for clustering in data analysis, (4) improperly addressing missing data, and (5) power/sample size concerns. Issues subsumed under the second theme were (1) Inadequate description of the methods and analysis and (2) Misstatement of results, including undue emphasis on p-values and incorrect inferences and interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific quality of submitted manuscripts would increase if researchers addressed these common design, analytical, and reporting issues. Improving the application and presentation of quantitative methods in scholarly manuscripts is essential to advancing medical research.

13.
Psychiatr Serv ; 62(2): 179-85, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21285096

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Capitated Medicaid mental health programs have reduced costs over the short term by lowering the utilization of high-cost inpatient services. This study examined the five-year effects of capitated financing in community mental health centers (CMHCs) by comparing not-for-profit with for-profit programs. METHODS: Data were from the Medicaid billing system in Colorado for the precapitation year (1994) and a shadow billing system for the postcapitation years (1995-1999). In a panel design, a random-effect approach estimated the impact of two financing systems on service utilization and cost while adjusting for all the covariates. RESULTS: Consistent with predictions, in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit CMHCs, relative to the precapitation year, there were significant reductions in each postcapitation year in high-cost treatments (inpatient treatment) for all but one comparison (not-for-profit CMHCs in 1999). Also consistent with predictions, the for-profit programs realized significant reductions in cost per user for both outpatient services and total services. In the not-for-profit programs, there were no significant changes in cost per user for total services; a significant reduction in cost per user for outpatient services was found only in the first two years, 1995 and 1996). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that different strategies were used by the not-for-profit and for-profit programs to control expenditures and utilization and that the for-profit programs were more successful in reducing cost per user.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Colorado , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
14.
Psychiatr Serv ; 61(1): 90-4, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20044426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether organizational characteristics and quality improvement initiatives were related to HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) testing rates in veterans' substance use disorders programs. METHODS: Data were collected by surveying 232 program directors at all U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) substance use disorder programs. RESULTS: Program directors (N=223) reported that, on average, 35% of their patients were tested for HIV (median=10%) and 57% were tested for HCV (median=80%). Of the quality improvement initiatives examined, computerized reminders to clinicians (p=.02) and a designated clinician for screening (p=.01) were positively associated with HCV testing, and computerized templates that guide clinicians through ordering of testing were positively associated with HIV testing (p=.06). CONCLUSIONS: Despite national emphasis on HIV testing, rates of testing were lower for HIV than for HCV in programs serving veterans with substance use disorders and at risk of both illnesses. System-level quality improvement initiatives may be effective at increasing rates of infectious disease screening.


Asunto(s)
Seropositividad para VIH/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
15.
J Psychiatr Res ; 43(15): 1231-4, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19435635

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Journal editors and statistical reviewers are often in the difficult position of catching serious problems in submitted manuscripts after the research is conducted and data have been analyzed. We sought to learn from editors and reviewers of major psychiatry journals what common statistical and design problems they most often find in submitted manuscripts and what they wished to communicate to authors regarding these issues. Our primary goal was to facilitate communication between journal editors/reviewers and researchers/authors and thereby improve the scientific and statistical quality of research and submitted manuscripts. METHOD: Editors and statistical reviewers of 54 high-impact psychiatry journals were surveyed to learn what statistical or design problems they encounter most often in submitted manuscripts. Respondents completed the survey online. The authors analyzed survey text responses using content analysis procedures to identify major themes related to commonly encountered statistical or research design problems. RESULTS: Editors and reviewers (n=15) who handle manuscripts from 39 different high-impact psychiatry journals responded to the survey. The most commonly cited problems regarded failure to map statistical models onto research questions, improper handling of missing data, not controlling for multiple comparisons, not understanding the difference between equivalence and difference trials, and poor controls in quasi-experimental designs. CONCLUSIONS: The scientific quality of psychiatry research and submitted reports could be greatly improved if researchers became sensitive to, or sought consultation on frequently encountered methodological and analytic issues.


Asunto(s)
Autoria , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Políticas Editoriales , Periodismo Médico/normas , Revisión por Pares , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Psychosomatics ; 45(3): 230-4, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15123849

RESUMEN

Chronic granulomatous disease is an inherited immunodeficiency in which phagocytes fail to generate superoxide and its metabolites, resulting in severe recurrent infections and frequent hospitalizations. Chronic illness and frequent hospitalizations can affect growth and development as well as social and educational opportunities. Since no data have been reported on cognitive functioning in patients with this illness, the authors sought to examine cognitive function in a group of patients with chronic granulomatous disease. A retrospective chart review of 26 patients seen and followed at the National Institutes of Health who had received cognitive testing at the request of parent or staff was performed. Demographic information including medical, psychiatric, and developmental histories was gathered. Six patients (23%) were found to have an IQ of 70 or below, indicative of cognitive deficits, and all of those patients had defects in the membrane-linked cytochrome b558. The prevalence of cognitive deficits in this selected population of chronic granulomatous disease patients was high. The determination of the true distribution of cognitive functioning in the general chronic granulomatous disease population is important, since cognitive deficits have implications for educational planning and potential therapies such as transplantation and gene therapy in children.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA