Unplanned Surgery in Dually Eligible Beneficiaries for Conditions that Should Be Treated Electively.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of unplanned surgery among dually eligible beneficiaries for surgical conditions that should be treated electively. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Access-sensitive surgical conditions (e.g. abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy for colon cancer, ventral hernia repair) are ideally treated with elective surgery, but when left untreated have a natural history leading to unplanned surgery. Dually eligible beneficiaries may face systematic barriers to access surgical care. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study of all beneficiaries who were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and underwent surgery for an access-sensitive surgical condition between 2016-2020. We compared the rate of unplanned surgery as well as 30-day mortality, complications and readmissions for dually eligible versus non-dually eligible beneficiaries. Sex, age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, teaching status, nursing ratio, hospital region and bed size and surgery year were included in the risk-adjustment model. RESULTS: Out of 853,500 beneficiaries, 118,812 were dually eligible with an average age (SD) of 75.2(7.7) years. Compared to non-dually eligible beneficiaries, dually eligible beneficiaries had a higher rates of unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions (45.1% vs. 31.8%, P<0.001), 30-day mortality (2.9% vs. 2.6%, aOR=1.10 (1.07-1.14), P<0.001), complications (23.6% vs. 20.1%, aOR=1.23 (1.20-1.25), P<0.001), and 30-day readmissions (15.5% vs. 12.9%, aOR=1.24 (1.22-1.27), P<0.001). These differences narrowed significantly when evaluating elective procedures only. CONCLUSIONS: Dually eligible beneficiaries were more likely to undergo unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions, leading to worse rates of mortality, complications and readmissions. Our findings suggest that improving rates of elective surgery for these conditions represents an actionable target to narrow the difference in post-operative outcomes between dually eligible and non-dually eligible beneficiaries.

Rate of Emergency Lower Extremity Amputations in the United States Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of emergency versus elective lower extremity amputations in the United States. BACKGROUND: Lower extremity amputation is a common endpoint for patients with poorly controlled diabetes and multilevel peripheral vascular disease. Although the procedure is ideally performed electively, patients with limited access may present later and require an emergency operation. To what extent rates of emergency amputation for lower extremities vary across the United States is unknown. METHODS: Evaluation of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent lower extremity amputation between 2015 and 2020. The rate was determined for each zip code and placed into rank order from lowest to highest rate. We merged each beneficiary's place of residence and location of care with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey using Google Maps Application Programming Interface to determine the travel distance for patients to undergo their procedure. RESULTS: Of 233,084 patients, 66.3% (154,597) were men, 69.8% (162,786) were White. The average age (SD) was 74 years (8). There was wide variation in rates of emergency lower extremity amputation. The lowest quintile of zip codes demonstrated an emergency amputation rate of 3.7%, whereas the highest quintile demonstrated 90%. The median travel distance in the lowest emergency surgery rate quintile was 34.6 miles compared with 10.5 miles in the highest quintile of emergency surgery ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the rate of emergency lower extremity amputations among Medicare beneficiaries, suggesting variable access to essential vascular care. Travel distance and rate of amputation have an inverse relationship, suggesting that barriers other than travel distance are playing a role.

Association of Hospital System Affiliation with Spending and Postoperative Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study of Hospital Mergers And Acquisitions From 2010 To 2018.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital system affiliation was associated with changes in surgical episode spending or postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND: Over 70% of US hospitals are now part of a hospital system. The presumed benefits of hospital consolidation include concentrating volume and expertise, care integration, and investment in quality improvement. However, there is conflicting evidence as to whether expanding hospital systems are actually reducing health spending or improving quality. These observations call into question whether systems are leveraging their collective volume and experience to standardize care and maximize efficiencies. METHODS: The American Hospital Association Annual Survey was used to identify whether a hospital was part of a system and in which year a hospital joined the respective system. Using 100% Medicare claims data, we identified fee-for-service Medicare patients undergoing elective inpatient coronary artery bypass graft colon resection, lung resection, hip replacement, or knee replacement from 2010 to 2018. We used a difference-in-differences framework to evaluate hospital spending and outcomes before and after joining a system. The primary outcome was Medicare 30-day episode spending, with specific attention to the total episode payment, index hospitalization, and post-acute care components. Secondary outcomes included serious complications, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The cohort included 3,395,565 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018. Patients were treated at 3961 hospitals, of which 1097 (27.7%) were never in a system, 2262 (57.1%) were always in a system, and 602 (15.2%) joined a system during the study period. By 1 year after system affiliation, 30-day episode spending had decreased by $303 (95% CI: 63, 454, P=0.01), and after 5 years, 30-day episode spending decreased by $429 (95% CI: 5, 853, P=0.04). One year after system association, index hospitalization spending was not statistically different from before system affiliation ($-30, 95% CI: -160, 100, P=0.65). Conversely, 1 year after system association, postacute care spending decreased by $268 (95% CI: 107, 429, P<0.01) and remained lower for ≥5 years. There was no significant change in hospitals serious complications (-0.14, 95% CI: -0.40, 0.11, P=0.27), 30-day readmission (-0.14, 95% CI:-0.52, 0.25, P=0.48), or 30-day mortality (-0.08, 95% CI: -0.18, 0.03, P=0.17), 1 year after joining a system; similar patterns were observed at three and ≥5 years. CONCLUSIONS: system affiliation was associated with a small decrease in 30-day episode spending, driven by decreased spending in postacute care services. Notably, there was no difference in postoperative outcomes after system affiliation.

Association of Neighborhood Deprivation, Race, and Postoperative Outcomes: Improvement in Neighborhood Deprivation is Associated With Worsening Surgical Disparities.

INTRODUCTION: While there is a broad understanding that patient factors, hospital characteristics, and an individual's neighborhoods all contribute to the observed disparities, the relationship between these factors remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of neighborhood deprivation improve postoperative outcomes for White and Black Medicare beneficiaries equally. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional Retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2018 of 1372,487 White and Black Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who underwent an inpatient colon resection, coronary artery bypass, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair. We compared postoperative complications, readmission, and mortality by race across neighborhood deprivation. Outcomes were risk-adjusted using a multivariable logistical regression model accounting for patient factors (age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidities), admission type (elective, urgent, emergency), type of operation, and each neighborhoods Area Deprivation Index; a modern-day measure of neighborhood disadvantage that includes education, employment, housing quality, and poverty measures. RESULTS: Overall, 1372,487 Medicare beneficiaries with mean age 72.1 years, 50.3% female, 91.2% White, residing in 1107,051 unique neighborhoods underwent 1 of 5 operations. The proportion of Black beneficiaries was 6.5% within the lowest deprivation neighborhoods and increased to 16.9% within the highest deprivation neighborhoods ( P <0.001). The interaction between beneficiary neighborhood and race demonstrated that the association of neighborhood on outcomes varied by race. Specifically, White beneficiaries had 1.5% absolute mortality decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods [odds ratio (OR):1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-1.38; P <0.001], whereas Black beneficiaries had a 0.72% absolute mortality decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; P =0.018). Similarly, White beneficiaries had 3.6% absolute decrease in complication rate from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.21-1.28; P <0.001) while Black beneficiaries had a 1.2%% absolute decrease in complication rate from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; P =0.017). For 30-day readmission rates, White beneficiaries realized a 2.3% absolute decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; P <0.001), whereas Black beneficiaries saw no change (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.10; P =0.269). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Lower neighborhood deprivation is associated with improved outcomes across both White and Black Medicare beneficiaries; however, improvement in neighborhood deprivation disproportionately favored White beneficiaries. These findings provide a cautionary example of the misperception of the protective effect of higher social class for Black patients and provide a cautionary example that improvements in neighborhoods may have disparate health impact on its members.

Neighborhood Deprivation, Hospital Quality, and Mortality After Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if receipt of complex cancer surgery at high-quality hospitals is associated with a reduction in disparities between individuals living in the most and least deprived neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: The association between social risk factors and worse surgical outcomes for patients undergoing high-risk cancer operations is well documented. To what extent neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation as an isolated social risk factor known to be associated with worse outcomes can be mitigated by hospital quality is less known. METHODS: Using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims, we analyzed data on 212,962 Medicare beneficiaries more than age 65 undergoing liver resection, rectal resection, lung resection, esophagectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer between 2014 and 2018. Clinical risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality rates were used to stratify hospitals into quintiles of quality. Beneficiaries were stratified into quintiles based on census tract Area Deprivation Index. The association of hospital quality and neighborhood deprivation with 30-day mortality was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 212,962 patients in the cohort including 109,419 (51.4%) men with a mean (SD) age of 73.8 (5.9) years old. At low-quality hospitals, patients living in the most deprived areas had significantly higher risk-adjusted mortality than those from the least deprived areas for all procedures; esophagectomy: 22.3% versus 20.7%; P <0.003, liver resection 19.3% versus 16.4%; P <0.001, pancreatic resection 15.9% versus 12.9%; P <0.001, lung resection 8.3% versus 7.8%; P <0.001, rectal resection 8.8% versus 8.1%; P <0.001. Surgery at a high-quality hospitals was associated with no significant differences in mortality between individuals living in the most compared with least deprived neighborhoods for esophagectomy, rectal resection, liver resection, and pancreatectomy. For example, the adjusted odds of mortality between individuals living in the most deprived compared with least deprived neighborhoods following esophagectomy at low-quality hospitals (odds ratio=1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, P <0.001) was higher than at high-quality hospitals (odds ratio=0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.02, P =0.03). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Receipt of complex cancer surgery at a high-quality hospital was associated with no significant differences in mortality between individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods compared with least deprived. Initiatives to increase access referrals to high-quality hospitals for patients from high deprivation levels may improve outcomes and contribute to mitigating disparities.

Association of Health Professional Shortage Area Hospital Designation With Surgical Outcomes and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and expenditures at hospitals located in Health Professional Shortage Areas to nonshortage area designated hospitals among Medicare beneficiaries. BACKGROUND: More than a quarter of Americans live in federally designated Health Professional Shortage Areas. Although there is growing concern that medical outcomes may be worse, far less is known about hospitals providing surgical care in these areas. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study from 2014 to 2018 of 842,787 Medicare beneficiary patient admissions to hospitals with and without Health Professional Shortage Area designations for common operations including appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, and hernia repair. We assessed risk-adjusted outcomes using multivariable logistic regression accounting for patient factors, admission type, and year were compared for each of the 4 operations. Hospital expenditures were price-standardized, risk-adjusted 30-day surgical episode payments. Primary outcome measures included 30-day mortality, hospital readmissions, and 30-day surgical episode payments. RESULTS: Patients (mean age=75.6 years, males=44.4%) undergoing common surgical procedures in shortage area hospitals were less likely to be White (84.6% vs 88.4%, P <0.001) and less likely to have≥2 Elixhauser comorbidities (75.5% vs 78.2%, P <0.001). Patients undergoing surgery at Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals had lower risk-adjusted rates of 30-day mortality (6.05% vs 6.69%, odds ratio=0.90, CI, 0.90-0.91, P <0.001) and readmission (14.99% vs 15.74%, odds ratio=0.94, CI, 0.94-0.95, P <0.001). Medicare expenditures at Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals were also lower than nonshortage designated hospitals ($28,517 vs $29,685, difference= -$1168, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting to Health Professional Shortage Area hospitals obtain safe care for common surgical procedures without evidence of higher expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries. These findings should be taken into account as current legislative proposals to increase funding for care in these underserved communities are considered.

Surgical Procedures at Critical Access Hospitals Within Hospital Networks.

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and expenditures at critical access hospitals that do versus do not participate in a hospital network among Medicare beneficiaries. BACKGROUND: Critical access hospitals provide essential care to more than 80 million Americans. These hospitals, often rural, are located more than 35 miles away from another hospital and are required to maintain patient transfer agreements with other facilities capable of providing higher levels of care. Some critical access hospitals have gone further to formally participate in a hospital network. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study from 2014 to 2018 comparing 16,128 Medicare beneficiary admissions for appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, or hernia repair at critical access hospitals that do versus do not participate in a hospital network. Thirty-day mortality and readmissions were risk adjusted using multivariable logistic regression accounting for patient and hospital factors. Price-standardized, risk-adjusted Medicare expenditures were compared for the 30-day total episode payments consisting of index hospitalization, physician services, readmissions, and postacute care payments. RESULTS: Beneficiaries (average age = 75.7 years, SD = 7.4) who obtained care at critical access hospitals in a hospital network were more likely to carry ≥2 Elixhauser comorbidities (68.7% vs. 62.8%, P < 0.001). Rates of 30-day mortality were higher at critical access hospitals in a hospital network (4.30% vs. 3.81%, OR = 1.11, P < 0.001). Similarly, readmission rates were higher at critical access hospitals that were in a hospital network (15.13% vs. 14.34%, OR = 1.06, P < 0.001). Additionally, total episode payments were found to be $960 higher per patient at critical access hospitals that were in a hospital network ($23,878 vs. $22,918, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Critical access hospitals within hospital networks provided care to more medically complex patients and were associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing common general surgery operations.

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Health Professional Shortage Areas.

OBJECTIVE: Health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) were created by the Health Resources and Services Administration to identify communities with a shortage of clinical providers. For medical conditions, these designations are associated with worse outcomes. However, far less is known about patients undergoing high-complexity surgical procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare postoperative surgical outcomes of high-complexity surgery in beneficiaries living in HPSA versus non-HPSA designated areas. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort review of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CABG between 2014 and 2018. The authors compared risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, complication, reoperation, and readmission rates for beneficiaries living in a designated HPSA versus non-HPSA using a multivariable logistic regression model accounting for patient (eg, age, sex, comorbidities, surgery year) and hospital characteristics (eg, patient-to-nurse ratio, teaching status). Patient travel burden was measured based on the time and distance required to travel from the beneficiary's home zip code to the hospital zip code. RESULTS: Of the 370,532 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CABG, 30,881 (8.3%) lived in a HPSA. Beneficiaries in HPSAs were found to experience comparable 30-day mortality (3.50% vs. 3.65%, P <0.001), complication (32.67% vs. 33.54%, P <0.001), reoperation (1.58% vs. 1.66%, P <0.001), and readmission (14.72% vs. 14.86%, P <0.001) rates. Beneficiaries experienced greater mean travel times (91.2 vs. 64.0 minutes, P <0.001) and mean travel distances (85.0 vs. 59.3 miles, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries living in designated HPSA experienced comparable surgical outcomes after CABG surgery but a significantly greater travel burden. The greater travel burden experienced by patients living in designated shortage areas to obtain comparable surgical care for complex procedures demonstrates important tradeoffs between access and quality.

High Deductibles are Associated With Severe Disease, Catastrophic Out-of-Pocket Payments for Emergency Surgical Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket spending has risen for individuals with private health insurance, yet little is known about the unintended consequences that high levels of cost-sharing may have on delayed clinical presentation and financial outcomes for common emergency surgical conditions. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of claims data from a large commercial insurer (2016-2019), we identified adult inpatient admissions following emergency department presentation for common emergency surgical conditions (eg, appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, and intestinal obstruction). Primary exposure of interest was enrollment in a high-deductible health insurance plan (HDHP). Our primary outcome was disease severity at presentation-determined using ICD-10-CM diagnoses codes and based on validated measures of anatomic severity (eg, perforation, abscess, diffuse peritonitis). Our secondary outcome was catastrophic out-of-pocket spending, defined by the World Health Organization as out-of-pocket spending >10% of annual income. RESULTS: Among 43,516 patients [mean age 48.4 (SD: 11.9) years; 51% female], 41% were enrolled HDHPs. Despite being younger, healthier, wealthier, and more educated, HDHP enrollees were more likely to present with more severe disease (28.5% vs 21.3%, P <0.001; odds ratio (OR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.28-1.42]); even after adjusting for relevant demographics (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.18-1.31). HDHP enrollees were also more likely to incur 30-day out-of-pocket spending that exceeded 10% of annual income (20.8% vs 6.4%, adjusted OR: 3.93, 95% CI: 3.65-4.24). Lower-income patients, Black patients, and Hispanic patients were at highest risk of financial strain. CONCLUSIONS: For privately insured patients presenting with common surgical emergencies, high-deductible health plans are associated with increased disease severity at admission and a greater financial burden after discharge-especially for vulnerable populations. Strategies are needed to improve financial risk protection for common surgical emergencies.

Emergency Surgery Rates Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Access Sensitive Surgical Conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Access sensitive surgical conditions should be treated electively with optimal access but result in emergency operations when access is limited. However, the rates of emergency procedures for these conditions are unknown. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective review of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent access sensitive surgical procedures (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy for colorectal cancer, or incisional hernia repair) between 2014 and 2018. Risk-adjusted outcomes using a multivariable logistical regression that adjusted for patient factors (age, sex, race, and Elixhauser comorbidities), hospital characteristics (ownership, size, geographic region, surgical volume) and type of operation were compared between planned and emergency (urgent and emergent) surgical procedures. Outcome measures were rates of emergency procedures as well as associated postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 744,818 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing access sensitive surgical procedures, 259,541 (34.9%) were done in the emergency setting. Risk-adjusted rates of emergency surgery varied widely across hospital service areas from 23.28% (lowest decile) to 54.88% (highest decile) (Odds Ratio 4.74; P < 0.001). Emergency procedures were associated with significantly higher rates of 30-d mortality (8.15% versus 3.65%, P < 0.001) and readmissions (16.28% versus 12.88%, P < 0.001) compared to elective procedures. Sensitivity analysis with younger and healthier beneficiaries demonstrated persistently high rates (23.3%) of emergency surgery with wide regional variation and worse patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for access sensitive surgical conditions is extremely common and varied almost fivefold across United States hospital service areas. This suggests there are opportunities to improve access for these common surgical conditions.

Association of Historic Housing Policy, Modern Day Neighborhood Deprivation and Outcomes After Inpatient Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of historical racist housing policies and modern-day healthcare outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 1933 the United States Government Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition of neighborhoods to determine creditworthiness and labeled them "Best", "Still Desirable", "Definitely Declining", and "Hazardous." Although efforts have been made to reverse these racist policies that structurally disadvantage those living in exposed neighborhoods, the lasting legacy on modern day healthcare outcomes is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of 212,179 Medicare beneficiaries' living in 171,930 unique neighborhoods historically labeled by the HOLC who underwent 1 of 5 of common surgical procedures - coronary artery bypass, appendectomy, colectomy, cholecystectomy, and hernia repair - between 2012 and 2018. We compared 30-day mortality, complications, and readmissions across HOLC grade and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) of each neighborhood. Outcomes were risk-adjusted using a multivariable logistical regression model accounting for patient factors (age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidities), admission type (elective, urgent, emergency), type of operation, and each neighborhoods ADI; a modern day measure of neighborhood disadvantage that includes education, employment, housing-quality, and poverty measures. RESULTS: Overall, 212,179 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 71.2 years; 54.2% women) resided in 171,930 unique neighborhoods historically graded by the HOLC. Outcomes worsened in a stepwise fashion across HOLC neighborhoods. Overall, 30-day postoperative mortality was 5.4% in "Best" neighborhoods, 5.8% in "Still Desirable", 6.1% in "Definitely Declining", and 6.4% in "Hazardous" (Best vs Hazardous Odds Ration: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13-1.24, P < 0.001). The same stepwise pattern was seen from "Best" to "Hazardous" neighborhoods for complications (30.5% vs 32.2%; OR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.07-1.17]; P < 0.001) and Readmissions (16.3% vs 17.1%; OR: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.01-1.11]; P = 0.023). After controlling for modern day deprivation using ADI, the patterns persisted with "Hazardous" neighborhoods having higher mortality (OR: 1.17 [95% CI: 1.08-1.27]; P < 0.001) and complications (OR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.02-1.12]; P = 0.003), but not for readmissions (OR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.97-1.07]; P = 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in neighborhoods previously "redlined" or labeled "Hazardous" were more likely to experience worse outcomes after inpatient hospitalization compared to those living in "Best" neighborhoods, even after taking into account modern day measures of neighborhood disadvantage.

What Metrics Accurately Reflect Surgical Quality?

Surgeons are increasingly under pressure to measure and improve their quality. While there is broad consensus that we ought to track surgical quality, there is far less agreement about which metrics matter most. This article reviews the important statistical concepts of case mix and chance as they apply to understanding the observed wide variation in surgical quality. We then discuss the benefits and drawbacks of current measurement strategies through the framework of structure, process, and outcomes approaches. Finally, we describe emerging new metrics, such as video evaluation and network optimization, that are likely to take on an increasingly important role in the future of measuring surgical quality.

Association of Hospital Network Participation With Surgical Outcomes and Medicare Expenditures.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether hospital network participation is associated with improvement in surgical outcomes and spending compared to control hospitals not participating in a network. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATE: Hospitals face significant financial and organizational pressures to integrate into networks. It remains unclear whether these business arrangements impact clinical quality or healthcare expenditures. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study of 1,981,095 national Medicare beneficiaries (2007-2014) undergoing general, vascular, cardiac, or orthopedic surgery at a network (n = 1868) or non-network (n = 2734) hospital. We tested whether joining a network was associated with improvement in the study outcomes after accounting for overall trends toward better outcomes. We used hierarchical multivariable logistical and linear regression to adjust for patient factors, procedural characteristics, type of admission, and hospital factors. RESULTS: After accounting for patient factors and existing trends toward better outcomes, there was no association between network participation and surgical outcomes. For example, the rates of serious complications were similar between network [11.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1%-11.5%] and non-network hospitals (11.2%; 95% CI 11.0%-11.3%; odds ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03, P = 0.92). There was no association between time-in-network and improvement in rates of serious complications during the 8-year study period. For example, after 7 years of network participation, the rate of serious complications in 2014 was 9.6% (95% CI 8.8%-10.4%) in network hospitals versus 9.2% (95% CI 8.5%-9.9%, P = 0.11) in non-network hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital network participation was not associated with improvements in patient outcomes or lower episode payments among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing inpatient surgery.

Emergency Surgery for Medicare Beneficiaries Admitted to Critical Access Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of emergency operations performed at critical access and non-critical access hospitals. BACKGROUND: Critical access hospitals are often the only source of surgical care for rural populations. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients undergoing common, elective operations at these rural hospitals have similar outcomes to their urban counterparts. Little is known, however, about the quality of care these hospitals provide for emergency operations for which they are most essential. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of 219,170 urgent or emergency colon resections among Medicare beneficiaries between 2009 and 2012. We compared mortality, serious complications, reoperation, and readmission rates at critical access and non-critical access hospitals using a multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient factors (age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidities,) indication (cancer, diverticulitis, obstruction, inflammatory bowel disease, bleeding), year of operation, and type of operation. RESULTS: Operative indications were similar at both critical access and non-critical access hospitals with the most common being cancer (38.5% vs 31.1%) followed by diverticulitis (26.9% vs 28.0%). Compared with patients treated at non-critical access hospitals, patients undergoing surgery at critical access hospitals were less likely to have multiple comorbid diseases (% of patients with 2 or more comorbid conditions, 67.5% vs 75.9%; P < 0.01). After accounting for these differences, patients in critical access hospitals had lower risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rates (14.3% vs 16.2%; P = 0.012) and lower rates of serious complications (11.1% vs 27.2%; P < 0.001). However, critical access hospitals had higher rates of reoperation (2.1% vs 1.4%; P = 0.009) and readmissions (22.3% vs 19.4%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For emergency colectomy procedures, Medicare beneficiaries in critical access hospitals experienced lower mortality rates but more frequent reoperation and readmission. These findings suggest that critical access hospitals provide safe, essential emergency surgical care, but may need more resources for postoperative care coordination in these high-risk operations.

Surgeon Experience and Medicare Expenditures for Laparoscopic Compared to Open Colectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which payments for laparoscopic and open colectomy are influenced by a surgeon's experience with laparoscopy. BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that healthcare costs for laparoscopic colectomy are lower than open surgery. None have assessed the importance of surgeon experience on the relative financial benefits of laparoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a study of 182,852 national Medicare beneficiaries undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy between 2010 and 2012. Using instrumental variable methods to account for selection bias, we compared Medicare payments for laparoscopic and open colectomy. We stratified our analysis by surgeons' annual experience with laparoscopic colectomy to determine the influence of provider experience on payments. RESULTS: In the fully adjusted analysis, average episode payments per patient were $2640 [95% confidence interval (CI) -$4091 to -$1189] lower with the laparoscopic approach versus open. Surgeons in the highest quartile of laparoscopic experience demonstrated an average payment savings of $5456 per patient (CI -$7918 to -$2994) in their laparoscopic versus open cases. Among surgeons in the lowest quartile of laparoscopic experience, there was, however, no difference between laparoscopic and open cases (difference: $954, 95% CI -$731 to $2639). Differences in payments were explained by differences in complications rates. Both groups had similar rates of complications for open procedures (least experience, 21%, most experience, 21%; P = 0.45), but differed significantly on rates of complications for laparoscopic cases (least experience, 28%, most experience, 15%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study demonstrates that differences in payments between laparoscopic and open colectomy are influenced by surgeon experience. The laparoscopic approach does not reduce payments for patients whose surgeons have limited experience with the procedure.

The Emergence of Rural Emergency Hospitals: Safely Implementing New Models of Care.

This Viewpoint discusses the potential benefits of the rural emergency hospital model, which exclusively provides outpatient and emergency services, in rural communities faced with possible hospital closures, as well as safeguards to monitor and minimize unintended consequences.

Pretherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio do not predict survival in resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pretherapy serum neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have both been identified as prognostic in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic implication of pretherapy NLR and PLR in patients with resectable PDAC. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on patients operated at our institution between 2004 and 2014. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the relationship between clinical and pathological parameters, NLR and PLR to overall survival (OS). Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 217 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 17.5 months. Factors identified as being predictive of OS by univariate analysis included age, receipt of adjuvant therapy, margin positivity, pathologic angiolymphatic invasion, T-stage, and N-stage (P < 0.05). Factors identified as being independently predictive of OS by multivariate analysis included age and angiolymphatic invasion (P < 0.05). NLR and PLR were not predictive of OS. Survival analysis demonstrated no difference in OS in patients who had high or low NLR or PLR. DISCUSSION: Pretherapy NLR and PLR do not predict survival in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC at our institution.