Reduction of Z alpha-1 antitrypsin polymers in human iPSC-hepatocytes and mice by LRRK2 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD) is a life-threatening condition caused by the inheritance of the serpin family A member 1 "Z" genetic variant driving alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein misfolding in hepatocytes. There are no approved medicines for this disease. METHODS: We conducted a high-throughput image-based small molecule screen using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell-hepatocytes (iPSC-hepatocytes). Identified targets were validated in vitro using 3 independent patient iPSC lines. The effects of the identified target, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), were further evaluated in an animal model of A1ATD through histology and immunohistochemistry and in an autophagy-reporter line. Autophagy induction was assessed through immunoblot and immunofluorescence analyses. RESULTS: Small-molecule screen performed in iPSC-hepatocytes identified LRRK2 as a potentially new therapeutic target. Of the commercially available LRRK2 inhibitors tested, we identified CZC-25146, a candidate with favorable pharmacokinetic properties, as capable of reducing polymer load, increasing normal AAT secretion, and reducing inflammatory cytokines in both cells and PiZ mice. Mechanistically, this effect was achieved through the induction of autophagy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of CZC-25146 and leucine-rich repeat kinase-2 inhibitors in hepatic proteinopathy research and their further investigation as novel therapeutic candidates for A1ATD.

Social, clinical and biological barriers to hepatitis B virus suppression with nucleos/tide analogue therapy: who is at risk and what should we do about it?

Optimising treatment outcomes for people living with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is key to advancing progress towards international targets for the elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health threat. Nucleos/tide analogue agents (most commonly tenofovir or entecavir) are well-tolerated and suppress viraemia effectively in the majority of those who are offered therapy. However, outcomes are not consistent, and we explore the factors that may contribute to incomplete therapeutic responses. We discuss situations in which therapy is not accessible, affordable or acceptable, reflecting the impact of social, cultural and economic barriers, stigma and discrimination, low awareness, poor access to health systems and comorbidity. These challenges are amplified in certain vulnerable populations, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes-which include liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma-among people who already experience marginalisation and health inequities. We also tackle the physiological and biological mechanisms for incomplete virological suppression in individuals receiving HBV treatment, considering the possible impact of inadequate tissue drug levels, poor drug-target avidity and genomic resistance. These factors are interdependent, leading to a complex landscape in which socioeconomic challenges increase the challenge of consistent daily therapy and set the scene for selection of drug resistance. By putting a spotlight on this neglected topic, we aim to raise awareness, prompt dialogue, inform research and advocate for enhanced interventions. As criteria for HBV treatment eligibility relax, the population receiving therapy will expand, and there is a pressing need to optimise outcomes and close the equity gap.