Immediate outcome after sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The aim of this study was to compare the immediate outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (SU-AVR). This is a retrospective multicenter analysis of 773 patients who underwent either TAVI (394 patients, mean age, 80.8 ± 5.5 years, mean EuroSCORE II 5.6 ± 4.9 %) or SU-AVR (379 patients, 77.4 ± 5.4 years, mean EuroSCORE II 4.0 ± 3.9 %) with or without concomitant myocardial revascularization. Data on SU-AVRs were provided by six European institutions (Belgium, Finland, Germany, Italy and Sweden) and data on TAVIs were provided by a single institution (Catania, Italy). In-hospital mortality was 2.6 % after SU-AVR and 5.3 % after TAVI (p = 0.057). TAVI was associated with a significantly high rate of mild (44.0 vs. 2.1 %) and moderate-severe paravalvular regurgitation (14.1 vs. 0.3 %, p < 0.0001) as well as the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (17.3 vs. 9.8 %, p = 0.003) compared with SU-AVR. The analysis of patients within the 25th and 75th percentiles interval of EuroSCORE II, i.e., 2.1-5.8 %, confirmed the findings of the overall series. One-to-one propensity score-matched analysis resulted in 144 pairs with similar baseline characteristics and operative risk. Among these matched pairs, in-hospital mortality (6.9 vs. 1.4 %, p = 0.035) was significantly higher after TAVI. SU-AVR with the Perceval prosthesis in intermediate-risk patients is associated with excellent immediate survival and is a valid alternative to TAVI in these patients.

Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The majority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures are currently performed by percutaneous transfemoral approach. The potential contribution of the type of vascular closure device to the incidence of vascular complications is not clear. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a Prostar XL- vs. Perclose ProGlide-based vascular closure strategy. METHODS: The ClOsure device iN TRansfemoral aOrtic vaLve implantation (CONTROL) multi-center study included 3138 consecutive percutaneous transfemoral TAVI patients, categorized according to vascular closure strategy: Prostar XL- (Prostar group) vs. Perclose ProGlide-based vascular closure strategy (ProGlide group). Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Propensity matching identified 944 well-matched patients (472 patient pairs). Composite primary end point of major vascular complications or in-hospital mortality occurred more frequently in Prostar group when compared with ProGlide group (9.5 vs. 5.1%, P = 0.016), and was driven by higher rates of major vascular complication (7.4 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001) in the Prostar group. However, in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (4.9 vs. 3.5%, P = 0.2). Femoral artery stenosis occurred less frequently in the Prostar group (3.4 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.004), but overall, Prostar use was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (16.7 vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (17.6 vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001) and with longer hospital stay (median 6 vs. 5 days, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Prostar XL-based vascular closure in transfemoral TAVI procedures is associated with higher major vascular complication rates when compared with ProGlide; however, in-hospital mortality is similar with both devices.

Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.30; P=0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.17; P=0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.30; P=0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.85; P=0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time (P=0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, -2.26; 95% confidence interval, -4.07 to -0.44; P=0.013; R(2)=0.121). CONCLUSIONS: The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.

Predictors of clinical outcomes after edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the long-term outcomes and prognostic clinical predictors after edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system. METHODS: Consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing MitraClip therapy between October 2008 and November 2013 in 4 Italian centers were analyzed. The primary end point of interest was all-cause death. The secondary end point was the composite of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients were included, of which 79% had functional MR and 17% were in New York Heart Association functional class IV. Acute procedural success was obtained in 92% of cases, with no intraprocedural death. The cumulative incidences of all-cause death were 3.4%, 10.8%, and 18.6% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. The corresponding incidences of the secondary end point were 4.4%, 22.0%, and 39.7%, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, New York Heart Association functional class IV at baseline and ischemic MR etiology were found to significantly and independently predict both the primary and the secondary end point. A baseline, left ventricular end-systolic volume >110 mL was found to be an independent predictor of the secondary endpoint. Acute procedural success was independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and the combination of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients undergoing MitraClip therapy, those presenting at baseline with ischemic functional etiology, severely dilated ventricles, or advanced heart failure and those undergoing unsuccessful procedures carried the worst prognosis.

Gender-related clinical and echocardiographic outcomes at 30-day and 12-month follow up after MitraClip implantation in the GRASP registry.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of patients' gender on the outcomes of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) using the MitraClip system. BACKGROUND: Although gender-related differences have been extensively documented in patients who undergo surgery for moderate-to-severe (3+) and severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR), studies assessing whether these differences exist after PMVR are lacking. METHODS: Clinical and echocardiographic data through 12-month follow up from 171 consecutive patients whom underwent MitraClip implantation and were dichotomized by the gender (106 males and 65 females) were obtained. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse events at 30 days and the primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from death, surgery for mitral valve dysfunction, or grade≥3+ MR at 12-month follow up. RESULTS: The primary safety endpoint was observed in four males (3.8%) and four females (6.2%) (P=0.358). Remarkable reduction in MR postprocedure was revealed in both groups, and these results were mostly sustained. Furthermore, left ventricle reverse remodeling and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement were revealed in both groups, but females tended to demonstrate worse results over time (P=0.083). The primary efficacy endpoint obtained by Kaplan-Meier estimates was observed in 76.3 and 70.2%, respectively (log rank P=0.231). CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation in patients with 3+ and 4+ MR is safe and efficacious until mid-term follow up, regardless of patients' gender. Despite improvement in NYHA functional class in both groups, female gender demonstrated a trend toward poorer results. Further validation of our findings is warranted.

Advanced chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights on clinical outcomes and prognostic markers from a large cohort of patients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) on early and late outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to evaluate the predictive factors of poorer outcomes in such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre study including a total of 2075 consecutive patients who had undergone TAVI. Patients were grouped according the estimated glomerular filtration rate as follows: CKD stage 1-2 (≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 950), stage 3 (30-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 924), stage 4 (15-29 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 134) and stage 5 (<15 mL/min/1.73 m² or dialysis; n = 67). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 30-days and at follow-up (median of 15 [6-29] months) and defined according to the VARC criteria. Advanced CKD (stage 4-5) was an independent predictor of 30-day major/life-threatening bleeding (P = 0.001) and mortality (P = 0.027), and late overall, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.01 for all). Pre-existing atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.47-3.58, P = 0.001) and dialysis therapy (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.17-2.97, P = 0.009) were the predictors of mortality in advanced CKD patients, with a mortality rate as high as 71% at 1-year follow-up in those patients with these 2 factors. Advanced CKD patients who had survived at 1-year follow-up exhibited both a significant improvement in NYHA class (P < 0.001) and no deterioration in valve hemodynamics (P = NS for changes in mean gradient and valve area over time). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced CKD was associated with a higher rate of early and late mortality and bleeding events following TAVI, with AF and dialysis therapy determining a higher risk in these patients. The mortality rate of patients with both factors was unacceptably high and this should be taken into account in the clinical decision-making process in this challenging group of patients.

Accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography for aortic root assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has generally been accepted as the most accurate modality fulfilling this purpose with good reproducibility. A major drawback of MSCT consists in the use of contrast dye, which may be unsafe in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients who frequently are affected by renal failure. We sought to appraise the accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in measurements of structures in the aortic root in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: Aortic annulus and sinus of Valsalva diameters were measured using ICE, performed during standard invasive preprocedural assessment in 30 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI. Multislice computed tomography was performed in all patients afterward, and aortic root measurements were made by an independent radiologist. RESULTS: Effective ICE measurements were obtained in all patients, easily and without any complication. Mean aortic annulus diameters were 21.9 ± 1.8 mm using ICE, 22.0 ± 1.9 mm using MSCT (3-chamber [3-C] view) and 22.8 ± 1.8 mm using the mean of long-axis and short-axis (L-ax/S-ax) view MSCT (P = .192, ICE vs 3-C MSCT; P < .001, ICE vs L-ax/S-ax MSCT, respectively). Correlation between ICE and both MSCT measurements was good (r(2) = 0.83, P < .001; r(2) = 0.80, P < .001, respectively). Mean sinus of Valsalva diameters were 32.3 ± 3.3 mm using ICE and 32.5 ± 3.1 mm using 3-C MSCT view (P = .141). Even in this case, correlation between ICE and both MSCT measurements was excellent (r(2) = 0.96, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for TAVI, measurements of the aortic annulus and the sinus of Valsalva using ICE compare favorably with those made at MSCT. This approach might be a useful and reproducible strategy in patients with severe renal impairment to avoid the administration of contrast dye during MSCT.

Early- and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with logistic EuroSCORE less than 20%: a comparative analysis between different risk strata.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative to medical therapy reserved to a limited population with severe aortic stenosis. The European consensus document recommended TAVI for prohibitive-risk patients not eligible for conventional surgery (prohibitive risk defined as expected mortality ≥ 20% calculated with the Logistic EuroScore (LES) in association with clinical judgment). To date, there is lack of clarity on data about outcomes of TAVI in lower risk patients. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with LES ≥ 20% in comparison with patients with LES < 20%. METHOD: Of 165 patients who underwent TAVI using the 18-French Medtronic CoreValve (N = 153) and the Sapien Edwards™ (N = 12) at our Institution between June 2007 and September 2010, we identified those with LES < 20%, with prosthesis implantation (n = 84), and reported on their clinical outcome compared with patients with LES ≥ 20% (n = 78). The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall death and major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) at 30-day and midterm follow-up stratifying patients by clinical characteristics. RESULTS: At 30-day, a significant higher incidence of MACCE (20.8% vs. 6.0%, odds ratio [OR] 4.08 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-11.74, P = 0.009) and death (15.6% vs. 2.4%, OR 7.45 95% CI 1.61-34.48, P = 0.010) was reported in the LES ≥ 20% group as compared with the LES < 20% group, respectively. The 12-month MACCE rates was (27.1% vs. 11.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.47 95% CI 0.93-6.63, P = 0. 071) for LES ≥ 20% and LES < 20% patients, respectively (mortality rates was 25.7% vs. 6.8% HR 4.21 95% CI 1.24-14.30, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study tends to suggest that current mortality reported after TAVI could be significantly affected by the very-high risk profile of the population which currently undergoes this procedure, making comparison with surgical series rather unreliable.

Functional and metabolic frailty predicts mortality in patients undergoing TAVI: Insights from the OBSERVANT II study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the prognostic role of frailty among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is known, its assessment still represents a challenge due to the multitude of scales proposed in literature. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic impact of a simple combined frailty model including both functional and metabolic parameters in a large cohort of patients undergoing TAVI with new generation devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 1-year survival of patients affected by aortic valve stenosis treated with new generation TAVI devices from the OBSERVANT II study. Frailty of patients undergoing TAVI was stratified in four groups according to a combination of functional (geriatric status scale - GSS) and metabolic (global nutritional risk index - GNRI) assessment. Among 1985 patients included in the analysis, 1008 (51%) had no significant frailty, 246 (12%) had only functional impairment, 522 (26%) had only metabolic impairment and 209 (11%) had both functional and metabolic impairment. The presence of combined functional and metabolic frailty was associated with a two-fold increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 2.06 [95% CI 1.35-3.14]; p = 0.001). GNRI as a single parameter had a lower impact on mortality (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.05 - 2.09]; p = 0.027), whereas GSS did not impact on mortality (HR 1.23 [95% CI 0.77-1.97]; p = 0.386). CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVI with new generation devices, combined functional and metabolic frailty had a significant and incremental impact on 1-year mortality.

Annular size and interaction with trans-catheter aortic valves for treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the BEAT registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is safe and feasible in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), but whether annular size may influence TAVR results in BAV patients remains unclear. We aimed at evaluating the impact of aortic annular size on procedural and clinical outcomes of BAV patients undergoing TAVR, as well as potential interactions between annular dimension and trans-catheter heart valve (THV) type (balloon-expandable (BEV) vs. self-expanding (SEV). METHODS: BEAT is a multicenter registry of consecutive BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR. For this sub-study patients were classified according to annular dimension in small-annulus (area < 400 mm2 or perimeter <72 mm), medium-annulus (area ≥ 400 and < 575 mm2, perimeter ≥72 mm and< 85 mm), large-annulus (area ≥ 575 mm2 or perimeter ≥85 mm). Primary endpoint was Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) device success. RESULTS: 45(15.5%) patients had small, 132(45.3%) medium, and 114(39.2%) large annuli. Compared with other groups, patients with large annuli were more frequently male, younger, with higher body mass index, larger aortic valve area, higher rate of moderate-severe calcification, lower mean trans-aortic valve gradient and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. In large-annuli SEVs were associated with a lower VARC-2 device success (75.9% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.049) driven by a higher rate of paravalvular valvular leak (PVL) compared to BEVs (20.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed according to annular size nor THV type. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR in BAV patients is feasible irrespective of annular size. However in patients with large aortic annulus SEVs were associated with a significantly higher rate of PVLs compared to BEVs.

Predictors of high residual gradient after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To define the incidence of high residual gradient (HRG) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in BAVs and their impact on short term outcome and 1-year mortality. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter heart valves (THVs) offer good performance in tricuspid aortic valves with low rate of HRG. However, data regarding their performance in bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are still lacking. METHODS: The BEAT (Balloon vs Self-Expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid Aortic valve sTenosis) registry included 353 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR (Evolut R/PRO or Sapien 3 valves) in BAV between June 2013 and October 2018. The primary endpoint was device unsuccess with post-procedural HRG (mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg). The secondary endpoint was to identify the predictors of HRG following the procedure. RESULTS: Twenty patients (5.6%) showed HRG after TAVR. Patients with HRG presented higher body mass index (BMI) (30.7 ± 9.3 vs. 25.9 ± 4.8; p < 0.0001) and higher baseline aortic mean gradients (57.6 ± 13.4 mmHg vs. 47.7 ± 16.6, p = 0.013) and more often presented with BAV of Sievers type 0 than patients without HRG. At multivariate analysis, BMI [odds ratio (OR) 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.20, p = 0.001] and BAV type 0 (OR 11.31, 95% CI 3.45-37.06, p < 0.0001) were confirmed as independent predictors of high gradient. CONCLUSION: HRG following TAVR in BAVs is not negligible and is higher among patients with high BMI and with BAV 0 anatomy.

Procedural and clinical outcomes of type 0 versus type 1 bicuspid aortic valve stenosis undergoing trans-catheter valve replacement with new generation devices: Insight from the BEAT international collaborative registry.

BACKGROUND: Although bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is not considered a "sweet spot" to trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a certain number of BAV underwent TAVR. Whether BAV phenotype affects outcomes following TAVR remains debated. We aimed at evaluating the impact of BAV phenotype on procedural and clinical outcomes after TAVR using new generation trans-catheter heart valves (THVs). METHODS: patients included in the BEAT registry were classified according to the BAV phenotype revealed at multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in type 0 (no raphe) vs. type 1 (1 raphe). Primary end-point was Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) device success. Secondary end-points included procedural complications, rate of permanent pacemaker implantation, clinical outcomes at 30-day and 1-year. RESULTS: Type 0 BAV was present in 25(7.1%) cases, type 1 in 218(61.8%). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Moderate-severe aortic valve calcifications at MSCT were less frequently present in type 0 vs. type 1 (52%vs.71.1%,p = 0.05). No differences were reported for THV type, size, pre and post-dilation between groups. VARC-2 success tended to be lower in type 0 vs. type 1 BAV (72%vs86.7%;p = 0.07). Higher rate of mean transprosthetic gradient ≥20 mmHg was observed in type 0 vs. type 1 group (24%vs6%,p = 0.007). No differences were reported in the rate of post-TAVR moderate-severe aortic regurgitation and clinical outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms TAVR feasibility in both BAV types, however a trend toward a lower VARC-2 device success and a higher rate of mean transprosthetic gradient ≥20 mmHg was observed in type 0 vs. type 1 BAV.

Management of implant failure during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative to palliative medical therapy for nonsurgical patients with severe aortic stenosis. There is a paucity of detailed data on the management and outcome of complications related to the sub-optimal deployment of the prosthesis. We appraised the incidence and management of early implant failure occurring during TAVI. METHODS: Of 110 patients who underwent TAVI using the third generation 18-French CoreValve ReValving System (Medtronic, MN) in our Institution between June 2007 and January 2010, we identified those experiencing early implant failure and reported on their management and clinical outcome. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 30 days and mid-term follow up. RESULTS: Early implant failure occurred in 18 of 110 patients (16.3%). The most common cause was prosthesis under-expansion conditioning moderate to severe peri-valvular leak (44.4%). Prosthesis deployment too low or too high with respect to the aortic annulus leading to severe peri-valvular leak occurred in 22.2% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. Need of valve retrieve after the first attempt of deployment occurred in four cases (22.2%). Prosthesis embolization in the ascending aorta occurred in 5.5% of patients who experienced early implant failure. All implant failure cases were managed percutaneously with gain in aortic valve area from 0.44 ± 0.17 to 1.28 ± 0.27 cm(2) (P < 0.001), decrease of mean transaortic gradient from 55.00 ± 19.51 to 11.58 ± 5.91 mmHg (P < 0.001) and no MACCE at 30 days. After 11 ± 6 months, MACCE occurred cumulatively in two patients (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Early implant failure can complicate the TAVI procedure with the CoreValve system, but it can be managed safely and effectively with bailout transcatheter techniques, avoiding surgery, with good early and mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results.

Postprocedural management of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure with self-expanding bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) carries higher risk of post-procedural adverse events than conventional percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. We report our experience about postoperative management protocol adopted in our Division. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients underwent TAVI and 108 were transferred to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) after procedure. During the first 48 hours, vital parameters were monitored continuously. Close attention was given to rhythm and atrio-ventricular conduction disturbances, systemic blood pressure, fluid balance and vascular accesses. RESULTS: The most common complications were renal impairment (21.3%), femoral artery pseudo-aneurysms (FAP) (11%), new complete atrioventricular block (20.3 %), cerebral vascular accident (4.5%) and cardiac perforation due to temporary pacemaker lead (1.8%). Ultrasound-guided compression repair was considered the first line treatment for FAP, but in 6 cases surgical treatment was immediately performed due to the rapid expansion of FAP. Complete atrio-ventricular block occurred in 22 patients (20.3 %) within the first 24 hours after TAVI and a permanent pacemaker was implanted in 21 patients (19.1%). Acute kidney injury occurred in 18 patients (35%) with pre-procedural chronic renal failure and in 5 patients (9%) without preoperative renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: After TAVI, cardiovascular complications are common and therefore accurate standardized management of patients in CICU during the first 48 hours is mandatory to early detect and manage complications and to decrease the rate of adverse events and the length of in-hospital stay. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Quality of life assessment after percutaneous aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: To assess the NYHA class and the quality of life (QoL) scores after percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) with the 18-Fr CoreValve prosthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2007 until August 2008, 57 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis were evaluated for PAVI. Of these, 30 patients with successfully prosthesis implantation had more than 5-month follow-up. QoL assessment was realized with the SF-12v2 Health-Survey, a simple questionnaire designed for self-administration that provides easily interpretable scales for physical [physical component summary (PCS)] and mental [mental component summary (MCS)] health. The questionnaire was administered before and 5 months after PAVI. All 30 patients had a marked upgrading in haemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters (peak-to-peak gradient from 64 +/- 23 to 2 +/- 0.4; P < 0.001; aortic valve area index from 0.3 +/- 0.1 to 0.9 +/- 0.3; P < 0.001), with an improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at discharge and after 5 months. Mean pre-operative SF-12v2 scores showed a severe impairment of perceived quality of life compared with general Italian population >75 years, both for physical (PCS-baseline 28.5 vs. 37.9, P < 0.001) and mental scores (MCS-baseline 37.8 vs. 45.4, P < 0.001). After 5 months, a striking improvement in both scores (PCS 41.3-MCS 48.3; P < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results show a marked short-term improvement in functional status and physical and mental health in patients underwent PAVI.

Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Insights From the BEAT International Collaborative Registrys.

BACKGROUND: Large data comparing the performance of new-generation self-expandable versus balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in bicuspid aortic stenosis are lacking. We aim to compare the safety and performance of balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis. METHODS: The BEAT (balloon versus self-expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis) registry included 353 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using new-generation Evolut R/PRO or Sapien 3 valves in bicuspid aortic valve. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients (n=242 [68.6%] treated with Sapien 3 and n=111 [68.6%] treated with Evolut R (n=70)/PRO [n=41]) were included. Mean age was 77.8±8.3 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.4±3.3%. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO (85.6% versus 87.2%; P=0.68). In the Sapien 3 group, 4 patients experienced annular rupture whereas this complication did not occur in the Evolut R/PRO group. After propensity score matching, Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between both groups (Sapien 3=85.7% versus Evolut R/Pro=84.4%; P=0.821). Both in the overall and in the matched population, no differences in the rate of permanent pacemaker implant were observed. At 1-year follow-up, the rate of overall death and cardiovascular death were similar between the 2 groups. In the unmatched population, the 1-year echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated similar rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (Evolut R/PRO 10.5% versus Sapien 3 4.2%, P=0.077); however, after propensity matching, the rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak became significantly higher among patients treated with self-expandable valves (9.3% versus 0%; P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility of both Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO implantation in bicuspid aortic valve anatomy; a higher rate of moderate-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation was observed in the Evolut R/PRO group at 1-year follow-up in the matched cohort, although patients treated with balloon-expandable valve had a higher rate of annular rupture.

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with a bioabsorbable occluder device: single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is routinely performed with nonbiological devices, characterized by a persistent low-grade inflammatory response. We report our experience about PFO closure with a bioabsorbable device, BioSTAR (NMT Inc, USA). METHODS: From September 2007 to September 2008, 14 patients with migraine (eight with aura) and cerebral magnetic resonance positive for silent ischemia and nine patients with prior cardiovascular accident (CVA) underwent closure of PFO using BioSTAR. One patient had heterozygosis for sickle-cell-anaemia. Nickel allergy was present in eight patients. Echocardiogram was performed at 24 hr, one and 6 months. At 6 and 12 months a contrast-transcranial-doppler (c-TCD) and a trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) were scheduled, respectively. RESULTS: BioSTAR was successfully implanted in 22 patients (96%). The mean procedural time and the mean fluoroscopy time were 22 +/- 6 and 4 +/- 2 minutes, respectively. The mean in-hospital stay was 3 +/- 0.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 7.8 +/- 3.5 months there was an hemorrhagic stroke related to double antiaggregation. No other CVA or allergic reactions were registered. There were two cases of atrial arrhythmia. Fifteen patients had not residual shunts at c-TCD, while in four patients we observed a trivial microbubbles passage. The TOE, achieved in nine patients without contrast, showed the device well positioned, with a low profile and without thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience PFO closure with BioSTAR is safe and efficacious in preventing recurrent CVA. Its use could be advantageous in patients with nickel allergy and haematological disorders. The potential benefits of this device need to be certified in a larger cohort of patients with a longer follow-up.

Percutaneous closure of left atrial appendage to prevent embolic events in high-risk patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a novel alternative for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and with a high risk of stroke who are not eligible for long-term anticoagulation therapy. The aim of this study was to asses the safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: From July 2004 to June 2007, 20 patients (13 male, mean age 69 +/- 8 years) with non-valvular AF (NV-AF) underwent LAA percutaneous closure using the PLAATO system, implanted through a transeptal access. All patients had contraindications to anticoagulant therapy and were at high risk for cardioembolic stroke (mean CHADS(2) score 3 +/- 1.2). A trans-thoracic echocardiogram was performed at 1, 3, and every 6 months after the procedure, whereas a trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) was scheduled at 6 months. After 24 months, a phone interview was obtained. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully performed in 18 patients. In two patients, LAA closure was not feasible for the presence of a multilobed LAA. Two patients underwent percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in the same session. In one patient, the procedure was complicated by cardiac perforation with pericardial effusion, treated with pericardiocentesis. At a mean follow up of 40 +/- 10 months, no embolic events occurred. One patient died, after 36 months, for gastric cancer. TOE examination showed the complete exclusion of the LAA in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous closure of LAA is safe and efficacious to prevent stroke in patients with NV-AF at high risk for cardioembolic events, with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy.

Incidence of Long-Term Structural Valve Dysfunction and Bioprosthetic Valve Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background Long-term data on durability of currently available transcatheter heart valves are sparse. We sought to assess the incidence of long-term (8-year) structural valve dysfunction and bioprosthetic valve failure in a cohort of patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( TAVR ) who reached at least 5-year follow-up. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with at least 5-year follow-up available undergoing TAVR from June 4, 2007 to March 30, 2012 were included. Structural valve dysfunction and bioprosthetic valve failure were defined according to newly standardized European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions/ European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery criteria and reported as cumulative incidence function to account for the competing risk of death. A total of 288 consecutive patients with a mean age of 80.7±5.3 years and with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgery mortality score of 8.1±5.1% were analyzed. Survival rate at 8 years was 29.8%. Mean pressure gradients decreased from 53.3±15.9 mm Hg (pre- TAVR ) to 10.5±4.5 mm Hg (in-hospital post- TAVR ) ( P<0.001). There was a small, not significant, increase in the transaortic gradient throughout follow-up. Bioprosthetic valve failure was observed in a total of 11 patients (8-year cumulative incidence function: 4.51%; 95% confidence interval , 1.95%-8.76%). Severe and moderate structural valve dysfunctions were reported in 7 patients (8-year cumulative incidence function: 2.39%; 95% confidence interval, 0.77%-5.71%) and 13 patients (8-year cumulative incidence function: 5.87%; 95% confidence interval , 3.06%-9.96%), respectively. Aortic valve reintervention (redo TAVR ) was successfully performed in 2 patients (0.7%) presenting with symptomatic severe restenosis and intraprosthetic regurgitation subsequent to endocarditis. Conclusions In an aged population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated with first-generation bioprostheses, TAVR was associated with a survival rate of 30% but low rates of bioprosthetic valve failure and structural valve dysfunction at 8 years.